*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
COMMUNITY ALERT:
SFPD Gone Wild In Bayview Hunters Point! JOIN US:
San Francisco Police Commission meeting
Wednesday, December 5 5:30pm
City Hall room 400
Public Safety Committee meeting: Hearing on Gang Injunctions
Monday, December 10 10am
2nd floor, City Hall
On Thanksgiving Day, one of POWER’s leaders and her family were terrorized by several San Francisco Police officers. At the time, the woman was taking a shower while her children were downstairs. The police entered her home, terrorized her children, assaulted and arrested one of her family members, and removed her from the shower and held her, in front of her children, with no clothes on.
This woman is not alone. Dozens of families in Bayview Hunters Point, the Mission District, and the Fillmore/Western Addition are being terrorized by the SFPD and gang injunctions that protect developers, not families. These racist gang injunctions need to be stopped, and the SFPD needs to be held accountable.
WE DESERVE:
-Community policing, not policing for Lennar and other developers
-The removal of these officers from the community
-Community education and control over the terms and enforcement of the gang injunctions
-Police Accountability—including contact information and badge numbers of all officers in the community, and an anonymous complaint line
SFPD SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO RUN WILD
IN BAYVIEW HUNTERS POINT OR
ANY OTHER COMMUNITY!
For more information, please call POWER (Alicia or Jaron):
(415) 864-8372 ext. 302/303
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
"Why Are Politicians Always Trying to Scare Us?" (Oakland, Calif.; 12/6/07)
Featuring Robert Higgs
http://www.independent.org/events/detail.asp?eventID=130
From ancient times to the present, politicians, bureaucrats, and
interest groups have gained resources and control over the public by
playing to people's fears of various "crises" and by offering
"solutions" that often only make problems worse. This tactic has
been facilitated by the widespread belief that gaining economic,
military, and personal security requires sacrificing liberty. In
contrast, Benjamin Franklin once said, "Those who would give up
essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
Please join us as Robert Higgs (author, NEITHER LIBERTY NOR SAFETY:
Fear, Ideology, and the Growth of Government) shows how fear
mongering by politicians and their allies erodes people's willingness
and ability to govern themselves. Dr. Higgs will also expose the
false trade-off between freedom and security by showing how the U.S.
government's economic and military interventions in the 20th and 21st
centuries have reduced Americans' civil and economic liberties,
prosperity, and genuine security.
SPEAKER:
Robert Higgs, Senior Fellow in Political Economy at the Independent
Institute, is the author of numerous books at the intersection of
politics and economics, including RESURGENCE OF THE WARFARE STATE:
The Crisis Since 9/11, NEITHER LIBERTY NOR SAFETY; DEPRESSION, WAR,
AND COLD WAR; AGAINST LEVIATHAN and CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN: Critical
Episodes in the Growth of American Government. He is also the editor
of numerous other books and the scholarly quarterly, THE INDEPENDENT
REVIEW: A Journal of Political Economy.
For more about Robert Higgs, please see:
http://www.independent.org/aboutus/person_detail.asp?id=489.
WHEN:
Thursday, December 6, 2007
Reception and book signing: 6:30 p.m.
Program: 7:00 p.m.
WHERE:
The Independent Institute Conference Center
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA 94621-1428
Map and directions
http://www.independent.org/aboutus/map.asp
TICKETS:
Admission: $15 per person ($10 for Institute Members).
Special offer: $27 includes admission and one copy of
NEITHER LIBERTY NOR SAFETY ($22 for members).
Reserve tickets by calling (510) 632-1366 or ordering
online.
For ticket reservations, please see:
http://www.independent.org/store/events/event_detail.asp?eventID=130.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
GET JROTC OUT OF OUR SCHOOLS! LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD OVER THE U.S. MILITARY! WE ARE AN ANTIWAR CITY! WE WANT THE MILITARY OUT OF OUR SCHOOLS!
SPEAK OUT AT THE BOARD MEETING TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11, 6:00 P.M.
555 Franklin Street, 1st Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
415/241-6427 or (415) 241-6493
(To get on the speaker’s list, call the Monday before the meeting from 8:30 AM - 4:00 PM or Tuesday, the day of the meeting from 8:30 AM - 3:30 PM. You will get at most, two minutes and most probably only one minute to speak. BRING SIGNS! WRITE LETTERS TO THE BOARD! (A sample letter will be posted soon.)
JROTC Campaign: Fight to Win?
by Marc Norton, 2007-12-04
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=5163
GOOD NEWS... The San Francisco school district administration has decided not to give physical education (PE) credit to JROTC students next year. Beyond Chron has been informed of this decision by Gentle Blythe, head of the school district's public affairs office. Up to now, students could take JROTC as a substitute for PE classes. By eliminating this option, the number of students likely to enroll in JROTC should be greatly reduced.
This policy change appears to be the result of a new state law, SB 601, which was signed by the governor in October. This new law clarifies existing law relating to high school physical education and requires that all PE classes be taught by a certified PE teacher. JROTC instructors, all retired military officers, do not have certification to teach PE.
BAD NEWS... Why is the district talking about JROTC classes next year anyway? According to the resolution passed by the school board over a year ago, there should be no more JROTC classes after the end of the current 2007-2008 school year.
The answer to this question, unfortunately, is obvious. Some of the current school board members are backsliding on the decision reached last year. On November 13, almost a year to the day after the original board decision to phase out JROTC, the board came within a hair's breadth of considering a resolution to extend JROTC for an additional year, although with certain qualifications. In the end, after community pressure from all sides, this resolution was withdrawn, at least for the time being.
It may seem that a one-year extension of the phase out is not that big a deal. Think again. The school board is going to be much different a year from now.
The most resolute school board opponent of JROTC, Dan Kelly, lost his seat in the November, 2006 election. He was a lame-duck member a week later, when he voted to phase out JROTC. Kelly doesn't talk much about it, but he refused induction in 1967 during the Vietnam war, and served two years in jail for his convictions. Whatever Kelly's accomplishments and failings as a school board member, he was an unswerving opponent of the militarization of our schools.
Only two members of last year's anti-JROTC majority remain on the board -- Mark Sanchez and Eric Mar. Both of their terms end in January, 2009, and both are running for supervisor in next year's election. Sanchez is running in Ammiano's District 9, centered on the Mission, and Mar is running in the relatively-conservative District 1 out in the Richmond. The complicated politics of running for Supervisor in this town make it hard to predict just exactly how much political capital either Sanchez or Mar will be willing to expend on banishing JROTC once and for all. Indeed, it was Sanchez who was the lead sponsor of last month's resolution to extend JROTC for another year.
The rest of the school board is even more problematical. That includes Green Party member Jane Kim, the object of the death threat Beyond Chron reported on last week.
Daniel Chin, a student leader of the pro-JROTC movement, was apparently not too happy with Kim when he issued his now-infamous death threat. Yet the Chronicle recently reported that Kim is "willing to support JROTC, but only if there were a way to address the military's discriminatory hiring practice involving homosexuals. She suggested a JROTC diversity curriculum or a cadet campaign against the military's 'don't ask, don't tell' policy."
This same Chronicle article also reported that the other four current school board members were "open to keeping JROTC alive."
And, of course, nobody knows who will replace Sanchez and Mar on the board.
Given this tenuous situation for anti-JROTC forces, it would seem that any extension of JROTC only buys time for the pro-JROTC side to continue marshalling their forces. Indeed, the Chronicle editorialized recently in favor of JROTC, and claimed that "supporters of JROTC are considering a ballot measure to overturn the 2006 vote."
The school board needs to follow through on the 2006 resolution, not look for excuses to delay and pass the buck.
Despite the spin, the chief proponents of JROTC are not the students. It is the "military-industrial complex," as former President Dwight Eisenhower put it. These are the same people who have brought us Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo, who spend billions on all sorts of fantastical high-tech weapons, who organize the butchery of the people of Iraq and Afghanistan -- and of our young men and women sent to fight these wars. They don't want to see San Francisco kick them out of our schools. God only knows what they are capable of doing to prevent it.
The JROTC students are being used by the military just like our troops are used -- as cannon fodder in a much bigger game of war.
Eric Blanc, one of the youth leaders of the movement against JROTC, emailed me after my last Beyond Chron article, providing some more details of the death threat he received. He got a phone call from a guy who "said his daughter was in the army, we were putting her life in peril by organizing against JROTC, and thus if something happened to her 'he would come after me, chop off my head, and shit down my neck.'" Sounds a lot like those terrorists we are supposed to be fighting, doesn't it?
The movement to remove JROTC from our schools needs to take itself very, very seriously if we actually want to win.
---
Still to come: The JROTC Task Force and "alternatives" to JROTC.
When the school board passed the resolution to phase out JROTC, it adopted an amendment calling for the creation of a task force to find "alternative" programs. The best I can tell, the main thing this task force has done is ask for a delay in the implementation of the 2006 resolution. Last Friday, I emailed Assistant Superintendent Margaret Chiu, the district contact for the task force, and asked the following questions:
1- Why did it take from November, 2006 to May, 2007 to convene the task force?
2- Who selected the members of the task force?
3- Who made the decision to close meetings of the task force to the public?
4- When is the next meeting of the task force?
I'll let you know what I hear.
Copyright © 2007 by Marc Norton
Marc Norton is a bellman at a small hotel in downtown San Francisco. Contact him at nortonsf@ix.netcom.com, or through his website at www.MarcNorton.us.
NEXT MEETING OF CITY-WIDE COMMITTEE TO GET RID OF JROTC:
Monday, January 7, 7:00 P.M., at 474 Valencia Street, First Floor, Room 145 (To the left as you come in, and all the way to the back of the long hallway, then, to the right.)
See:
JROTC-Perpetrator of Jane Kim Death Threat Identified
November 29, 2007
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/
The original version of this article
was published in Beyond Chron
on November 29, 2006.
Copyright © 2006 Marc Norton
http://www.marcnorton.us/98827/99108.html
JROTC Supporters Threaten JROTC Opponents
by Marc Norton‚ Nov. 22‚ 2006
http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=3940
Here's what Wikipedia says about JROTC:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JROTC
There is a wealth of information at this site. Pay special attention to
those quotes from the Generals below!
Ain't the internet great!
Bonnie
Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JROTC
The Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps (JROTC) is a Federal program
sponsored by the United States Armed Forces in high schools across the
United States. The program was originally created as part of the National
Defense Act of 1916 and later expanded under the 1964 ROTC Vitalization
Act.[1]
Role and purpose
According to Title 10, Section 2031 of the United States Code, the purpose
of JROTC is "to instill in students in United States secondary educational
institutions the values of citizenship, service to the United States, and
personal responsibility and a sense of accomplishment."[2] Additional
objectives are established by the service departments of the Department of
Defense. Under 542.4 of Title 32 (National Defense) of the Code of Federal
Regulations, the Department of the Army has declared those objectives for
each cadet to be:
* Developing good citizenship and patriotism.
* Developing self-reliance, leadership, and responsiveness to
constituted authority.
* Improving the ability to communicate well both orally and in writing.
* Developing an appreciation of the importance of physical fitness.
* Increasing a respect for the role of the US Armed Forces in support of
national objectives.
* Developing a knowledge of basic military skills.
Section 524.5 of the CFR National Defense title states in part that JROTC
should "provide meaningful leadership instruction of benefit to the student
and of value to the Armed Forces. ... Students will acquire: (1) An
understanding of the fundamental concept of leadership, military art and
science, (2) An introduction to related professional knowledge, and (3) An
appreciation of requirements for national security. The dual roles of
citizen/soldier and soldier/citizen are studied. ... These programs will
enable cadets to better serve their country as leaders, as citizens, and in
military service should they enter it. ... The JROTC and NDCC are not, of
themselves, officer-producing programs but should create favorable attitudes
and impressions toward the Services and toward careers in the Armed Forces."
-The US military frequently asserts that they are not actively recruiting
from JROTC students.[citation needed] The military has stated that JROTC
will inform young Americans about the opportunities available in the
military and "may help motivate young Americans toward military service."[3]
An Army policy memorandum states that JROTC is not precluded from
"facilitating the recruitment of young men and women into the U.S. Army,"
directing instructors to "actively assist cadets who want to enlist in the
military [and] emphasize service in the U.S. Army; facilitate recruiter
access to cadets in JROTC program and to the entire student body ... [and]
work closely with high school guidance counselors to sell the Army
story."[4] Former United States Secretary of Defense William Cohen referred
to JROTC as "one of the best recruitment programs we could have."[5]
-In a February 2000 testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, the
armed service chiefs of staff testified that 30%–50% of graduating JROTC
cadets go on to join the military:
-General James L. Jones, Commandant of the Marine Corps testified that the
value of the Marine JROTC program "is beyond contest. Fully one-third of our
young men and women who join a Junior ROTC program wind up wearing the
uniform of a Marine."
-General Eric K. Shinseki, Chief of Staff of the United States Army
testified that "Our indications are about 30 percent of those youngsters —
we don't recruit them, as you know. We are not permitted to do that. But by
virtue of the things that they like about that experience, about 30 percent
of them end up joining the Army, either enlisting or going on to ROTC and
then joining the officer population."
-General Michael E. Ryan, Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force
testified that "almost 50 percent of the folks that go [...] out of the Air
Force Junior ROTC go into one of the Services by enlisting or going to ROTC
or going to one of the academies."
-Admiral Jay L. Johnson, Chief of Naval Operations testified that "Even if
the number is only 30 percent, that is a good number. But think about what
we get out of the other 70 percent. They have exposure to us. They have
exposure to the military. And the challenge of the education mandate that we
all share in principals and school counselors and school districts that
won't let us in, that is a powerful tool I think to educate whether or not
they end up in the service. So it is a long way around saying it is well
worth the investment for lots of different reasons."[6]
-General Colin Powell admitted in his 1995 autobiography that "the armed
forces might get a youngster more inclined to enlist as a result of Junior
ROTC," but added that "Inner-city kids, many from broken homes, found
stability and role models in Junior ROTC."[7] US Congress found in the
Recruiting, Retention, and Reservist Promotion Act of 2000 that JROTC and
similar programs "provide significant benefits for the Armed Forces,
including significant public relations benefits."[8]
Each branch of the US Armed Forces maintains a Junior Reserve Officers’
Training Corps, organized into units. As of June 2006, there are a total of
3,229 units:
* 1555 Army AJROTC units[1]
* 794 Air Force AFJROTC units[9]
* 619 Navy NJROTC units[10]
* 260 Marine Corps MCJROTC units[11]
* 1 Coast Guard JROTC unit[12]
In 1967, Congress increased the total number of units authorized to be
established from 1,200 to 1,600. In 1992, Congress expanded the maximum
number of JROTC units to 3,500; The statutory limitation on the number of
units was struck from the law in 2001.[13] Their goal is to reach 3,500
units by FY 2011 by encouraging program expansion into educationally and
economically deprived areas.[14]
Units are set up according to the layout of their parent service. Army and
Marine Corps JROTC units follow the battalion structure. Air Force JROTC
units are composed structurally based on size (wing if more than 251 cadets,
group if more than 101, squadron if more than 51). Navy JROTC also typically
follows the company (100-149 cadets), battalion (150-299 cadets), or
regiment (300+ cadets) structure depending on the size of the unit.
DoD Budget[15] FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
AJROTC 125,894 135,166 141,416
NJROTC 39,798 39,743 42,875
MCJROTC 13,807 13,115 16,905
AFJROTC 44,747 47,518 57,573
Total US $1000 224,246 235,542 258,769
JROTC is partly funded by the United States Department of Defense with an
allocation in the military budget of about 340 million dollars for the
fiscal year 2007, of which about 68 million are personnel costs.[16] The
Federal Government subsidizes instructor salaries, cadet uniforms, equipment
and textbooks. The instructors, usually retired military personnel, continue
to receive retirement pay from the Federal government, but in addition, the
schools pay the difference from what the instructors would receive if they
were on active duty. The service concerned then reimburses the school for
approximately one-half of the amount paid by the school to the instructor.
Although active duty officers may be assigned, most instructors are retired
from the sponsoring branch of the Armed Forces. In the Army JROTC program,
the cadet unit at each school is directed by at least one retired
commissioned officer, an SAI, (in the grade of Second Lieutenant through
Colonel) or a warrant officer (WO1 through CW5) and at least one retired
noncommissioned officer, an AI, (in the grade of Sergeant First Class
through Sergeant Major). In certain situations there may be additional
instructors. Retired general or flag officers are generally not permitted to
work as JROTC instructors.[citation needed] Neither are retired National
Guard personnel permitted to work as JROTC instructors.[citation needed] A
new provision from the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2007 (Section 540) was signed into law in October 2006,
permitting retired Reserve officers and noncommissioned officers to be hired
as instructors.
There are no national requirements that JROTC instructors have the teaching
credential required by other teachers in public high school.[17] In at least
one jurisdiction (California), the government requires JROTC instructors to
have at least four years of military experience and possess a high school
diploma or equivalent.[18] AJROTC instructors need to be within one year of
retirement or retired from active military service for three or fewer years
[3]. MCJROTC instructors need to have graduated from high school, have at
least 20 years of active military service and be physically qualified
according to Marine Corps standards [4]. AFJROTC requires minimum 20 years
of active duty; Officer instructors need to have a minimum of a bachelors
degree, while a high school diploma or equivalent is sufficient for enlisted
instructors.[19] NJROTC also requires a minimum of 20 years of active
military duty; the minimum education requirement for an instructor is a high
school diploma or equivalent, with a baccalaureate degree from an accredited
college or university required for a senior instructor [5]. The Navy
requires that JROTC instructors be employees of the school and that they are
accorded the same status as other school faculty members.[20]
The National Defense Cadet Corps (NDCC) offers similar programs as JROTC.
NDCC units differ from JROTC in that they receive little or no financial
support from the Armed Forces; uniforms, equipment, other materials and
instructor salaries must normally be furnished by the school hosting an NDCC
program.[21] Except for the funding aspects, JROTC and NDCC programs are
virtually identical, although the cadet corps is not limited by the federal
statute that restricts JROTC to offering courses only for students in ninth
through 12th grades.[22] Per 2005, Chicago had 26 Middle School Cadet Corps
enlisting more than 850 kids.[23]
[edit] Instruction and activities
The Code of Federal Regulations states that JROTC is "designed for
physically fit citizens attending participating schools"[6]. In public
schools, JROTC is usually an elective course with membership limited to US
citizens and legal foreign nationals, those who will graduate with their 9th
grade corhort, and have not experienced an out of school suspension during
the preceding 6 month period. Boarding schools or (pre-college) military
schools may offer JROTC programs, with some requiring participation as a
condition for acceptance to the school. Often, students will participate for
one year receive credit in lieu of a physical education class. Students who
excel in the first year of JROTC can apply for a second year. Most schools
offer three to four years of JROTC training.
The JROTC program stresses military discipline[24][25], with a curriculum
that emphasizes study of military science and military history.[7] Cadets
typically wear their uniforms once or twice a week, usually standing for
inspection, with the exception being those cadets who attend a JROTC-based
military academy. Their creed encourages conduct that brings credit to
family, country, school and the corps of cadets, loyalty, citizenship and
patriotism.[26] Many cadets participate in extracurricular activities such
as drill, color guard, rocketry or orienteering. At least two-thirds of
JROTC units offer rifle marksmanship programs, and most of these have rifle
teams.[27] During the school year, there are regional competitions between
JROTC units, with testing in all areas of military, naval and aerospace
science. Some units organize special visits to US military bases during
school breaks. There are also many summertime "leadership academies" for
cadets hosted by various military installations.[28]
Many units also host an annual military ball where cadets put on their best
dress uniforms (see related article mess dress) and gather together for a
formal dinner. Usually awards are presented, speeches are given, and in many
respects the occasion is like a second "prom" for juniors and seniors;
sophomores and freshman are also allowed to attend the Military Ball. Female
cadets are generally not required to wear the dress uniform for military
ball, but some do so voluntarily.
Sometimes units also have a separate awards ceremony, which is attended by
the instructors, guests, and parents. Fraternal organizations, such as the
American Legion, often give out awards for military excellence, academics,
and citizenship, in addition to the standard awards given by the JROTC
program.
The year may be finished with a change of command ceremony, where the new
unit commander, executive officer, and other unit officers are named and
take command from the current officers. Mid-level officers are also named.
Some units choose the next year's NCO and junior officer corps based on
officer and NCO candidate schools, usually held immediately following the
end of the school year.
Successful completion of the program (usually 2-4 years of classes) can lead
to advanced rank upon enlistment in the Armed Forces.[29][30] For example,
upon completion of 4 years of Air Force JROTC, cadets may at their
instructor's discretion enlist in the Air Force at the rank of Airman First
Class (E-3). [8] However, JROTC participation incurs no obligation to join
the military.[9]
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
SUPPORT THE DAY AFTER DEMONSTRATIONS TO FREE MUMIA ABU-JAMAL
From: LACFreeMumia@aol.com
A ruling by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals on Mumia's case, based on the hearing in Philadelphia on May 17th 2007, is expected momentarily. Freeing Mumia immediately is what is needed, but that is not an option before this court. The Labor Action Committee To Free Mumia Abu-Jamal calls on everyone who supports Mumia‚s case for freedom, to rally the day after a decision comes down. Here are Bay Area day-after details:
OAKLAND:
14th and Broadway, near the Federal Building
4:30 to 6:30 PM the day after a ruling is announced,
or on Monday if the ruling comes down on a Friday.
Oakland demonstration called by the Partisan Defense Committee and Labor Black Leagues, to be held if the Court upholds the death sentence, or denies Mumia's appeals for a new trial or a new hearing. info at (510) 839-0852 or pdcbayarea@sbcglobal.org
SAN FRANCISCO:
Federal Courthouse, 7th & Mission
5 PM the day after a ruling is announced,
or Monday if the decision comes down on a Friday
San Francisco demo called by the Mobilization To Free Mumia,
info at (415) 255-1085 or www.freemumia.org
Day-after demonstrations are also planned in:
Philadelphia, New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Toronto, Vancouver
and other cities internationally.
A National Demonstration is to be held in Philadelphia, 3rd Saturday after the decision
For more information, contact: International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal, www.mumia.org;
Partisan Defense Committee, www.partisandefense.org;
Free Mumia Abu-Jamal Coalition (NYC), www.freemumia.com;
MUMIA ABU-JAMAL IS INNOCENT!
World-renowned journalist, death-row inmate and political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal is completely innocent of the crime for which he was convicted. Mountains of evidence--unheard or ignored by the courts--shows this. He is a victim, like thousands of others, of the racist, corrupt criminal justice system in the US; only in his case, there is an added measure of political persecution. Jamal is a former member of the Black Panther Party, and is still an outspoken and active critic of the on-going racism and imperialism of the US. They want to silence him more than they want to kill him.
Anyone who has ever been victimized by, protested or been concerned about the racist travesties of justice meted out to blacks in the US, as well as attacks on immigrants, workers and revolutionary critics of the system, needs to take a close look at the frame-up of Mumia. He is innocent, and he needs to be free.
FREE MUMIA NOW!
END THE RACIST DEATH PENALTY!
FOR MASS PROTESTS AND LABOR ACTION TO FREE MUMIA!
In 1995, mass mobilizations helped save Mumia from death.
In 1999, longshore workers shut West Coast ports to free Mumia, and teachers in Oakland and Rio de Janeiro held teach-ins and stop-works.
Mumia needs powerful support again now. Come out to free Mumia!
- The Labor Action Committee To Free Mumia Abu-Jamal
PO Box 16222, Oakland CA 94610
510.763.2347
LACFreeMumia@aol.com
November 2007
ACTION ALERT: Ensure Fairness For Mumia Abu-Jamal on NBC’s The Today Show!
On Dec. 6, NBC’s The Today Show intends to air a show about Michael Smerconish and Maureen Faulkner’s new book “Murdered By Mumia.” According to the announcement on Michael Smerconish’s website, the show is planning to feature both Smerconish and Faulkner as guests.
The International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal (FreeMumia.com), Journalists for Mumia (Abu-Jamal-News.com), and Educators for Mumia (EmajOnline.com) have initiated a media-activist campaign urging people to write The Today Show at today@msnbc.com asking them to fairly present both sides of the Mumia Abu-Jamal / Daniel Faulkner case, by also featuring as guests, Linn Washington, Jr. (Philadelphia Tribune columnist and Associate Professor of Journalism at Temple University ) and Dr. Suzanne Ross (Clinical Psychologist and Co-Chair of the Free Mumia Abu-Jamal Coalition, NYC).
A sample letter (http://www.abu-jamal-news.com/pr/TodayShow.doc), accompanied by an extensive informational press pack (http://www.abu-jamal-news.com/pr/PressPackNov07.pdf) has been created to use for contacting The Today Show. Please take a minute and contact them to ensure fair media coverage of this controversial and important case.
Sincerely,
The International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal (FreeMumia.com)
Journalists for Mumia Abu-Jamal (Abu-Jamal-News.com)
Educators for Mumia Abu-Jamal (EmajOnline.com)
SAMPLE LETTER:
Dear Today Show,
In December 2007, the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal will be entering the 27th year. In the course of those years, much of the media coverage has contained pure speculation and falsehoods. Media watchdogs like FAIR.ORG have sharply criticized this coverage as being biased against Abu-Jamal.
We understand that on Dec. 6, the Today Show intends to air a show about Michael Smerconish and Maureen Faulkner’s book “Murdered By Mumia.” Interestingly, the scheduled interview regarding the new book focusing on Mrs. Faulkner comes at a time of many startling new developments in this historic case, generating international attention.
Reflecting the international interest in this case, in 2003, Abu-Jamal was named an honorary citizen of Paris , and in 2006, the city of St. Denis named a street after him. While this was largely motivated by opposition to the death penalty, they also cited strong evidence of both an unfair trial and Abu-Jamal’s innocence.
One of these developments centers on extraordinary photos of the 1981 crime scene taken by Philadelphia-based press photographer Pedro Polakoff (viewable at Abu-Jamal-News.com) that reveal manipulation of evidence, and completely contradict the prosecution’s case, including Officer James Forbes’ testimony that he properly handled both Abu-Jamal’s and Faulkner’s guns (the photos show Forbes holding both guns in his bare hand). Also the photos reveal that there were no large bullet divots or destroyed chunks of cement where Faulkner was found, which should be visible in the pavement if the prosecution’s scenario was accurate, according to which Abu-Jamal shot down at Faulkner and allegedly missed several times while Faulkner was on his back. Of particular note, this photographer twice attempted to provide these photos to the District Attorney for both the 1982 trial and the 1995 PCRA hearings, and was ignored both times.
Since his incarceration, Abu-Jamal has published six books and countless articles, and has delivered hundreds of speeches, including keynote addresses for college graduations. As a prolific writer and tenacious journalist, he has earned the respect (and support) of such notable prize-winning authors as Toni Morrison, Alice Walker, John Edgar Wideman, and Salman Rushdie. Just recently, he was accepted into the PEN American Center , one of the highest honors a writer can achieve. Additionally, at the time of his arrest, he was president of the Philadelphia chapter of the Association of Black Journalists, and was awarded the PEN Oakland award for outstanding journalism after the publication of his first book, Live from Death Row. Since Live, he has garnered a following of dedicated readers around the world, including scholars, college educators, and journalists. His work is, in part, testament to the dignity he has demonstrated for the past 25 years he has been on death row.
The ethical interests in balance and fairness in presenting “news” regarding the Abu-Jamal case, arguably requires providing Today Show viewers with information evidencing Mr. Abu-Jamal’s innocence and unfair trial. To represent this other side, and to provide perspectives addressing the informational needs of your viewers, I ask that you also feature experts Linn Washington, Jr. (Philadelphia Tribune columnist and Associate Professor of Journalism at Temple University ) and Dr. Suzanne Ross (Clinical Psychologist and Co-Chair of the Free Mumia Abu-Jamal Coalition, NYC) as guests on your Dec. 6 show (they can be contacted via Journalists for Mumia: hbjournalist@gmail.com).
While Mrs. Faulkner certainly has a “story” and is entitled to her opinions, your viewers should be privy to other facts, such as the prosecution withholding key evidence, witness coercion, racist jury selection, and evidence that Judge Albert Sabo boasted about his desire to help the prosecution “fry the nigger,” as enclosed in the press packet provided here for you: http://www.abu-jamal-news.com/pr/PressPackNov07.pdf
I also write to provide you with information (inclusive of material from Abu-Jamal’s lawyer) in the interests of journalistic balance, fairness and integrity. The press packet includes 1) A recent Black Commentator article by Philadelphia lawyer/journalist David A. Love describing the significance of the Polakoff photos, 2) An Educators for Mumia Abu-Jamal press release about the Polakoff photos, written by Princeton University Professor Mark L. Taylor, 3) Criticism of the 1998 ABC 20/20 program about Abu-Jamal, 4) Background on the case, focusing on both the 1982 trial and 1995-97 PCRA hearings, with a focus on Abu-Jamal’s alleged “hospital confession,” ballistics evidence, and the testimony of Veronica Jones, 5) Recent police intimidation of Abu-Jamal’s supporters, including reported death threats against Sgt. DeLacy Davis, of Black Cops Against Police Brutality, and more.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Your Name
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Help end the war by supporting the troops who have refused to fight it.
Please sign the appeal online:
"DEAR CANADA: LET U.S. WAR RESISTERS STAY!"
"I am writing from the United States to ask you to make a provision for sanctuary for the scores of U.S. military servicemembers currently in Canada, most of whom have traveled to your country in order to resist fighting in the Iraq War. Please let them stay in Canada..."
To sign the appeal or for more information:
http://www.couragetoresist.org/canada
Courage to Resist volunteers will send this letter on your behalf to three key Canadian officials--Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Diane Finley, and Stéphane Dion, Liberal Party--via international first class mail.
In collaboration with War Resisters Support Campaign (Canada), this effort comes at a critical juncture in the international campaign for asylum for U.S. war resisters in Canada.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Next Antiwar Coalition meeting Sunday, January 6, 1:00 P.M.
474 Valencia St.
The OCT. 27 COALITION met Saturday, November 18. After a long discussion and evaluation of the Oct. 27 action, the group decided to meet again, Sunday, January 6, at 1:00 P.M. at CENTRO DEL PUEBLO, 474 Valencia Street, SF (Near 16th Street) to assess further action.
Everyone felt the demonstration was very successful and, in fact, that the San Francisco demonstration was the largest in the country and, got the most press coverage. Everyone felt the "die in" was extremely effective and the convergence added to the scope of the demonstration.
Please keep a note of the date of the next coalition meeting:
Sunday, January 6, 1:00 P.M.
EXPLORATORY LETTER: UNIFIED NATIONAL ACTION DURING MARCH 2008:
The regional antiwar demonstrations on October 27th were a great success.. The Boston mobilization organized by New England United (NEU) drew about 10,000 people, including many new activists and young people. Nationally, tens of thousands demanded an end to war and occupation now.
The NEU-sponsored action on October 27 was endorsed by a broad range of over 200 organizations. At a follow-up meeting, many members of NEU believed that we should build on this momentum by bringing together the antiwar movement in unified national protest in the spring for the fifth anniversary of the Iraq war.
Reasons given included: 1) March will be the fifth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, and the antiwar movement must come together to demand an end to this war now; 2) The war plans against Iran are intensifying, and we have to fight now to stop a war on Iran before it's too late. At the same time, it was recognized that successful national action in the spring would require a broad base of support from antiwar organizations around the country. Therefore, NEU decided to create a working group to assess the level of support for such an action, and report back to our next general meeting in December with both an assessment of support, and a detailed proposal for a unified national mobilization in the spring. As an indication of growing interest in national action, Cindy Sheehan is convening a peace summit in San Francisco in January to help develop a unified strategy for the peace movement and to develop a plan for a unified national mobilization in DC during the March anniversary of the Iraq war.
A strong base of support from the grass-roots organizations around the country will be necessary to make unified national action a reality. If your organization is interested in planning for unified national action in March, please contact us as soon as possible at the following email address: spring2008@lists.riseup.net . Thank you. Spring Mobilization working group New England United http://www.newenglandunited.org/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
ARTICLES IN FULL:
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
1) Chavez Calls to Continue Strengthening Socialism in Venezuela
GRANMA
December 4, 2007
Walter Lippmann
2) Will Defeat Alter Chávez's Path?
Venezuela Leader's Failure
To Cement Power Expected
To Embolden Opposition
By JOSÉ DE CÓRDOBA and JOHN LYONS
December 4, 2007; Page A4
WALL STREET JOURNAL
3) What's next for Venezuela?
An analysis of the referendum setback
By: Gloria La Riva
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
http://www.pslweb.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7717&news_iv_ctrl=1016
4) Supreme Court Hearing Guantánamo Cases
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 12:41 p.m. ET
December 5, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Scotus-Guantanamo.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
5) Guantánamo Prisoner Cuts His Throat With Fingernail
By WILLIAM GLABERSON
December 5, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/us/05gitmo.html?ref=world
6) Abu Jamal backers say new evidence merits retrial
By Jon Hurdle
Tue Dec 4, 2007 6:41pm EST
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0454988720071204
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
1) Chavez Calls to Continue Strengthening Socialism in Venezuela
GRANMA
December 4, 2007
Walter Lippmann
CARACAS, December 3.- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said on Monday
that he would continue to raise the banner of socialism in his
country, waiting for the day when history would allow it to reach its
greatest height.
Chavez spoke on the Dando y Dando Venezuelan TV program, reflecting
on the close defeat Sunday of his constitutional reform proposal.
"Let's rally; let's study more to better understand socialism," said
Chavez after analyzing the reasons why his initiative was defeated.
He said that his initial conclusion after hearing the results was
that the people were not ready to take such a big leap towards this
model.
Chavez noted that abstention proved the greatest enemy of the
reforms, "We didn't even get the number of votes of all the members
of the United Socialist Party." He said the experience merits a
reflection on what went wrong and why three million followers of his
government stayed home instead of going to the polls.
President Chavez was buoyed up by the fact that nearly 50 percent
voted YES for socialism, and three million people who abstained
didn't say NO, "We are going to convince them that this project is
for them."
Chavez said that while an opportunity had been lost, "the rhythm and
the government program will continue on course."
"Beyond the media bombardment and our shortcomings -our inability to
properly explain and coming up short in our communications strategy-,
I might have chosen the wrong moment to put forth this proposal,"
said Chavez.
Nonetheless, he said his government would continue to make social
reforms where permitted by the constitution and will prepare to
present the proposal again when the right conditions for doing so
exist.
Chavez concluded his statements saying, "We didn't fail with this
proposal, nor do we have to find another. The proposal is there, and
it is positive, even for many who voted against it." (PL)
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
2) Will Defeat Alter Chávez's Path?
Venezuela Leader's Failure
To Cement Power Expected
To Embolden Opposition
By JOSÉ DE CÓRDOBA and JOHN LYONS
December 4, 2007; Page A4
WALL STREET JOURNAL
CARACAS, Venezuela -- Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez's defeat in a
referendum on changing the country's constitution will energize the nation's
opposition, but the leader is likely to continue his quest to remain in
power and turn the country into a bastion of what he calls 21st-century
socialism.
Mr. Chávez's defeat in Sunday's vote shows a growing impatience among
Venezuelans, including surprising numbers of Mr. Chávez's supporters, about
his inability to substantially improve their lives, despite near-record-high
oil prices and the fact that he has governed the country for nearly a
decade. Mr. Chávez sought to amend the constitution of the world's
ninth-largest oil producer to allow him to concentrate nearly all power,
including scrapping limits on re-election.
Mr. Chávez's defeat will ripple across Latin America, hurting allies in
countries like Bolivia and Ecuador and boosting moderates in Brazil and
Chile. For the U.S. and Europe, a weaker Mr. Chávez is welcome news. The
former military officer has been increasingly hostile to Western interests
in the past few years, nationalizing key areas of the economy like the oil
industry, telecommunications and utilities.
Despite the result, Mr. Chávez will remain a major force. He still enjoys a
deep reservoir of support among the country's majority poor and working
class. He controls the country's courts, most of its media, the congress and
almost all local and state governments. He is also a recognized comeback
king. In 2002, he was knocked out of power for two days but came back. And
in 1998, only four years after being released from prison for his
unsuccessful 1992 coup attempt, Mr. Chávez was elected president of
Venezuela for the first time.
"He is wounded, but he's still very dangerous," says Fernando Ochoa, a
former defense minister. Now that the constitutional referendum has failed,
Mr. Ochoa warns that Mr. Chávez may try to keep pushing his agenda, perhaps
by calling for a constitutional convention.
[Hugo Chavez]
The main lesson for Mr. Chávez from the vote could be that he needs to focus
on issues of popular concern such as the economy and crime. His ideas about
so-called 21st-century socialism and performances on the international
stage, including his gibes at President Bush, didn't help him much with
voters.
"People are tired of his bombast after nine years of nearly constant
mobilization," says Peter Hakim, president of the Inter-American Dialogue, a
Washington think tank. "His magic and charm are wearing thin next to the
still poor quality of government services."
Mr. Chávez has used oil money to direct billions of dollars in health and
food subsidies. The spending has created make-work jobs and put money in
people's pockets, but other economic policies like price controls have
backfired. Basics like rice, sugar, milk and chicken are sometimes hard to
find in a country where the economy is booming from oil wealth.
Crime is another problem area. While Mr. Chávez gives Venezuela's oil money
to allies around Latin America, violent crime is rising in Venezuela's
cities. The poor -- Mr. Chávez's base -- suffer the most because the rich
insulate themselves behind bodyguards and high walls.
The outcome of the vote shows that Mr. Chávez is more out of touch with his
supporter base than his man-of-the-people image would suggest.
Mr. Chávez had predicted a 10-percentage-point victory in the referendum and
was seemingly unaware that many of his supporters could defect. One
explanation is a heavy travel schedule that leaves him less time for
domestic affairs. Another is the isolation that comes with power.
"Strongmen often surround themselves with sycophants who tell them what they
want to hear," said Riordan Roett, director of Western Hemisphere Studies at
Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. "They get carried away by the
soothing tones of their advisers."
It remains to be seen whether Mr. Chávez, whose political style has been one
of confrontation rather than conciliation, will heed the wake-up call he has
received. If he doesn't, Venezuela could face unrest as Mr. Chávez's
emboldened opposition presses for more space.
Jerrold Post, the head of George Washington University's Political
Psychology Program, recently completed a psychological study of Mr. Chávez
for the U.S. Air Force. Mr. Chávez, says Dr. Post, is "immensely
narcissistic" and "enormously self-absorbed."
Mr. Chávez's defeat should give succor to his opponents. One of the biggest
challenges for the middle- and upper-class leaders of the opposition parties
will be figuring out how to cross class lines and compete for the votes of
disillusioned Chávez supporters in working-class neighborhoods. While many
of these voters opposed the referendum, they also have a deep mistrust of
Venezuelan elites who governed the country for generations.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
3) What's next for Venezuela?
An analysis of the referendum setback
By: Gloria La Riva
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
http://www.pslweb.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7717&news_iv_ctrl=1016
[A nice companion piece to read is FAIR's reminder, written on August 18, 2002,
of how U.S. newspapers hailed the 2002 coup:
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1867]
The defeat of Chávez’s proposed constitutional reforms in the Dec. 2 referendum
does not signify by any means that the struggle for socialism is over.
It only shows there is an urgent need for a renewed drive to organize the people
to defend their gains and to build the Unified Socialist Party of Venezuela
(PSUV) on the basis of fighting for socialist revolution.
It is true that supporters of the Bolivarian revolutionary process have suffered
a setback, but lessons can be learned from the experience to strengthen the
movement.
It is understandable that millions of Venezuelan people who believe in the
socialist vision of Chávez’s leadership might be temporarily demoralized by the
referendum’s defeat.
The fact that 5.7 million Venezuelans have signed on to become members of the
Unified Socialist Party of Venezuela shows that they share that vision of
reorganizing society to meet people’s needs.
The defeat shows that the people’s struggle and organization is more necessary
than ever. The counter-revolutionary forces, emboldened by its narrow victory,
have already gone on the offensive.
The U.S. imperialists have pumped tens of millions of dollars into Venezuelan
counterrevolutionary groups. That figure will surely be multiplied in the coming
period with the intention of reversing the Bolivarian gains already won, and to
promote student, military, corporate and worker opponents.
For instance, the former general Raúl Baduel, who on Nov. 5 defected to the
opposition and slandered the proposed reforms as a “coup,” is now announcing a
campaign to “reform” the 1999 popular Bolivarian constitution.
Baduel’s denunciation of the referendum was not a surprise. As the revolutionary
process advances, the more liberal elements among the former Chávez backers
inevitably fall away and turn actively against the process.
But an inexcusable betrayal of the masses was the action of a smaller group of
so-called socialist elements (those trying to find a “third road” between
revolution and counter-revolution) like Orlando Chirino, of the “Movement to
Build a Workers’ Party,” who urged a “null” vote, abstention, before the
referendum, or Heinz Dieterich, a petty-bourgeois intellectual who had proposed
“conciliation” between Baduel and Chávez.
These so-called supporters of the Bolivarian revolution who called for “no”
votes and abstention only helped confuse Chávez supporters. Regardless of any
differences they had with the proposed reforms, Chirino and Dieterich played the
role of strike-breakers. But their betrayal was on a much larger scale than a
union fight, for U.S. imperialism is leading the other side.
The 50.7 percent vote against the constitutional reforms does not invalidate the
progressive changes embodied in the 69 articles of reform, including the 6-hour
workday, social security for the marginalized sector of informal workers, a
prohibition on any type of discrimination, and an increase in institutional
power for local community entities.
Nor does it mean that the vast majority of people oppose those changes.
The referendum results point to the fact that socialism, a new social system,
cannot be achieved through elections alone.
While a referendum proclaiming socialism could conceivably win, getting the
capitalists to peacefully agree to give up their wealth and power is quite
another thing.
Why did the referendum lose? In absolute terms, compared to Chávez's landslide
presidential victory a year ago, the opposition only increased its vote by about
100,000. On the other hand, around 2.8 million people who voted for Chávez last
year abstained this year. What explains the abstentions?
For one, the capitalist class still possesses powerful instruments for shaping
public opinion, and organized a massive misinformation campaign full of
hysterical anti-communist lies. A CIA communiqué discovered only a few days
before the referendum, reveals that Washington played an active part in this
campaign. The U.S. government engineered a multi-pronged destabilization effort
that included falsifying poll statistics, claiming fraud after the referendum,
and potentially launching a military coup in the days after Dec. 2.
The newly formed PSUV still contains a non-revolutionary wing that in some areas
did not launch an aggressive offensive to counter the opposition. In addition,
the capitalists have organized wide-scale economic sabotage, which have led to
shortages of goods as basic as milk and eggs. Unemployment and poverty remain,
despite the many advances and mobilizations of the Bolivarian revolution. The
defection of Baduel and the social-democratic party Podemos—both of which
campaigned in the name of “21st century socialism” against the reforms—added to
the confusion.
A protracted year’s long political mobilization that seeks to incrementally move
a country in the direction of socialism entails the inevitable risk of creating
a degree of exhaustion, at least in some sectors of the working class. Over such
a long period of time, consciousness invariably ebbs and flows. The over 4
million people who voted for the 69 reforms consciously voted for socialism.
This in itself represents an enormous advance in class consciousness compared to
a few years ago. But other Chávez supporters undoubtedly will only mobilize in
the name of socialism once it has provided a concrete remedy to the economic
situation.
How will socialism come about?
A virtual dual power exists in Venezuela, with a revolutionary government headed
by Hugo Chávez, which has loosened the grip of international and Venezuelan
capitalists.
With the nationalization of Venezuela’s oil reserves, the foreign oil companies
lost their longstanding control of the petroleum resources. Those that have
remained in Venezuela have been forced to pay higher royalties to the state.
The hundreds of billions of dollars in extra government funds, coupled with the
legislative moves of the pro-Chávez National Assembly, have allowed the
Bolivarian government to launch great changes in people’s lives.
Healthcare is now free to millions on demand, with the invaluable contribution
of 14,000 Cuban doctors, and the virtual replacement of the private-sector
capitalist healthcare system.
Private university education, another institution of the capitalist system, has
been supplemented by the creation of 14 popular universities providing free
education. In this way hundreds of thousands of working-class and poor youth are
being prepared for vital economic, social and administrative futures in a new
revolutionary society.
Significant progress has been made in the countryside where peasants have
mobilized to take advantage of their newly-won rights to confiscate land from
the wealthy.
The capitalists’ influence has been eroded, but tremendous power still remains
in the hands of the Venezuelan bourgeoisie.
They retain the right of private property, which is the right to own the means
of production, to hire and fire workers, and to shut down a workplace. This is
not to be confused with the right to personal property, which includes home
ownership. The landlords still have the right to throw tenants from their homes
and into the streets.
Chávez’s presidency and the many tremendous social and economic gains of the
Venezuelan people have defied the capitalists’ longstanding control of the
system and society, but the capitalists have not been vanquished.
The struggle, not elections brought Chávez to office
Notwithstanding Chávez’s election as president in 1998, it was in reality the
open struggle that brought Chávez to prominence. And it was this struggle that
propelled him to the presidency.
Chávez was swept into office by the Venezuelan people in December 1998 not
because he had money or a political machine that could deliver votes in the way
of traditional bourgeois elections.
It was not because Chávez had served as a congressman or senator previously and
thus had some traditional electoral sway; he never held public office before 1999.
Chávez was completely unknown to the population, until two seminal events
propelled him from anonymity into the spotlight, and launched the Venezuelan
masses onto the stage of history.
First was the 1989 Caracazo, a spontaneous rebellion of tens of thousands of
Venezuela’s poorest and most downtrodden. Although Venezuela is one of the
richest oil-producing countries in the world, 80 percent of the country suffered
in a desperate situation of poverty. In 1989, the poor came into the streets to
protest the country’s widespread poverty and the government’s food and energy
price hikes. The military killed thousands before suppressing the uprising.
The Caracazo was the people’s response to the country’s objective conditions.
What awoke the people’s struggle was not a convincing electoral campaign by
Chávez. The struggle came first. It is the struggle that has sustained the
revolutionary process to the present.
On Feb. 4, 1992, Chávez led a revolt by progressive forces in the military
against the rightwing government of Carlos Andrés Pérez. Though it failed,
millions of Venezuelans were deeply inspired by Chávez’s fighting spirit.
Chávez’s first electoral victory in 1998, when he was elected president, and the
subsequent electoral victories, have been products of struggle.
In April 2002—just three years into his administration, before today’s social
projects had been fully developed—Chávez was overthrown by elements in the
military. Then too it was the hundreds of thousands of the poorest and most
exploited people in society who spontaneously came into the streets, prepared
for battle, and restored their president.
As one young man I interviewed in 2004 said, “We came from Caricuao, Catia, from
all the neighborhoods, to bring Chávez back. Either we were going to bring back
our president, or we were going to die doing so. And we brought back our president.”
When the oil managerial class sabotaged Venezuela’s oil industry, shutting it
down from Dec. 2002 to Feb. 2003, the Bolivarian workers rescued it by
restarting the industry, and supporting the ouster of the saboteurs. It did not
require a referendum to justify their actions but they succeeded in regaining
control of the country’s oil.
The capitalists will not be dislodged by elections
In a society where the capitalists hold power, socialism will not be built by
electoral mobilizations—regardless of how popular some of the referenda have
been in the past.
As long as the capitalist class is not expropriated, it will continue to
mobilize, spread misinformation, prepare for counter-revolution and function as
a conveyor belt for U.S. imperialist aggression.
Many commentaries from pro-Chávez forces—in Venezuela and abroad—have been
issued in the hours since the defeat of the constitutional reform. Some have
lauded the “institutional maturity” of the elections, and assured the rightwing
that the Bolivarian masses and leadership, by respecting the outcome, hope that
in the future, the opposition will also abide by any future Bolivarian victory.
This argument is deeply flawed. Formal democracy is a false issue raised by
bourgeois' propaganda only when it fits into their plan to discredit the
revolution. The revolutionaries gain nothing by adopting the arguments of the
counter-revolution. The working people more than ever need a consistently class
conscious explanation of the referendum setback.
The opposition has no interest in any kind of democracy. It has learned time and
time again in the past nine years that its future as exploiters of the
Venezuelan people is threatened.
It is not even interested in preserving the bourgeois democracy that it used to
control society before 1999. If the U.S. imperialists and rightwing were to
succeed in overpowering the Bolivarian dual-power government, it would
immediately turn to violent counter-revolution, to crush the popular
organizations and the millions of working people who have awakened to political
life.
In the bourgeoisie’s 48-hour experiment during the short-lived April 2002 coup
that overthrew Chávez, Pedro Carmona, head of the country’s Chamber of Commerce
and the two-day coup “president,” annulled the constitution, dissolved the
National Assembly and Supreme Court and declared martial law. The police began
to round up known pro-Chávez activists. If not for the overturn of the coup,
there would have soon followed severe repression and killing of revolutionary
leaders.
All pretenses of democracy were instantly abolished. This provides a glimpse of
what Venezuela will look like should the opposition regain political power.
Although the right wing is howling that Chávez threatens "democracy,” what they
really fear is a workers’ democracy which necessarily includes nationalization
of the economy -- unfolding before their eyes. They fear a social system that
aims to do away with exploitation, misery and oppression.
The United States ruling class is determined to see that the revolutionary
vision of Chávez and the people is not only defeated but annihilated. The impact
of Venezuela’s revolutionary struggle, as well as Cuba’s, is reaching virtually
every corner of Latin America.
What is at stake is either socialist revolution or fascist repression. For the
Bolivarian masses, there can be no hesitation going forward.
Strengthening of the popular organizations and defense preparedness is critical.
The dangerous U.S. destabilization plots entailed in the Nov. 20 CIA memorandum,
if the referendum had passed, are only the tip of the iceberg. There can be no
vacillation or middle ground for the people of Venezuela.
It is critical to recognize that while the revolution has been dealt a setback,
it has not been defeated, and therefore can recover and carry the revolutionary
process forward. No true revolution has gone from success to success; all have
suffered setbacks.
December 2, 2007 is not like September 11, 1973, when the U.S.-backed coup led
to the physical destruction of the revolutionary and progressive forces in Chile.
The duty of progressive-minded people the world over is to defend the Venezuelan
revolutionary process and to demand the end of U.S. intervention.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
4) Supreme Court Hearing Guantánamo Cases
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 12:41 p.m. ET
December 5, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Scotus-Guantanamo.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Bush administration argued in the Supreme Court on Wednesday that foreign terrorism suspects held at Guantanamo Bay have sufficient opportunities to challenge their confinement, the third round of high court review of the detentions.
The measures set out in U.S. law for the 305 men to contest their detention is a ''remarkable, remarkable liberalization'' of the protections historically afforded foreigners held by the United States somewhere other than on U.S. soil, said Solicitor General Paul Clement.
But attorney Seth Waxman, representing the detainees, portrayed the case as a fundamental test of the U.S. system of justice. Many of the prisoners ''have been held ... for six years,'' he said.
Under the current system, ''they have no prospect'' of being able to challenge their detention in any meaningful way, said Waxman, who held Clement's job during the Clinton administration.
The justices, who ruled for the detainees in two prior decisions, subjected both Clement and Waxman to a barrage of questions.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia pressed Waxman on whether the detainees are entitled to hearings in civilian courts.
''Show me one case'' down through the centuries where circumstances similar to those at Guantanamo Bay entitled an alien to challenge his detention in civilian courts, said Scalia.
Roberts challenged Waxman's argument that the duration of detention is important.
But most questions from the justices seemed to accept that the detainees have some rights and focused on whether procedures in place are adequate.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, considered a pivotal vote in the case, raised the possibility of returning the issue to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, where the detainees' status as enemy combatants is undergoing a highly restrictive form of review.
Waxman argued that such a move would simply cause more delays in deciding the prisoners' fate. Clement said the appeals court would be an appropriate forum for resolving the issue.
Lawyers for the foreign detainees contend the courts must get involved to rein in the White House and Congress, which changed the law to keep the detainee cases out of U.S. courts after earlier Supreme Court rulings. The most recent legislation, last year's Military Commissions Act, strips federal courts of their ability to hear detainee cases.
Waxman, the top Supreme Court lawyer during the Clinton administration, said that ''after six years of imprisonment without meaningful review, it is time for a court to decide the legality'' of their confinement.
The detainee case drew several hundred spectators who lined up outside the courthouse in a light snow. About 50 had camped out overnight for a chance to get inside to hear the arguments in the third case the Supreme Court has heard since 2004 on the administration's detention program.
Meanwhile, two dozen protesters, some in orange prison-like jumpsuits, chanted and waved signs.
''Restore habeas corpus!'' they intoned, referring to the right to court review of the legality of detention, the heart of the argument before the high court.
Clement said foreigners captured and held outside the United States ''have no constitutional rights to petition our courts for a writ of habeas corpus,'' a judicial determination of the legality of detention.
The case could turn on whether the court decides that Guantanamo is essentially U.S. soil, which would make the case for detainee rights stronger. Kennedy said as much in a concurring opinion in Rasul v. Bush, the 2004 case that was the court's first foray into the administration's detention policies.
''Guantanamo Bay is in every practical respect a United States territory,'' Kennedy said in the earlier ruling.
The administration also argues that panels of military officers that review the detainees' status as enemy combatants are adequate, even if the Supreme Court decides they have the right to contest their confinement.
The justices, however, decided to review the issue in June, after having turned down the detainees' appeal in April. They provided no explanation, but their action followed a declaration from a military officer who criticized Combatant Status Review Tribunals.
The United States has no plans to put most of those held at Guantanamo on trial. Just three detainees face charges under the Military Commissions Act and the military has said it could prosecute as many as 80.
The consolidated cases are Boumediene v. Bush, 06-1195, and Al Odah v. U.S., 06-1196.
Associated Press writer Natasha Metzler contributed to this report.
^------
On the Net:
Supreme Court: http://www.supremecourtus.gov
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
5) Guantánamo Prisoner Cuts His Throat With Fingernail
By WILLIAM GLABERSON
December 5, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/05/us/05gitmo.html?ref=world
GUANTÁNAMO BAY, Cuba, Dec. 4 — A prisoner at the detention camp here cut his throat with his own fingernail last month, causing a substantial loss of blood, but was never at risk of death, military officials said Tuesday.
“He did in fact use a sharpened fingernail,” Cmdr. Andrew Haynes, the deputy commander of the guard force here, told reporters on a tour of the camp.
Commander Haynes said there had been four to six occurrences in the last two months in which detainees harmed themselves, a rate that he said was consistent with recent experience. Those instances show that a potentially deadly struggle between detainees and their jailers continues, largely out of public view. One detainee committed suicide in May, after three other suicides the previous June, and there have also been numerous suicide attempts.
Advocates for detainees describe such acts as signs of desperation born of indefinite detention and hopelessness. But camp administrators call them a tactic to draw publicity and provoke criticism of the government.
The self-inflicted harm involving the detainee with the sharpened nail occurred in early November but was not disclosed at the time. Responding to questions from reporters, Commander Haynes confirmed that the detainee had intentionally injured himself while in the shower, saying he had been stopped because of “the vigilance of the guard force.” He did not describe how the detainee had sharpened his nail.
Senior military medical officers said there had been “a lot of bleeding” from the wound, which one said had required stitches to close. They classified the occurrence as a “suicidal gesture,” a category that falls short of what they deem suicide attempts.
Officials here have described the recent months as a relatively calm period in the five-year history of the detention operation at Guantánamo, where about 305 detainees are now held. Guantánamo officials have emphasized recent efforts to reduce tensions, for instance giving some detainees the opportunity to see nature films. But it is also clear that some detainees remain locked in a long-term struggle with guards.
In interviews with reporters Tuesday, officials said nine detainees remained on hunger strikes and were being force-fed daily. The detainee engaged in the longest of the hunger strikes, the officials said, has been force-fed for 816 days.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
6) Abu Jamal backers say new evidence merits retrial
By Jon Hurdle
Tue Dec 4, 2007 6:41pm EST
http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0454988720071204
PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - Supporters of a Pennsylvania man condemned to death for the 1981 murder of a policeman released photographs on Tuesday that they said prove he deserves a new trial.
Mumia Abu Jamal, a former Philadelphia radio journalist and taxi driver, has been on death row for 25 years for the killing of officer Daniel Faulkner, a crime he says he did not commit.
Abu Jamal and his backers say he was framed by a police force and a judiciary tainted by racism. Even before the latest development, they had sought a new trial on grounds including a contention that too many blacks were removed from the jury.
Abu Jamal writes on current affairs from his prison cell in western Pennsylvania and has become an international cause celebre for the anti-death penalty movement, attracting supporters who include South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu.
The photographs depict aspects of the murder scene that his supporters say are inconsistent with evidence produced by prosecutors.
The pictures, by freelance photographer Pedro Polakoff, were published in the same week that Faulkner's widow Maureen published a book describing the shooting and its aftermath, and five days before the 26th anniversary of the policeman's death.
One photo shows another policeman holding two guns in his bare hand, contradicting that officer's trial testimony that he had preserved ballistics evidence, said Hans Bennett, co-founder of Journalists for Mumia, a support group.
Another picture shows Faulkner's hat on top of a parked car, contrasting with the official police photo of the crime scene in which the hat was on a sidewalk grating. The picture suggests the police were manipulating evidence to produce a more dramatic picture, Bennett told a news conference.
A third picture shows a blood-stained sidewalk where Faulkner was shot but lacks any sign of "divots" or marks in the concrete that would have occurred if the officer had been shot from above, as prosecutors contended, Bennett said.
"We are making the point that at a minimum, he needs a new trial," Bennett said.
(Editing by Daniel Trotta and Eric Walsh)
© Reuters 2007. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.
Reuters journalists are subject to the Reuters Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
LINKS AND VERY SHORT STORIES
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Senator Criticizes Genentech’s Limits on a Cheaper Drug
By BLOOMBERG NEWS
Genentech’s plan to restrict the availability of Avastin so doctors cannot use it instead of a more expensive medicine for eye disease will cost taxpayers $1 billion to $3 billion a year, according to Senator Herb Kohl.
Senator Kohl, Democrat of Wisconsin, said in letters to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Food and Drug Administration that Genentech’s decision to limit access to the medicine by pharmacies that repackage drugs “is of great concern.”
He also sent the company a letter saying that his staff would investigate the restrictions.
The company, based in South San Francisco, wants specialists to buy its newer treatment, Lucentis, instead of Avastin.
November 29, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/29/business/29eye.html?ref=health
Weak Dollar Propels Sales at Tiffany
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The Jewelry and luxury goods retailer Tiffany & Company’s third-quarter earnings more than tripled on strong sales growth and a gain on the sale and leaseback of its Tokyo flagship store, the company said yesterday.
It also raised its earnings outlook for the full year. However, the company’s stock fell $2.32, or 5 percent, to $46.43 a share, after a morning rally, as analysts expressed caution that its Manhattan flagship store has become a temporarily disproportionate driver of sales, helped by a flood of foreign tourists who are taking advantage of the declining dollar.
The company, based in New York, said net income climbed to $98.9 million, or 71 cents a share, from $29.1 million, or 21 cents per share, a year earlier.
Sales increased 18 percent to $627.3 million from $531.8 million a year earlier, helped by a 9 percent rise in global sales at stores open at least one year.
Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial expected profit of 25 cents a share.
December 1, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/business/01tiffany.html?ref=business
Israeli Court Upholds Gaza Fuel Cuts
By STEVEN ERLANGER
World Briefing | Middle East
Israel’s Supreme Court ruled that the government could continue cutting fuel supplies to the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, which it has done since Oct. 28. But it ordered a delay on plans to cut electricity until new details are offered by the groups challenging the plan.
December 1, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/01/world/middleeast/01briefs-gaza.html?ref=world
Canada: Man Dies After Shock From Taser
By IAN AUSTEN
World Briefing | Americas
November 23, 2007
A 45-year-old man who had been arrested on assault charges died, about a day after the police in Nova Scotia used a Taser to subdue him. The man was the third person to die in Canada in just over a month after being shocked by Tasers wielded by police officers. Justice Minister Cecil Clarke ordered a review of the use of the hand-held stun guns following the man’s death, the latest in a series of government inquiries into the use of Tasers by the police. Widespread outrage in Canada followed the broadcast of a video last month that showed another man being shocked at least twice with Tasers at a Vancouver airport by officers of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. The man, a Polish immigrant who appeared extremely confused on the video, died. A Montreal man also died last month, three days after he was subdued by the police with a Taser while being arrested for drunken driving.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/23/world/americas/23briefs-taser.html?ref=world
California: Cards for Immigrants
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Lawmakers have given final approval to a law making San Francisco the nation’s largest city to issue identification cards to illegal immigrants. The Board of Supervisors voted 10 to 1 to create a municipal ID program to help residents without driver’s licenses obtain access to services and feel secure dealing with local law enforcement. The measure is modeled after a program that started last summer in New Haven, Conn. Supporters say that along with immigrants, elderly people who no longer drive and transgender individuals whose driver’s licenses no longer reflect their appearances also would benefit from having the cards. The measure goes into effect in August.
November 21, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/21/us/21brfs-CARDSFORIMMI_BRF.html?ref=us
Manhattan: Teachers Criticize Review Unit
By ELISSA GOOTMAN
Randi Weingarten, president of the United Federation of Teachers, called for Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and his schools chancellor to apologize to the city’s 80,000 teachers yesterday, a day after the chancellor sent principals an e-mail message announcing the formation of teams of lawyers and consultants meant to help principals remove poorly performing tenured teachers. Ms. Weingarten said that the message seemed timed to the release yesterday of national reading and math test scores showing little progress among New York City students. “The first speck of bad news, all of the sudden they go after teachers,” Ms. Weingarten said. The mayor said yesterday that removing tenured teachers was “a last alternative.”
November 16, 2007
New York
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/16/nyregion/16mbrfs-TEACHERS.html?ref=nyregion
Waterboarding and U.S. History
by William Loren Katz
"U.S. officers in the Philippines routinely resorted to what they called ‘the water cure.'"
November 14, 2007
http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=435&Itemid=1
Writers Set to Strike, Threatening Hollywood
By MICHAEL CIEPLY and BROOKS BARNES
November 2, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/02/business/media/02cnd-hollywood.html?ref=us
Raids Traumatized Children, Report Says
By JULIA PRESTON
Hundreds of young American children suffered hardship and psychological trauma after immigration raids in the last year in which their parents were detained or deported, according to a report by the National Council of La Raza and the Urban Institute. Of 500 children directly affected in three factory raids examined in the report in which 900 adult immigrants were arrested, a large majority were United States citizens younger than 10. With one or both parents deported, the children had reduced economic support, and many remained in the care of relatives who feared contact with the authorities, the study said. Although the children were citizens, few families sought public assistance for them, the study found.
November 1, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/01/us/01brfs-raids.html?ref=us
Newark: Recalled Meat Found in Store
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
New Jersey consumer safety officials said yesterday that state inspectors bought recalled frozen hamburgers at a store weeks after the meat was recalled because of fears of E. coli contamination. The 19 boxes were bought in Union City on Wednesday, nearly four weeks after the manufacturer, the Topps Meat Company, issued a nationwide recall of 21.7 million pounds of frozen patties. Officials would not name the store yesterday because of the investigation, and investigators have not determined when the store received the meat, said Jeff Lamm, a spokesman for the state’s Division of Consumer Affairs.
New Jersey
October 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/26/nyregion/26mbrfs-meat.html?ref=nyregion
Florida: Sentence for Lionel Tate Is Upheld
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
An appeals court has upheld a 30-year probation violation sentence for Lionel Tate, who for a time was the youngest person to be sentenced to life in an American prison. The ruling Wednesday by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in West Palm Beach sets the stage for Mr. Tate’s trial on robbery charges that could carry another life term. Mr. Tate, 20, had sought to have the sentence thrown out based on procedural mistakes. Mr. Tate was 12 at the time of the 1999 beating death of 6-year-old Tiffany Eunick. An appeals court overturned his murder conviction in 2004, and he was released but was on probation. In May 2005, the police said, Mr. Tate robbed a pizza delivery man, and he was found to be in possession of a gun even before that, a violation of his probation.
October 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/26/us/26brfs-lionel.html?ref=us
Submarine’s Commanding Officer Is Relieved of His Duties
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The commanding officer of the nuclear-powered submarine Hampton was relieved of his duty because of a loss of confidence in his leadership, the Navy said. The officer, Cmdr. Michael B. Portland, was relieved of duty after an investigation found the ship had failed to do daily safety checks on its nuclear reactor for a month and falsified records to cover up the omission. Commander Portland will be reassigned, said Lt. Alli Myrick, a public affairs officer. [Aren't you glad they are out there making the world safe for democracy?...bw]
October 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/26/us/26brfs-sub.html?ref=us
Britain: New Claim for Sovereignty in Antarctica
By REUTERS
World Briefing | Europe
Britain plans to submit a claim to the United Nations to extend its Antarctic territory by 386,000 square miles, the Foreign Office said. Argentina wants some of it, and its foreign minister said his country was working on its own presentation. May 13, 2009, is the deadline for countries to stake their claims in what some experts are describing as the last big carve-up of maritime territory in history.
October 18, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/18/world/europe/18briefs-claim.html?ref=world
California: Veto of 3 Criminal Justice Bills
By SOLOMON MOORE
Bucking a national trend toward stronger safeguards against wrongful convictions, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed bills that would have explored new eyewitness identification guidelines, required electronic recordings of police interrogations and mandated corroboration of jailhouse informant testimony. Mr. Schwarzenegger cited his concern that the three bills would hamper local law enforcement authorities, a contention shared by several state police and prosecutor associations. The proposals had been recommended by the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice, a bipartisan body of police officials, prosecutors and defense lawyers charged by the State Senate to address the most common causes of wrongful convictions and recommend changes in criminal justice procedures.
October 16, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/16/us/16brfs-VETOOF3CRIMI_BRF.html?ref=us
Illinois: Chicagoans May Have to Dig Deeper
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Chicagoans would have to spend 10 cents more on a bottle of water, pay higher property taxes and spend more for liquor under Mayor Richard M. Daley’s proposed budget for next year. Also financing Mr. Daley’s $5.4 billion budget are higher water and sewer fees and more expensive vehicle stickers for people driving large vehicles, $120 a vehicle sticker, up from $90. Mr. Daley announced his budget to aldermen, calling it a last resort to ask taxpayers for more money. His budget closes a $196 million deficit and avoids service cuts and layoffs. Budget hearings will be held, and a city spending plan will require a vote by aldermen.
Midwest
October 11, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/us/11brfs-CHICAGO.html?ref=us
Wisconsin Iraq vet returns medals to Rumsfeld
By David Solnit, Courage to Resist / Army of None Project.
"I swore an oath to protect the constitution ... not to become a pawn in your New American Century."
September 26, 2007
http://www.couragetoresist.org/x/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS AND INFORMATION
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Russell Means Speaking at the Transform Columbus Day Rally
"If voting could do anything it would be illegal!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8Lri1-6aoY
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Stop the Termination or the Cherokee Nation
http://groups.msn.com/BayAreaIndianCalendar/activismissues.msnw?action=get_message&mview=1&ID_Message=5580
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
We Didn't Start the Fire
http://yeli.us/Flash/Fire.html
I Can't Take it No More
http://lefti.blogspot.com/2007_11_01_archive.html#9214483115237950361
The Art of Mental Warfare
http://artofmentalwarfare.com/pog/artofmentalwarfarecom-the-warning/
MONEY AS DEBT
http://video. google.com/ videoplay? docid=-905047436 2583451279
http://www.moneyasd ebt.net/
UNCONSTITUTIONAL
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6582099850410121223&pr=goog-sl
IRAQ FOR SALE
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6621486727392146155
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Port of Olympia Anti-Militarization Action Nov. 2007
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOkn2Fg7R8w
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
"They have a new gimmick every year. They're going to take one of their boys, black boys, and put him in the cabinet so he can walk around Washington with a cigar. Fire on one end and fool on the other end. And because his immediate personal problem will have been solved he will be the one to tell our people: 'Look how much progress we're making. I'm in Washington, D.C., I can have tea in the White House. I'm your spokesman, I'm your leader.' While our people are still living in Harlem in the slums. Still receiving the worst form of education.
"But how many sitting here right now feel that they could [laughs] truly identify with a struggle that was designed to eliminate the basic causes that create the conditions that exist? Not very many. They can jive, but when it comes to identifying yourself with a struggle that is not endorsed by the power structure, that is not acceptable, that the ground rules are not laid down by the society in which you live, in which you are struggling against, you can't identify with that, you step back.
"It's easy to become a satellite today without even realizing it. This country can seduce God. Yes, it has that seductive power of economic dollarism. You can cut out colonialism, imperialism and all other kind of ism, but it's hard for you to cut that dollarism. When they drop those dollars on you, you'll fold though."
—MALCOLM X, 1965
http://www.accuracy.org/newsrelease.php?articleId=987
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
A little gem:
Michael Moore Faces Off With Stephen Colbert [VIDEO]
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/57492/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
LAPD vs. Immigrants (Video)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/qws/ff/qr?term=lapd&Submit=S&Go.x=0&Go.y=0&Go=Search&st=s
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Dr. Julia Hare at the SOBA 2007
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeo9ewi/proudtobeblack2/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
"We are far from that stage today in our era of the absolute
lie; the complete and totalitarian lie, spread by the
monopolies of press and radio to imprison social
consciousness." December 1936, "In 'Socialist' Norway,"
by Leon Trotsky: “Leon Trotsky in Norway” was transcribed
for the Internet by Per I. Matheson [References from
original translation removed]
http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1936/12/nor.htm
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Wealth Inequality Charts
http://www.faireconomy.org/research/wealth_charts.html
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
MALCOLM X: Oxford University Debate
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dmzaaf-9aHQ
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
"There comes a times when silence is betrayal."
--Martin Luther King
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
YouTube clip of Che before the UN in 1964
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtATT8GXkWg&mode=related&search
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
The Wealthiest Americans Ever
NYT Interactive chart
JULY 15, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/business/20070715_GILDED_GRAPHIC.html
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
New Orleans After the Flood -- A Photo Gallery
http://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=795
This email was sent to you as a service, by Roland Sheppard.
Visit my website at: http://web.mac.com/rolandgarret
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
[For some levity...Hans Groiner plays Monk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51bsCRv6kI0
...bw]
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Which country should we invade next?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3g_zqz3VjY
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
My Favorite Mutiny, The Coup
http://www.myspace.com/thecoupmusic
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Michael Moore- The Awful Truth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeOaTpYl8mE
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Morse v. Frederick Supreme Court arguments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_LsGoDWC0o
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Free Speech 4 Students Rally - Media Montage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfCjfod8yuw
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
'My son lived a worthwhile life'
In April 2003, 21-year old Tom Hurndall was shot in the head
in Gaza by an Israeli soldier as he tried to save the lives of three
small children. Nine months later, he died, having never
recovered consciousness. Emine Saner talks to his mother
Jocelyn about her grief, her fight to make the Israeli army
accountable for his death and the book she has written
in his memory.
Monday March 26, 2007
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,2042968,00.html
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Introducing...................the Apple iRack
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-KWYYIY4jQ
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
"A War Budget Leaves Every Child Behind."
[A T-shirt worn by some teachers at Roosevelt High School
in L.A. as part of their campaign to rid the school of military
recruiters and JROTC--see Article in Full item number 4, below...bw]
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
THIS IS AN EXCELLENT VIDEO DESTRIBUTED BY U.S. LABOR AGAINST
THE WAR (USLAW) FEATURING SPEAKERS AT THE JANUARY 27TH
MARCH ON WASHINGTON FOCUSING ON THE DEMAND - BRING
THE TROOPS HOME NOW.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6935451906479097836&hl=en
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
George Takai responds to Tim Hardaway's homophobic remarks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcJoJZIcQW4&eurl_
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Iran
http://www.lucasgray.com/video/peacetrain.html
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Another view of the war. A link from Amer Jubran
http://d3130.servadmin.com/~leeflash/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
A Girl Like Me
7:08 min
Youth Documentary
Kiri Davis, Director, Reel Works Teen Filmmaking, Producer
Winner of the Diversity Award
Sponsored by Third Millennium Foundation
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1091431409617440489
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Film/Song about Angola
http://www.prisonactivist.org/angola/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
"200 million children in the world sleep in the streets today.
Not one of them is Cuban."
(A sign in Havana)
Venceremos
View sign at bottom of page at:
http://www.cubasolidarity.net/index.html
[Thanks to Norma Harrison for sending this...bw]
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
"Cheyenne and Arapaho oral histories hammer history's account of the
Sand Creek Massacre"
CENTENNIAL, CO -- A new documentary film based on an award-winning
documentary short film, "The Sand Creek Massacre", and driven by
Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho people who tell their version about
what happened during the Sand Creek Massacre via their oral
histories, has been released by Olympus Films+, LLC, a Centennial,
Colorado film company.
"You have done an extraordinary job" said Margie Small, Tobient
Entertainment, " on the Colorado PBS episode, the library videos for
public schools and libraries, the trailer, etc...and getting the
story told and giving honor to those ancestors who had to witness
this tragic and brutal attack...film is one of the best ways."
"The images shown in the film were selected for native awareness
value" said Donald L. Vasicek, award-winning writer/filmmaker, "we
also focused on preserving American history on film because tribal
elders are dying and taking their oral histories with them. The film
shows a non-violent solution to problem-solving and 19th century
Colorado history, so it's multi-dimensional in that sense. "
Chief Eugene Blackbear, Sr., Cheyenne, who starred as Chief Black
Kettle in "The Last of the Dogmen" also starring Tom Berenger and
Barbara Hershey and "Dr. Colorado", Tom Noel, University of Colorado
history professor, are featured.
The trailer can be viewed and the film can be ordered for $24.95 plus
$4.95 for shipping and handling at http://www.fullduck.com/node/53.
Vasicek's web site, http://www.donvasicek.com, provides detailed
information about the Sand Creek Massacre including various still
images particularly on the Sand Creek Massacre home page and on the
proposal page.
Olympus Films+, LLC is dedicated to writing and producing quality
products that serve to educate others about the human condition.
Contact:
Donald L. Vasicek
Olympus Films+, LLC
7078 South Fairfax Street
Centennial, CO 80122
http://us.imdb.com/Name?Vasicek,+Don
http://www.donvasicek.com
dvasicek@earthlink.net
303-903-2103
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
A NEW LOOK AT U.S. RADIOACTIVE WEAPONS
Join us in a campaign to expose and stop the use
of these illegal weapons
http://poisondust.org/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
You may enjoy watching these.
In struggle
Che:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqcezl9dD2c
Leon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukkFVV5X0p4
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
FIGHTBACK! A Collection of Socialist Essays
By Sylvia Weinstein
http://www.walterlippmann.com/sylvia-weinstein-fightback-intro.html
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
[The Scab
"After God had finished the rattlesnake, the toad,
and the vampire, he had some awful substance left with
which he made a scab."
"A scab is a two-legged animal with a corkscrew soul,
a water brain, a combination backbone of jelly and glue.
Where others have hearts, he carries a tumor of rotten
principles." "When a scab comes down the street,
men turn their backs and angels weep in heaven, and
the devil shuts the gates of hell to keep him out."
"No man (or woman) has a right to scab so long as there
is a pool of water to drown his carcass in,
or a rope long enough to hang his body with.
Judas was a gentleman compared with a scab.
For betraying his master, he had character enough
to hang himself." A scab has not.
"Esau sold his birthright for a mess of pottage.
Judas sold his Savior for thirty pieces of silver.
Benedict Arnold sold his country for a promise of
a commision in the british army."
The scab sells his birthright, country, his wife,
his children and his fellowmen for an unfulfilled
promise from his employer.
Esau was a traitor to himself; Judas was a traitor
to his God; Benedict Arnold was a traitor to his country;
a scab is a traitor to his God, his country,
his family and his class."
Author --- Jack London (1876-1916)...Roland Sheppard
http://web.mac.com/rolandgarret]
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
END ALL U.S. AID TO ISRAEL!
Stop funding Israel's war against Palestine
Complete the form at the website listed below with your information.
https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Advocacy?
JServSessionIdr003=cga2p2o6x1.app2a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=177
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Sand Creek Massacre
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FEATURED AT NATIVE AMERICAN FILM FESTIVAL:
http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/local/16035305.htm
(scroll down when you get there])
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING
WRITER/FILMMAKER DONALD L. VASICEK REPORT:
http://www.digitalcinemareport.com/sandcreekmassacre.html
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FINALIST IN DOCUMENTARY CHANNEL COMPETITION (VIEW HERE):
http://www.docupyx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=41
VIEW "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FILM MOVIE OF THE WEEK FOR FREE HERE:
http://twymancreative.com/twymanc.html
On November 29, 1864, 700 Colorado troops savagely slaughtered
over 450 Cheyenne children, disabled, elders, and women in the
southeastern Colorado Territory under its protection. This act
became known as the Sand Creek Massacre. This film project
("The Sand Creek Massacre" documentary film project) is an
examination of an open wound in the souls of the Cheyenne
people as told from their perspective. This project chronicles
that horrific 19th century event and its affect on the 21st century
struggle for respectful coexistence between white and native
plains cultures in the United States of America.
Listed below are links on which you can click to get the latest news,
products, and view, free, "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" award-
winning documentary short. In order to create more native
awareness, particularly to save the roots of America's history,
please read the following:
Some people in America are trying to save the world. Bless
them. In the meantime, the roots of America are dying.
What happens to a plant when the roots die? The plant dies
according to my biology teacher in high school. American's
roots are its native people. Many of America's native people
are dying from drug and alcohol abuse, poverty, hunger,
and disease, which was introduced to them by the Caucasian
male. Tribal elders are dying. When they die, their oral
histories go with them. Our native's oral histories are the
essence of the roots of America, what took place before
our ancestors came over to America, what is taking place,
and what will be taking place. It is time we replenish
America's roots with native awareness, else America
continues its decaying, and ultimately, its death.
You can help. The 22-MINUTE SAND CREEK MASSACRE
DOCUMENTARY PRESENTATION/EDUCATIONAL DVD IS
READY FOR PURCHASE! (pass the word about this powerful
educational tool to friends, family, schools, parents, teachers,
and other related people and organizations to contact
me (dvasicek@earthlink.net, 303-903-2103) for information
about how they can purchase the DVD and have me come
to their children's school to show the film and to interact
in a questions and answers discussion about the Sand
Creek Massacre.
Happy Holidays!
Donald L. Vasicek
Olympus Films+, LLC
http://us.imdb.com/Name?Vasicek,+Don
http://www.donvasicek.com
dvasicek@earthlink.net
303-903-2103
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FEATURED AT NATIVE AMERICAN FILM FESTIVAL:
http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/local/16035305.htm
(scroll down when you get there])
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING
WRITER/FILMMAKER DONALD L. VASICEK REPORT:
http://www.digitalcinemareport.com/sandcreekmassacre.html
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FINALIST IN DOCUMENTARY CHANNEL COMPETITION (VIEW HERE):
http://www.docupyx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=41
VIEW "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FILM MOVIE OF THE WEEK FOR FREE HERE:
http://twymancreative.com/twymanc.html
SHOP:
http://www.manataka.org/page633.html
BuyIndies.com
donvasicek.com.Peace Articles at Libraryofpeace.org">
No comments:
Post a Comment