Saturday, January 15, 2005

BAUAW NEWSLETTER-FRIDAY, JAN. 14, 2005

1) MANHATTAN: JURY DELIBERATES IN TERROR TRIAL (Lynne Stewart)
January 13, 2005
METRO BRIEFING
NEW YORK
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/13/nyregion/13mbrf.html
(For more information about the case go to: www.lynnestewart.org
Or call: 212-625-9696)

2) NEXT BAUAW MEETING:
SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 11:00 a.m.
CENTRO DEL PUEBLO
474 VALENCIA STREET
(NEAR 16TH ST. IN S.F.)
HELP GET THE MILITARY OUT OF OUR SCHOOLS!
KILLING AND BEING KILLED
IS NOT A CAREER CHOICE!
BRING ALL THE TROOPS HOME NOW!
MARCH AND RALLY JANUARY 20, 5 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER, SAN FRANCISCO

3) [Alerts] Fw: Antiwar bleachers at 4th & Pennsylvania Ave. (
north side) for Jan. 20 CounterInaugural
alerts at lists.iww.org alerts at lists.iww.org
Wed Jan 12 16:54:34 PST 2005
-----Forwarded Message-----
From: "VoteNoWar.org" < Action at VoteNoWar.org >
Sent: Jan 12, 2005 4:45 PM
WE HAVE WON THE RIGHT
TO SET UP ANTIWAR BLEACHERS
AND HOLD A RALLY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
4TH ST. & PENNSYLVANIA AVE. NW!
http://lists.iww.org/pipermail/alerts/2005-January/001354.html


4) Let's Hit the Streets
On the 32nd Anniversary of Roe v. Wade
To Defend Abortion Rights!
Saturday, January 22
* 10 am - Rally at Powell and Market Streets, San Francisco
(Powell Street BART)
* 11 am - March up Market Street, along the Embarcadero
to Aquatic Park
www.indybay.org/womyn .
Driving? Need a ride? Visit
http://drivingvotes.org/rides/sfprochoice.php
ALSO: Join the Women‚s Rights Contingent in the
San Francisco Counter-Inaugural Protest on January 20th.
Meet at 5 pm at the corner of Grove and Polk in
Civic Center Plaza.

5) PICTURES OF WAR

6) You are invited To Celebrate and claim victory on
James Yee's case and his Honorable Discharge from
the U.S. Army
Martin Luther King Jr. Birthday
JOIN THOUSANDS in the Freedom March
When: Monday, January 17, 2005
11:30 A.M. TO 12:30 p.m.
Where:J4NA members will meet at
3rd & Mission at 11:30 a.m and join the parade.
The big march will start at the San Francisco
Caltrain Station
(4th St. and Townsend St.,) proceeding to Mission Street @
Third Street, continuing to the Bill Graham
Civic Auditorium

7) ITALIAN.QUEER.DANGEROUS
a one-man show featuring Tommi Avicolli Mecca
directed by Francesca Prada, Jan. 14-19, 8:00pm,
JON SIMS CENTER
1519 Mission, Between Van Ness and 11th Sts., SF

8) Kin of Marine Who Shot Policemen Ask if He Is a Casualty of War
By DEAN E. MURPHY
CERES, Calif.
January 14, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/14/national/14marine.html?oref=login

9) War's 'hidden cost' called heavy
Billions eyed to replenish forces
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff | January 14, 2005
WASHINGTON
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/01/14/wars_hidden
_cost_called_heavy/

10) Protesters Plan to Mark Bush Inauguration
By Andy Sullivan
WASHINGTON (Reuters)
Wed Jan 12, 2005 04:06 PM ET
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=OTRG3I0BD0I3ECRBAE0CFEY?
type=domesticNews&storyID=7309119

11) US military relief operations in Asia far worse than
the tsunami
International League of Peoples' Struggle
Press Statement of the ILPS-Philippines Chapter
January 11, 2005
Postbus 1452, NL 3600 BL
Utrecht, Netherlands
Email: ilp515@runbox.com
Website http://www.ilps2001.com

12) Indonesia Defends Restrictions in Aceh
By Jeff Franks and Karima Anjani
BANDA ACEH, Indonesia (Reuters)
Thu Jan 13, 2005 07:48 AM ET
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=7316499&src=eD
ialog/GetContent§ion=news

13) U.S. High Court Gives Judges Sentencing Discretion
By James Vicini
WASHINGTON (Reuters)
Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:07 PM ET
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=7311683&src=eD
ialog/GetContent§ion=news

14) NEWS: Iraq war worth it? -- Bush: 'Oh,
absolutely' -- 57% of US: 'No'

15) Fear Stalks Baghdad
The City Where Even Police Hide Behind Masks
By ROBERT FISK
The Independent
January 12, 2005
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2005/01/1708886.php

16) URGENT Call to Action - January 22!
NARAL Pro-Choice California

17) Working Towards Peace
Forum on Israel/Palestine
Sponsored by: Mt. Diablo Peace and Justice Center
Tuesday, January 25, 2005 at 7:00 p.m.
Mt. Diablo Unitarian Universalist Church,
55 Eckley Lane, Walnut Creek
Admission: FREE!

18) "A Message from the 'Iraq Resistance.'"

19) U.S. Army Sergeant Defies Order, Refuses Re-Deployment:
2 Soldiers Attempt Suicide at 2-7 Infantry, 17 Go AWOL
By Robert S. Finnegan
http://207.44.245.159/article7659.htm

20) The Normalization of Horror:
American Gulags Become Permanent
By Ted Rall
January 11, 2004
http://www.uexpress.com/tedrall/

21) Abu Ghraib prisoners escape
Baghdad election center director killed
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Iraqi police are on the lookout for 28 Abu
Ghraib prisoners who escaped while en route to Baghdad for trial.
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/01/14/iraq/index.html

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

1) MANHATTAN: JURY DELIBERATES IN TERROR TRIAL
January 13, 2005
METRO BRIEFING
NEW YORK
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/13/nyregion/13mbrf.html
(For more information about the case go to: www.lynnestewart.org
Or call: 212-625-9696)

MANHATTAN: JURY DELIBERATES IN TERROR TRIAL
The jurors in the trial of Lynne F. Stewart, a lawyer accused of aiding
terrorism, began to deliberate yesterday [Wednesday, Jan. 12, 2005],
after the judge cautioned that they could not convict on the basis of
her political views. The decisions must be unanimous on 16 questions
concerning Ms. Stewart and two co-defendants, Ahmed Abdel Sattar
and Mohamed Yousry, who are charged with conspiring to lie to the
government and to help terrorists in Egypt. Judge John G. Koeltl,
who read 139 pages of instructions, told them that "expression of
opinion alone, even an opinion advocating violence, is not a crime
in this country." Julia Preston (NYT)

Compiled by Anthony Ramirez

Copyright 2005 The New York Times

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

2) NEXT BAUAW MEETING:
SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 11:00 a.m.
CENTRO DEL PUEBLO
474 VALENCIA STREET
(NEAR 16TH ST. IN S.F.)
HELP GET THE MILITARY OUT OF OUR SCHOOLS!
KILLING AND BEING KILLED
IS NOT A CAREER CHOICE!
BRING ALL THE TROOPS HOME NOW!
MARCH AND RALLY JANUARY 20, 5 P.M.
CIVIC CENTER, SAN FRANCISCO

Help work on a campaign to get the military off our school
campuses. The recent passing of Proposition N, to Bring our
troops home now, by a 63% majority of San Francisco voters,
mandates that the military should keep their hands off our
kids. Killing and being killed is not the career choice we
want for our kids or anyone's kids. We want them to have an
education so that they can make things better, not training
in the art of killing. We want our tax dollars to go for
schools, housing, healthcare and good jobs instead of war.

Don't forget to protest on Jan. 20th. If you can take a day
off, Join Not In Our Name's outreach campaign. We want to
hold banners near freeway on/off ramps, and in other public
locations to encourage everyone to protest in some way that
day-even if you can only wear a button on your job or honk
your horn in solidarity. For more information go to:
http://www.notinourname.net/~bayarea/

Jan. 20th is not a happy day for us. It's a day of protest!

Don't forget to show up at 5 p.m., Jan. 20, at the
Civic Center for a March and rally.

Bay Area United Against War

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

3) [Alerts] Fw: Antiwar bleachers at 4th & Pennsylvania Ave.
(north side) for Jan. 20 CounterInaugural
alerts at lists.iww.org alerts at lists.iww.org
Wed Jan 12 16:54:34 PST 2005
-----Forwarded Message-----
From: "VoteNoWar.org" < Action at VoteNoWar.org >
Sent: Jan 12, 2005 4:45 PM
WE HAVE WON THE RIGHT
TO SET UP ANTIWAR BLEACHERS
AND HOLD A RALLY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
4TH ST. & PENNSYLVANIA AVE. NW!
http://lists.iww.org/pipermail/alerts/2005-January/001354.html

*Updated Jan. 20 CounterInaugural
logistics, bus transportation and more*

Dear VoteNoWar member,

VoteNoWar members will be able to join together at antiwar
bleachers and a rally at 4th St. and Pennsylvania Ave. NW (north side)
on January 20. This is the first time in history that people have won
the right to establish antiwar bleachers along the presidential
inaugural parade route.

The National Park Service has acknowledged the right of the
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition to set up antiwar bleachers at 4th St. and
Pennsylvania Avenue NW (north side). Our movement has obtained a
permit to hold this large convergence along the Inaugural route.

George Bush - as he rides in the inaugural motorcade - will be forced
to pass a large bleacher set up filled with signs demanding "U.S. Out
of Iraq Now, End the Occupation - Bring the Troops Home Now," "End
Colonial Domination from Palestine to Haiti, and Everywhere," "Health
Care, Education, Housing, and a Job at a Living Wage Must be a Right!"
and more.

You can bring your own signs or pick up signs, banners and other
materials at this location. Any sign that is made of cardboard,
posterboard or cloth and that is no larger than 3 feet by 20 feet and
1/4 inch in thickness can be brought to the parade route.

To cover the cost of the bleachers, the sound system, stage,
transportation, printing placards and other materials, we will need to
raise $30,000 in the next few days. We can't do it without your help.
Please make a generous donation. You can make a contribution through a
secure server, where you can also find information on how to contribute
by check, by clicking here:

http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=7R-E-j-EqAi72suC2Mm5YQ..

We want to make it clear to everyone that while we have obtained
permitted space at 4th St. and Pennsylvania Ave. (north side), we are
continuing to fight the government's attempts to prohibit the general
public from gaining access to all the areas along the parade route
while reserving those areas for the exclusive use of Bush
supporters and donors. Pennsylvania Avenue is not the private
property of Corporate America and the ultra-right.

The only way to maintain our right to demonstrate along the route of
the inaugural parade is to come to Pennsylvania Avenue in large
numbers as close to 9 am - 10 am as possible on January 20.

Those organizing bus transportation, vans, car caravans, or planning
individual transportation should do everything in their power to be at
4th St. and Pennsylvania Avenue, and along the Pennsylvania Avenue
parade route, as close to 9 am - 10 am as possible.

* * * * *

Click below for UPDATED DOWNLOADABLE MAPS
of the site of the antiwar bleachers and mass rally

Color PDF http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=MUzn9TOqkEC72suC2Mm5YQ.. Black &
White PDF http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=3nyMcihbq-G72suC2Mm5YQ.. * *

FUNDS ARE URGENTLY NEEDED

Funds are urgently needed for the January 20th mobilization. If you
cannot personally attend but would like to help cover the costs of
transportation, printing banners, signs and literature you can make a
contribution through a secure server, where you can also find information
on how to contribute by check, by clicking here:

http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=RWuhIllZbmC72suC2Mm5YQ..
Click the link below to change your email preferences:
http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=51Db-MEKhTi72suC2Mm5YQ..
If the method for unsubscribing, above,
do not work for you, then write us at IWantOff at VoteNoWar.org and
we'll remove you manually.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

4) Let's Hit the Streets
On the 32nd Anniversary of Roe v. Wade
To Defend Abortion Rights!
Saturday, January 22
* 10 am - Rally at Powell & Market Streets, San Francisco
(Powell Street BART)
* 11 am - March up Market Street, along the Embarcadero
to Aquatic Park

Jan. 22 is the 32nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court
decision that established the constitutional right to reproductive freedom.
On the same day, anti-choice extremists plan to march in San Francisco
against women‚s health and rights. The anti-choice minority might be
emboldened by the climate in Washington, DC but they are not
welcome here!

Join the San Francisco Area Pro-Choice Coalition to Stand Up for
Reproductive Freedom and Demonstrate that San Francisco is PRO-CHOICE!

Sponsored by the San Francisco Area Pro-Choice Coalition. For more
information or to get involved, visit www.indybay.org/womyn www.indybay.org/womyn> .
Driving? Need a ride? Visit http://drivingvotes.org/rides/sfprochoice.php

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

5) PICTURES OF WAR

PLEASE ACCESS:
** Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches **
** http://dahrjamailiraq.com **

I have obtained the originals of the photos I recently posted which were
taken from inside Fallujah.
These are of much higher quality.

Some of the comments have been updated, and there are some additional
pictures added which I did not have before.

http://dahrjamailiraq.com/gallery/
view_album.php?set_albumName=album28&page=1

More writing, photos and commentary at http://dahrjamailiraq.com

You can visit http://dahrjamailiraq.com/email_list/ to subscribe or
unsubscribe to the email list.

(c)2004 Dahr Jamail.
All images and text are protected by United States and
international copyright law. If you would like to reprint Dahr's
Dispatches on the web, you need to include this copyright notice
and a prominent link to the DahrJamailIraq.com website. Any
other use of images and text including, but not limited to,
reproduction, use on another website, copying and printing
requires the permission of Dahr Jamail. Of course, feel free
to forward Dahr's dispatches via email.

Iraq_Dispatches mailing list
http://lists.dahrjamailiraq.com/mailman/listinfo/iraq_dispatches

http://dahrjamailiraq.com/gallery/
view_album.php?set_albumName=album28&page=1
view_album.php?set_albumName=album28&page=1>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/coalitionforfreethoughtinmedia/message/26138
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/coalitionforfreethoughtinmedia/message/26138
Virginion Pilot via AP - Photos - click here
http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=79598&ran=187050

TSUNAMI PHOTOS:
A Community Labor News E-Zine

http://homepage.mac.com/demark/tsunami/2.html

This one has a BUNCH of different sources. I liked the
CTV site and the maps on the Washington Post site.

ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/asl/guides/indian-ocean-disaster.html

Readers may email your article submissions
or your comments to ListAdmin@CLNews.org

http://www.clnews.org/MailList/subscribtion.htm
"Freedom is always and exclusively
freedom for the one who thinks differently"
--Rosa Luxemburg

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

6) You are invited To Celebrate and claim victory on
James Yee's case and his Honorable Discharge from
the U.S. Army
Martin Luther King Jr. Birthday
JOIN THOUSANDS in the Freedom March
When: Monday, January 17, 2005
11:30 A.M. TO 12:30 p.m.
Where:J4NA members will meet at
3rd & Mission at 11:30 a.m and join the parade.
The big march will start at the San Francisco
Caltrain Station
(4th St. and Townsend St.,) proceeding to Mission Street @
Third Street, continuing to the Bill Graham
Civic Auditorium

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

7) ITALIAN.QUEER.DANGEROUS
a one-man show featuring Tommi Avicolli Mecca
directed by Francesca Prada, Jan. 14-19, 8:00pm,
JON SIMS CENTER
1519 Mission, Between Van Ness and 11th Sts., SF

JANUARY 14-29 (
Friday and Saturday nights only: 14, 15; 21, 22; 28, 29)

JON SIMS CENTER, 1519 Mission/between Van Ness and 11th
8pm, $5-10 sliding scale (no one turned away)
Seating is limited, for reservations: 415-554-0402
To volunteer to help with the show, call 415-552-6031

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

8) Kin of Marine Who Shot Policemen Ask if He Is a Casualty of War
By DEAN E. MURPHY
CERES, Calif.
January 14, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/14/national/14marine.html?oref=login

CERES, Calif., Jan. 13 - A surveillance camera captured the gun battle
in this small central California farm town in terrifying detail.

A marine on weekend leave from Camp Pendleton on Sunday night
instructed a clerk in George's Liquor Store to call the police. When patrol
cars arrived, the marine pulled an assault rifle from beneath his poncho
and began firing. Both Sgt. Howard Stevenson and Officer Sam Ryno
were hit.

"He walked over to where Sergeant Stevenson laid suffering from
several gunshot wounds and shot him in the back of the head," said
Lt. Bill Heyne, the lead investigator on the case for the Stanislaus
County sheriff. "It was an execution of that officer."

The marine, Lance Cpl. Andres Raya, 19, who spent seven months
in Iraq last year as a motor transportation operator, then walked to
a muddy alley around the corner, a place where he used to pick
oranges as a student on his way to Ceres High School. He slipped
from one backyard to the next, telling some residents they were
"innocent civilians" and would not be harmed.

Before the evening ended, as police officers from across the region
responded to the shootings, more than 200 rounds had been fired,
both Sergeant Stevenson and Corporal Raya were dead, and "small
town America," as the police and fire chief here (he has to do both
jobs) called Ceres, was desperately debating whether the young
marine had deliberately gotten himself killed to escape possible
return to Iraq.

"It is going to take a great deal of work to sort out what happened,"
Lieutenant Heyne said.

Some here blame the violence on Corporal Raya's wartime experience,
which friends and relatives say was so traumatic that he cried during
his home leave at Christmas about having to report back to Camp
Pendleton. They suggest Corporal Raya, whose wish throughout high
school was to be a marine and then a Ceres firefighter, might have
invited the confrontation with the intention of erasing forever the
awful images in his head.

But others say they see a vicious criminal who authorities say had
a past association with gangs. They see drugs or alcohol as the more
likely spark of his deadly rage, and they question how he was able
to get the outlawed assault rifle used in the shooting spree.

The sharply differing viewpoints have spiked tensions between the
authorities and many Hispanic residents, some of whom have repeatedly
tried to erect a shrine to Corporal Raya on a dirt patch in the alley
where he died only to have it removed by the city. At one point, graffiti
against the police was splattered on a garage and fence in the alley.
On Wednesday night, the authorities blocked access to the alley with
barricades.

At a meeting about the killings in the high school cafeteria on Tuesday
night, some angry and tearful Hispanic residents accused the police
of ignoring their grief. One woman, Hilda Mercado, said after the
meeting that no matter the circumstances, she was proud that
Corporal Raya "died like a true Mexican: He died standing on his
feet." Others said there were rumors that Corporal Raya had been
trying to surrender, but that the police killed him anyway, something
the police dismiss as unfounded.

Law enforcement and other city officials are scheduled to meet with
some Hispanic community leaders on Friday to try to breach the
divide. The Rev. Dean McFalls, a priest and former police chaplain
in Ceres, said that the tensions were not new, but that the Corporal
Raya he knew several years ago would have disapproved of them.

"There is a general sentiment among some people against authority
and against the police," said Father McFalls, who accompanied
Corporal Raya's parents and a dozen other relatives to the police
station on Tuesday where they prayed at a memorial to Sergeant
Stevenson. "This young man in his earlier life would not have
encouraged any of this anti-police rhetoric."

Corporal Raya grew up in The Camp, a neighborhood of subsidized
housing near the high school where Mexican immigrants, including
his father, found shelter for their families while working in the nearby
fields. For many teenagers in The Camp, a job fighting in Iraq is
considered a dream ticket to somewhere better, which has made
ever more poignant the mystery about why one life from The Camp
ended so badly.

"Somewhere along the line, somebody let this young man down,
and what it did was just domino right back into our neighborhood,"
said Frankie Haney, who lives near the alley and saw some of the
shooting. "I feel the government owes us answers."

An investigation is under way at Camp Pendleton. Art de Werk, the
Ceres police chief, said military authorities were cooperating with
the police. "They have asked themselves what might have happened
that could have contributed to this man's state of mind," Chief de
Werk said. Whatever they find out, he added, "may be a reason, but
it is no excuse."

Corporal Raya's friends and family say they are also looking for
answers, but they are deeply offended by the presumption among
some in Ceres that the blame lies solely with him. In an interview
Thursday, his father, Tomas Raya, said the family was especially
saddened at the thought that he might not be given special military
honors at his funeral on Friday. "It is very painful," said Mr. Raya,
who works in a canning company. "He served his country. He loved
his country as we do."

The police said they were investigating one notion that even if
Corporal Raya had a death wish, his decision to engage in a gun
battle with police officers in his hometown was an indication that
he hoped to impress local gang members. Sergeant Stevenson, 39,
an 18-year veteran and a father of three, is the first Ceres police
officer to be killed in the line of duty. Officer Ryno, 50, a 22-year
veteran, was listed in good condition on Thursday.

"He wanted to take as many cops with him as he could," Lieutenant
Heyne said.

Lalo Madrigal, 19, a friend of Corporal Raya since they were small
children, said the authorities were trying to smear his friend by
raising the possibility of gang involvement. He said that Corporal
Raya was not a gang member but a "proud Mexican" and that most
young people in Ceres had friends in gangs.

"He shouldn't be known as a cop killer," he said. "No one is saying
glorify what he did, but it should be understood. The best way to
look at it was he was a casualty of war."

Though Corporal Raya had no adult criminal record, Mr. Madrigal
said the marine had sparred with the police as recently as October
when several officers stopped him near Ceres High School during
a home leave, and Corporal Raya insisted the officers show him
"more respect" now that he was a marine.

It was about the same time, friends and relatives said, that
Corporal Raya began acting strangely. A cousin, Rebeca Raya,
said he visited her in Texas in October and was unable even to
order food in a restaurant without viewing the waiter fearfully.
After they went to see the Michael Moore film "Fahrenheit 9/11,"
Ms. Raya said, her cousin told her: "That is only some of it. There
are worse things to it."

Ms. Raya said she was so disturbed by his behavior that she called
one of her sisters in California. "I said, 'He is just not right,' "
Ms. Raya recalled. "I grew up with him. He wasn't the same person."

The police said Corporal Raya had several brushes with the law
as a juvenile, but those records are sealed. Officials at the Marine
recruitment station in neighboring Modesto, where Corporal Raya
enlisted in July 2003, said that it had taken him about eight months
to pass a qualifying exam but that a background check had raised
no red flags.

Representative Dennis Cardoza, a Democrat who represents the
area and who was briefed by the authorities before attending
a candlelight vigil for Sergeant Stevenson on Wednesday night,
said he was convinced that Corporal Raya was not "a poor
soldier who has post-traumatic syndrome."

He said, "We have to be very careful in this case not to make
this out to be something that it isn't."

On Thursday, family members gathered at the home of one of
Corporal Raya's relatives in a subdivision that a few years ago was
planted with strawberries. Final preparations were under way for the
funeral. A poem the young man wrote in eighth grade with the
refrain, "I am a person with fears and desires," was faxed to
the funeral home.

"I pretend I can never die.

I feel my heart beating when I am scared.

I touch the clouds in my dreams.

I worry how will I die."

Copyright 2005 The New York Times

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

9) War's 'hidden cost' called heavy
Billions eyed to replenish forces
By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff | January 14, 2005
WASHINGTON
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/01/14/wars_hidden
_cost_called_heavy/

WASHINGTON -- A forthcoming request for additional funds to
continue waging war in Iraq will not begin to address the "hidden
cost" of the conflict, according to Pentagon officials and other
government authorities who say that tens of billions of dollars more
will eventually be needed to repair or replace heavily used equipment
and to compensate for the wear and tear on members of the armed
services.

The Pentagon next month plans to ask Congress for up to
$100 billion in supplemental funds to pay for the ongoing combat
in Iraq and Afghanistan, bringing the total budgeted so far to well
over $200 billion. But military officers say the administration's
estimates do not include the investment that will be necessary to
fix what they say they fear is becoming a broken ground force.

"We're going to be paying for this war for years to come," Representative
Martin T. Meehan, a Lowell Democrat and member of the House
Armed Services Committee, said by telephone yesterday from the
Middle East, where he has been touring US military bases in Iraq.
"We are not preparing for much of the cost."

If the war were to end today, according to a preliminary estimate
by the Congressional Budget Office that was described by officials
who have been briefed on it, the Army would still need at least
$20 billion more than budgeted over the next three years just to
be at the same level of preparedness as before the war.

All four branches of the military recently completed a "stress study"
ordered a year ago by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to
determine the impact the war is having on equipment. "What they
found was an amazing toll on combat vehicles, generators, just
about everything," said a defense analyst involved in the study.
"At some point it doesn't make sense to overhaul the equipment,
you have to replace it."

The forthcoming Iraq supplemental request is expected to include
several billion dollars to replace lost and damaged equipment and
pay for maintenance in Pentagon equipment depots, according to
a Pentagon official who spoke on condition that he not be identified.
However, that money will largely cover current expenses, not the
long-term costs specialists say will burden the federal budget for
years to come.

The Army and Marine Corps, and a growing number of National
Guard and Reserve units, are burning through trucks and armored
vehicles at rates between five and 10 times the peacetime average,
according to a confidential briefing prepared by budget analysts
and Army officials.

As a result, tanks, trucks, aircraft, and other equipment are aging
much more quickly than anticipated. By some estimates, up to 40
percent of certain classes of ground equipment will have to be
overhauled or replaced.

Yet the Bush administration's current practice of only asking Congress
for money to cover the operating costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan
wars does not account for the need to fund readiness for future
missions.

"We have to account for the overall cost of this war -- not just the
public cost, but the hidden cost," Meehan said.

The stress on Army equipment, and growing concerns about the
impact of the Iraq war on military readiness, has led to calls from
members of Congress to immediately begin increasing the size of
the Army and Marine Corps.

Led by Senator John F. Kerry, who called for adding 40,000 ground
troops to the ranks during his failed presidential bid last year, 21
Democratic senators sent a letter to President Bush yesterday urging
him to set aside money in the fiscal 2006 defense budget -- also
headed to Congress for review in February -- to increase the Army
and Marine Corps.

"The United States military is too small for the missions it faces," the
lawmakers wrote. "Simply put, success in modern war requires
sufficient boots on the ground. With nearly 150,000 troops and
Marines in Iraq, nearly 20,000 in Afghanistan, and tens of thousands
more in Korea and elsewhere, we are left to conclude that the American
military is too small, not simply for the challenges we face today,
but also as an appropriate hedge against future dangers."

Concerns that the Iraq war will ultimately cost billions more than
estimated before the end of the decade stem from the grinding
toll the conflict is taking on the US military machine -- ground
forces in particular.

Already the Iraq operation has uncovered funding shortages in the
Army that will have to be met with funds not included in the
supplemental spending packages. An estimate by the Army, which
was obtained by the Globe, paints an even bleaker picture than
did the Congressional Budget Office analysis. The Army briefing
estimates that in fiscal years 2005, 2006, and 2007, more than
$35 billion could be needed to pay for backlogged equipment
maintenance, battle losses, and to replace dwindling stocks
prepositioned in the Persian Gulf.

"The cost of the war will continue for a decade," said Brett Lambert,
a defense budget specialist at Defense Forecasters International,
a Washington consulting firm. "The roughly $500 billion we spend
annually on defense is just the retainer. On top of that you have the
supplementals, but they pay mostly for operations and maintenance,"
or what is needed in the short term to keep the war going.

Steve Kosiak, a defense budget analyst at the Center for Strategic
and Budgetary Assessments in Washington, believes that equipment
costs as a result of the Iraq war will not be as great as some others
predict, noting that much of the equipment being overused would
have to be replaced anyway because it has already been in service
for several decades.

Nevertheless, he said, "the supplemental was designed to replace
equipment directly destroyed in combat or damaged. It hasn't paid
for replacing equipment because of the wear and tear."

Such hidden equipment costs now being estimated will even be larger
when financial packages to keep soldiers in the ranks and attract new
recruits, disability and death benefits, and other healthcare costs are
factored in, specialists said. "That is a cost burden that continues
for generations," said Lambert.

Bryan Bender can be reached at bender@globe.com.
(c)Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

10) Protesters Plan to Mark Bush Inauguration
By Andy Sullivan
WASHINGTON (Reuters)
Wed Jan 12, 2005 04:06 PM ET
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=OTRG3I0BD0I3ECRBAE0CFEY?
type=domesticNews&storyID=7309119

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Protesters will march through Washington,
stage a "die in" across from the White House and turn their backs on
President Bush's limousine during his inaugural celebration next week,
organizers said on Wednesday.

As U.S. authorities prepared unprecedented security for the Jan. 20
event, organizers said thousands of protesters will stage a noisy
counterpoint to the lavish $40 million celebration.

One group of anti-war activists said it would carry 1,000 coffins to
the White House and stage a "die in" to protest the lives lost in Iraq.

Another group said it had obtained a permit to protest along a
200-foot (60-meter) section of the parade route but planned to sue
for more access to the large sections of Pennsylvania Avenue set
aside for Bush supporters.

"The Bush administration, in conjunction with the National Park
Service, is trying to stage-manage democracy," said Mara
Verheyden-Hilliard, a lawyer for the anti-war group
International ANSWER.

A spokeswoman for the U.S. Secret Service, which is overseeing
security for the event, declined immediate comment.

U.S. authorities plan to involve thousands of police, troops and
bomb-sniffing dogs in the first inaugural event since the
Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. Spectators will pass through metal
detectors before attending any inaugural events or watching
the parade from the street.

Organizers said the protests were to express opposition to
a range of Bush policies, from the war in Iraq to economic
programs.

"We're facing a right-wing future that has no sympathy for
the concerns of black people and the poor in this country,"
said Shazza Nzingha, founder of the National Alliance of Black
Panthers.

One organization called Turn Your Back on Bush wants people
to stake out spots along the parade route and turn their backs
on Bush's limousine when it rolls by.

"There are a lot of people who feel Bush has turned his
back on them," said field director Sarah Kauffman, who said she
is expecting busloads of participants from across the country.

In a separate event, black-clad anarchists will wave
puppets and beat drums to protest capitalism and organized
government, said Lila Kaye of Anarchist Resistance.

Bush's inauguration plans have also drawn protest from the
District of Columbia government, which says its security costs
for the event should not come out of its Homeland Security
budget.

"We the people of Washington, D.C., rejected Bush by over
90 percent (in the last election)," said Washington resident
Nancy Shia. "Maybe this is our punishment."

(c) Reuters 2005

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

11) US military relief operations in Asia far worse than
the tsunami
International League of Peoples' Struggle
Press Statement of the ILPS-Philippines Chapter
January 11, 2005
Postbus 1452, NL 3600 BL
Utrecht, Netherlands
Email: ilp515@runbox.com
Website http://www.ilps2001.com

The ILPS Philippines Chapter condemns the US for making political
capital out of the catastrophic tsunami which engulfed a wide swath
of Asia, including some parts of Africa, and killed 160,000 people.

The ILPS Philippines Chapter denounces the crass opportunism
expressed by US State Secretary Colin Powell when he said that the
US military relief and aid that it is giving Aceh "should change the
battered image of the US" around the globe after its arrogant
disregard of international public opinion against the invasion of
Iraq. He likewise boasted that this aid is a manifestation of US
"generosity" and "American values in action".

Instead of sending skilled civilians, the US seized the opportunity
to send an array of US warships, planes, helicopters, and more than
13,000 US military personnel purportedly to help Indonesia, Thailand,
and Sri Lanka, countries most affected by the December 26 disaster.
The USS Abraham Lincoln, an aircraft carrier with 6,000 sailors on
board, is currently stationed about 28 kms or 15 nautical miles off
Aceh while a fleet of Sea Hawk helicopters from same carrier has
been flying food, water, and medical supplies in said region where
there is an armed rebellion against the Indonesian government.
One thousand and five hundred US troops, meanwhile, are deployed
in Sri Lanka where there is also an armed rebellion waged by the
Tamil Tigers which is fighting for self-determination.

US forces are also using Thailand's Vietnam era air base of Utapao
as an airlift hub for the so-called "humanitarian" mission,
strengthening potential US military logistical support through
Southeast Asia. Conducting the largest operation in Asia since
the Vietnam War, the US military said that its forces could remain
in the region for up to six months. Six months can always be
extended of course until it becomes permanent.

It is well known that strengthening US military presence in
Southeast Asia is a major element in the neocons' imperialist
project of Pax Americana in the 21st century that presupposes
US imperialism's unchallenged global hegemony.
Given US imperialism's proven record of economic plunder
and destructive wars, the US military deployment augurs
a calamity far worse than the tsunami that devastated
these Asian countries. ###

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

12) Indonesia Defends Restrictions in Aceh
By Jeff Franks and Karima Anjani
BANDA ACEH, Indonesia (Reuters)
Thu Jan 13, 2005 07:48 AM ET
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=7316499&src=eD
ialog/GetContent§ion=news

BANDA ACEH, Indonesia (Reuters) - Indonesia said on Thursday
restrictions on aid workers in Aceh were for their own safety in a
province troubled by a decades-old insurgency, and voiced
readiness to sit down with the rebels to seek a cease-fire.

As aid agencies and Indonesian government officials put the
limitations into effect, palpable signs emerged that the
devastated region was beginning to pull itself together after
the Dec. 26 earthquake and tsunami.

In a grim sign of progress, Aceh Vice Governor Azwar
Abubakar said that by Thursday relief workers had buried 75,500
bodies from the disaster.

More markets opened in the provincial capital, Banda Aceh,
where excavators cleared debris and rubble and more bodies from
the streets. But public transport was scarce, making it
difficult for people to begin rebuilding their lives.

Fishermen in the Sri Lankan coastal town of Beruwela cast
their nets for the first time since the tsunami, saying they
had previously been too afraid to go down to the sea shore.

In Banda Aceh, officials said about 80 foreigners working
for aid groups and media companies had already sought the
official approval needed to work beyond the provincial capital
and the other main city, Meulaboh.

"If someone is shot from a United Nations agency, the whole
United Nations agency will withdraw," chief social welfare
minister and Aceh chief administrator Alwi Shihab told
reporters.

"Who will be responsible if a foreigner is kidnapped? The
responsible party is us."

Asked if the restrictions would hamper the aid effort as
the United Nations feared, Information Minister Sofyan Djalil
said: "I don't think so."

Djalil said these were security measures and should not be
regarded "from a political point of view."

"It's related to the fact that the situation on the ground
is not normal," Djalil told Reuters. "We're simply trying to
give a maximum protection for the workers, and for that they
need restrictions."

Jakarta has long been edgy about a foreign presence in
Aceh, where separatists have fought the army for three decades
for a homeland on Sumatra island's northern tip.

The disaster has raised the possibility of reconciliation
between the government and the Free Aceh Movement (GAM).

CEASE-FIRE POSSIBILITY

The chief administrator said Indonesia was willing to sit
down with the rebels to seek a cease-fire.

"This is the moment of reconciliation. This is the moment
of establishing peaceful Aceh and prosperous Aceh ... If they
want to have a cease-fire, reconciliation, we're open to any
reconciliation term," Alwi Shihab told reporters in Banda Aceh.

The comments followed an offer by GAM leaders to stop the
fighting to facilitate the international aid effort.

Both sides have called repeatedly for a cease-fire since
the calamity that killed at least 110,000 Indonesians, almost
all of them in Aceh, but there have been few signs that the
rhetoric is translating into action.

Of the 158,000 killed across Asia by the disaster, more
than 100,000 were in Aceh. More than 30,000 died in Sri Lanka,
15,000 in India and 5,300 in Thailand.

In Berlin, Indonesian Foreign Minister Hassan Wirajuda told
a news conference that he welcomed the presence of foreign
troops helping relief efforts.

"You can rest assured that we welcome even ... foreign
troops. Their presence is based on our request," said Wirajuda.

On Wednesday, the Indonesian government said all foreign
troops should leave the country by the end of March.

WELCOME DEBT RELIEF

Australia, the United States, Singapore, Malaysia, Germany,
China, Spain, Pakistan, Japan and Switzerland all have forces
aiding the relief efforts in Aceh.

Indonesia welcomed an agreement by Western governments for
an interim freeze of debts owed by Indian Ocean countries
devastated by the tsunami, but Sri Lanka said it did not go far
enough.

The 19 members of the Paris Club of sovereign creditors
agreed to an initial three-month debt moratorium while the
World Bank and the International Monetary Fund assess the cost
of recovery.

The Paris Club made it clear that debt relief could then be
extended.

"The length of the moratorium has not been decided, but if
we can have it for one year, that's good," Indonesia's chief
economics minister, Aburizal Bakrie, told reporters.

Jakarta owes $48 billion to Paris Club creditors and is due
to pay them $4.5 billion in principal and interest this year.

Sri Lanka, which has multilateral and bilateral debt
amounting to $8.82 billion, was less enthusiastic. Colombo had
hoped for at least a two-year freeze and still hoped for
outright debt forgiveness, presidential spokesman Harim Peiris
said.

"We recognize this is an interim measure and, after the
assessments, further decisions on debt moratoriums or whatever
may be taken," he said. "Debt forgiveness, a step beyond a
moratorium, is certainly one that would be very welcome."

The Asian Development Bank said nearly two million people
could fall into poverty as a result of the tsunami.

The ADB's report said one million people could fall below
the poverty line in Indonesia alone, mostly in Aceh.

The number of poor in India could rise by 645,000, and by
250,000 in Sri Lanka, the ADB report found.

The global response to the disaster has been unprecedented.
Governments have promised $5.5 billion in aid, with individuals
and corporations pledging at least $2 billion more.

Puerto Rican singer Ricky Martin landed on Thailand's
Phuket island on Thursday with two film crews and an entourage
filling four vans to find out what his foundation could do to help.

"It's all about the most vulnerable, the children of
Phuket," Martin said. "It's all about learning and seeing which
ways I can help."

(c) Reuters 2005

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

13) U.S. High Court Gives Judges Sentencing Discretion
By James Vicini
WASHINGTON (Reuters)
Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:07 PM ET
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=7311683&src=eD
ialog/GetContent§ion=news

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In a major criminal law decision, a
closely divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that
federal judges no longer must follow the long-criticized
sentencing guidelines in effect since 1987.

The 5-4 ruling was a defeat for the U.S. Justice
Department, which had defended as constitutional the federal
sentencing guidelines that apply to more than 60,000 criminal
defendants each year.

Thousands of cases nationwide have been on hold awaiting a
high court ruling. The decision, which makes the guidelines
advisory instead of mandatory, was seen as the most important
criminal law decision of the court's term.

Legal experts said it would have broad impact. Craig
Margolis, a former federal prosecutor who now practices law in
Washington, D.C., said tens of thousands of imprisoned
defendants will seek to be resentenced and federal courts will
have to decide if the ruling applied to them.

The court reaffirmed the principle in its ruling in June,
striking down a similar state law that any facts necessary to
support a longer sentence must be admitted by the defendant or
proven to the jury.

In the court's main opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer said
federal judges are no longer required to apply the guidelines,
and only can consider them, along with certain other sentencing
criteria, in deciding a defendant's punishment.

The guidelines, long criticized by criminal justice reform
advocates for imposing overly harsh sentences on a mandatory
basis, set rules for judges to calculate punishment and attempt
to reduce wide disparities in sentences for the same crime.

Even some judges have criticized the guidelines for taking
away their sentencing flexibility. The guidelines say which
factors can lead to a lighter sentence and which ones can
result in a longer sentence. The experts said the ruling will
shift power back to judges.

BREYER: UP TO CONGRESS TO ACT

Breyer said the U.S. Congress could act next. "Ours, of
course, is not the last word: The ball now lies in Congress'
court."

Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican and the
Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, vowed to "thoroughly
review the ... decision and work to establish a sentencing
method that will be appropriately tough on career criminals,
fair, and consistent with constitutional requirements."

But Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the committee's ranking
Democrat, said, "Congress should resist the urge to rush in
with quick fixes that would only generate more uncertainty and
litigation and do nothing to protect public safety."

Critics of the guidelines welcomed the ruling and said
Congress should now reform the sentencing laws.

"Congress must not react with a 'quick fix' and miss the
chance to solve a lingering and serious national problem. They
need to get it right this time," said Barry Scheck, president
of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Breyer said the court removed two provisions that make the
guidelines mandatory and that provide standards for appellate
review. The new standard would be whether the sentence was
"reasonable," he said.

Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day
O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined Breyer
in the opinion.

The dissenters complained about making the guidelines
advisory and warned it will result in a return to sentencing
disparities. Justice Antonin Scalia said the ruling will "wreak
havoc" in the courts for the indefinite future.

Assistant Attorney General Christopher Wray told reporters
the Justice Department was disappointed in the decision. "In
the wake of this ruling, judges have greater discretion," he
said. "Greater discretion tends to mean greater disparity."

(c) Reuters 2005

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

14) NEWS: Iraq war worth it? -- Bush: 'Oh,
absolutely' -- 57% of US: 'No'

[A pre-inauguration interview of George W. Bush conducted by Barbara Walters
will be broadcast Friday at 10:00 p.m. -- In it, the president answered
with
two words a question about whether the war was worth it despite the
non-existence of the WMDs that were its chief rhetorical justification:
"Oh,
absolutely." -- The majority of the U.S. public disagrees. -- A
*Washington Post*-ABC News poll (http://www.ufppc.org/content/view/1960/)
conducted Dec. 16-17 showed that 57% of U.S. adults disagree. -- Here's
how
the results broke down: Question: All in all, considering the costs to the
United States versus the benefits to the United States, do you think the war
with Iraq was worth fighting, or not? -- Answer #1: "No, not worth
fighting, STRONGLY": 47% (Male 45% - Female 48% - White 43% - Black 64% -
Democrats 71% - Republicans 12% - Independents 48% - High School or less 49%
-
Some College 43% - College Graduate 45% - 18-30 47% - 31-44 47% - 45-60 42%
-
61+ 51% - East 57% - Midwest 41% - South 42% - West 50%). -- Answer #2:
"No, not worth fighting, SOMEWHAT": 10% (Male 9% - Female 10% - White 10% -
Black 8% - Democrats 11% - Republicans 7% - Independents 11% - High School
or
less 10% - Some College 9% - College Graduate 10% - 18-30 12% - 31-44 12% -
45-60 6% - 61+ 8% - East 13% - Midwest 17% - South 10% - West 8%). --
Answer
#3: "Yes, worth fighting, STRONGLY": 31% (Male 34% - Female 28% - White
35%
- Black 10% - Democrats 10% - Republicans 65% - Independents 27% - High
School
or less 28% - Some College 34% - College Graduate 34% - 18-30 26% - 31-44
32%
- 45-60 36% - 61+ 31% - East 25% - Midwest 29% - South 37% - West 29%) --
Answer #4: "Yes, worth fighting, SOMEWHAT": 11% (Male 10% - Female 12% -
White 10% - Black 17% - Democrats 8% - Republicans 13% - Independents 12% -
High School or less 11% - Some College 13% - College Graduate 10% - 18-30
12%
- 31-44 8% - 45-60 15% - 61+ 8% - East 10% - Midwest 13% - South 10% - West
11%) -- Answer #5: "DonÂ’t know/Undecided": 2% (Male 2% - Female 2% -
White
2% - Black 1% - Democrats 0% - Republicans 3% - Independents 2% - High
School
or less 2% - Some College 1% - College Graduate 1% - 18-30 3% - 31-44 1% -
45-60 1% - 61+ 2% - East 5% - Midwest 0% - South 1% - West 2%). --Mark]

http://www.ufppc.org/content/view/2072/

ABC News Home

20/20

BUSH: IRAQ INVASION WORTH IT DESPITE NO TRACE OF WMD

** President Bush Speaks with Barbara Walters **

ABC News
January 12, 2005

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Inauguration/story?id=406639&page=1

The invasion of Iraq, which ousted Saddam Hussein and has cost the lives of
some 1,300 U.S. military personnel and billions of dollars, was "absolutely"
worth it, despite the absence of any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq,
President Bush told ABC News' Barbara Walters in an exclusive interview that
will air this Friday.

Watch Barbara Walters' full interview with President Bush this Friday at 10
p.m. on "20/20."

The White House acknowledged today that there is no longer an active search
for Iraqi weapons. The final report from chief U.S. weapons inspector
Charles
Duelfer, due out next month, has concluded that "the former regime had no
formal written strategy or plan for the revival of WMD."

The Bush administration does not hold out hopes that any weapons will ever
be
found.

Duelfer's predecessor David Kay reached the same conclusion a year ago.
"It's
taken them another year, and in fact we were right a year ago. There were
no
weapons there," Kay said in response to Duelfer's announcement.

Bush told Walters, "I felt like we'd find weapons of mass destruction --
like
many here in the United States, many around the world. The United Nations
thought he had weapons of mass destruction. So, therefore: one, we need to
find out what went wrong in the intelligence gathering. . . . Saddam was
dangerous and the world is safer without him in power."

When asked if the war was worth it even if there were no weapons of mass
destruction in Iraq, Bush responded, "Oh, absolutely."

Saddam insisted he had no weapons of mass destruction, and U.N. inspectors
failed to uncover them. But the Bush administration was adamant that Saddam
was deceiving the international community. The administration justified its
decision to wage war on Iraq largely on its contention that Iraq possessed
weapons of mass destruction.

Kay estimates that more than $1 billion and countless man hours were spent
looking for weapons.

Today House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said, "Now that the
search is finished, President Bush needs to explain to the American people
why
he was so wrong."

The 1,700-member Iraq Survey Group, a U.S. team responsible for the weapons
search, is now tasked with what commanders had long wanted them to do --
gather intelligence about the real threat now in Iraq: the insurgents.


UNITED FOR PEACE & JUSTICE | 212-868-5545

This email list is designed for posting news articles or event
announcements of interest to UFPJ member groups.
It is not a discussion list.

To engage in online discussion of UFPJ matters, join our
discussion list by sending a blank email to
ufpj-disc-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ufpj-news/

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

15) Fear Stalks Baghdad
The City Where Even Police Hide Behind Masks
By ROBERT FISK
The Independent
January 12, 2005
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2005/01/1708886.php

Journalism yields a world of clichés but here, for once, the first
cliché that comes to mind is true. Baghdad is a city of fear. Fearful
Iraqis, fearful militiamen, fearful American soldiers, fearful
journalists.

That day upon which the blessings of democracy will shower upon us, 30
January, is approaching with all the certainty and speed of doomsday.
The latest Zarqawi video shows the killing of six Iraqi policemen. Each
is shot in the back of the head, one by one. A survivor plays dead. Then
a gunman walks up behind him and blows his head apart with bullets.
These images haunt everyone.

At the al-Hurriya intersection yesterday morning, four truckloads of
Iraqi national guardsmen--the future saviours of Iraq, according to
George Bush--are passing my car. Their rifles are porcupine quills,
pointing at every motorist, every Iraqi on the pavement, the Iraqi army
pointing their weapons at their own people. And they are all wearing
masks--black hoods or ski-masks or keffiyahs that leave only slits for
frightened eyes. Just before it collapsed finally into the hands of the
insurgents last summer, I saw exactly the same scene in the streets of
Mahmoudiya, south of Baghdad. Now I am watching them in the capital.

At Kamal Jumblatt Square beside the Tigris, two American Humvees
approach the roundabout. Their machine-gunners are shouting at drivers
to keep away from them. A big sign in Arabic on the rear of each vehicle
says: "Forbidden. Do not overtake this convoy. Stay 50 metres away from
it."

The drivers behind obey; they know the meaning of the "deadly force"
which the Americans have written on to their checkpoint signs. But the
two Humvees drive into a massive traffic jam, the gunners now screaming
at us to move back.

When a taxi which does not notice that US troops block their path, the
American in the lead vehicle hurls a plastic bottle full of water on to
its roof and the driver mounts the grass traffic circle. A truck
receives the same treatment from the lead Humvee. "Go back," shouts the
rear gunner, staring at us through shades. We try desperately to turn
into the jam.

Yes, the Russians would probably have chucked hand grenades in Kabul.
But here were the terrified "liberators" of Baghdad throwing bottles of
water at the Iraqis who are supposed to enjoy an American-imposed
democracy on 30 January.

The rear Humvee has "Specialist Carrol" written on the windscreen.
Specialist Carrol, I am sure, regards every damn one of us as a
potential suicide bomber--and I can't blame him. One such bomber had
just driven up to the police station in Tikrit, north of Baghdad, and
destroyed himself and the lives of at least six policemen.

Round the corner, I discover the reason for the jam: Iraqi cops are
fighting off hundreds of motorists desperate for petrol, the drivers
refusing to queue any longer for the one thing which Iraq possesses in
Croesus-like amounts--petrol.

I drop by the Ramaya restaurant for lunch. Closed. They are building a
20-floor security wall around the premises. So I drive to the Rif for a
pizza, occasionally tinkling the restaurant's piano while I watch the
entrance for people I don't want to see. The waiters are nervous. They
are happy to bring my pizza in 10 minutes. There is no one else in the
restaurant, you see, and they watch the road outside like friendly
rabbits. They are waiting for The Car.

I call on an old Iraqi friend who used to publish a literary magazine
during Saddam's reign. "They want me to vote, but they can't protect
me," he says. "Maybe there will be no suicide bomber at the polling
station. But I will be watched. And what if I get a hand-grenade in my
home three days' later? The Americans will say they did their best;
Allawi's people will say I am a 'martyr for democracy'. So, do you think
I'm going to vote?"

At Mustansiriya University--one of Iraq's best--students of English
literature are to face their end-of-term exam. January marks the end of
the Iraqi semester. But one of the students tells me that his fellow
students had told their teacher that--so fraught are the times--they
were not yet prepared for the examination. Rather than giving them all
zeros, the teacher meekly postpones the exam.

I drive back through the al-Hurriya intersection beside the "Green Zone"
and suddenly there is a big black 4x4, filled with ski-masked gunmen.
"Get back!" they scream at every motorist as they try to cut across the
median. I roll the window down. The rear door of the 4x4 whacks open. A
ski-masked Westerner--blond hair, blue eyes--is pointing a Kalashnikov
at my car. "Get back!" he shrieks in ghastly Arabic. Then he clears the
median, followed by three armoured pick-ups, windows blacked, tyres
skidding on the road surface, carrying the sacred Westerners inside to
the dubious safety of the "Green Zone", the hermetically-sealed compound
from which Iraq is supposedly governed. I glance at the Iraqi press.
Colin Powell is warning of "civil war" in Iraq. Why do we Westerners
keep threatening civil war in a country whose society is tribal rather
than sectarian? Of all papers, it is the Kurdish Al Takhri, loyal to
Mustafa Barzani, which asks the same question. "There has never been a
civil war in Iraq," the editorial thunders. And it is right.

So, "full ahead both" for the dreaded 30 January elections and
democracy. The American generals--with a unique mixture of mendacity and
hope amid the insurgency--are now saying that only four of Iraq's 18
provinces may not be able to "fully" participate in the elections.

Good news. Until you sit down with the population statistics and
realise--as the generals all know--that those four provinces contain
more than half of the population of Iraq.

Robert Fisk is a reporter for The Independent and author of Pity the
Nation. He is also a contributor to CounterPunch's hot new book, The
Politics of Anti-Semitism.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

16) URGENT Call to Action - January 22!
NARAL Pro-Choice California

You've been asking for more ways to get involved. You know we have
another four years of fighting to protect and defend our fundamental
freedoms against any attacks by the Bush Administration - and you
are a critical part of that fight. Now you have an opportunity to hit
the streets to show your support for women's choices, health, and
reproductive freedom.


Rally in support of reproductive freedom with NARAL Pro-Choice
California and the San Francisco Area Pro-Choice Coalition on the
32nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade. Anti-choice extremists are going
to march in San Francisco on Saturday, January 22, and we need to
show them that their anti-choice, anti-woman agenda is NOT
welcome in our pro-choice city!


Saturday, January 22
10:00 am Rally at Powell and Market Streets
11:00 am March along the Embarcadero to Aquatic Park


For more information visit www.prochoiceca.org or to volunteer,
email Nicole at NYelich@prochoiceamerica.org.


Need transportation? Let us know!
We want as many people as possible to stand with us on this
important day - if you're already driving or if you need a ride,
visit the Driving Votes website to post on the ride board and
connect with others traveling to San Francisco on that day!


Spread the word!
Click here to tell your friends about this important call to
action-and help us make this demonstration of our
pro-choice values a BIG success!


We look forward to standing with you on January 22.


Sincerely,
Amy, Lauren, and Nicole
NARAL Pro-Choice California Staff

Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.
Tell-a-friend!

If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up
for NARAL Pro-Choice America's Choice Action Network.

If you would like to unsubscribe from NARAL Pro-Choice
America's Choice Action Network or update your account
settings, please click here.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

17) Working Towards Peace
Forum on Israel/Palestine
Sponsored by: Mt. Diablo Peace and Justice Center
Tuesday, January 25, 2005 at 7:00 p.m.
Mt. Diablo Unitarian Universalist Church,
55 Eckley Lane, Walnut Creek
Admission: FREE!

Speakers:
AMIR TERKEL,
Israeli Defense Force Veteran/Reservist turned Refusenik
HANAN RASHEED,
Palestinian-American peace and reconciliation activist

Learn more about the historical/political
context of the conflict, current conditions
in the Occupied Territories, the human
effects of the Occupation on both the
Occupied and the Occupier, and what
steps can be taken toward a just and
peaceful resolution of the conflict.

Mt. Diablo Peace and Justice Center,
55 Eckley Lane, Walnut Creek, CA * 925-933-7850

PLEASE FORWARD TO INTERESTED PARTIES...

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

18) "A Message from the 'Iraq Resistance.'"

Reuters obtained from Iraqi guerrillas "an English-language video
urging U.S. troops to lay down their weapons and seek refuge in
mosques and homes" (Michael Georgy, "Iraq Rebels in Video Taunt,"
January 12, 2005 ), promising protection to soldiers who heed their call.
The Information Clearing House has made the video and a transcript
of its content available: "A Message from the 'Iraq Resistance.'"
http://montages.blogspot.com/2005/01/video-message-from-iraqi-resistance.htm
l

The messenger's delivery is clear and effective, and the tone is
very confident. And the message is politically sophisticated:
Know that by helping the Iraqi people you are helping yourselves,
for tomorrow may bring the same destruction to you.

In helping the Iraqi people does not mean dealing for the Americans
for a few contracts here and there. You must continue to isolate
their strategy.

This conflict is no longer considered a localized war. Nor can the
world remain hostage to the never-ending and regenerated fear
that the American people suffer from in general.

We will pin them here in Iraq to drain their resources, manpower,
and their will to fight. We will make them spend as much as they
steal, if not more.

We will disrupt, then halt the flow of our stolen oil, thus, rendering
their plans useless. ( "A Message from the 'Iraq Resistance'" )
They value the contribution of anti-war movements abroad and
ask us to "form a world wide front against war and sanctions":
We thank all those, including those of Britain and the U.S., who
took to the streets in protest against this war and against Globalism.
We also thank France, Germany and other states for their position,
which least to say are considered wise and balanced, till now.

Today, we call on you again.

We do not require arms or fighters, for we have plenty.

We ask you to form a world wide front against war and sanctions.
A front that is governed by the wise and knowing. A front that will
bring reform and order. New institutions that would replace the
now corrupt.

Stop using the U.S. dollar, use the Euro or a basket of currencies.
Reduce or halt your consumption of British and U.S. products.
Put an end to Zionism before it ends the world. Educate those
in doubt of the true nature of this conflict and do not believe
their media for their casualties are far higher than they admit.
( "A Message from the 'Iraq Resistance'" )
The message is said to come from "the media platoon of the
Islamic Jihad Army" and dated December 10, 2004.

If all Iraqi resistance fighters can unite behind a message like
this one and stick to it in deed as well as rhetoric, it will be
a political body blow against not only the George W. Bush
administration but liberal imperialists who, like Lakshmi Chaudhry
(Senior Editor of AlterNet ), claim to speak for the so-called "silent
majority" of Iraqis and urge "our European counterparts to reverse
their resistance and demand that their governments send troops
to join a multinational force in Iraq" (as Tom Hayden paraphrases
their position in his surprisingly sharp critical response
[ January 13, 2005 ] to Chaudhry's article "Rethinking Iraq"
[ January 6, 2005 ]). At least, the video message gives us hope
that we may see an emergence of a national liberation front in
Iraq sooner than many of us thought we would.
#posted by Yoshie : 7:39 PM : :0 blogger comments :comments(0)

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

19) U.S. Army Sergeant Defies Order, Refuses Re-Deployment:
2 Soldiers Attempt Suicide at 2-7 Infantry, 17 Go AWOL
By Robert S. Finnegan
http://207.44.245.159/article7659.htm

(courtesy of Information Clearing House)

01/11/05 -- On Friday, January 7, 2005 Sergeant Kevin Benderman,
stationed with the 2-7 Infantry Battalion at Ft. Stewart Georgia,
refused an order from the Command Sergeant Major of his unit Samuel
Coston to deploy to Iraq and requested a General Courts-Martial.

Benderman, 40 is a combat veteran, having served one tour in Iraq in
2003 during which a Captain in his command ordered soldiers from
Benderman's outfit to fire on children throwing rocks at unit
personnel. Having personally witnessed this and other illegal acts by
military personnel during his tour, Benderman now says that under no
circumstances will he participate further in the war in Iraq, a war
Secretary General of the United Nations Kofi Annan has labeled
"illegal".

Benderman has applied for Conscientious Objector status. His
commanders have not yet acted on his request, as required by Army
regulations.

In further developments this weekend, it has been confirmed that
Specialist J.R. Burt and Specialist David Beals, also of 2-7 attempted
suicide rather than deploy to Iraq, and an additional seventeen
soldiers in 2-7 Infantry Battalion have gone AWOL for the same reason.
Army sources who have been granted anonymity because they feared
retaliation stated that both Burt and Beals are being harassed and
mistreated on the Psychiatric Ward of Winn Army Hospital by unit
commanders and a civilian, Dr. Capp who in apparent violation of state
law is reported as informing them of the harsh punishments they may
expect should they refuse deployment. In addition, SFC Johnson, 2-7
platoon sergeant for Spec. Beals reportedly told him recently ".when I
get you to Iraq, I'm going to get you killed," in the presence of
several witnesses who say this incident was a catalyst in Beals'
attempted suicide.

Winn Army Hospital Public Affairs Officer Laurie Kemp refused to even
confirm that the two Specialists had been admitted to the hospital.

The 2-7 Chaplain, Captain Matt Temple in a letter addressed to
Benderman today stated that: "It is unfortunate that you have chosen
the course of action you have taken. You should have had the moral
fortitude to deploy with us and see me here in Kuwait to begin your CO
application. To expect me to complete an interview with you within 48
hours of a major deployment was unreasonable and quite inconsiderate of
my own time. I would have gladly helped you once we got here. As an NCO
in the US ARMY, I expected a greater display of maturity from you.
Furthermore, for you to have media personnel contacting me at my
personal email address without first acquiring my permission was very
unprofessional of you. You should be ashamed of the way you have
conducted yourself. I certainly am ashamed of you. I hope you will see
your misconduct as an opportunity to upgrade your character and moral
behavior for your own good and the good of your fellowman." Benderman
said the letter disgusted him, stating "Nothing in my career as a
professional soldier has prepared me to respond to something like that
letter from the Chaplain."

Benderman's congressional representative, Congresswoman Cynthia
McKinney has written a letter to his Battalion Commander Lt. Col. Todd
Wood expressing her concern for Benderman's rights and suggesting that
Wood designate him as non-deployable to Iraq.

Support for Sergeant Benderman has been overwhelming, says his wife,
Monica. "We are being swamped for interview requests by the media," she
said on Monday.

Benderman has also garnered the support of an American icon and war
hero, Colonel James "Bo" Gritz, USA (Ret.), who profiled Benderman for
three days running on his radio show "Freedom Call". Gritz has labeled
previous charges by the Army in connection with Benderman's refusal to
deploy and statements to the press "ridiculous," and savaging the
officers of 2-7, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and President Bush
on the air while calling Benderman "a hero" and his immediate superiors
"weenies." Colonel Gritz is one of the most decorated soldiers in U.S.
Army history, having led the only raid on a prisoner of war camp during
the Vietnam War at Son Tay, North Vietnam.

On Monday afternoon, Benderman says he is still in the dark as to what
the Army plans for him. "I have learned nothing from anyone in my chain
of command informing me on the disposition of my case, despite my
attempts to communicate with them. Perhaps tomorrow," he said.

Telephone calls to 2-7 Public Affairs Officer Lt.Col. Kent and the
Pentagon requesting comment on Benderman, Burt, Beals and the
additional 2-7 AWOL cases were unanswered by press time.

Southeast Asia News Managing Editor Robert S. Finnegan is an
internationally published investigative reporter and former Marine
Corps Non-Commissioned Officer. Working most recently as a Senior
Editor and lead investigator on the Bali Bombings for The Jakarta Post,
he may be reached at seanews1@yahoo.com.

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with
the originator of this article nor is Information Clearing House
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)


€ To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
govtwatch4-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

20) The Normalization of Horror:
American Gulags Become Permanent
By Ted Rall
January 11, 2004
http://www.uexpress.com/tedrall/

New York--A new documentary, "Hitler's Hit Parade," runs 76 minutes without
narration. Comprised entirely of archival footage, the film prompts its
reviewers to remark upon Hannah Arendt's famous observation about the
banality of evil. German troops subjugated Europe and shoved millions of
people into ovens; German civilians went to the movies, attended concerts,
and gossiped about their neighbors. People lived mundane, normal lives while
their government carried out unspeakable monstrosities.

Sound familiar?

As Congress prepared to rubberstamp the nomination of torture aficionado
Alberto Gonzales as the nation's chief prosecutor, the Washington Post broke
news that would have torn a saner nation apart. The Bush Administration, the
paper reported January 2, is no longer planning to keep hundreds of Muslim
prisoners currently rotting away in U.S. concentration camps at Guantánamo,
Abu Ghraib and Bagram merely "indefinitely." The Defense Department and CIA
are now planning "a more permanent approach for potentially lifetime
detentions" for these innocents.

We're locking them up forever. Without due process.

Before gangsters like Alberto Gonzales seduced us into abandoning our
values, a person was considered innocent before being proven guilty. Now
we're locking people away because "the government does not have enough
evidence to charge [them] in courts." And everyone, including Democrats, is
OK with this.

Untold thousands of people are being held without charges, tortured and
occasionally murdered in the system of gulags hastily strung together by the
CIA, FBI, INS and Pentagon. According to the government itself, only a few
dozen are former Al Qaeda officials. Most of these postmodern misérables
were farmers, truck drivers, grunt militiamen and political enemies sold
into bondage by Afghan warlords and similarly trustworthy souls for cash
bounties on a no questions asked basis. We know they have no ties to
terrorism, but they've already spent years getting beaten up. Releasing them
would serve as a tacit admission that we were wrong to describe them as--in
Dick Cheney's words--"the worst of the worst." They would sue our
government, and eventually win. Worst of all, they have unpleasant tales to
tell about systemic sodomy and countless other forms of horrific
taxpayer-funded abuse. We can never let them out.

Bush plans to divide U.S. concentration camp victims into two groups. One
set of "lifers" will end up in U.S.-run stalags like Gitmo's new Camp 6,
built to hold 200 "detainees who are unlikely to ever go through a military
tribunal for lack of evidence, according to defense officials." But not to
worry: Camp 6 would "allow socializing among inmates."

Others captured in the "war on terrorism" will be outsourced "to third
countries willing to hold them indefinitely and without proceedings" in
foreign-run gulags that pledge to make victims available for torture by
American interrogators. This practice, some claim, is "an effective method
of disrupting terrorist cells and persuading detainees to reveal
information."

"The threat of sending someone to one of these countries [where they are
likely to be tortured] is very important," said Rohan Gunaratna, author of
"Inside Al Qaeda: Global Network of Terror."

But the so-called "ticking time bomb" rationale for torture is patently
fallacious. We've heard the scenario repeatedly: wouldn't it be worth
torturing someone who knew the location of a nuclear bomb that was
about to destroy Manhattan? The short answer, to a moral person,
is obviously no.

Moreover, its logic is ludicrous.

Suppose we had captured Osama bin Laden on 9/10 and immediately
gone to work on him with our Alberto Gonzales-approved
psychotropic drugs and our AlbertoGonzales-approved "waterboard"
dunking technique. It wouldn't take long forOsama's pals to notice that
he'd failed to show up at the Terrorcave. They'd
assume that we had him and were torturing him. They'd assume
that he'd tell us everything he knew. So they'd delay 9/11 to 10/11
or 11/12 or 9/11/02. Or
go to Plan B. Or develop a Plan C. No one in an underground organization,
not even its top leader, is indispensable. Arrests are inconvenient, not
debilitating.

The information a person possesses at the moment of his capture
ages like a ripe cheese in hot sun. Even if what he told you at the
beginning was true, anything you'd get out of him days and weeks
and months and years later would be completely worthless.

Wait a minute.

Look at what we're talking about. Consider the breezy way we
Americans--Americans!--are debating the pros and cons of torture.
Marvel at our moral bankruptcy. The liberal argument against torture
used to be that it was wrong. Now it's that it doesn't work.

So.

Read any good books lately?

Marxism mailing list
Marxism@lists.econ.utah.edu
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

21) Abu Ghraib prisoners escape
Baghdad election center director killed
BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Iraqi police are on the lookout for 28 Abu
Ghraib prisoners who escaped while en route to Baghdad for trial.
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/01/14/iraq/index.html

The detainees, which included several Arabs from other countries, were
traveling aboard a bus from the prison to the courthouse late Thursday,
according to a police official.

But due to a shortage of handcuffs, several had their hands bound with
rope and were able to loosen the knots before overpowering police and
security guards in the western Baghdad neighborhood of Sa'alam.

Iraqi police found handcuffs and rope scattered in the streets.

One prisoner managed to seize an officer's AK-47 and critically wounded
him with it.

Four guards and the bus driver were severely beaten.

All 38 detainees escaped, but multinational and Iraqi forces were able to
capture 10 of them shortly afterward.

The mass escape comes as violence batters Iraq in the run-up to election
day.

Three Kurdish Peshmerga fighters died Thursday while fighting alongside
Iraqi national guard forces against insurgents in the northern Iraqi city
of Mosul, according to a Kurdish Democratic Party official.

The incident happened around 7 p.m. (11 a.m. ET) in Mosul's southwest
district of al-Zira'i.

The Kurdish Democratic Party, led by Massoud Barzani, is one of two
main factions of Iraq's Kurdish minority.

The U.S. military had no comment and said they are investigating the
incident.

Two U.S. Marines were killed in action Thursday "while conducting
security and stability operations" in Iraq's vast al-Anbar province,
according to a military release.

The Marines were assigned to the I Marine Expeditionary Force. The
military, citing security risks, released no other details.

Also Thursday, a 1st Infantry Division soldier died near the northern
Iraqi city of Mosul in a non-combat-related death, which is still under
investigation, according to the 1st ID.

With the deaths, 1,364 U.S. troops have died in Operation Iraqi
Freedom. Of those, 1,076 were killed in combat.

On Thursday morning, around ten gunmen opened fire on a minibus
in central Baghdad -- killing all six Iraqis on board -- before abducting
a Turkish businessman waiting for the bus outside a hotel, according
to police.

The deputy chief of mission for the Turkish Embassy in Baghdad,
Aydin Selcen, identified the kidnap victim as Abdulkadir Tanrikulu,
a crane operator working for a Turkish construction firm in Baghdad.

Later, a car bomb outside a Shia mosque in the town of Khan Bani
Saad, south of Baquba, killed four Iraqi policemen and three civilians.
The blast also wounded 30 other people.

Meanwhile, gunmen killed the director of a Baghdad election center
Thursday, another in a series of attacks targeting election officials
and candidates as the vote set for January 30 approaches.

Baghdad police, who reported the slaying, did not release the director's
name. He was in charge of an election center in the al-Khadoumiyah
neighborhood in the northern part of Baghdad.

Insurgents also made an apparent assassination attempt on Iraqi
presidential candidate Mithal al-Alousi, the second bid in two weeks.

Al-Alousi, who supports normal relations between Iraq and Israel,
was attacked Tuesday at midnight in western Baghdad.

On Wednesday, a representative for prominent Shiite cleric Ali
al-Sistani was shot to death in Salman Pak, east of Baghdad. The
representative's son and four bodyguards were also shot, police said.

Al-Sistani is Iraq's most influential Shiite leader and strongly
supports the general elections. ( Full story )

Group explains boycott

In a separate election-related development, an organization claiming
about 3 million Iraqi tribesmen as members said it expects many of
them to follow its lead and boycott the elections.

The organization said it was withdrawing from the elections because
of security and fairness concerns.

The Patriotic Front of Iraqi Tribes comprises Sunni and Shiite Muslims
as well as Turkmen and Kurds, according to the group's spokesman,
Ibrahim Al-Nahar.

The majority are Sunni, he said. The group announced Wednesday
it will withdraw from the elections.

Formed in April 2004, the group appears on the election list as the
Patriotic Front of the Unity of Iraq, as the country's election
commission refused to allow them to register with the word "tribes"
in the name, Al-Nahar said Thursday.

It could not be confirmed how many candidates representing the
group are on the ballot.

The organization initially submitted 275 names for the ballot,
Al-Nahar said.

The group's main goal is to have a united, democratic Iraq,
Al-Nahar said. While it is opposed to the presence of occupying
troops, it believes in legal, not armed, resistance, he said.

The tribal system and allegiances remain important to Iraqis,
Al-Nahar said, and many tribesmen are expected to follow them
as far as political and social decisions.

Quick reaction forces

A U.S. commander overseeing security in north-central Iraq said
Iraqi forces will lead security efforts there on election day and U.S.
troops will lend support.

Maj. Gen. John R.S. Batiste, commander of the 1st Infantry Division,
said quick-reaction forces will be on hand to "stomp on the insurgent
when he raises his ugly head."

And despite some problems in certain provinces, "the bottom line is,
north-central Iraq is ready for elections," Batiste said.

Under no circumstances should the election be delayed, Iraqi national
security adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie told CNN on Thursday.

"This will send ... the whole country into absolute chaos," he said.
"We will be in a deep constitutional crisis, because the transitional
administrative law did not make any permission or allowance [for
an election delay]."

Al-Rubaie acknowledged that Iraq's security situation "is not
100 percent."

"There are still some trouble pockets here and there, especially in
the [Sunni] triangle," he said. "But I feel and I believe the overall
security situation in the country will allow us to carry a fair and free
election."

The White House said Iraqis' interest in the elections is strong.

"In survey after survey, the Iraqi people say, 'We want to choose our
leaders,'" White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters
in Washington.

CNN's Dana Bash, Elise Labott, Nermeen al-Mufti, Barbara Starr,
Mohammed Tawfeeq, Ayman Mohyeldin and Jennifer Yuille contributed
to this report.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*


BAUAW NEWSLETTER-WEDNESDAY, JAN. 12, 2005

Breaking News on Lynne Stewart Case:
From: PatLevasseurP@aol.com
www.lynnestewart.org
212-625-9696

The jury began deliberating around 2 p.m. today. After today they
can deliberate as late as they want and on Friday if they choose to.
Lynne would like people to come by if they can and wait with the
defense during deliberations. The jury may have questions or ask
for read back of testimony. So if you are in New York and even have
an hour or so to go to the courtroom please do. As soon as a verdict
is announced I will get the word out. Pat

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

NEXT BAUAW MEETING:

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 11:00 a.m.
CENTRO DEL PUEBLO
474 VALENCIA STREET
(NEAR 16TH ST. IN S.F.)

HELP GET THE MILITARY OUT OF OUR SCHOOLS!
KILLING AND BEING KILLED IS NOT A CAREER CHOICE!

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

1) STOP THE WAR ON IRAQ! BRING OUR TROOPS HOME NOW!
ALL OUT JANUARY 20TH, 5:00 P.M., CIVIC CENTER, S.F.
Washington, D.C.:
Converge at 4th St. & Pennsylvania Ave.
on the north side of the parade route

2) Let's Hit the Streets
On the 32nd Anniversary of Roe v. Wade
To Defend Abortion Rights!
Saturday, January 22
10 am Rally at Powell & Market Streets, San Francisco
11 am March to the Embarcadero
www.indybay.org/womyn .
Driving? Need a ride? Visit http://drivingvotes.org/rides/sfprochoice.php
ALSO: Join the Women‚s Rights Contingent in the San Francisco
Counter-Inaugural Protest on January 20th. Meet at 5 pm at the
corner of Grove and Polk in Civic Center Plaza.

3) PICTURES OF WAR

4) ITALIAN.QUEER.DANGEROUS
a one-man show featuring Tommi Avicolli Mecca
directed by Francesca Prada, Jan. 14-19, 8:00pm,
JON SIMS CENTER
1519 Mission, Between Van Ness and 11th Sts., SF

5) You are invited To Celebrate and claim victory on
James Yee's case and his Honorable Discharge from the U.S. Army
Martin Luther King Jr. Birthday
JOIN THOUSANDS in the Freedom March
When: Monday, January 17, 2005
11:30 A.M. TO 12:30 p.m.
Where:J4NA members will meet at
3rd & Mission at 11:30 a.m and join the parade.
The big march will start at the San Francisco Caltrain Station
(4th St. and Townsend St.,) proceeding to Mission Street @
Third Street, continuing to the Bill Graham Civic Auditorium

6) Health Care? Ask Cuba
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
OP-ED COLUMNIST
January 12, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/12/opinion/12kris.html?oref=login&hp

7) A High Level of Alert for the Inauguration
"This is the most visible manifestation of our democracy,"
Mr. Ridge said, adding, "So there's very little intelligence,
but we're as vigilant as ever."
By DAVID JOHNSTON and MICHAEL JANOFSKY
January 12, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/12/politics/12security.html

8) What the First Lady Will Wear
"She has gone from being just folks to being a bit
imperial, assuming a bit more of a queenly role,"
By RUTH LA FERLA
January 11, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/11/fashion/11DRES.html

9) Is Al Qaeda Just a Bush Boogeyman?
By Robert Scheer
January 11, 2005
http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/011305Z.shtml
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-scheer11jan11,0,4938608
,print.column

10) U.S. MULLS STRIKES ON SYRIA
By Richard Sale
United Press International
January 12, 2005
http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20050111-105709-6329r.htm

11) URGENT: Mumia Hearing Cancelled,
Stay Tuned for Update on Action of Feb.11th!
Ona MOVE!
In a message dated 1/11/05 6:57:34 PM, icffmaj@aol.com writes:

12) 1000 Days of Hell
After three years' incarceration, Guantanamo Britons are
set to be freed
By Robert Verkaik, Legal Affairs Correspondent
12 January 2005
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/story.jsp?story=599984

13) January 20: Inauguration Day
Not Our President! Not in Our Name!

14) Should a Defender of Immigrants and Critic of
the Patriot Act be silenced?
A tribute to Manlin Chee, a local and national hero
Who is Manlin Chee?

15) BOEING SCANDAL PART OF DEEPER PENTAGON CORRUPTION
By David Phinney
From: "CorpWatch"
Date: Thu,6 Jan 2005 20:54:38 -0800 (PST)
List-Id:
List-Subscribe:

List-Owner:
List-Archive:

16) GLOBAL DAY OF PROTEST ON THE TWO-YEAR
ANNIVERSARY OF THE IRAQ WAR
SATURDAY, MARCH 19:
ACTION ALERT * UNITED FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE
* End the War * Bring the Troops Home Now
* Rebuild Our Communities *
http://www.unitedforpeace.org | 212-868-5545

17) JANUARY 20, 2005 COUNTER INAUGURAL EVENT
THE COST OF WAR - THE PRICE WE'RE ALL PAYING
JOIN US AS WE STATE THE FACTS
AND OFFER ALTERNATIVES
WHERE: The Foundry United Methodist Church
1500 16TH Street, NW and P Street
(near DuPont Circle), Washington, D.C.
WHEN: 10:00 AM – 11:30 PM


---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

1) STOP THE WAR ON IRAQ! BRING OUR TROOPS HOME NOW!
ALL OUT JANUARY 20TH, 5:00 P.M., CIVIC CENTER, S.F.
Washington, D.C.:
Converge at 4th St. & Pennsylvania Ave.
on the north side of the parade route

A permit has been obtained for a mass convergence at 4th St. and
Pennsylvania Ave. along the north side of the parade route. You can
bring your own signs or pick up signs, banners and other materials
at this location. Any sign that is made of cardboard, posterboard
or cloth and that is no larger than 3 feet by 20 feet and 1/4 inch in
thickness can be brought to the parade route. We will provide
additional logistical information in the coming days.

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

2) Let's Hit the Streets
On the 32nd Anniversary of Roe v. Wade
To Defend Abortion Rights!
Saturday, January 22
10 am Rally at Powell & Market Streets, San Francisco
11 am March to the Embarcadero

Jan. 22 is the 32nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court
decision that established the constitutional right to reproductive freedom.
On the same day, anti-choice extremists plan to march in San Francisco
against women‚s health and rights. The anti-choice minority might be
emboldened by the climate in Washington, DC but they are not
welcome here!

Join the San Francisco Area Pro-Choice Coalition to Stand Up for
Reproductive Freedom and Demonstrate that San Francisco is PRO-CHOICE!

Sponsored by the San Francisco Area Pro-Choice Coalition. For more
information or to get involved, visit www.indybay.org/womyn www.indybay.org/womyn> .
Driving? Need a ride? Visit http://drivingvotes.org/rides/sfprochoice.php

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

3) PICTURES OF WAR

PLEASE ACCESS:
** Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches **
** http://dahrjamailiraq.com **

I have obtained the originals of the photos I recently posted which were
taken from inside Fallujah.
These are of much higher quality.

Some of the comments have been updated, and there are some additional
pictures added which I did not have before.

http://dahrjamailiraq.com/gallery/
view_album.php?set_albumName=album28&page=1

More writing, photos and commentary at http://dahrjamailiraq.com

You can visit http://dahrjamailiraq.com/email_list/ to subscribe or
unsubscribe to the email list.

(c)2004 Dahr Jamail.
All images and text are protected by United States and
international copyright law. If you would like to reprint Dahr's
Dispatches on the web, you need to include this copyright notice
and a prominent link to the DahrJamailIraq.com website. Any
other use of images and text including, but not limited to,
reproduction, use on another website, copying and printing
requires the permission of Dahr Jamail. Of course, feel free
to forward Dahr's dispatches via email.

Iraq_Dispatches mailing list
http://lists.dahrjamailiraq.com/mailman/listinfo/iraq_dispatches

http://dahrjamailiraq.com/gallery/
view_album.php?set_albumName=album28&page=1
view_album.php?set_albumName=album28&page=1>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/coalitionforfreethoughtinmedia/message/26138
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/coalitionforfreethoughtinmedia/message/26138
Virginion Pilot via AP - Photos - click here
http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=79598&ran=187050

TSUNAMI PHOTOS:
A Community Labor News E-Zine

http://homepage.mac.com/demark/tsunami/2.html

This one has a BUNCH of different sources. I liked the
CTV site and the maps on the Washington Post site.

ublib.buffalo.edu/libraries/asl/guides/indian-ocean-disaster.html

Readers may email your article submissions
or your comments to ListAdmin@CLNews.org

http://www.clnews.org/MailList/subscribtion.htm
"Freedom is always and exclusively
freedom for the one who thinks differently"
--Rosa Luxemburg

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

4) ITALIAN.QUEER.DANGEROUS
a one-man show featuring Tommi Avicolli Mecca
directed by Francesca Prada, Jan. 14-19, 8:00pm,
JON SIMS CENTER
1519 Mission, Between Van Ness and 11th Sts., SF

JANUARY 14-29 (
Friday and Saturday nights only: 14, 15; 21, 22; 28, 29)

JON SIMS CENTER, 1519 Mission/between Van Ness and 11th
8pm, $5-10 sliding scale (no one turned away)
Seating is limited, for reservations: 415-554-0402
To volunteer to help with the show, call 415-552-6031

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

5) You are invited to Celebrate and claim victory on
James Yee's case and his Honorable Discharge from the U.S. Army
Martin Luther King Jr. Birthday
JOIN THOUSANDS in the Freedom March
When: Monday, January 17, 2005
11:30 A.M. TO 12:30 p.m.
Where:J4NA members will meet at
3rd & Mission at 11:30 a.m and join the parade.
The big march will start at the San Francisco Caltrain Station
(4th St. and Townsend St., )proceeding to Mission Street
@ Third Street, continuing to the Bill Graham Civic Auditorium
BART FREEDOM TRAINS
For free flash passes go to the transportation page
or
call (510) 268-3777
We encourage you to take home made signs to celebrate honorable
discharge of Chaplain James Yee

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

6) Health Care? Ask Cuba
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
OP-ED COLUMNIST
January 12, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/12/opinion/12kris.html?oref=login&hp

Here's a wrenching fact: If the U.S. had an infant mortality rate as good
as Cuba's, we would save an additional 2,212 American babies a year.

Yes, Cuba's. Babies are less likely to survive in America, with a health
care system that we think is the best in the world, than in impoverished
and autocratic Cuba. According to the latest C.I.A. World Factbook,
Cuba is one of 41 countries that have better infant mortality rates
than the U.S.

Even more troubling, the rate in the U.S. has worsened recently.

In every year since 1958, America's infant mortality rate improved,
or at least held steady. But in 2002, it got worse: 7 babies died for
each thousand live births, while that rate was 6.8 deaths the year before.

Those numbers, buried in a recent report from the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, didn't get much attention. But
they are part of a pattern of recent statistics dribbling out of the
federal government suggesting that for those on the bottom in
America, life in our new Gilded Age is getting crueler.

"America's children are at greater risk than they've been in for at
least a decade," said Dr. Irwin Redlener, associate dean at the
Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University and
president of the Children's Health Fund. "The rising rate of infant
mortality is an early warning that we're headed in the wrong
direction, with no relief in sight."

It's too early to know just what to make of the increase in infant
mortality in 2002 for American babies. Reliable data for 2003 and
2004 are not out yet. Sandy Smith of the Centers for Disease
Control says that the statisticians are pretty sure there was not
a further deterioration in 2003, but that it's too soon to know
whether there was an improvement or just a leveling off at the
higher rate.

Singapore has the best infant mortality rate in the world: 2.3 babies
die before the age of 1 for every 1,000 live births. Sweden, Japan
and Iceland all have a rate that is less than half of ours.

If we had a rate as good as Singapore's, we would save 18,900 babies
each year. Or to put it another way, our policy failures in Iraq may
be killing Americans at a rate of about 800 a year, but our health
care failures at home are resulting in incomparably more
deaths - of infants. And their mothers, because women are
70 percent more likely to die in childbirth in America than in Europe.

Of course, deaths in maternity wards occur one by one, and
don't generate the national attention, grief and alarm of an
explosion in Falluja or a tsunami in Sri Lanka. But they are far
more frequent: every day, on average, 77 babies die in the U.S.
and one woman dies in childbirth.

Bolstering public health isn't as dramatic as spending $300 million
for a single F/A-22 Raptor fighter jet, but it can be a far more
efficient way of protecting Americans.

For example, during World War II, the employment boom meant
that many poor Americans enjoyed regular health care for the
first time. So even though 405,000 Americans died in the war,
life expectancy in the U.S. actually increased between 1940 and
1945, rising three years for whites and five years for blacks.

True, infant mortality and many other American health problems
are largely intertwined with poverty, and experience suggests that
neither the left nor the right has easy solutions for intractable
poverty. But some of the steps the government is now taking or
talking about - like cutting back further on entitlements,
particularly those giving children access to health care - would
aggravate the situation. Last year, a study by the Institute of
Medicine, a branch of the National Academy of Sciences, estimated
that the lack of health insurance coverage causes
18,000 unnecessary deaths a year.

As readers know, I complain regularly about the Chinese government's
brutality in imprisoning dissidents, Christians and, lately, Zhao Yan,
a New York Times colleague in Beijing. Yet for all their ruthlessness,
China's dictators have managed to drive down the infant mortality
rate in Beijing to 4.6 per thousand; in contrast, New York City's
rate is 6.5.

We should celebrate this freedom that we enjoy in America - by
complaining about and working to address pockets of poverty and
failures in our health care system. It's simply unacceptable that the
average baby is less likely to survive in the U.S. than in Beijing
or Havana.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times


---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

7) A High Level of Alert for the Inauguration
"This is the most visible manifestation of our democracy,"
Mr. Ridge said, adding, "So there's very little intelligence,
but we're as vigilant as ever."
By DAVID JOHNSTON and MICHAEL JANOFSKY
January 12, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/12/politics/12security.html

WASHINGTON, Jan. 11 - Tom Ridge, the homeland security secretary,
said Tuesday that even in the absence of any specific security threat
to next week's presidential inauguration, civilian and military forces
had been ordered to an extraordinarily high state of alert.

"You can well imagine that the security for this occasion will be
unprecedented," Mr. Ridge said at a news conference. "Protective
measures will be seen. There will be quite a few that are not seen.
Our goal is that any attempt on the part of anyone or any group to
disrupt the inaugural will be repelled by multiple layers of security."

In his first detailed outline of inauguration security planning,
Mr. Ridge said that more than 6,000 civilian and military personnel
trained in crisis response, crowd control and dignitary security
would be in place, with thousands more available to respond if
necessary.

At the heart of the plan are tightly controlled security zones that
will restrict pedestrian and vehicle access to the streets around
the Capitol, where Mr. Bush will be sworn in, and over the route
of the traditional parade along Pennsylvania Avenue to the White
House.

Before the inauguration events, security teams will sweep through
hotels and office buildings along the parade route, in some cases
barring office workers from sitting near windows overlooking the
procession.

Even now, security teams are working to ensure the safety of food
that will be served to President Bush and other guests at inaugural
events. Caterers are being instructed to arrive for work at 7 p.m.
the night before the inauguration.

For next Thursday's swearing-in ceremonies, sniper teams will
be in position on rooftops. Specialists in chemical, biological
and radiological terrorism will mingle with the crowds, carrying
hand-held detection devices designed to pick up any sign of
unconventional weapons. Squads of plainclothes agents, with
federal prosecutors among them, will move along the parade
route scouting for potential problems. Armed Coast Guard
boats will patrol the Potomac River.

Security will be tighter than at recent high-profile events like
last year's political conventions.

"Our system of government is rooted in the sovereign principle
of democratic authority bestowed by the people," Mr. Ridge
said. "And the people, both the inauguration participants and
city residents, are resolved to go forward with an event that
so deeply reflects that ideal."

Mr. Ridge said that the security for the inauguration would
cost millions of dollars but that he did not know the total
amount

Costs have created at least one conflict between the federal
government and the District of Columbia. The city is underwriting
about $17.3 million of the cost, and Washington officials are
not happy about it.

Mayor Anthony A. Williams has asked Mr. Ridge and Joshua B. Bolten,
director of the Office of Management and Budget, why the city
should cover security costs out of federal grants that are otherwise
used for everyday needs, like protecting buildings, bridges,
subways and waterways, as well as for emergencies and events
like the funeral of President Ronald Reagan last year.

City officials say this is the first time that the federal government
has not promised to cover all of the district's inauguration expenses,
leaving open the possibility that district taxpayers might have to pay.

"We're delighted to be part of this; it's a great honor," said Gregory
McCarthy, Mr. Williams's deputy chief of staff. "But we shouldn't
be raided for something as predictable as this."

Asked about the issue, Mr. Ridge said that city governments of
Boston and New York had agreed to spend federal security money
to cover costs associated with protecting last year's political
conventions in their cities.

Even as Mr. Ridge emphasized the urgency of preventive steps,
several senior security officials said in private that planning for
security at inaugurations seemed to be growing beyond the
precautions that could be justified based on the threat level.

They also said that security planning for the inauguration was
a well-rehearsed responsibility involving agencies whose roles
were well known from past inaugurations.

"There's not much about this that we haven't done before,"
a senior law enforcement official said.

In part, the officials said, the extraordinary security arrangements
at this year's swearing-in, parade and related events represent
a chance for the nearly 50 federal agencies involved to show
newly bought exotic equipment, specially trained antiterror
units and communications networks put into place after the
September 2001 attacks.

The military will play a more visible role in this inauguration,
with 2,500 troops involved in security, said Maj. Gen. Galen
B. Jackman, commander of the Joint Task Force-Armed Forces
Inaugural Committee, which coordinates military operations
for the inauguration.

"We believe we are ready to deter any type of attack," General
Jackman said before Mr. Ridge's news conference.

The general wore camouflage gear as he spoke with reporters
in front a group of battle-dressed soldiers who carried
automatic weapons.

The security plan for the inauguration is based on a system
of overlapping zones. Vehicular traffic will be restricted from
an outer zone about six blocks from inauguration sites.
Pedestrians will be screened at 22 checkpoints set up around
an inner zone perimeter about two blocks from event locations.
An even more restrictive area in the vicinity of the swearing-in
and the parade bleachers will be closed to anyone without
a ticket or an invitation.

In a break with past inauguration parades, protest groups are
being assigned specific areas for their demonstrations in
a way that protest organizers say will enable law enforcement
agencies to exert tighter control over them.

Access to the presidential entourage itself will be limited to
people who have been subjected to fingerprinting and criminal
background checks.

Security is under the control of the Secret Service, which will
manage the event from a central command center, known as
the Joint Field Office, in a Virginia suburb. A number of federal
agencies will open operations centers in a network being
coordinated through 13 subcommittees, each with
responsibilities ranging from the processing of drunken
revelers to a nuclear attack.

Not everything is working smoothly, officials said. At one
training exercise this week intended to test the complex
communications network that links federal, state and local
agencies, personnel were handed a 10-page phone directory
of agencies listed only by acronym. The directory was so confusing
- even to emergency workers - that officials ordered a new phone
book with the names of agencies written out in full.

Mr. Ridge said that the nation's color-coded alert level would not
be raised for the inauguration. The alert level is at yellow, for
a heightened but not imminent threat.

"This is the most visible manifestation of our democracy,"
Mr. Ridge said, adding, "So there's very little intelligence,
but we're as vigilant as ever."

Mr. Ridge has said that several factors may help explain
the absence of threats, among them efforts by the United
States and its allies to disrupt terrorist networks overseas
and initiatives by the government to reduce the nation's
vulnerability to attack.

Some intelligence officials have offered other reasons for the
fewer reports of threats, including the possibility that planning
for an attack might be going on undetected or that extremists
might be turning their attention to other objectives like
interfering with Iraqi elections scheduled this month.

Copyright 2005 The New York Times

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

8) What the First Lady Will Wear
"She has gone from being just folks to being a bit
imperial, assuming a bit more of a queenly role,"
By RUTH LA FERLA
January 11, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/11/fashion/11DRES.html

Laura Bush has made her choice. Ending weeks of speculation
on Seventh Avenue about what she would wear on Inauguration
Day, Jan. 20, Mrs. Bush said Monday that Oscar de la Renta would
design her inaugural ball gown, a dress that for a time at least
will be the most scrutinized in the country.

The silver-blue tulle gown, embroidered with bugle beads and
outlined in Austrian crystals, is the stately if conventional
centerpiece in a wardrobe Mrs. Bush will wear during four
days of festivities in Washington, including 10 balls,
candlelight dinners, a parade and fireworks.

In addition to Mr. de la Renta, a longtime couturier to the
fashionable elite, designers for Mrs. Bush's wardrobe include
Carolina Herrera, who fills a similar niche, and Peggy Jennings,
a little-known designer who has been quietly wardrobing
Mrs. Bush from her apartment at the Waldorf Towers in
Manhattan for two years.

The president's daughters, Jenna and Barbara, will be
dressed by Badgley Mischka, Lela Rose, Derek Lam and
Mr. de la Renta for the inaugural festivities.

The first lady's wardrobe is sure to be studied for clues
about her evolving personal style and even for hints about
the overall tone of the White House in the next four years.
"The first lady is certainly a reflection as to the man holding
the office," Mr. de la Renta said. He was reluctant to ascribe
special significance to Mrs. Bush's sartorial choices, which
are more glamorous than anything the White House has
seen since the Reagan years.

But another observer, Catherine Allgor, a historian of first
lady style, suggested that in anointing Mr. de la Renta and
Mrs. Herrera, mainstays of taste among wealthy women,
Mrs. Bush appears to be displaying a growing awareness
that "her power is entrenched." "She has gone from being
just folks to being a bit imperial, assuming a bit more of
a queenly role," said Ms. Allgor, the author of "Parlor Politics:
In Which the Ladies of Washington Help Build a City and
a Government" (University Press of Virginia, 2002).

Mrs. Bush, who during her husband's first term sometimes
professed an aversion to fashion, preferring straight-fitting,
neutral and matronly suits that concealed her shape, has
reversed herself. She has embraced Seventh Avenue to the
point of visiting Mr. de la Renta and Mrs. Herrera in their
design showrooms - a departure from White House tradition.

Bush watchers point out that Mr. de la Renta and
Mrs. Herrera are light years in sophistication from the image
Mrs. Bush conceived four years ago by employing Michael
Faircloth, a little-known Texas designer, to make her scarlet
lace gown for the inauguration.

The dress was much deprecated by style-watchers. Since
then, Mrs. Bush has projected a more feminine, worldly
image, and she seems more conscious of her role as
a symbol of state. "Mrs. Bush has very successfully created
a strong iconography for herself," said Hamish Bowles, an
editor of Vogue who was curator of an exhibition on the
style of Jacqueline Kennedy in the White House for the
Metropolitan Museum of Art in 2001. "She is less provincial,
more urbane, but still on the safe side," he said, adding
that her image is "calculated not to frighten the horses."

There is nothing intimidating about Mr. de la Renta's
ice-blue ball gown. To judge from the sketches released
by the White House on Monday, it has a reassuringly
familiar look, reminiscent in spirit and in silhouette of
the gowns James Galanos designed for Nancy Reagan
in the 1980's.

Since 2001, Mrs. Bush's fashion sense has ripened with
nudges from her daughters and design world friends.
She appeared with President Bush to claim victory in the
election in November dressed in a pale pink suit by
Ms. Jennings that discreetly showed off her figure,
slimmed down to a size 6, the designer said over the
weekend. Ms. Jennings has designed a rose-colored
hand-beaded lace gown that Mrs. Bush will wear to
candlelight dinners on Jan. 19.

In addition, she will wear a raspberry-colored striped
silk shirtdress by Mrs. Herrera to the Texas State
Society's black tie and boots ball on Jan. 19. Mrs. Bush
will pay for all of her dresses, said Gordon Johndroe,
her press secretary.

In Vogue this month, the first lady is photographed
modeling a streamlined Herrera suit and a deep blue
silk shirtwaist gown by Mr. de la Renta, accessorized
with amber beads that match her hair, which was clipped
for a youthfully breezy look by Sally Hershberger, who
shears the heads of the Hollywood elite.

Through Mr. Johndroe, Mrs. Bush acknowledged that she
is increasingly taking style cues from her 22-year-old twin
daughters, who have been dressed by New York arbiters of
hip like Zac Posen and Narciso Rodriguez. "Mrs. Bush has
really enjoyed working with some of the designers Barbara
and Jenna favor," Mr. Johndroe said.

The glamorization of Mrs. Bush's image began as far back
as the aftermath of the 2001 inauguration. Preparing to have
her photographed for Vogue, Anna Wintour, the magazine's
editor, requested that Mr. de la Renta provide some clothes.
The designer, who dressed Hillary Rodham Clinton in the
White House, balked at first. "I didn't think Mrs. Bush would
want to wear my clothes," he recalled. "I had been so closely
identified with Mrs. Clinton."

But Mrs. Bush, it seemed, had notions of her own. "She arrived
at the shoot with a red suit of mine that she had bought in
Austin, Tex.," Mr. de la Renta said, and specifically asked to see
more of his work. He has been dressing her since.

What he did not acknowledge is that coaxing Mrs. Bush out of
the prim, upholstered-looking suits she once favored is a job
requiring a vast reservoir of tact.

"You have to be very diplomatic to dress a president's wife," said
Arnold Scaasi, who has wardrobed his share, including Barbara
Bush, the president's mother; Mrs. Kennedy; and Mamie Eisenhower.
"You must tell them nicely that they didn't look too great before
you, and would look so much better now if they would only
listen to you. "

Ms. Jennings, who met with Mrs. Bush last Saturday for a fitting
in Manhattan, prides herself on having persuaded Mrs. Bush to
wear more form-fitting, feminine clothes. "The first gown that
I made for her I took the liberty of making the neckline too low,"
Ms. Jennings said. She recalled that Mrs. Bush responded with tact.
" `You know, Peggy,' the first lady told me, `maybe this would
look nicer if the neckline were a little higher,' " Ms. Jennings recalled,
adding that she recut the dress.

For designers inaugural commissions are well worth it. For prestige
they know no equal, not even a dress for the Oscars. "Designing
for the first lady is the best sort of attention you can get," Mr. Scaasi
said, translating into dresses that are widely copied and widely
ordered by stores.

Mr. Faircloth, whose star has faded a bit since Inauguration Day
in 2001, still designs for Mrs. Bush. As a fashion billboard, she
trumps any celebrity, he said. "Celebrities are like chameleons,
playing many different roles in their careers and in their fashion
statements," he said. "I feel more in line with someone who wants
to create a consistent image."

Mr. Scaasi agreed. "There are 2,700 girls out there that have
a one-night shot and stardom, and then you never see them
again," he scoffed. "The first family is beyond all that."

Copyright 2005 The New York Times

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

9) Is Al Qaeda Just a Bush Boogeyman?
By Robert Scheer
January 11, 2005
http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/011305Z.shtml
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-scheer11jan11,0,4938608
,print.column

Is it conceivable that Al Qaeda, as defined by President Bush as the
center of a vast and well-organized international terrorist conspiracy,
does not exist?

To even raise the question amid all the officially inspired hysteria is
heretical, especially in the context of the U.S. media's supine
acceptance of administration claims relating to national security.
Yet a brilliant new BBC film produced by one of Britain's leading
documentary filmmakers systematically challenges this and many
other accepted articles of faith in the so-called war on terror.

"The Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear,"
a three-hour historical film by Adam Curtis recently aired by the
British Broadcasting Corp., argues coherently that much of what
we have been told about the threat of international terrorism "is
a fantasy that has been exaggerated and distorted by politicians.
It is a dark illusion that has spread unquestioned through
governments around the world, the security services and the
international media."

Stern stuff, indeed. But consider just a few of the many questions
the program poses along the way:

€ If Osama bin Laden does, in fact, head a vast international
terrorist organization with trained operatives in more than
40 countries, as claimed by Bush, why, despite torture of
prisoners, has this administration failed to produce hard
evidence of it?

€ How can it be that in Britain since 9/11, 664 people have been
detained on suspicion of terrorism but only 17 have been found
guilty, most of them with no connection to Islamist groups and
none who were proven members of Al Qaeda?

€ Why have we heard so much frightening talk about "dirty
bombs" when experts say it is panic rather than radioactivity that
would kill people?

€ Why did Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld claim on "Meet
the Press" in 2001 that Al Qaeda controlled massive high-tech
cave complexes in Afghanistan, when British and U.S. military
forces later found no such thing?

Of course, the documentary does not doubt that an embittered,
well-connected and wealthy Saudi man named Osama bin Laden
helped finance various affinity groups of Islamist fanatics that
have engaged in terror, including the 9/11 attacks. Nor does
it challenge the notion that a terrifying version of fundamentalist
Islam has led to gruesome spates of violence throughout the
world. But the film, both more sober and more deeply provocative
than Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11," directly challenges the
conventional wisdom by making a powerful case that the Bush
administration, led by a tight-knit cabal of Machiavellian
neoconservatives, has seized upon the false image of a unified
international terrorist threat to replace the expired Soviet
empire in order to push a political agenda.

Terrorism is deeply threatening, but it appears to be a much
more fragmented and complex phenomenon than the
octopus-network image of Al Qaeda, with Bin Laden as
its head, would suggest.

While the BBC documentary acknowledges that the threat
of terrorism is both real and growing, it disagrees that the
threat is centralized:

"There are dangerous and fanatical individuals and groups
around the world who have been inspired by extreme Islamist
ideas and who will use the techniques of mass terror - the
attacks on America and Madrid make this only too clear. But
the nightmare vision of a uniquely powerful hidden organization
waiting to strike our societies is an illusion. Wherever one looks
for this Al Qaeda organization, from the mountains of Afghanistan
to the 'sleeper cells' in America, the British and Americans are
chasing a phantom enemy."

The fact is, despite the efforts of several government commissions
and a vast army of investigators, we still do not have a credible
narrative of a "war on terror" that is being fought in the shadows.

Consider, for example, that neither the 9/11 commission nor any
court of law has been able to directly take evidence from the key
post-9/11 terror detainees held by the United States. Everything
we know comes from two sides that both have a great stake in
exaggerating the threat posed by Al Qaeda: the terrorists
themselves and the military and intelligence agencies that have
a vested interest in maintaining the facade of an overwhelmingly
dangerous enemy.

Such a state of national ignorance about an endless war is, as
"The Power of Nightmares" makes clear, simply unacceptable in
a functioning democracy.

Copyright 2005 Los Angeles Times


---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

10) U.S. MULLS STRIKES ON SYRIA
By Richard Sale
United Press International
January 12, 2005
http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20050111-105709-6329r.htm

NEW YORK -- Bush administration hard-liners have been considering launching
selected military strikes at insurgent training camps in Syria and
border-crossing points used by Islamist guerrillas to enter Iraq in an
effort
to bolster security for the upcoming elections, according to former and
current administration officials.

Pressure for some form of military action is also coming from interim Iraqi
Prime Minister Iyad Allawi, these sources said.

Some former and serving U.S. intelligence officials who have usually been
opposed to any expansion of U.S. military activities in the region are
expressing support for such strikes.

A former senior U.S. intelligence official told United Press International,
"I
don't usually find myself in sympathy with the Bush neo-cons, but I think
there is enough fire under this smoke to justify such action."

Referring to the escalating attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq by Iraqi
insurgents, he added, "Syria is complicit in the (anti-U.S.) insurgency up
to
its eyeballs."

"Syria is the No. 1 crossing point" for guerrillas entering Iraq," Gary
Gambill, editor of the *Middle East Intelligence Bulletin*, said. He added
that Damascus "does nothing about it."

An administration official said Syria has "camps in which Syrians are
training
Iraqis for the insurgency and others where Iraqis are training Syrians for
the
same purpose" which could be hit by U.S. air strikes.

Gal Luft, a former Israeli military official with ties to Israeli and U.S.
intelligence, said, "I have heard of the same thing about the camps."

Recently, Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the top U.S. commander in Iraq, said
that
senior Baath Party officials from Iraq are operating from Syria where they
provide financing and direction to the cells of Iraqi insurgents killing
Americans, sparking new discussions within the administration about possible
measures against Syria.

"There are all sorts of discussions going on, the White House, the Pentagon,
the Joint Chiefs," said former CIA counterterrorism chief, Vince
Cannistraro.

He felt the talk of strikes "is part of a general plan of intimidation."

The White House did not return phone calls.

U.S. officials told United Press International that money, direction,
weapons
and personnel are flowing into Iraq from Syria, ending up in Iraqi cities
such
as Iskanderiya, Baqouba, Latafiya and Fallujah.

Damascus is also home to associates of a top insurgency commander now
affiliated with al-Qaida, Jordanian Abu Musab Zarqawi, who is responsible
for
many major suicide bombing attacks in Iraq, U.S. officials said.

The presence of a Zarqawi branch in Damascus, discovered last summer,
was said to have acted as a major spur in uniting France and the
United States in supporting U.N. Resolution 1559 that demanded
Syria withdraw from Lebanon and that elections be held in April 2005,
U.S. officials said.

Gambill charged that a major Zarqawi deputy lives in Damascus.

In addition to Syria being used as a rear area for insurgents, it is a key
center of finance for former Saddam Hussein officials who are leading the
insurgency, thanks to stashes of Iraqi cash that could run as high as $3
billion, which is all in the Syrian banking system, according for former and
serving administration officials.

There are also allegedly "many millions of dollars" from Palestinian groups
flowing into Syria that are also being used to help finance anti-American
guerrilla groups in Iraq, these sources said.

The Bush administration has applied increasing pressure on Syrian President
Bashar Assad to halt the activities of militant groups inside Syria, and to
arrest and extradite former Saddam Hussein officials who are the leading
financiers, according to several U.S. government sources.

So far there has been no positive response, they said.

What especially worries U.S. former and serving intelligence analysts is the
seeming weakness of Assad to act against these groups. According to these
sources, Assad is "well aware of the U.S. Army on its border to the east,"
and
does not want to antagonize the United States, in the words of one.

In fact, Bashar's inner circle of key advisers consists of reformist,
"smart,
streetwise young technocrats" who are urging Bashar to yield to U.S.
pressure
and begin to shut down some of the anti-U.S. activity, one U.S. official
said.

But Bashar is also surrounded by "the old guard" -- rogue members of the
ruling circle, "various people who are making millions and millions of
dollars" by allowing former Baath officials to shelter in Syria, this source
said.

"If something goes wrong, they can pack up and go and live in Geneva," he
said.

Because of the rogue elements, after the technocrats (who are also
pro-reform)
give Bashar their views, they often find themselves visited the next day by
hard-line members of Syria's Mukhabarat, or secret police, who tell them to
keep their mouths shut, according to this official.

"Bashar is trapped," this U.S. government official said. "He's the prisoner
of Zenda."

Luft agreed, saying, "The Mukhabarat and some of the old guard are
known to be pressuring Bashar's senior confidents to
ignore U.S. demands."

One former senior CIA official, usually an administration critic, said, "We
should send a cruise missile into south-side Damascus and blow the
Mukharbarat headquarters off the map. We should first make clear
to them that they are the target."

But are the hawks likely to get their strikes?

Former CIA Syria expert, Martha Kessler doesn't think so. "I don't think
the
administration can afford to destabilize another country in the region," she
said.

Kessler pointed out that Syria has tried, often in vain, to cooperate with
the
United States, only to be either snubbed or ignored.

According to Kesssler, Syria offered to station U.S. forces on its soil
before
the U.S. invasion of Iraq in March 2003. The Syrians have also opened their
intelligence books that identify assets in Europe, including front
companies,
to the administration in an attempt to help track down al-Qaida.

But Kessler said a chief reason for not moving against Damascus is that any
strikes would "destabilize Lebanon," where the Lebanese Hezbollah movement
awaits orders from Iran before launching retaliations against Israeli
attacks.

"Damascus is not the heartbeat of this Iraqi insurgent movement," she said.

However, one administration official said, "We have got one hell of a
problem."

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

11) URGENT: Mumia Hearing Cancelled,
Stay Tuned for Update on Action of Feb.11th!
Ona MOVE!
In a message dated 1/11/05 6:57:34 PM, icffmaj@aol.com writes:

Judge Pamela Dembe cancelled Mumia's scheduled Feb. 11th court
hearing. Her reasoning was explained by Mumia's attorney, Robert Bryant:

"Judge Pamela Dembe, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia, has ordered
briefing by February 15 on the issue of whether the Pennsylvania Supreme
Court's recent decision in Commonwealth v. Johnson, 2004 Pa. LEXIS
3118, "speaks to the jurisdiction of the Court to proceed in defendant's
third PCRA petition." This is disturbing since the court's preliminary
interpretation of the Johnson case appears to be wrong, for it does not
prevent her from granting us a hearing on two issues of great significance
relating to the unfairness of the trial. There is no new law in Johnson,
rather it is just the application of long-established law to the facts of
Mumia's case."

Legally, cancelling a hearing at this late date is not the norm, but
Mumia's case has consistently been subject to rule bending against
him. Dembe should be pressured to do right by Mumia. Call her and demand
that Mumia's hearing be reinstated, with him present, to let the evidence
be heard and ultimately release him!

phone 215-683-7148
fax 215-683-7150

We previously scheduled a meeting to organize for the hearing. This
meeting will go ahead as planned: tomorrow, Wednesday January 12th, 7 pm,
at the AFSC (Cherry and 15th). We need your presence at the
meeting! There will still be an action on Feb. 11th to keep the pressure
on! There is even *more* work ahead of us now-- to attack Dembe and her
contemporaries flagrant disregard for justice and most importantly to press
forward for Mumia's freedom at this critical juncture!

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

12) 1000 Days of Hell
After three years' incarceration, Guantanamo Britons are
set to be freed
By Robert Verkaik, Legal Affairs Correspondent
12 January 2005
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/story.jsp?story=599984

1000 Days of Hell

Promise to pursue convictions secures the repatriation of last British
inmates

Prisoners freed a year ago struggle to rebuild their lives

Leading article: The return of the last British detainees will not end the
disgrace of Guantanamo

It has been just over a thousand days since Pakistani security officers
broke down Moazzam Begg's front door and bundled him into the
boot of a waiting police car.

His terrified wife and three children looked on helplessly as Mr Begg
was taken away in the middle of the night, transported to Bagram air
base near Kabul before being flown to the infamous prison camp at
Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.

The former law student and bookshop owner from Birmingham joined
hundreds of other "unlawful combatants", shackled and dressed in
orange jump suits, and then held without charge, trial or even access
to lawyers.

For much of his detention he has been held in solitary confinement,
often exposed to extreme weather conditions and deprived of basic
necessities.

His letters home, supported by testimony from former Guantanamo
detainees, reveal that Mr Begg may also have been tortured by US
military officials, increasingly desperate to extract a confession
from him.

Last night the end of his ordeal appeared to be in sight after the
British and American governments brokered a deal to release
Mr Begg and three other Britons from the notorious US detention
centre.

Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, said following "intensive and
complex" discussions with the US, the four men would be
returned to Britain to face questioning. But for Mr Begg and his
elderly father, Azmat, who has tirelessly campaigned for his son's
release, freedom will come at a price.

Their reunion after three turbulent years is likely to be tempered
by the psychological and physical toll of the ordeals endured by
both men. Mr Begg, or detainee JJEEH#00558 as he is known to his
American captors, will not be the same man who first left Birmingham
with his family four years ago to help educate children in Afghanistan.

Azmat Begg said: "I will be very happy, I will be the happiest person
that he is released. But my concern is about his mental health and
his physical health after he has spent three years in solitary
confinement without talking to people.

"I am very much worried because I was told that even after three
or four weeks in solitary confinement, like he had, that people go
out of their minds." The detainee's father, a retired bank manager,
is still haunted by the telephone call that he received from his son
while he was in the boot of the police car driving through Islamabad.

"I can't help thinking how terrifying that must have been for him
and how distraught he must have been to have been separated from
his wife and children without a chance to say goodbye or say where
he was being taken." Moazzam Begg's three-year detention at
Camp X-Ray and Camp Delta has also taken its toll on the health
of his father, who is diabetic. Doctors have twice treated Azmat
Begg, 66, for a heart condition they believe may have been brought
on by stress caused by his son's detention: as a result, he suffers
paralytic spasms.

His ill-health has not prevented him running a high-profile
campaign for his son's release, including two trips to Washington
to try to persuade the Americans of his son's innocence and the
injustice of his continued detention. The story of Moazzam Begg,
argue his family and supporters, is a case of an innocent abroad
who took his wife and three young children to Afghanistan to
help educate the local children.

Mr Begg was a law student at Wolverhampton University before
dropping out in his second year. After marrying a local girl he
opened a bookshop in Birmingham, but started to feel the need
to play a bigger part in the education of the children in poorer
countries. So he took his young family to Taliban-controlled
Afghanistan.

His father said: "The Taliban didn't allow any co-education so
his wife wanted to teach the girls and he wanted to teach the
boys. But he ran into trouble with Taliban red tape. While he was
waiting for clearance he took his family to a remote area to make
tube wells to improve their access to water."

Then the US bombardment started and the family fled to Pakistan.
It was while the Beggs were waiting in Islamabad to return to
teaching that he was arrested, taken to the US-controlled Bagram
airbase, and then to Guantanamo Bay.

Moazzam Begg's wife, stepmother and three brothers will spend
the next few days waiting anxiously for the RAF plane that will
bring him home. But it will be the Begg children who have suffered
the most. "The eldest one can remember the day when the police
came and took her father away and she still wakes in the middle
of the night screaming," said Azmat Begg.

There is one other member of the Begg family who has never seen
his father. Ibrahim Begg, nearly three, was born shortly after his
mother Sally, 33, returned to Britain. Azmat Begg added: "He is
nearly old enough to be told the story of his father - it's not a story
any child should be told."

(c) 2004 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

13) January 20: Inauguration Day
Not Our President! Not in Our Name!

Order posters and stickers online, or make your own!

On January 20th, the day George W. Bush is inaugurated, Not in
Our Name is planning a massive day of protest declaring "NO" to
Bush and all he represents. In addition to a massive poster and
media campaign-and building for an outpouring of resistance in
the streets of San Francisco that evening-we are calling for groups
and individuals to choose an intersection or overpass to hold
a banner during the morning commute that morning to greet
commuters with a very visible repudiation! "Not Our President!"
is the suggested theme.

Help make it happen!

VOLUNTEER WORK PARTIES
Wednesday, January 12 ~ 6pm-8:30pm
Thursday, January 13 ~ 6pm-8:30pm
Meet at the Not in Our Name office for phone banking, poster
prep, banner making prep, and more! Join us to get ready for
January 20! Not in Our Name, 3945 Opal Street, Oakland
(at 40th Street-short walk towards the hills from Macarthur BART)

OUTREACH
Saturday, January 15 ~ 11am
Meet at Macarthur Bart parking lot - we'll leave at 11am sharp
to do poster blitzes throughout the entire Bay Area!

BANNER MAKING PARTY
Sunday, January 16 ~ 11am-6pm
Laney College - Student Center Quad
(From the Lake Merritt Bart station walk directly onto Laney
campus, and then to the Student Center - look for Not in
Our Name signs!)

JANUARY 20-DAY OF

Morning Commute Banner/Sign Holding
Join Not In Our Name on January 20 to hold a banner declaring
NO to Bush during the morning commute. Call or email to
claim a corner or overpass, make your own banner, or use
one of ours! Stay tuned for more details - or call our office
at 510.601.8000. Email: bayarea@notinourname.net

"Stop the War! Fight the Right" March and Rally
Join the Not In Our Name contingent at the January 20 march a
nd rally! Powell and Market, San Francisco ~ 5pm. Declare
"Not Our President!" with us - look for the banners, and red "
NO" posters!

The Not in Our Name Project
needs your support!

Donate online
donate.notinourname.net

Or send your tax-deductible contribution today to:

Not in Our Name
3945 Opal Street, Oakland CA 94609
www.notinourname.net

phone: 510-601-8000
email: bayarea@notinourname.net
local: bayarea.notinourname.net

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

14) Should a Defender of Immigrants and Critic of
the Patriot Act be silenced?
A tribute to Manlin Chee, a local and national hero
Who is Manlin Chee?

Manlin is a defense attorney specializing in immigration law.
Some facts:

*One of the first Asian-American women to graduate from
Wake Forest School of Law in 1978.

*Called "one of the foremost immigration attorneys in North
Carolina, if not the country" by the Triad Business News.

*Presented the American Bar Association's Pro Bono Public
Award in 1991 by U. S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra
Day O'Connor.

*Recipient of the 1990 William L. Thorp Pro Bono Award by
the North Carolina Bar Association.

*Graduate of Guilford College.

*Naturalized Citizen.

*Wife and Mother.

For years Manlin helped her clients navigate the complex and
daunting web of immigration regulations. She is well known
for going beyond an attorney's duties by assisting her clients
to obtain work, education, credit, and housing.

She also challenged North Carolinians to learn about and
appreciate the rich histories and customs of people from other
countries.

Should Manlin and her daughter Chernlian Forgay be punished?
Is this right?

Beginning in Spring 2003 Manlin, her clients past and present,
and her staff became the target of an extensive investigation
by the FBI and the Dept. of Homeland Security. After months
of scrutinizing hundreds, perhaps thousands, of cases that
Manlin had handled over the years, the government finally
sent two undercover agents into Manlin's office, where they s
olicited advice that they knew to be illegal. One "client,"
appealing to Manlin's well-known sense of compassion for
immigrants and concern for human life, pretended to be
gay and from a country where homosexuality is punishable
by death. The other wanted an arranged marriage.

Significantly, both of the agents were immigrants, whose
insecure position made them extremely vulnerable to
government "persuasion."

The relentless and unprecedented investigation made it
impossible for Manlin's law practice to continue, leaving
her clients without legal representation. It is now known
that government investigators attempted to "sweat" information
out of her immigrant clients by subjecting them to interrogation
sessions that often lasted for hours. Some of her office staff
had to endure this as well.

To get more leverage in their efforts to silence Manlin Chee,
the government even resorted to charging her daughter
Chernlian, who worked in the law office as a paralegal for
only 10 months. Manlin admitted to the seven charges
involving the two agents and was prepared to contest the
other 20 charges. The following week the government
dismissed all charges not linked to the undercover agents.

Of course, Manlin Chee is not the only immigration attorney
in the Triad. Why, then, has the government spent so much
time and taxpayer money investigating her only to dismiss
the charges?

Why is Manlin being singled out?

Could it be because:

*She spoke out against the Patriot Act at a forum at the
Greensboro Public Library, which was broadcast repeatedly
on local television? Shortly after this forum Manlin became
aware that she was the target of a federal investigation.

*She carried the largest caseload of Muslim and Middle Eastern
clients in the area? Beginning after 9/11 she would wear Muslim
dress to work one day a week in solidarity with this beseiged
population.

*She pointed out that John Ashcroft's involuntary registration
of Muslims after 9/11 was identical to procedures in Nazi Germany?
She was the only immigration attorney in the area who personally
accompanied her clients to the registrations to prevent them from
being secretly deported.

*She has been an outspoken critic of the severe and overly complex
regulations of the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services
(formerly the INS)?

This follows a pattern of the Federal government where individuals
are accused of crimes which are widely and uncritically reported
in the media, only to have the "evidence" fail to stand up to scrutiny.
Such individuals include Capt. James Yee, a Muslim chaplain at the
military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, who was accused of spying,
and attorney Brandon Mayfield, who was acccused of involvement in
the Madrid terrorist attacks that killed 191 people. In both
these cases accusations either evaporated or charges were
dropped.

Why We Care

We believe that in singling out Manlin for investigation and
prosecution the federal government is attempting to chill dissent
and our constitutional right to free speech, as well as sending a
threatening message to attorneys and other defenders of immigrants.
By forcing her out of her law practice and attempting to
silence her, the immigrant community has been deprived of an
effective, passionate advocate.

(photos not shown)

For more information please email us at
defendchee@hotmail.com
Hands off Manlin Chee!

First they came for the Communists, and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a Communist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up
because I was a Protestant.

Then they came for me, but by that time no one
was left to speak up.

-Pastor Martin Niemoellor, concentration camp
survivor, on repression in Hitler's Germany

You Be the Judge

* Organization listed for indentification purposes only
We, the undersigned, believe that Manlin Chee has been
a friend to immigrants and a force for good in our community
for many years. We believe any attempt to silence and punish
her sets a dangerous precedent and is incompatible with the
right of free speech and dissent that is
essential to a just society. In addition, we are concerned
about the role that some local media played in this case,
uncritically printing stories about "marriage rings" and articles
that promoted the U.S. Government's allegations against Manlin
Chee that have since been found to be false.

Daniel Bayer, journalist °¥ Elizabeth Ito, ESOL teacher
°¥ Joseph Gruendler °¥ Tim and Robin Hopkins, Not In
Our Name Project °¥ Ann F.
Deagan °¥ Lewis A. Brandon, III, Beloved Community
Center* °¥ Ginger Holt °¥ Ronda J. Cranford °¥
Lynn Dorn °¥ Jane Cranford °¥ Roberta M.
Trulove, teacher °¥ Leia Forgay, student °¥ Linda
Horney °¥ Scott Trent, Blue Triangle Network °¥ Larkin
Carroll, Blue Triangle Network °¥ John
Rash, Slave Magazine °¥Carolyn S. Allen, Truth &
Community Reconciliation Project* °¥Signe Waller °¥Marnie
Thompson, Partnership Project*
°¥Edward Goins °¥Liz Seymour,
Greensboro Community Arts Collective °
¥Diane Phoenix-Neal °¥Calvert "Butch"
Stewart, October 22 Coalition
Against Police Brutality °¥ Edward L.
Whitfield, Greensboro Peace Coalition* °¥
John Skujins °¥ Deborah Greene °¥ Muslims
for a Better North
Carolina °¥ Barbara P. Walker °¥ Chris Censullo
°¥ Chellie Mason °¥ Rev. Alex L. Richardson,
Unitarian Universalist Church of Greensboro °¥ Rev.
Nelson Johnson °¥ Marilyn Clayton °¥ Anita Earls,
UNC Center for Civil Rights °¥ Brenda Howerton,
mother of Daryl Howerton °¥ Tina Mercado
l
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

15) BOEING SCANDAL PART OF DEEPER PENTAGON CORRUPTION
By David Phinney
From: "CorpWatch"
Date: Thu,6 Jan 2005 20:54:38 -0800 (PST)
List-Id:
List-Subscribe:

List-Owner:
List-Archive:


WHAT'S NEW ON CORPWATCH
Holding Corporations Accountable
<< http://www.corpwatch.org >>
BOEING SCANDAL PART OF DEEPER PENTAGON CORRUPTION
By David Phinney
Military contractors like Boeing, Halliburton and Lockheed, have
beome increasingly embedded with the Pentagon bureaucrats who give
them lucrative work as the jailing of Darleen Druyun, a former U.S.
Air Force weapons buyer, demonstrates.
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11780

HOT OFF THE PRESS!
Seven Stories Press publishes "Iraq, Inc.: A Profitable Occupation."
Read the most complete chronicle to date of the exploits of private
contractors hired to reconstruct and manage Iraq. Donate to CorpWatch
and get your own copy today!
http://www.corpwatch.org/donate

IN THE NEWS

GUATEMALA: Supermarket Giants Crush Farmers
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11770

US: War is Bad for Business
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11771

US: Departing Lawmakers Cash in Years of Service for Big Bucks
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11773

WORLD: Newmont Must Keep Focus on the Goal
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11779

IRAQ: Families Sue Blackwater Over Deaths in Fallujah
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11772

EU: Corporate Lobbying Grows
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11774

IRAQ: Four Halliburton Workers from U.S. Killed
http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=11775

DONATE TO CORPWATCH!
Support CorpWatch's work to hold corporations accountable on human
rights, labor rights and environmental justice issues through
education and activism. Help us bring the critical information and
resources that tens of thousands of you access every month by making
a contribution to CorpWatch. http://www.corpwatch.org/donate

For all list information and functions, including changing
your subscription mode and options, visit the Web page:
http://lists.corpwatch.org/lists/info/corp-watchers

New Address!
CorpWatch -- Holding Corporations Accountable
1611 Telegraph Ave, Suite 702
Oakland, CA 94612 USA
Tel: 510-271-8080
Fax: 510-271-8083
Email: corpwatch@corpwatch.org
URL: http://www.corpwatch.org

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

16) GLOBAL DAY OF PROTEST ON THE TWO-YEAR
ANNIVERSARY OF THE IRAQ WAR
SATURDAY, MARCH 19:
ACTION ALERT * UNITED FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE
* End the War * Bring the Troops Home Now
* Rebuild Our Communities *
http://www.unitedforpeace.org | 212-868-5545


March 19-20 marks the two-year anniversary of the U.S. bombing
and invasion of Iraq. After all of the death and destruction, and with
the Bush administration claiming a mandate to continue their war,
there's a new urgency and a stronger determination within the
global antiwar movement to bring the troops home now.

LOCAL ACTIONS NATIONWIDE

UFPJ calls on supporters of peace and justice in every corner of
the country, in communities large and small, to organize local
protests against the war on Saturday, March 19. These can take
many forms: vigils, rallies, marches, nonviolent civil disobedience.
We especially encourage creative efforts to put the spotlight on
the institutions of militarism at home by organizing actions
outside military bases or military recruitment offices. List your
activities on the UFPJ website calendar at
http://www.unitedforpeace.org/events

(select "March 19" under Event Type).

On the first anniversary of the war, at least 319 cities and towns
across the United States organized protests. This year there is
the potential to organize even more demonstrations, and to
bring more people than ever out into the streets. The Bush
Administration will soon ask Congress to pump as much as
$100 billion more into the war; March 19 is an opportunity to
call for an end to this disaster, and to demand that the billions
be allocated instead for rebuilding our communities at home
and paying for the damage in Iraq.

MAJOR REGIONAL PROTEST IN FAYETTEVILLE, N.C.

UFPJ is also supporting a major regional demonstration in
Fayetteville, North Carolina. We hope those of you within
driving distance of Fayetteville will make this action your priority.
Fayetteville is home to Fort Bragg - ground zero for the 82nd
Airborne Division and many of the Army's elite units. Beyond
Fort Bragg, North Carolina hosts four other of the nation's largest
military bases, making the state one of the friendliest to the
military-industrial complex.

Less well-known is the fact that Fayetteville is also home to
a growing base of anti-war activists and organizations. They
are military folks, veterans, families of active-duty soldiers
and veterans, students, workers, housewives, clergy, educators,
and all are part of a vibrant, and growing, statewide network.
They stand firm in the knowledge that organizing in Fayetteville
is a key to bringing the troops home from Iraq.

Military Families Speak Out (http://www.mfso.org/
), Bring Them Home Now
(http://www.bringthemhomenow.org
),
Iraq Veterans Against the War
(http://www.ivaw.net ),
Veterans For Peace (http://www.veteransforpeace.org
), Quaker House,
Fayetteville Peace with Justice, the North Carolina
Peace and Justice Coalition (http://www.ncpeacejustice.org
), and the North
Carolina Council of Churches
(http://www.nccouncilofchurches.org
) are spearheading
the Fayetteville action. Please do all you can to
be in Fayetteville this year; by actively building
and participating in this demonstration, we have
the opportunity to support the efforts of Southern
organizers to build a Southern network, and
a Southern movement, to replace war and
occupation with justice and self-determination.

BE PART OF A GLOBAL ANTIWAR MOVEMENT

In addition to the many protests already being planned in the
United States, people all around the world will be taking action
on March 19 as well. Responding to a call from the European
Social Forum's Assembly of Social Movements, European
activists are organizing national mobilizations across Europe.
Brussels will be the site of a central demonstration on the eve
of a meeting of the European Council, where demonstrators
will march against war, racism, and a corporate-dominated
Europe. India's national Anti-War Assembly recently committed
to major protests on the second anniversary of the war. And
we anticipate that the World Social Forum will join this call
when it meets later this month in Sao Paolo, Brazil.

GET OUT THE WORD

Circulate this email wide and far. UFPJ will soon have flyers,
stickers, and other resources available to help you get
out the word.

BEGIN PLANNING LOCAL MARCH 19th ACTIONS

Bring together local groups to plan March 19th actions in
your community. Post your plans at
http://www.unitedforpeace.org/events


UFPJ mailing list
UFPJ@mediajumpstart.net
https://secure.mediajumpstart.net/mailman/listinfo/ufpj

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*

17) JANUARY 20, 2005 COUNTER INAUGURAL EVENT
THE COST OF WAR - THE PRICE WE'RE ALL PAYING
JOIN US AS WE STATE THE FACTS
AND OFFER ALTERNATIVES
WHERE: The Foundry United Methodist Church
1500 16TH Street, NW and P Street
(near DuPont Circle), Washington, D.C.
WHEN: 10:00 AM – 11:30 PM

PROGRAM: 10:00 -11:30 a.m. Speakers and Discussion

· Jana Meyer, Minister, FUMC

· Elias Vlanton, Co-author of www.costofwar.org

· Erik Leaver, Associate at Foreign Policy in Focus
www.fpif.org)

· Other speakers, including representatives from Military
Families Speak Out and Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)



REFRESHMENTS



11:30 Join DC Anti War Network members as we walk down 16th Street
to the Inaugural Parade.



DONATIONS WELCOME ON SITE



BRING: Signs showing the cost of war for YOUR STATE, COUNTY
or CITY and what those dollars could buy (go to
www.costofwar.org ). Supporters. Fact sheets for distribution.
Organizational materials (tables available).



DO: Contact your media.



RSVP: Malachy (malachykilbride@yahoo.com, Debby
dchurchm@yahoo.com or Moya (moyaatk@att.net)



Sponsored by

Foundry United Methodist Peace with Justice Mission – and Hosts

Middle Atlantic Region of the American Friends Service Committee

Northern Virginians for Peace and Justice

Arlingtonians for Peace

DC Anti-War Network (DAWN)

Prince George's Co. Peace & Justice Coalition


UNITED FOR PEACE & JUSTICE | 212-868-5545

This email list is designed for posting news articles or event
announcements of interest to UFPJ member groups.
It is not a discussion list.

To engage in online discussion of UFPJ matters, join our
discussion list by sending a blank
email to ufpj-disc-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ufpj-news/

---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*