*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
THIS IS AN EXCELLENT VIDEO DESTRIBUTED BY U.S. LABOR AGAINST
THE WAR (USLAW) FEATURING SPEAKERS AT THE JANUARY 27TH
MARCH ON WASHINGTON FOCUSING ON THE DEMAND - BRING
THE TROOPS HOME NOW.
It starts out with a statement by Fred Mason on behalf of the AFL-CIO
in favor of "Bring the troops home Now". This marked the first time
the AFL-CIO has come out against a U.S. War.
The speeches concentrate on the need to call for immediate and
unconditional withdrawal of troops as opposed to a gradual (even
for only a month or two) withdrawal of troops. Very strong arguments
are given by a variety of people in support of Bring the Troops Home Now.
Gerry Gordon gives a great statement for immediate and unconditional
withdrawal from Iraq and for Congress to de-fund the war.
Howard Wallace is in this video and he does a good job as a representative
of the San Francisco Labor Council in support of USLAW and the importance
of massive demonstrations to bring the troops home now.
Anthony Arnov gives a fantastic presentation placing the blame where
it lies--on the U.S. Government and nailing Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton
and the Democrats as being the new owners of the war! He quotes from
Obama and Clinton and videos of them are cut into his speech exposing
their ultimate support for the war and for a U.S. "victory" in Iraq.
There are moving interviews with Iraq Veterans Against the War--some
who are taking the courageous stance of refusing to return to Iraq who
have experienced unimaginable horrors.
All of the speakers call for continued mass actions against the war
to Bring the Troops Home Now!
I highly recommend this video...BW.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6935451906479097836&hl=en
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
CELL PHONE DO NOT CALL LIST:
REMINDER....10 days from today, all cell phone numbers are being
released to telemarketing companies and you will start to receive sale
calls......YOU WILL BE CHARGED FOR THESE CALLS
To prevent this, call the following number from your cell
phone:888-382-1222 or register your phone number at www.donotcall.gov
It is the National DO NOT CALL list. It will only take a minute of
your time. It blocks your number for five (5) years.
You must call from the cell phone number you want to have blocked.
You cannot call from a different phone number.
HELP OTHERS BY PASSING THIS ON TO ALL YOUR FRIENDS.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Lynne Stewart/Michael Ratner/Pam Africa/Jeff Mackler Tour
(For details on all events, admission costs, or requests for
additional meetings call 415-255-1085)
Monday, Feb. 26:
10:30 am Gray Panther Reception 415-552-8800
12:30 pm, University of SF Law School,
Fulton at Stanyon, Kendrick Hall, 646-729-4303
5:30 pm Fresno Reception
7:00 pm Fresno Rally, 559-255-9492.
Tuesday, Feb 27:
5:30 pm Reception, Santa Rosa Peace and Justice Center, 707-569-9922
Wednesday, Feb. 28:
12:00 Noon, UC Davis School of Law,
Moot Courtroom, 734-972-1036
5:30 pm Sacramento Reception,
403 21st Street, Sacramento, 916-369-5510 jekeltner@aol.com
"Fighting Back" for civil liberties & democratic rights
Defending Mumia Abu-Jamal: One court decision from
execution or new trial and freedom
"Fighting Back: No one shall be tortured, falsely imprisoned, or denied
basic democratic rights" is the theme of the upcoming February 23-28,
2007 San Francisco Bay Area tour of Lynne Stewart/Michael Ratner/
Pam Africa/Jeff Mackler
Sponsored by and a benefit for the Lynne Stewart Defense
Committee and the Northern California-based Mobilization
Free Mumia Abu-Jamal, the tour includes some eighteen
meetings, rallies, receptions and media events. (See tour
schedule below).
The tour is co-sponsored by the National Lawyers Guild, the
Peninsula Peace and Justice Center, Middle East Children's Alliance,
Vanguard Public Foundation, the Marin Peace and Justice Coalition,
and Pacifica Radio Station KPFA.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Human Rights Post-9/11: Detention, Torture, and Rendition
Tuesday, February 27, 5:00-6:15 in Room 2201
Golden Gate University Law School
536 Mission Street (btwn 1st and 2nd Street downtown)
San Francisco, CA
Please join us at a presentation and Q&A session with CCR
(Center for Constitutional Rights) Staff Attorney Rachel Meeropol
on February 27th in downtown San Francisco. Rachel will cover
the current work being done by CCR and our allies to counter
the tactics used by the Bush Administration in their "War on Terror."
She will give an update on the current conditions at Guantanamo
for the detainees; the issues being litigated; and the recently
passed Military Commissions Act. You will also hear the stories
of our clients in the Turkman case dealing with the dragnet
sweeps and detention of immigrants post 9-11 and of work
being done to stop torture and rendition (including recent
developments in the case of Maher Arar the Canadian citizen
sent by the U.S. government to be tortured in Syria) by holding
those who use or condone these tactics accountable in U.S. courts.
For more information on Rachel Meeropol and CCR, please visit
http://www.ccr-ny.org
Charlotte L. Kates charlotte.kates@gmail.com
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Tues. Feb. 27, 7pm
ANSWER Black History Month Forum
THE CASE OF THE BLACK PANTHER 8—VIDEO & SPEAKER
2489 Mission St. #30, (at 21st St.) near 24th St. BART / #49, #14 MUNI, SF
Report on the case of the San Francisco Black Panther 8 by Dr. Henry
Clark—former Black Panther and director of West County Toxics
Coalition in Richmond, CA. See the video “Legacy of Torture:
The War Against The Black Liberation Movement”
415-646-6469 revolutionyouthsf@gmail.com
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
TWO SF BAY AREA EVENTS TO SUPPORT IRAQ WAR VETERAN
AND WAR RESISTER ARMY SPC. AGUSTIN AGUAYO!
Agustín Aguayo, a 35-year-old Army medic and conscientious
objector, will face court martial on March 6 for resisting
redeployment to Iraq. He has been formally charged by the
Army with desertion and missing movement. If convicted
of all charges, Agustín faces a maximum of seven years
in prison for following his conscience and refusing to
participate in war. He is currently imprisoned pending
trial at a military brig in Manheim, Germany.
Tuesday, February 27 at 6:30 PM to 8:30 PM
Benefit Dinner with Helga Aguayo
SF War Memorial Veterans Building, 2nd Floor
401 Van Ness (Civic Center BART), San Francisco
With brief presentations by: Agustin's wife Helga Aguayo;
Journalist Sarah Olson who led a successful campaign to
oppose reporter subpoenas by the Army in Lt. Ehren Watada's
court martial; Pablo Paredes, former Navy sailor who in
2005 publicly resisted shipping out in support of the Iraq War.
Dinner hosted by Courage to Resist and Veterans for Peace
SF Bay Area Chapter 69. Co-sponsored by the American Friends
Service Committee, SF Code Pink, Watada Support Committee,
APIs Resist! and Not in Our Name-Bay Area. Call 510-764-2073
More info: http://couragetoresist.org/x/content/view/252/36/
Saturday, March 2 at 7:00 PM to 2:00 AM
*PRAXIS* Party to Benefit Agustin Aguayo
Capoeira Angola Center 2513 Magnolia St., Oakland
*PRAXIS* party to benefit Agustin Aguayo and other soldiers
who refuse to fight! Wicked performers and stylin' djs. Including
ICAF-Oakland, Taiko Ren, Queen Deelah & Cov Records Artists,
Zazous, Fuga, DJ Zahkee, and Qbug. Good times for good causes
- Conscientious Objector Agustin Aguayo and Courage to Resist.
If you can't make either event, please consider an urgently
needed and much appreciated tax-deductible donation to
Agustin's defense fund. Online at
http://couragetoresist.org/donate
or make check payable to "Courage to Resist / IHC",
note "Agustin Aguayo defense" on the memo line,
and send to: COURAGE TO RESIST
484 LAKE PARK AVE #41, OAKLAND CA 94610
http://www.couragetoresist.org/donate
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
IRAQ War Military Resisters Speak:
THE CASE FOR IMMEDIATE WITHDRAWAL AND THE GROWING
MILITARY RESISTANCE TO THE WAR
Panel and Community Discussion
Wednesday February 28th 10am-12pm
Diego Rivera Theater, City College, Ocean
Campus, 50 Phelan Ave, San Francisco, CA (Press
conference at 9:40 in the lobby of the Diego Rivera Theater)
Speakers will include:
Pablo Paredes, Iraq War Conscientious Objector
Helga Aguayo, Wife of Conscientious Objector Agustin Aguayo
Brian Cruz, SEIU, City College
Rayan Elamine, Lecturer in Middle Eastern Politics and Culture
Also, speakers from Courage to Resist and Students Against War
FREE!
Since the war in Iraq began four years ago,
justified by the lies of the Bush administration,
hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and over 3,000 US
military personnel have been killed. Untold damage
has been done to the lives of the Iraqi people,
while the 'war on terror' has been used as a premise
for a frontal assault on our constitutional rights
and social programs here at home.
In the 1970s, the combined actions by the Vietnamese
resistance, US military resisters, labor, students,
and the community were decisive in stopping the
Vietnam war. Now, the majority of Americans want to
see an end to the occupation of Iraq. How can we
draw on that sentiment, and turn it into something
that can be used to stop the war?
Come and hear a panel discussion and participate in
a debate on the nature of this war, and what we can
do to stop it.
Sponsored by American Federation of Teachers, local 2121
Endorsed by City College Associated Students,
Veterans for Peace SF Bay Area, Courage to Resist,
and The International Socialist Organization
Contact Person: Allan, CCSF faculty at 415-585-2121
or afisher@aft2121.com
Nicole, CCSF Student at
510-439-7153 or nroque216@students.deltacollege.edu
Contact: Allan Fisher
415-585-2121
Allan Fisher
afisher800@yahoo.com
afisher@aft2121.com
415-585-0414
415-585-2121
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
You are invited to
Witness to War: Revisiting Vietnam in Contemporary Art
at the Fine Arts Gallery, San Francisco State
University,
1600 Holloway Ave @ 19th Ave, SF
Open through March 15, 2007
Visit our website at:
http://www.sfsu.edu/~gallery/
Please join us. Spread the word, bring a friend!
Sat, Feb 24, 2:00 p.m.
Witness to War Artist Lecture – Daniel Joseph Martinez
Thurs, Mar 1, 1:00 p.m.
Witness to War Artist Panel Discussion
Sat, Mar 10, 1:00 p.m.
Artists Binh Danh, Thai Bui and Long Nguyen moderated
by art historian Boreth Ly.
Nguyen Dance Company
Dance Performance
Sat, Mar 10, 2:30 p.m.
West Coast Premiere of Documentary Film The Rain on
the River
Sat, Mar 10, 3:30 p.m.
Hope to see you there.
Defend the Los Angeles Eight!
http://www.committee4justice.com/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
March 17: March on the Pentagon-1967/2007
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0gIIzg9hpN8
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
George Takai responds to Tim Hardaway's homophobic remarks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcJoJZIcQW4&eurl_
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
MARCH ON THE PENTAGON
SATURDAY, MARCH 17
WASHINGTON, D.C .
Free Speech Victory! Permits Secured for Pentagon Demonstration
http://www.internationalanswer.org/
MARCH AND RALLY IN SAN FRANCISCO
SUNDAY, MARCH 18, 2007
(The annual St. Patrick's Day Parade is taking
place on Sat., March 17 in SF.)
ASSEMBLE 12:00 NOON
JUSTIN HERMAN PLAZA -
MARCH TO CIVIC CENTER
For more information:
http://www.actionsf.org/#local4
answer@actionsf.org
Phone: 415-821-6545
Fax: 415-821-5782
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Iran
http://www.lucasgray.com/video/peacetrain.html
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Another view of the war. A link from Amer Jubran
http://d3130.servadmin.com/~leeflash/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Petition: Halt the Blue Angels
http://action.globalexchange.org/petition.jsp?petition_KEY=458
http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/detail/289327
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
A Girl Like Me
7:08 min
Youth Documentary
Kiri Davis, Director, Reel Works Teen Filmmaking, Producer
Winner of the Diversity Award
Sponsored by Third Millennium Foundation
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1091431409617440489
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Film/Song about Angola
http://www.prisonactivist.org/angola/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
"200 million children in the world sleep in the streets today.
Not one of them is Cuban."
(A sign in Havana)
Venceremos
View sign at bottom of page at:
http://www.cubasolidarity.net/index.html
[Thanks to Norma Harrison for sending this...bw]
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
ARTICLES IN FULL:
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
1) 'GIVE *WAR* A CHANCE'
[Col. Writ. 2/2/07] Copyright 2007 Mumia Abu-Jamal
VIA Email from: Howard Keylor
howardkeylor@comcast.net
2) Arab/Palestinian Mural at SFSU in Jeopardy!
Students need our support.
http://www.petitiononline.com/mural/
3) U.S. Used Base in Ethiopia to Hunt Al Qaeda in Africa
By MICHAEL R. GORDON and MARK MAZZETTI
February 23, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/23/world/africa/23somalia.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
4) Cuba's known for cigars now, but oil could change that
Updated 2/22/2007 9:03 AM ET
By David J. Lynch, USA TODAY
http://www.usatoday.com/money/world/2007-02-22-cuba-usat_x.htm
5) THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
February 23, 2007
By JOSÉ DE CÓRDOBA
February 23, 2007; Page A5
VIA Email from:
Walter Lippmann
walterlx@earthlink.net
6) An American in Cuba
Nationality trumps race, and color still matters.
But everyone struggles together.
Erin Aubry Kaplan
February 21, 2007
http://www.latimes.com/news/columnists/la-oe-kaplan21feb21,1,1332754.column?coll=la-news-columns
7) "I Want To Be Free": 9-Year-Old Canadian Citizen Pleads
From Texas Immigration Jail
Friday, February 23rd, 2007
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/23/1532252
8) U.S. Weighs Extra Steps on Iran White House May Pursue
Sanctions Targeting Guard Corps Assets
By NEIL KING JR. and JAY SOLOMON
February 22, 2007; Page A6
WALL STREET JOURNAL
VIA Email from: Walter Lippmann
walterlx@earthlink.net
9) Cheney: 'All Options' Available for Iran
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 3:42 a.m. ET
February 24, 2007
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/02/23/ap3458866.html
10) US Economy Leaving Record Numbers in Severe Poverty
by Tony Pugh
February 23, 2007
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0223-09.htm
11) Chávez Ends Busy Week Aiding Venezuela’s Latin Neighbors
By SIMON ROMERO
February 24, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/world/americas/24venez.html
12) Blackstone Said to Plan Sale of 10 San Francisco Buildings
By TERRY PRISTIN
February 24, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/business/24real.html?ref=business
13) Iraqi Cabinet Approves Draft of Oil Law
By EDWARD WONG
"The law also grants regional oil companies the power to sign contracts
with foreign companies for exploration and development of fields,
opening the door for investment by foreign oil companies in a country
whose oil reserves rank among the world’s top three in size."
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/world/middleeast/26cnd-Iraq.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
14) A Necessary Vaccine
Editorial
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/opinion/26mon1.html?hp
15) Strike Ends in Guinea After Deal With Unions
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/world/africa/26guinea.html
16) A Push for Citizenship to Honor Anne Frank, but It’s No Easy Sell
By PAUL VITELLO
"SAYVILLE, N.Y., Feb. 23 — A congressman from Long Island wants
the United States government to grant honorary citizenship to Anne
Frank, at least in part to atone for having denied her family entry
in the years before her arrest and deportation to a Nazi
concentration camp."
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/nyregion/26frank.html?ref=nyregion
17) Venezuela Spending on Arms Soars to World’s Top Ranks
By SIMON ROMERO
February 25, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/25/world/americas/25venez.html
18) UFPJ Finally Mentions the March on the Pentagon March 17, in D.C.
A letter VIA Email from Leslie Cagan to UFPJ member groups
to the UFPJ list: ufpj@lists.mayfirst.org
lesliecagan@igc.org
19) Open Letter to Lesie Cagan, National Coordinator, UFPJ
by Bonnie Weinstein
www.bauaw.org
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
1) 'GIVE *WAR* A CHANCE'
[Col. Writ. 2/2/07] Copyright 2007 Mumia Abu-Jamal
VIA Email from: Howard Keylor
howardkeylor@comcast.net
A lifetime ago, when the British rock band, the Beatles were at the top
of the charts, and before cable TV and the reign of computers,
anti-war activists sang a haunting chorus as they demonstrated
by the tens of thousands at the Pentagon: "All we are saying,
is give peace a chance."
Decades later, and there is still war (albeit in another place, and for
another 'cause'), and demonstrations seem far less potent
than times past.
American imperialism, unshackled by the prospect of a true global
rival, now fairly bellows in the face of its own unpopularity (in the
voice of its acolytes, like George W. Bush): "Give war a chance."
The Iraq invasion and occupation has been an admitted disaster,
and those who called for it the loudest are deserting that sinking
ship like rats on a wharf.
The US imperial president, flirting with disapproval numbers that
rivals Nixon's at the height of the Watergate scandal, is overwhelming
only in his irrelevance, and perhaps his inability to convince anybody
to believe his blather about the so-called 'war on terror.'
So, in light of the administration's latest maneuver to support the
flagging war with 'new ideas' about a "surge", the White House and
its minions on the Hill are asking Americans to 'give the president's
plan a chance.'
In the face of this catastrophe, what is the role of Congress?
It proposes to debate, and then, after debating, to issue a non-binding
resolution, which condemns the current troop build-up, and also
critiques the president's present handling of the war.
In essence, Congress agrees to say, 'We don't like what you're doing,
but we won't stop it.'
This, in a time of war, a war launched on lies and subterfuge.
Apparently, over 600,000 dead Iraqis, over 3,000 dead Americans,
and over 400 billion dollars lost in this failing effort, isn't quite enough.
In fact, the Congress could stop the war today, by cutting the war
budget. But it won't do this, for it might endanger a congressman's
future political prospects.
Most of the millions of people who voted in the mid-term elections
did so to send a strong anti-war message.
The majority party heading both houses of Congress has indeed
changed, but little else has. It has resolved to issue words, while
the president launches bombs.
And given his profoundly neoconservative bent, it is entirely possible
that, before the remaining two years have passed through time's
hourglass, the US may've launched a strike against Iran.
Even now we hear the media stirrings, provocations meant to soften
up the American populace for a new 'preemptive war.'
What did your votes really mean?
Do you really still believe that you live in a democracy?
What you voted for, and what you believe, is ultimately irrelevant.
The words of the legendary Black freedom fighter, Frederick Douglass
echo through the annals of time: "Power concedes nothing without
demand. It never has, and never will."
Voting is never enough.
These ruinous wars didn't begin in a voting booth; nor will voting,
standing alone, end them.
It will take much stronger stuff.
Copyright 2007 Mumia Abu-Jamal
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
2) Arab/Palestinian Mural at SFSU in Jeopardy!
Students need our support.
http://www.petitiononline.com/mural/
We need your help. We are doing a petition drive right
now and we need as many signatures as possible to put
pressure on the SFSU president to approve our mural.
It is the first Arab/Palestinian Mural in a University
in the United States. Two governing boards approved it
but he remains against it. Sign it and forward this
message below in a bulletin, and whatever way you can
to help us get signatures.
Don’t be just hype! Be part of the revolution for
justice and equality for all!
Thank you very much.
HELP SPREAD THE WORD! Please post a bulletin etc…
Palestinian Mural in Jeopardy!
From: Norman Finkelstein
http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/article.php?pg=11&ar=903
http://www.petitiononline.com/mural/
If you are in support of the Palestinian mural please
sign the petition. Our artists are Dr. Fayeq Oweis and
Dr. Susan Greene; a Palestinian Muslim man and an
American Jewish woman. Thanks for the support!
General Union of Palestine Students (GUPS)
www.sfgups.org 415-338-1908
San Francisco State University
In April 2005, the General Union of Palestine Students
at San Francisco State University proposed something
revolutionary, to begin a process of implementing a
mural paying tribute to Edward Said and Palestinian
culture on the University campus. This is the first
mural of its kind a University in the United States.
After over a year of painstaking efforts by the mural
committee to follow the established process, the
President of San Francisco State University, Robert A.
Corrigan, prematurely denied the mural just before the
final stage. It is 2007 and the mural is in jeopardy
and needs your immediate help The SF State president,
Robert Corrigan claims the mural represents a “culture
of violence” and is “hate to Jews.” He is saying that
the Palestinian house key and Handala are offensive
but he does not explain why or what to support his
claim. He allowed other murals up on the Cesar Chavez
Student Center, such as the Malcolm X mural, the Cesar
Chavez mural, the Filipino Mural, the Pan Asian and
Pacific Islander Mural, which depict struggles of
refugees and colonialism,
http://www.sfsustudentcenter.com/about/murals.php
however the administration has been trying to stop our
mural since day one before they knew anything about
it. Please sign the latest online petition, and/or
writing a letter to President Corrigan from yourself
or your organization, and/or financially support the
legal process to show support for the mural and all
its elements including the Palestinian house key and
Handala! Go to www.sfgups.org for more info. (SFSU’s
newspaper website = xpress.sfsu.edu)
What You Can Do
1. Sign the New Online Petition:
http://www.petitiononline.com/mural/
2. Write a Letter or email SFSU President Robert A.
Corrigan: (corrigan@sfsu.edu, gups@sfsu.edu,
cortez@sfsu.edu)
President Robert Corrigan
1600 Holloway Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94132
(email: corrigan@sfsu.edu)
PLEASE CC:
General Union of Palestine Students
1650 Holloway Ave
Business Office, M100B
San Francisco, CA 94132
(email: gups@sfsu.edu)
and CC:
Maria Liliana Cortez
1650 Holloway Ave
Business Office, C-134
San Francisco, CA 94132
(email: cortez@sfsu.edu)
3. Make a Donation: Donations are tax- deductible.
Financial Support for the mural; The American Arab
Anti-Discrimation Committee San Francisco Chapter is
helping with the collection of donations.
Please make checks payable to: ADCSF/AGAPE with “GUPS”
written in the memo section of the check.
Please send your donation to:
The ADC-SF (American-Arab Anti-Discrimination
Committee of San Francisco)
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, California, 94110
email: adcsfintern@adcsf.org Phone (415) 861-7444
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
3) U.S. Used Base in Ethiopia to Hunt Al Qaeda in Africa
By MICHAEL R. GORDON and MARK MAZZETTI
February 23, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/23/world/africa/23somalia.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
WASHINGTON, Feb. 22 — The American military quietly waged
a campaign from Ethiopia last month to capture or kill top leaders
of Al Qaeda in the Horn of Africa, including the use of an airstrip
in eastern Ethiopia to mount airstrikes against Islamic militants
in neighboring Somalia, according to American officials.
The close and largely clandestine relationship with Ethiopia also
included significant sharing of intelligence on the Islamic militants’
positions and information from American spy satellites with the
Ethiopian military. Members of a secret American Special Operations
unit, Task Force 88, were deployed in Ethiopia and Kenya, and
ventured into Somalia, the officials said.
The counterterrorism effort was described by American officials
as a qualified success that disrupted terrorist networks in Somalia,
led to the death or capture of several Islamic militants and involved
a collaborative relationship with Ethiopia that had been developing
for years.
But the tally of the dead and captured does not as yet include some
Qaeda leaders — including Fazul Abdullah Mohammed and Fahid
Mohammed Ally Msalam — whom the United States has hunted
for their suspected roles in the attacks on American Embassies
in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998. With Somalia still in a chaotic state,
and American and African officials struggling to cobble together
a peacekeeping force for the war-ravaged country, the long-term
effects of recent American operations remain unclear.
It has been known for several weeks that American Special Operations
troops have operated inside Somalia and that the United States
carried out two strikes on Qaeda suspects using AC-130 gunships.
But the extent of American cooperation with the recent Ethiopian
invasion into Somalia and the fact that the Pentagon secretly used
an airstrip in Ethiopia to carry out attacks have not been previously
reported. The secret campaign in the Horn of Africa is an example
of a more aggressive approach the Pentagon has taken in recent
years to dispatch Special Operations troops globally to hunt high-
level terrorism suspects. President Bush gave the Pentagon powers
after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to carry out these missions, which
historically had been reserved for intelligence operatives.
When Ethiopian troops first began a large-scale military offensive
in Somalia late last year, officials in Washington denied that the Bush
administration had given its tacit approval to the Ethiopian government.
In interviews over the past several weeks, however, officials from
several American agencies with a hand in Somalia policy have
described a close alliance between Washington and the Ethiopian
government that was developed with a common purpose: rooting
out Islamic radicalism inside Somalia.
Indeed, the Pentagon for several years has been training Ethiopian
troops for counterterrorism operations in camps near the Somalia
border, including Ethiopian special forces called the Agazi Commandos,
which were part of the Ethiopian offensive in Somalia.
Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, declined to discuss details
of the American operation, but some officials agreed to provide specifics
because they saw it as a relative success story. They said that the close
relationship had included the sharing of battlefield intelligence on the
Islamists’ positions — a result of an Ethiopian request to Gen. John
P. Abizaid, then the commander of the United States Central Command.
John D. Negroponte, the director of national intelligence at the time,
then authorized spy satellites to be diverted to provide information
for Ethiopian troops, the officials said.
The deepening American alliance with Ethiopia is the latest twist in the
United States’ on-and-off intervention in Somalia, beginning with an
effort in 1992 to distribute food to starving Somalis and evolving into
deadly confrontation in 1993 between American troops and fighters
loyal to a Somali warlord, Mohammed Farah Aidid. The latest chapter
began last June when the Council of Islamic Courts, an armed
fundamentalist movement, defeated a coalition of warlords backed
by the Central Intelligence Agency and took power in Mogadishu,
the capital. The Islamists were believed to be sheltering Qaeda
militants involved in the embassy bombings, as well as in a 2002
hotel bombing in Kenya.
After a failed C.I.A. effort to arm and finance Somali warlords, the
Bush administration decided on a policy to bolster Somalia’s weak
transitional government. This decision brought the American
policy in line with Ethiopia’s.
As the Islamists’ grip on power grew stronger, their militias began
to encircle Baidoa, where the transitional government was operating
in virtual exile. Ethiopian officials pledged that if the Islamists attacked
Baidoa, they would respond with a full-scale assault.
While Washington resisted officially endorsing an Ethiopian invasion,
American officials from several government agencies said that the
Bush administration decided last year that an incursion was the best
option to dislodge the Islamists from power.
When the Ethiopian offensive began on Dec. 24, it soon turned into
a rout, somewhat to the Americans’ surprise. Armed with American
intelligence, the Ethiopians’ tank columns, artillery batteries and military
jets made quick work of the poorly trained and ill-equipped Islamist militia.
“The Ethiopians just wiped out entire grid squares; it was a blitzkrieg,”
said one official in Washington who had helped develop the strategy
toward Somalia.
As the Islamists retreated, the Qaeda operatives and their close aides
fled south toward a swampy region. Using information provided by
Ethiopian forces in Somalia as well as American intelligence, a task
force from the Pentagon’s Joint Special Operations Command began
planning direct strikes.
On Dec. 31, the largely impotent transitional government of Somalia
submitted a formal request to the American ambassador in Kenya
asking for the United States to take action against the militants.
General Abizaid called Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and informed
him that the Central Command was sending additional Special
Operations forces to the region. The deployment was carried out
under the terms of an earlier, classified directive that gave the military
the authority to kill or capture senior Qaeda operatives if it was determined
that the failure to act expeditiously meant the United States would lose
a “fleeting opportunity” to neutralize the enemy, American officials said.
On Jan. 6, two Air Force AC-130 gunships, aircraft with devastating
firepower, arrived at a small airport in eastern Ethiopia. American Special
Operations troops operating in Kenya, working with the Kenyan military,
also set up positions along the southern border to capture militants
trying to flee the country.
A Navy flotilla began to search for ships that might be carrying fleeing
Qaeda operatives. Support planes were deployed in Djibouti. F-15Es from
Al Udeid air base in Qatar also flew missions. Intelligence was shared with
Ethiopia and Kenya through C.I.A. operatives in each country. American
military planners also worked directly with Ethiopian and Kenyan military
officials.
On Jan. 7, one day after the AC-130s arrived in Ethiopia, the airstrike
was carried our near Ras Kamboni, an isolated fishing village on the
Kenyan border.
According to American officials, the primary target of the strike was
Aden Hashi Ayro, a young military commander trained in Afghanistan
who was one of the senior leaders of the Council of Islamic Courts.
Several hours after the strike, Ethiopian troops and one member
of the American Special Operations team arrived at the site and
confirmed that eight people had been killed and three wounded,
all of whom were described as being armed. After sifting through
the debris, they found a bloodied passport and other items that led
them to believe Mr. Ayro was injured in the strike and probably died.
Several members of the Special Operations team were also in Somalia
at the time of the strike, one official said.
The second AC-130 strike, on Jan. 23, had another of the Islamic
council’s senior leaders, Sheik Ahmed Madobe, as its target. Mr. Madobe
survived and was later captured by the Ethiopians, Americans say.
American officials said that Fazul Abdullah Mohammed, the mastermind
of the 1998 embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania and the alleged
ringleader of Al Qaeda’s East African cell, remains at large. Some officials
caution that while the Ethiopians have said additional “high-priority
targets,” including Abu Talha al-Sudani, a leading member of the cell,
were killed in their own airstrikes, American intelligence officials have
yet to confirm this.
In late January, American officials played a role in securing the safe
passage of Sheik Sharif Sheik Ahmed, the second-highest-ranking
Islamist leader, from southern Somalia to Nairobi, Kenya. The exact
role of American involvement is still not clear, but some American
officials consider him to be a moderate Islamist.
Jeffrey Gettleman contributed reporting from Nairobi, Kenya.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
4) Cuba's known for cigars now, but oil could change that
Updated 2/22/2007 9:03 AM ET
By David J. Lynch, USA TODAY
http://www.usatoday.com/money/world/2007-02-22-cuba-usat_x.htm
One day soon - possibly before the end of this year - an oil rig will
maneuver into position in waters less than 100 miles from the coast
of Florida. A drill will plunge into the inky sea and begin chewing
its way into the ocean floor, hunting for oil.
But the drilling rig won't belong to an American company, and any
petroleum it discovers won't do a thing to curb the USA's addiction
to foreign oil. Instead, any new sub-sea gusher will belong to Cuba.
That's right: Cuba. The island nation long has been known for its
aromatic cigars and sweet rums. But after years of limited oil
production on lands around Havana and in neighboring Matanzas
province, Cuba is poised for a significant expansion of its oil
program into the waters that separate it from the United States. And
thanks to U.S. law, Cuba's drilling partners will be working closer
to Florida beaches than any American company ever could.
"Our studies . have shown there is a great potential, especially
offshore," says Dagoberto Rodriguez, the senior Cuban diplomat in the
USA. "Basically, we know that there is oil. The problem is just where
it is."
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) agrees. Two years ago, after
reviewing available data on the subterranean structures in the
region, the agency estimated Cuba can lay claim to 4.6 billion
barrels of oil and 9.8 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
With oil prices hovering around $60 a barrel and global supplies
persistently tight, any new supply source could benefit the USA, the
world's top oil consumer. Likewise, Cuba, which relies on Venezuela
for more than half of its daily oil consumption, craves
self-sufficiency. "In economic terms, it could be a win-win," says
Daniel Erikson, an analyst at the Inter-American Dialogue, a
Washington, D.C., think tank.
There's just one problem: politics. Since 1962, the U.S. has
maintained an economic embargo of Cuba, aimed at toppling the
communist government of Fidel Castro. The ailing dictator, who has
outlasted nine U.S. presidents, last summer handed power temporarily
to his brother, Raul, while he recovers from abdominal surgery.
Companies such as ExxonMobil (XOM), Chevron (CVX) and Halliburton
(HAL), however, remain barred from the Cuban market, which a 2001
Rice University study said could be worth up to $3 billion annually.
The embargo also will increase the time and cost of the Cuban program
by denying Havana access to the closest source of oil industry
technology, spare parts and expertise. Likewise, U.S.-owned
refineries in Aruba and St. Croix are off-limits for any of the
heavy, sulfur-rich Cuban crude.
"The U.S. (embargo) presents them with significant barriers and
obstacles," says Jonathan Benjamin-Alvarado, a political scientist at
the University of Nebraska who studies Cuban energy issues.
Replacing the Soviets
Cuba is modernizing a dilapidated Soviet-era refinery at Cienfuegos
with help from Venezuela's state-owned oil company, PDVSA, and
refurbishing three other facilities, Rodriguez said. Within 18
months, Cuba will be able to satisfy all of its refining demand, he
said. Independent analysts are less optimistic.
The Cuban oil fields were formed more than 50 million years ago in a
slow-motion collision between Earth's tectonic plates, which entombed
pulverized rocks, animals and plants. Over subsequent millennia, the
resulting stew cooked into buried petroleum deposits, says
Christopher Shenk, a geologist at the USGS in Denver.
Before Castro's 1959 revolution, U.S. oil companies such as Esso and
Amoco carried out preliminary explorations. The following year, Cuba
nationalized refineries belonging to Exxon, Texaco and Shell (
(RDSA,RDSB), and U.S. industry hasn't been back since.
In the modern era, Cuba's first significant oil find came in 1971
when Soviet engineers discovered the Varadero field, east of Havana.
After the Soviet Union collapsed, Cuba opened its oil program to
foreign investment in 1993. Today, companies from Spain, Norway,
India, Malaysia and China are involved, either drilling wells onshore
or using horizontal drilling to reach reservoirs in shallow coastal
waters.
Canada's Sherritt is the most active foreign company with nine fields
operating onshore and five exploration or appraisal blocs being
drilled, says Michael Minnes, a company spokesman. Daily output from
the company's wells averages a modest 30,000 barrels a day, down from
about 43,000 in 2004.
"It's like any other foreign jurisdiction or developing nation. There
are challenges, and there are opportunities," Minnes said. "We see
Cuba as a great environment to do business in."
So far, only one offshore well has been drilled, in July 2004 by
Spanish oil company Repsol. The company said it found oil at the site
95 miles southwest of Key West, though not in commercially viable
deposits. Since then, the Spanish company has teamed with Norway's
Norsk Hydro, one of a select number of global oil companies with
expertise in deepwater exploration, according to Jorge Pinon, the
former president of Amoco's Latin American operations.
Offshore drilling this year
In an interview this week, Rodriguez, the chief of the Cuban
interests section in Washington, said widespread offshore drilling
could start by the end of this year. Cuban exploration, like drilling
ventures elsewhere, has been slowed by a worldwide shortage of
drilling rigs that has increased daily lease rates by more than 60%
since fall 2005.
Offshore wells aren't cheap: Those envisioned in Cuban waters will
cost $40 million to $50 million, says Pinon, the former oil executive
now affiliated with the University of Miami's Institute for Cuban and
Cuban-American Studies. "This is a very high-risk, high-reward area,"
R.S. Butola, managing director of India's ONGC, said on the company's
website.
Since 1981, the U.S. has observed a moratorium on coastal drilling,
except for a portion of the Gulf of Mexico and limited areas off of
Alaska. The drilling ban was enacted after a series of high-profile
oil industry environmental disasters. Perhaps the most notorious: the
1969 Santa Barbara spill that released 3 million gallons of oil in
waters off of California, coating 35 miles of coastline with oil up
to 6 inches thick.
Last year, the House voted to relax the prohibition on offshore
drilling, but the measure died in the Senate. There may be close to
95 billion barrels of oil affected by the ban, according to the
Interior Department.
The House-passed bill still would have allowed individual states to
ban drilling up to 100 miles from their shores. But Cuba's wells
could eventually be as close to the USA as 60 miles from Key West.
The two countries agreed in 1977 to a maritime boundary that evenly
divides the waters between them.
Capitol Hill takes notice
The prospect of foreign oil companies drilling Cuban wells so close
to American shores has unnerved some on Capitol Hill. Sen. Bill
Nelson, D-Fla., last year introduced legislation to deny U.S. visas
to executives employed by oil companies involved in the Cuban
program. Dan McLaughlin, a spokesman for Nelson, says the senator
plans to reintroduce the measure this year. Nelson also wants the
United States to renegotiate the 1977 treaty that defines the
U.S.-Cuban maritime boundary, a proposal Cuba's Rodriguez called
"silly."
Others see the prospect of Cuban offshore oil rigs as a reason to
relax the U.S. embargo. Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., co-authored
legislation last year that would have permitted U.S. firms to sell
their services to companies drilling for Cuba or to drill themselves.
"U.S. companies should be able to bid on these oil leases. . If there
are going to be oil rigs within 50 miles of Florida, . I'd rather see
U.S. oil rigs than Chinese oil rigs, given technological and safety
considerations," Flake said in a telephone interview.
For now, Big Oil is staying out of the political fray. But, at a time
when unexplored terrain is rapidly shrinking, the oil industry would
eagerly jump into Cuban waters if given the chance.
One year ago, a U.S.-Cuba Energy Summit attracted representatives
from Exxon and a handful of smaller oil service companies to three
days of meetings in Mexico City. Attendees viewed PowerPoint
presentations from Cuban government ministries including state-owned
oil company Cupet that invited American companies to help exploit
"several giant oil and gas fields."
Events since July, when Castro's illness forced him to step aside,
have rekindled industry interest in Cuba's future. "U.S. oil
companies would love to do business there as soon as this thing opens
up," says Ron Harper, an analyst at IHS Energy in Houston. "They're
looking at it quietly. They'd be short-sighted not to."
Earlier this week, Rodriguez reiterated that Cuba remains open to the
U.S. industry's involvement and may hold a second summit this year,
either in Mexico or Canada. But he said time may be running out for
the U.S. to change course. "In my opinion, if the American companies
are not able to get something, some changes before no more than one
year, after that it will be too late," he said.
For now, any U.S. involvement remains only hypothetical. Houston
oilman Antonio Szabo, president of Stone Bond Technologies, says U.S.
companies likely would require greater transparency, a commitment to
the rule of law and market economics in Cuba before investing
significant money there.
Some in the oil industry also have long memories when it comes to
Cuba. At the 1997 World Petroleum Congress in Beijing, a Cuban
official approached Lee Raymond, then Exxon's chief executive, and
asked in a jocular tone when the U.S. oil giant might return to Cuba.
"When you give us back our (expletive) refinery," Raymond growled.
Cuban officials note they already have willing partners from Canada,
Spain, Norway, Brazil, India, Malaysia, Venezuela and China.
Rodriguez made clear that the United States has no veto over Cuba's
oil plans.
"Everyone knows how advanced is American technology," the Cuban
diplomat said. "But we are going to continue with our programs - with
American companies or without American companies."
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
5) THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
February 23, 2007
By JOSÉ DE CÓRDOBA
February 23, 2007; Page A5
VIA Email from:
Walter Lippmann
walterlx@earthlink.net
MEXICO CITY -- The Cuban government refused to renew the visas of at
least two resident foreign journalists, dimming hopes it will move
forward with reforms as Fidel Castro fades from power.
The refusals were "part of a political tightening in the expectation
that when Fidel dies they will have total control and there won't be
any opposition or resistance," said Jaime Suchlicki, an expert on
Cuba at the University of Miami.
Mr. Castro, 80 years old, handed power over to his brother, longtime
Defense Minister Raúl Castro, 75, on a provisional basis after
undergoing surgery in July. Since then, many analysts have speculated
that the younger Castro, who is believed to be more pragmatic than
his brother, would experiment with reforms and fresh thinking.
Since the younger Castro assumed power, there have been some signals
of a domestic thaw. In one speech, Raúl Castro urged university
students to question authority. On another occasion, intellectuals
took the unprecedented action of demanding an apology from the
government for seeming to bring back a hard-line official who had
been involved in censuring writers decades ago. The younger Castro
also has called for negotiations with the U.S. to resolve the
differences between the two countries.
While Raúl Castro has sounded like a moderate, Ramiro Valdez, a
hard-line former interior minister who is information and technology
minister, has been cracking down on the use of parabolic antennas
used by Cubans to pick up television signals from the U.S. He also
defended the restrictions Cuba places on its citizens to access the
Internet.
Cuba recently announced regulations that it would require
correspondents to renew permits every 30 days, enabling the
government to keep a tighter leash on journalists.
Gary Marx, who has been based in Havana for the Chicago Tribune since
2002, and Cesar Gonzalez Calero, a reporter for the Mexico City daily
El Universal, were told this week by Cuban officials that their visas
wouldn't be renewed and they could no longer report from the island,
according to the Chicago Tribune and El Universal.
The Chicago Tribune said a reporter for the South Florida
Sun-Sentinel will continue to staff the Tribune Co. bureau in Havana,
and the Cuban government had told Mr. Marx that the government would
welcome an application from a new Chicago Tribune correspondent.
The Tribune quoted Mr. Marx as saying the Cuban government said it
had revoked his visa because he had been on the island too long, and
didn't give any examples of stories to which they objected.
Julia Sweig, a Cuba specialist at the Council on Foreign Relations,
said the Cuban government often exhibits a contradictory pattern of
opening up in one area and battening down in another. "It's like,
'Just in case someone is getting too excited that we might have
process of reform, we'll take a whack at the foreign press to show
who we are -- a closed society,' " she said.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
6) An American in Cuba
Nationality trumps race, and color still matters.
But everyone struggles together.
Erin Aubry Kaplan
February 21, 2007
http://www.latimes.com/news/columnists/la-oe-kaplan21feb21,1,1332754.column?coll=la-news-columns
Havana — VISITING CUBA last week for the first time, I immediately
noticed something both startling and reassuring: Just about everyone
looks like me.
People are black. And black in an American way, with a range of skin
color and features and that I see every day from Leimert Park to
Compton. I know folks like these, have family like them. Ninety miles
offshore from my native country, I am home.
But I am not. People of color here identify first with their country,
not with their race; Cuba and the state of its revolucion are a
discussion everyone has in common. Before this trip, sponsored by the
Institute for Advanced Journalism Studies at North Carolina
Agricultural and Technical State University, I read about this
nationalism and admired it. But it was difficult to believe.
Surely, my American consciousness told me, race trumps everything —
undermines the best political intentions the world over. The racial
situation in Cuba, I expected, would be no different, or not
different enough, from the hard lines of racial separatism that still
define the U.S. I was ready to embrace my suffering brethren — give
them the benefit of my experience.
They didn't need me to. Race in Cuba is different, though hardly in
the way I expected. People I met did tend to talk ideology first, but
it was more mundane things that stood out: the casual, confident way
people walked and talked, the lack of tension in the streets (which
also lacked decent cars and were lined with decrepit buildings).
Where I saw ghettos, Cubans simply saw the places they had always
lived, a byproduct of a 50-year social experiment that had worked in
their favor. They had literacy and life expectancy and college
attendance rates on a par with, if not greater than, those in the
U.S.
Despite the grim visuals, in other words, some crucial things worked
for them. It struck me that in the U.S., blacks often have great
visuals — a nice car, clothes — but the crucial things are still
missing. Cuba struggles, but with a payoff and with a sense that
everyone struggles together. In the U.S., for all our talk of
diversity, we struggle apart. And blacks struggle apart most of all.
Yet color does matter here; a common history of slavery assures that.
Digna Castañeda, a diminutive, decidedly black woman who teaches
history at the University of Havana, said both countries have the
infamous one-drop rule, though it is differently applied. "In the
U.S., one drop of black blood makes you black," she explained. "But
here in Cuba, it's the reverse — one drop of white blood makes you
white."
Which is to say, people with any bit of black ancestry like to
identify themselves as white or mulatto, not black. This color
aversion is awfully familiar to me. But Cuba's law is that there is
no institutional racism. It is officially and culturally a mestizo
nation. Still, I wonder: Where do they draw the line between mulatto
and black? At what point is whiteness undetectable and blackness
inarguable? And who draws that line?
Our tour guide, Abel, was young, stern looking and wiry. He looked
black. He said he was, but his ID card said mulatto. Another guide
and fellow journalist, Alicia, looked similarly black; she also
considered herself mulatto. When I suggested that dark-skinned people
have it worst here, she didn't disagree. But when I criticized the
dolls with big lips and black skin that populate the souvenir stands,
she shrugged. "They're just funny to us," she said.
Funny? I'm not sure if that's denial or liberation. I think it's the
first, but I can't transcend the American paradigm in order to know.
What I know for certain is that even in a mestizo society, it's
clearly better to be mestizo than not. Though it may not have the
same effect, the racial math here is calculated the same way it is at
home.
It's an uneasy kind of solidarity, not the sort I was expecting. Not
surprisingly, I was mistaken for Cuban more than once. "You look
Cuban," people told me. I felt for a fleeting moment the thrill of
nationalism that I'd never quite known. Wrong country, though.
"You look American" — I'm still waiting for that one.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
7) "I Want To Be Free": 9-Year-Old Canadian Citizen Pleads
From Texas Immigration Jail
Friday, February 23rd, 2007
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/23/1532252
Majid and his nine-year old son Kevin are Iranian immigrants
currently being held at the Hutto detention center. They’ve been
forcibly detained since their plane was forced to make an emergency
landing in Puerto Rico as they made their way to Canada. Kevin says:
“I want to be free. I want go to outside. I want to go home to Canada.”
[includes rush transcript]
We are also joined on the phone by an Iranian immigrant named Majid
from inside the Hutto detention center in Taylor, Texas. He, his wife
and nine-year-old son Kevin have been held at the center for the
past 19 days.
Majid, Iranian immigrant detained at Hutto detention center.
Kevin, Majid’s nine-year old son.
AMY GOODMAN: I’m going to break in for one minute, because
we have just gotten a call from the Hutto detention facility. We're
joined on the phone by an Iranian immigrant named Majid, from
inside the Hutto Detention Center in Taylor, Texas. He, his wife,
his nine-year-old son Kevin have been held at the center for the
past nineteen days. Majid, your story is quite a remarkable one.
Can you tell us how you ended up at this Texas jail?
MAJID: Hello. Thanks for taking my call. I was on my way to go
to Toronto, Canada, and my plane was -- after three hours in the
flight, somebody died on the plane and had an emergency landing
to Costa Rica. After that, they said everybody should come out.
After that, we went out. Immigration, they said you need to have
American visa. We had no American visa. And they hold us over there --
AMY GOODMAN: Now, just to be clear, you were never planning
to end up in the United States, is that right? You were flying to Canada,
but another passenger on the plane had a heart attack, and so you
guys had a forced landing in Puerto Rico, and when you had to come
out of the plane, while he was taken off the plane, that's when they
took you?
MAJID: Yes. This happened, yes -- was a Canadian Zoom Airline,
and our ticket was direct from Guyana to Toronto. And this happened.
They hold us -- my son is Canadian -- hold child is nine-and-a-half
years old, and they put us in detention in Puerto Rico. And from Monday
to Friday, I was in the jail in Puerto Rico between criminal people,
and my wife and son was other place. We had no news from each
other from Monday morning until Friday at noon, until we see each
other in a Puerto Rico airport. After that, they brought us here to
Hutto Detention Center, and here we are in same part, but different
room. My wife and my son is room, but it’s totally inside the room,
uncovered toilet. My son has asthma, and he’s very bad and still
comes here. It’s very horrible here. And we are in very bad situation.
We need help. We need the people help me --
JUAN GONZALEZ: Majid, in other words, basically, what reason did
they give you for holding you if you never intended to enter the
United States at all? What reason did they give for locking you up?
MAJID: Because they said, “You have an American visa?” That's why
you have to stay here. Just plane was waiting one hour for us, but
they didn't let us pass. A few officers came. They said Immigration
officers -- six, seven -- they said, “We’re going to send you, but
let us make decision.” After that, they called the police chief.
He came there. He said, “Let me think five minutes.” After five
minutes, he came, he said, “I’m going to send you to Canada,
but I’m afraid to lose my job. But usually we have to send with
your plane, but we keep you here. America is much better than
Canada. Here you have safer place. We send you to hotel, and after
a few days, you're going to be free.” But they broke their promise.
That's why they keep us here, and we have very bad situation here.
JUAN GONZALEZ: Do you know whether any other passengers
on your plane were also detained in the same way, or was your
family the only one, as far as you can tell?
MAJID: Only my family. No other passenger.
AMY GOODMAN: I just want to say to our listeners and viewers,
we are not giving your full name, we’re not showing your face
at your request. You did apply for political asylum in Canada
in the past when you lived there for ten years. You were ultimately
denied, sent back to Iran. And what happened when you were
sent back to Iran, you and your wife?
MAJID: Yes. In December 2005, we sent to Iran, whole family,
when my Canadian son born. And all documents -- the immigration
officer gave all our documents to the captain of plane. After that,
in Italy, we went with the Alitalia Airline. In Italy, police came to
plane. They took us to [inaudible] room in the transit of Italy, and
after that, again, they put us in the plane and give all documents
to the captain of Alitalia again. We went to Iran, and in Iran, the
plane’s captain said, “You have to sit until the police come to take
you.” All passengers went out, and four Iranian secret police came
in the plane, and he got all documents from the captain, and they
took us in the airport in the secret police office. We were there for
a few hours, four or five hours, in the same room.
After that, they separate us. They took me to other place, unknown
place. I was in Iran a small cell for six months, and lots of torture and
hitting. Now I have physical problem and knee problem and lots of
things. And they took my wife to other prison, where we have no
news from each other. And for six months, my wife was one year
and one month in the prison, and she [inaudible] -- after she was
free she [inaudible] the child, and because they [inaudible] him, and
she was [inaudible] two, three time in the jail. And it's a very bad
situation. But we had no news from each other. They told my wife,
because your husband, you have to cooperate with us.
AMY GOODMAN: They said they killed you?
MAJID: Yeah, they a few times told. One time they told her, “He's
in coma.” The other time, they said, “Already he was killed.” And,
you know, many times they play with her. After one month, they
free her in the street at nighttime. They did with me, too, after
six months, a lot of torture. And this one, they free me in the
street out of the town with closed eyes. And I didn't see anybody,
but they took me in daytime some day in winter -- you know, they
take my pants off to put in very cold water. They already broke the
ice, they put in the water, and they hit me every day, hitting me.
And when I came out, I was less than thirty kilograms, my weight.
And my wife was different, six months was under psychologist’s
medication over that. And after free, I should register two times
a week, every Sunday and Thursday. And when I took -- they took
us over there, they took me over there again. One week, they put
me in detention, and the other time, again three days. And after
that, one guard told me, “I’m going to help you.” After that, he
called me, said, “OK, your future is very dangerous. You have
to leave. Otherwise, you are in big trouble. I don't know what
will happen to you and your family.” That's why we decided
and we escaped from there.
AMY GOODMAN: And you tried to go to Canada. Can you put
your son Kevin on? He's standing next to you, nine years old?
MAJID: Yes. Just hold on, please?
AMY GOODMAN: Thank you. We're talking to Majid and Kevin
in the Hutto Detention Center that’s run by the Corrections
Corporation of America in Taylor, Texas.
KEVIN: Hello.
AMY GOODMAN: Hi, Kevin. How are you?
KEVIN: Not good.
AMY GOODMAN: Can you tell us the situation you're in right now
and what you want to happen right now?
KEVIN: Excuse me, I didn't hear you.
AMY GOODMAN: Can you describe where you are right now?
KEVIN: I’m in US jail right now.
JUAN GONZALEZ: And Kevin, where are you staying at night?
Are you with your parents, or are they locking you
up separately?
KEVIN: I’m with my parents, but we’re in separate rooms.
JUAN GONZALEZ: In separate rooms?
KEVIN: Yeah.
JUAN GONZALEZ: And are they letting you -- are you getting
any kind of education, or are you just sitting in your cell all day?
KEVIN: We’re sitting in the cell all day.
AMY GOODMAN: What do you want to do now, Kevin?
KEVIN: I want to be free. I want to go outside, and I want to
go to school. I want to be in my homeland: Canada.
AMY GOODMAN: You want to go home to Canada?
KEVIN: What?
AMY GOODMAN: You want to go home to Canada?
KEVIN: Yeah. My home is in Canada.
AMY GOODMAN: Were you with your parents in Iran?
KEVIN: My parents -- what?
AMY GOODMAN: Were you with your mother and father in Iran?
KEVIN: Yeah.
AMY GOODMAN: And you were coming on the plane?
KEVIN: Yeah.
AMY GOODMAN: What are the people telling you? Can
you go to Canada?
KEVIN: Hmm?
AMY GOODMAN: What are the guards telling you?
Will they release you?
KEVIN: I forgot what they were saying, but they told us
some stuff. I forgot what they were saying to us.
JUAN GONZALEZ: How are the other children there? Are you
spending time with any of the other children?
KEVIN: No.
AMY GOODMAN: They don't let you spend time with the
other children?
KEVIN: No. I’m sleeping beside the washroom, and I can't --
and I’m upstairs. I can't go to the washroom all the time. And
there's a lot of smell coming out from the washroom. And the
food is garbage. And the school is very bad. I can't learn anything
good. And I have asthma, and I got sick in here. I can't stay
here anymore.
AMY GOODMAN: Kevin, you said you're sleeping next
to the bathroom?
KEVIN: Yeah. And it's not a separate room. It's right beside the bed.
And I’m sleeping beside the wall, and my back gets sick and it hurts.
AMY GOODMAN: How is your mother?
KEVIN: My mother is sick.
AMY GOODMAN: Kevin, can you put your father back on the phone?
KEVIN: OK.
AMY GOODMAN: Kevin is nine years old. He's a Canadian citizen, came
from Iran with his parents. They were flying over the United States,
when the plane had to land in Puerto Rico because a passenger had
a heart attack, and when they landed, the Majid family -- we're not
using their real name -- was taken off the flight. Majid, have you talked
to the Canadian consulate, and what is your hope when you get
to Canada, if you get to Canada?
MAJID: Yeah, on Monday, they came here. They said -- they come here,
and we spoke to each other. They mostly asked my wife and Kevin, “What's
your food, and what kind of food they give you? Are you in same room
with family?” My son said no, because he said, I was told -- “All your
family in one room?” -- he said, “No, we are in separate room, and
the toilet is inside, the uncovered toilet, in the room.” And only they
said [inaudible] said, “You’re going to help us?” They said, “We don't
know. You have to speak with your lawyer.” After that, just regarding
information, my son’s birth certificate information, and they left. And
two days ago, I tried to call them in consul, and no response, because
he was to be phone. I tried again, but I couldn't reach him. No more
information I have.
JUAN GONZALEZ: Majid, now, do you have a lawyer who is helping
you? And do you have a scheduled hearing anytime in the future
on your case?
MAJID: Yeah. I have lawyers that’s from immigration clinic here.
They’re students. They’re working. They are very good people. And no
hearing. Two or three time, I requested for hearing, but no response
so far in the past seventeen, eighteen days here. No response.
We don't know what's going to happen for us.
AMY GOODMAN: Do you want to stay in the United States?
MAJID: You know, we escaped from Iran, OK? We escaped to be
safe and free with my family. But our plan was in Canada. And
I don't know, they keep us here. Anyway, we want safe and free,
Canada or US. If Canada give us a visa, we go there; we go to US,
if here, we’ll stay here.
AMY GOODMAN: Why are you afraid to use your full name
or to show your face?
MAJID: Because everybody knows the Iran. The Iran’s -- like this,
we are in very bad situation, because I don't trust here
immigration, because the first time they said lots of things
to us, but they broke their promise. They said you're going to
happen this, this, but now they said we're going to deported.
OK, maybe we deported. And we are like this. We are in 100%
in danger. If our whole full name goes, it's 200% in danger, because
especially United States -- if you go from other country, you have
less risk with government. If you go from United States, because
they said “US is our enemy,” they said, Iranian authorities says, OK?
But that's why we are in more and more trouble if we go back,
because they will say, “Why you go to US and this happen?”
AMY GOODMAN: Joshua Bardavid is an attorney that we are sitting
with in the New York studio. When you listen to this story,
what are your thoughts?
JOSHUA BARDAVID: Unfortunately, this is -- what he is experiencing
is a very common experience. It is the reflexive use of detention
for asylum seekers. The Majid family, they’re survivors -- from what
he’s describing, he’s a survivor of torture. He was detained in Iran.
He is seeking freedom, in this case, in Canada, arrives in the United
States and is placed back in detention. The re-traumatizing effects
of being placed back in detention cannot be underestimated. You
have a child who is sleeping in what was a jail cell for a maximum-
security prison that has been converted, but they still leave the
exposed toilet, you know, sitting in the middle of their room. There's
no privacy. With other children, he's in a room separate from his parents.
Now, but the door may be not locked at night, but that door is certainly
shut, and it’s a steel heavy door. They are placed in a prison. There's
no doubt that this is a prison. And what is particularly troubling about
this is that this was designed for the purpose of holding families,
yet they made a conscious decision to maintain the facility as a prison,
to leave the barbed wire, to leave the doors, to leave the environment
as a prison.
JUAN GONZALEZ: And what about the issue -- I don't know if you've
found with other of your clients -- given the fact that you do have young
children like this, you’d think there would be some kind of process
for expedited hearing to find out -- have an immigration judge review
the case, but they've been there now, what, more than two weeks now.
JOSHUA BARDAVID: Yeah, that's definitely another troubling aspect.
In order to sentence somebody in the United States to two weeks in
jail, you would need to have guilt proved beyond a reasonable doubt
by a jury of your peers. In order for the Majit family to spend an
additional two weeks in jail, it simply could take an administrative
delay. This is one of the problems.
AMY GOODMAN: I want to ask you about the role of these private
prison companies. The Hutto facility is run by CCA, the Corrections
Corporation of America. In fact, the jail is named after CCA’s cofounder,
T. Don Hutto. I want to play a comment made by William Andrews, the
chair of the CCA board, during a conference call with investors two
weeks ago.
WILLIAM ANDREWS: I don't want to leave anybody with the impression
that these facilities that are being reported in the paper of ICE are in
any way substandard. In fact, they are above standard, and the reports
come from special interest groups that are attempting to do away
with privatization and the whole immigration situation. And, you know,
we welcome anybody to visit our facilities. And the family facility, particularly,
at T. Don Hutto is almost like a home.
AMY GOODMAN: That was William Andrews, the chair of the board of the
Corrections Corporation of America, describing the conditions at the Hutto
jail as “almost like a home.” Michelle Brane in Washington, D.C., your response?
MICHELLE BRANE: Well, as I mentioned already, and has been made very
clear by your other guests, it is very clearly a prison that is being used
to house inmates, and it has no resemblance to a home. I mean, there’s
sofas. There are plastic sofas and TVs, but that’s about it. And one of
the things that's very disturbing about this model that they’re using is that
there are alternatives. As I mentioned before, there are pre-hearing
release programs that could be used.
There’s a whole range of ways to ensure that people appear for hearings,
that they don't abscond and that enforcement of our immigration laws
can be accomplished without resorting to these drastic measures. And
that's one of the things that we've really been stressing in the report,
is that, you know, as you've heard from the responses, in the White
House response and the ICE response to our report, and to other
complaints about the Hutto facility, they are presenting it as an
alternative of either a facility like this or complete separation, into
different buildings and different centers, of entire families. And there
is a wide range of other alternatives in between those two.
AMY GOODMAN: I want to thank you both for being with us. I also
want to thank Majid and Kevin. And we will certainly continue to cover
their story and update you on the situation. For one brief moment,
because they called in in the middle of you describing your own clients,
if you could briefly finish, Joshua, and then we're going to go to
Raymondville, to something that is, well, a tent city, a prison camp
for immigrants in the tip of Texas. But very briefly.
JOSHUA BARDAVID: Well, my clients now, the Hazahza family, who
are being held in Haskell, which is a county facility and is a maximum-
security facility, this is an entire family that again is being separated
in this center in extremely harsh conditions, that includes isolation
of a seventeen-year-old, who has now turned eighteen, but at the time
he was seventeen when he was placed in solitary confinement. You
have the -- there is physical threats. There is strip searches as a common
tool of discipline. And it is a prison. And this is an ongoing problem
with intermingling immigration detainees with criminal violent
offenders in the United States.
JUAN GONZALEZ: And, again, the reason for their detention is they’re
-- are they asylum seekers?
JOSHUA BARDAVID: They were asylum seekers. They lost their asylum
hearing, but the US government has been unable to remove them,
so they do not know what to do with them, so they placed them
in this facility.
AMY GOODMAN: I want to thank you, Joshua Bardavid, for joining us.
To purchase an audio or video copy of this entire program, click
here for our new online ordering or call 1 (888) 999-3877.
RUSH TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations help
us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on
our TV broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate - $25, $50, $100, more...
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
8) U.S. Weighs Extra Steps on Iran White House May Pursue
Sanctions Targeting Guard Corps Assets
By NEIL KING JR. and JAY SOLOMON
February 22, 2007; Page A6
WALL STREET JOURNAL
VIA Email from: Walter Lippmann
walterlx@earthlink.net
WASHINGTON -- Amid signs of economic unease in Iran, the U.S. and its
European partners are weighing another set of financial restrictions
on Tehran, including the possibility of targeting companies run by
the country's elite Revolutionary Guard Corps.
. The Goal: Officials from the U.S. and Europe say that U.N.
sanctions on Iran are working and plan to pursue further financial
restrictions in the Security Council to force Tehran to the
negotiating table.
. The Alternative: If the Security Council doesn't act, as is likely,
the Bush administration will take its own measures, and is keen to
find ways to home in on the growing business operations of the
Revolutionary Guard, Iran's paramilitary force.
. The Hurdle: Despite rising friction among various factions in Iran
over how to proceed on the nuclear front, there are few suggestions
so far that the Iranian government plans to bend.
U.S. and European officials say that the move toward a second round
of United Nations sanctions, which would likely involve freezing the
overseas assets of certain Iranian companies or individuals, reflects
their cautious optimism that sustained pressure on Tehran might
succeed in bringing the country to the negotiating table over its
nuclear program. International financial restrictions, including a
U.N. package in December, have stirred significant debate within Iran
about the wisdom of confrontation with the outside world, as the
economy there begins to show signs of distress.
Bush administration officials say they are also considering ways for
the U.S. to ramp up pressure on its own if countries within the U.N.
Security Council balk at sterner steps, as is likely. The
administration is particularly keen to find ways to home in on the
growing business operations of the Revolutionary Guard, the country's
secretive paramilitary force also known as the IRGC.
Keeping up the pressure may not be easy. Of the five permanent
members of the Security Council, France, Britain and the U.S. are
eager to push ahead on a second resolution and have already begun to
consider some potential targets. But China and, above all, Russia are
wary of pushing too hard. "Russia will control the pace of things
going forward," said one U.S. official.
The December resolution gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to freeze its
uranium-enrichment work or face stiffer economic sanctions. The West
alleges Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons under the guise of a
civilian nuclear program; Iran insists it is developing an
independent energy source. The U.N. deadline lapsed yesterday,
without any signs of compromise from Iran.
Despite rising friction among various factions in Iran over how to
proceed on the nuclear front, there are few suggestions so far that
the Iranian government plans to bend. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
said earlier this week that Iran might be willing to suspend its
uranium-enrichment work if other countries did the same, an offer the
U.S. quickly rejected. Yesterday, he said in a speech that the U.S.
and others will not "thwart the will of the Iranian nation to achieve
the peaceful use of nuclear technology."
Still, the combination of U.N. sanctions and more-focused U.S.
financial actions has already scared away some international business
from Iran and increased the cost for Iran of conducting international
trade. Recent U.S. moves to isolate Iranian banks and companies from
international financial circles have led several major European banks
to cut off their operations in Iran. So far, European trade with Iran
hasn't slumped substantially.
Current and former U.S. officials say they are now focusing on how to
combat the IRGC, which is seen as the power base behind Mr.
Ahmadinejad's presidency and the central Iranian player supporting
militant Islamist groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas. The IRGC is
also central to Tehran's pursuit of unconventional weaponry, and it
has increasingly taken a leading role in Tehran's business
activities, particularly gaining concessions in lucrative oil and gas
deposits, U.S. officials say.
The December U.N. resolution singled out the financial assets of two
of the IRGC's top leaders, Major Gen. Yahya Rahim Safavi and IRGC Air
Force chief Gen. Hosein Salimi. It alleged that both are aiding
Iran's pursuit of nuclear technologies and long-range missiles.
Some U.S. officials now want to expand these sanctions to target the
financial assets of the IRGC. These officials argue that the listing
of the two IRGC leaders in the December resolution gives the
international community legal grounds to try to freeze all IRGC
assets internationally. The IRGC's oil and gas investments are seen
as particularly vulnerable, because they often would involve foreign
partners or foreign financing to succeed. Some U.S. officials believe
many Iranians would support sanctions against the IRGC, because the
organization is gaining a greater hold over Iran's overall economy.
Singling out the IRGC "buttresses domestic criticism of the regime's
cronyism; and it pulls at the purse strings of the specific element
of the Iranian bureaucracy responsible for the region's most
egregious behavior," said Matthew Levitt, who served as the
Treasury's deputy assistant secretary for intelligence and analysis
until last month.
Some U.S. and European officials working on Iran said there isn't yet
a consensus internationally or in Washington to challenge the IRGC
directly. Others disagree over whether the U.N. mandate provides the
legal grounds to try to freeze the IRGC's assets, while some U.S.
diplomats worry that taking a confrontational stance against the IRGC
risks undermining continuing efforts to find a negotiated settlement
over Iran's nuclear program.
A second U.N. sanctions resolution would most likely seek to expand
the list of targeted Iranian companies and individuals whose assets
abroad would be frozen, U.S. and European officials said. The U.S.
may try to include more IRGC officials, or even IRGC companies, on an
expanded list, although that debate has yet to begin among U.N.
Security Council members, which would need to approve any new
sanctions on Iran.
The December resolution demanded that countries freeze the assets of
10 companies and organizations and 12 individuals involved in Iran's
nuclear and ballistic missile programs. That list was the result of
months of debate between the U.S., Britain, France and Germany on one
side, and Russia on the other. China was less involved in the
negotiations. Moscow, in particular, resisted the imposition of any
restrictions that would take aim at Iran's economy generally or that
would impede its continuing construction of a nuclear-energy plant in
Iran.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
9) Cheney: 'All Options' Available for Iran
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 3:42 a.m. ET
February 24, 2007
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/02/23/ap3458866.html
SYDNEY, Australia (AP) -- Vice President Dick Cheney on Saturday
renewed Washington's warning to Iran that ''all options'' are on the
table if the country continues to defy U.N.-led efforts to end
Tehran's nuclear ambitions.
At a joint news conference with Prime Minister John Howard during a
visit to Australia, Cheney also said Washington was ''comfortable''
with Britain's decision to withdraw troops from Iraq and that it was
up to Australia to decide if it would do the same.
Cheney said the United States was ''deeply concerned'' about Iran's
activities, including the ''aggressive'' sponsoring of terrorist
group Hezbollah and inflammatory statements by President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad.
He said top U.S. officials would meet soon with European allies to
decide the next step toward planned tough sanctions against Iran if
it continues enriching uranium.
''We worked with the European community and the United Nations to put
together a set of policies to persuade the Iranians to give up their
aspirations and resolve the matter peacefully, and that is still our
preference,'' Cheney said.
''But I've also made the point, and the president has made the point,
that all options are on the table,'' he said, leaving open the
possibility of military action.
The International Atomic Energy Agency reported on Thursday that Iran
had not only ignored a U.N. Security Council ultimatum to freeze its
enrichment program, but had expanded the program by setting up
hundreds of centrifuges. Enriched uranium fuels nuclear reactors but,
enriched further, is used in nuclear bombs.
The IAEA report came after the expiration Wednesday of a 60-day grace
period for Iran to halt uranium enrichment.
Ahmadinejad said on Thursday it was of no importance if countries did
not believe Iran's nuclear activities were peaceful, and said the
country would resist ''all bullies.''
Howard said efforts to keep Iran in check would be hampered if the
United States and its allies lose the Iraq war.
''I can't think of a country whose influence and potential clout
would be more enhanced in that part of the world than Iran's could be
if there were to be a coalition defeat in Iraq,'' Howard said.
On Iraq, Cheney sidestepped a question about whether the White House
had asked the British government to redeploy troops into another part
of Iraq rather than withdraw them.
British Prime Minister Tony Blair has outlined a plan to withdraw
about 1,600 troops from southern Iraq in the coming months, and to
reduce Britain's 7,100-strong contingent further by late summer.
''They are going to continue to have a major presence there. They are
also ... beefing up their operations in Afghanistan,'' Cheney said.
''So we are very comfortable with that decision.''
Britain said Friday it will increase its troop strength in
Afghanistan to bolster NATO forces battling Taliban militants, with
media reports saying 1,000 soldiers will join the more than 5,000
troops already there.
Cheney declined to say if he had asked Howard during talks held
Saturday to add to the 1,400 troops Australian has in and around
Iraq.
''It's not for us to stress to our allies what their appropriate
response might be,'' Cheney said, adding there would be no damage to
the U.S.-Australian military alliance if Australia did withdraw its
troops.
Cheney -- due to leave Australia on Sunday -- promised that an
Australian who has been detained without trial at the U.S. military
prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for more than five years was ''near
the head of the queue'' of possible military trials.
Howard said he had expressed Australia's concern at the length of
time it was taking to bring David Hicks, a former kangaroo skinner
who was captured in Afghanistan in 2001 on the Taliban side, to
trial.
''I can assure you we will be doing everything we can to deal with
these matters in as expeditious manner as possible,'' Cheney said.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
10) US Economy Leaving Record Numbers in Severe Poverty
by Tony Pugh
February 23, 2007
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0223-09.htm
The percentage of poor Americans who are living in severe poverty has
reached a 32-year high, millions of working Americans are falling closer
to the poverty line and the gulf between the nation's "haves" and
"have-nots" continues to widen.
A McClatchy Newspapers analysis of 2005 census figures, the latest
available, found that nearly 16 million Americans are living in deep
or severe poverty. A family of four with two children and an annual
income of less than $9,903 - half the federal poverty line - was
considered severely poor in 2005. So were individuals who made
less than $5,080 a year.
The McClatchy analysis found that the number of severely poor
Americans grew by 26 percent from 2000 to 2005. That's 56 percent
faster than the overall poverty population grew in the same period.
McClatchy's review also found statistically significant increases
in the percentage of the population in severe poverty in 65 of 215
large U.S. counties, and similar increases in 28 states. The review
also suggested that the rise in severely poor residents isn't confined
to large urban counties but extends to suburban and rural areas.
The plight of the severely poor is a distressing sidebar to an unusual
economic expansion. Worker productivity has increased dramatically
since the brief recession of 2001, but wages and job growth have
lagged behind. At the same time, the share of national income
going to corporate profits has dwarfed the amount going to wages
and salaries. That helps explain why the median household income
of working-age families, adjusted for inflation, has fallen for five
straight years.
These and other factors have helped push 43 percent of the nation's
37 million poor people into deep poverty - the highest rate since
at least 1975.
The share of poor Americans in deep poverty has climbed slowly
but steadily over the last three decades. But since 2000, the number
of severely poor has grown "more than any other segment of the
population," according to a recent study in the American Journal
of Preventive Medicine.
"That was the exact opposite of what we anticipated when we began,"
said Dr. Steven Woolf of Virginia Commonwealth University, who
co-authored the study. "We're not seeing as much moderate poverty
as a proportion of the population. What we're seeing is a dramatic
growth of severe poverty."
The growth spurt, which leveled off in 2005, in part reflects how
hard it is for low-skilled workers to earn their way out of poverty
in an unstable job market that favors skilled and educated workers.
It also suggests that social programs aren't as effective as they once
were at catching those who fall into economic despair.
About one in three severely poor people are under age 17, and
nearly two out of three are female. Female-headed families with
children account for a large share of the severely poor.
Nearly two out of three people (10.3 million) in severe poverty are
white, but blacks (4.3 million) and Hispanics of any race (3.7 million)
make up disproportionate shares. Blacks are nearly three times
as likely as non-Hispanic whites to be in deep poverty, while Hispanics
are roughly twice as likely.
Washington, D.C., the nation's capital, has a higher concentration
of severely poor people - 10.8 percent in 2005 - than any of the
50 states, topping even hurricane-ravaged Mississippi and Louisiana,
with 9.3 percent and 8.3 percent, respectively. Nearly six of 10 poor
District residents are in extreme poverty.
'I DON'T ASK FOR NOTHING'
A few miles from the Capitol Building, 60-year-old John Treece
pondered his life in deep poverty as he left a local food pantry
with two bags of free groceries.
Plagued by arthritis, back problems and myriad ailments from years
of manual labor, Treece has been unable to work full time for 15 years.
He's tried unsuccessfully to get benefits from the Social Security
Administration, which he said disputes his injuries and work history.
In 2006, an extremely poor individual earned less than $5,244
a year, according to federal poverty guidelines. Treece said he
earned about that much in 2006 doing odd jobs.
Wearing shoes with holes, a tattered plaid jacket and a battered
baseball cap, Treece lives hand-to-mouth in a $450-a-month
room in a nondescript boarding house in a high-crime neighborhood.
Thanks to food stamps, the food pantry and help from relatives,
Treece said he never goes hungry. But toothpaste, soap, toilet
paper and other items that require cash are tougher to come by.
"Sometimes it makes you want to do the wrong thing, you know,"
Treece said, referring to crime. "But I ain't a kid no more. I can't
do no time. At this point, I ain't got a lotta years left."
Treece remains positive and humble despite his circumstances.
"I don't ask for nothing," he said. "I just thank the Lord for this
day and ask that tomorrow be just as blessed."
Like Treece, many who did physical labor during their peak
earning years have watched their job prospects dim as their
bodies gave out.
David Jones, the president of the Community Service Society
of New York City, an advocacy group for the poor, testified before
the House Ways and Means Committee last month that he was
shocked to discover how pervasive the problem was.
"You have this whole cohort of, particularly African-Americans
of limited skills, men, who can't participate in the workforce
because they don't have skills to do anything but heavy labor,"
he said.
'A PERMANENT UNDERCLASS'
Severe poverty is worst near the Mexican border and in some
areas of the South, where 6.5 million severely poor residents
are struggling to find work as manufacturing jobs in the textile,
apparel and furniture-making industries disappear. The Midwestern
Rust Belt and areas of the Northeast also have been hard hit as
economic restructuring and foreign competition have forced
numerous plant closings.
At the same time, low-skilled immigrants with impoverished family
members are increasingly drawn to the South and Midwest to work
in the meatpacking, food processing and agricultural industries.
These and other factors such as increased fluctuations in family
incomes and illegal immigration have helped push 43 percent
of the nation's 37 million poor people into deep poverty - the
highest rate in at least 32 years.
"What appears to be taking place is that, over the long term, you
have a significant permanent underclass that is not being impacted
by anti-poverty policies," said Michael Tanner, the director of Health
and Welfare Studies at the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank.
Arloc Sherman, a senior researcher at the Center on Budget and
Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank, disagreed. "It doesn't look like
a growing permanent underclass," said Sherman, whose organization
has chronicled the growth of deep poverty. "What you see in the
data are more and more single moms with children who lose their
jobs and who aren't being caught by a safety net anymore."
About 1.1 million such families account for roughly 2.1 million
deeply poor children, Sherman said.
After fleeing an abusive marriage in 2002, 42-year-old Marjorie
Sant moved with her three children from Arkansas to a seedy boarding
house in Raleigh, N.C., where the four shared one bedroom. For
most of 2005, they lived off food stamps and the $300 a month
in Social Security Disability Income for her son with attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder. Teachers offered clothes to Sant's children.
Saturdays meant lunch at the Salvation Army.
"To depend on other people to feed and clothe your kids is horrible,"
Sant said. "I found myself in a hole and didn't know how to get out."
In the summer of 2005, social workers warned that she'd lose her
children if her home situation didn't change. Sant then brought
her two youngest children to a temporary housing program at the
Raleigh Rescue Mission while her oldest son moved to California
to live with an adult daughter from a previous marriage.
So for 10 months, Sant learned basic office skills. She now lives in
a rented house, works two jobs and earns about $20,400 a year
Sant is proud of where she is, but she knows that "if something
went wrong, I could well be back to where I was."
'I'M GETTING NOWHERE FAST'
As more poor Americans sink into severe poverty, more individuals
and families living within $8,000 above or below the poverty line
also have seen their incomes decline. Steven Woolf of Virginia
Commonwealth University attributes this to what he calls
a "sinkhole effect" on income.
"Just as a sinkhole causes everything above it to collapse
downward, families and individuals in the middle and upper
classes appear to be migrating to lower-income tiers that bring
them closer to the poverty threshold," Woolf wrote in the study.
Before Hurricane Katrina, Rene Winn of Biloxi, Miss., earned
$28,000 a year as an administrator for the Boys and Girls Club.
But for 11 months in 2006, she couldn't find steady work and
wouldn't take a fast-food job. As her opportunities dwindled,
Winn's frustration grew.
"Some days I feel like the world is mine and I can create my own
destiny," she said. "Other days I feel a desperate feeling. Like I gotta'
hurry up. Like my career is at a stop. Like I'm getting nowhere fast.
And that's not me because I've always been a positive person."
After relocating to New Jersey for 10 months after the storm, Winn
returned to Biloxi in September because of medical and emotional
problems with her son. She and her two youngest children moved
into her sister's home along with her mother, who has Alzheimer's.
With her sister, brother-in-law and their two children, eight people
now share a three-bedroom home.
Winn said she recently took a job as a technician at the state health
department. The hourly job pays $16,120 a year. That's enough
to bring her out of severe poverty and just $122 shy of the $16,242
needed for a single mother with two children to escape poverty
altogether under current federal guidelines.
Winn eventually wants to transfer to a higher-paying job, but she's
thankful for her current position.
"I'm very independent and used to taking care of my own, so I don't
like the fact that I have to depend on the state. I want to be able
to do it myself."
The Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation
shows that, in a given month, only 10 percent of severely poor
Americans received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families in
2003 - the latest year available - and that only 36 percent received
food stamps.
Many could have exhausted their eligibility for welfare or decided
that the new program requirements were too onerous. But the low
participation rates are troubling because the worst byproducts
of poverty, such as higher crime and violence rates and poor health,
nutrition and educational outcomes, are worse for those in deep poverty.
Over the last two decades, America has had the highest or near-
highest poverty rates for children, individual adults and families
among 31 developed countries, according to the Luxembourg Income
Study, a 23-year project that compares poverty and income data from
31 industrial nations.
"It's shameful," said Timothy Smeeding, the former director of the
study and the current head of the Center for Policy Research at
Syracuse University. "We've been the worst performer every year
since we've been doing this study."
With the exception of Mexico and Russia, the U.S. devotes the smallest
portion of its gross domestic product to federal anti-poverty programs,
and those programs are among the least effective at reducing poverty,
the study found. Again, only Russia and Mexico do worse jobs.
One in three Americans will experience a full year of extreme poverty
at some point in his or her adult life, according to long-term research
by Mark Rank, a professor of social welfare at the University
of Wisconsin, Madison.
An estimated 58 percent of Americans between the ages of 20 and
75 will spend at least a year in poverty, Rank said. Two of three will
use a public assistance program between ages 20 and 65, and
40 percent will do so for five years or more.
These estimates apply only to non-immigrants. If illegal immigrants
were factored in, the numbers would be worse, Rank said.
"It would appear that for most Americans the question is no longer
if, but rather when, they will experience poverty. In short, poverty has
become a routine and unfortunate part of the American life course,"
Rank wrote in a recent study. "Whether these patterns will continue
throughout the first decade of 2000 and beyond is difficult to say ...
but there is little reason to think that this trend will reverse itself
any time soon."
'SOMETHING REAL AND TROUBLING'
Most researchers and economists say federal poverty estimates are
a poor tool to gauge the complexity of poverty. The numbers don't
factor in assistance from government anti-poverty programs, such
as food stamps, housing subsidies and the Earned Income Tax Credit,
all of which increase incomes and help pull people out of poverty.
But federal poverty measures also exclude work-related expenses
and necessities such as day care, transportation, housing and health
care costs, which eat up large portions of disposable income,
particularly for low-income families.
Alternative poverty measures that account for these shortcomings
typically inflate or deflate official poverty statistics. But many
of those alternative measures show the same kind of long-term
trends as the official poverty data.
Robert Rector, a senior researcher with the Heritage Foundation,
a conservative think tank, questioned the growth of severe poverty,
saying that census data become less accurate farther down the income
ladder. He said many poor people, particularly single mothers
with boyfriends, underreport their income by not including cash
gifts and loans. Rector said he's seen no data that suggest increasing
deprivation among the very poor.
Arloc Sherman of the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
argues that the growing number of severely poor is an indisputable fact.
"When we check against more complete government survey data and
administrative records from the benefit programs themselves, they
confirm that this trend is real," Sherman said. He added that even
among the poor, severely poor people have a much tougher time
paying their bills. "That's another sign to me that we're seeing
something real and troubling," Sherman said.
McClatchy correspondent Barbara Barrett contributed to this report.
BY THE NUMBERS
States with the most people in severe poverty:
California - 1.9 million
Texas - 1.6 million
New York - 1.2 million
Florida - 943,670
Illinois - 681,786
Ohio - 657,415
Pennsylvania - 618,229
Michigan - 576,428
Georgia - 562,014
North Carolina - 523,511
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
11) Chávez Ends Busy Week Aiding Venezuela’s Latin Neighbors
By SIMON ROMERO
February 24, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/world/americas/24venez.html
CARACAS, Venezuela, Feb. 23 — President Hugo Chávez met here
on Friday with President Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua to discuss
an array of Venezuelan assistance programs, capping an unusually
frenetic week for this country’s efforts to enhance its political
and economic influence in parts of Latin America.
At the heart of many of the agreements reached this week —
with Nicaragua, Ecuador and Argentina — is Venezuela’s use
of its windfall from historically high oil prices, and sometimes
its own reserves and exports of oil, to lift its regional profile.
Mr. Chávez is using Venezuela’s oil revenues, valued at more
than $50 billion a year, to counter the influence of the United
States and multilateral lending organizations like the International
Monetary Fund.
The Venezuelan aid for Nicaragua has been a godsend for
Mr. Ortega, the former Sandinista guerrilla leader who was
elected president last year. Venezuela has already agreed
to forgive more than $30 million in Nicaraguan debt, provide
more than two dozen generating plants to alleviate an electricity
shortage and open an office of Venezuela’s development bank
in Managua to offer low-interest loans to small businesses.
Venezuela is also considering building an oil refinery in Nicaragua
and a pipeline across that country from the Caribbean to the Pacific
to transport Venezuelan crude oil to refineries in China and Japan,
part of an effort to move away from exporting oil to the United States.
“Nicaragua can forget about fuel problems,” Mr. Chávez said
during a recent visit to Managua.
The talks with Nicaragua were preceded in recent days by an offer
from Venezuela of $500 million in financial assistance to Ecuador,
where the administration of President Rafael Correa has been
considering efforts to restructure part of its foreign debt.
On Friday, Rafael Ramírez, Venezuela’s energy minister, was
in Ecuador for the arrival of a Venezuelan tanker carrying 220,000
barrels of diesel fuel, part of a fuel swapping deal aimed at saving
Ecuador millions of dollars in foreign exchange.
This week, Mr. Chávez’s government said it would provide $135
million in financing for an Argentine dairy cooperative. Venezuela
and Argentina also said they would create a regional development
bank and carry out a joint $1.5 billion bond issue.
The bonds are intended to offer Argentina an alternative to the
monetary fund and to give investors in Venezuela a way of acquiring
dollar-denominated securities at a time when hard currency
is increasingly sought after here.
Elsewhere, Venezuela has revealed how it deals with countries with
governments that speak critically of Mr. Chávez. Venezuela shut
an aluminum plant in Costa Rica with 400 employees last week
after Óscar Arias, Costa Rica’s president, criticized Mr. Chávez’s
recently acquired power to govern by decree.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
12) Blackstone Said to Plan Sale of 10 San Francisco Buildings
By TERRY PRISTIN
February 24, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/business/24real.html?ref=business
The Blackstone Group, which has been rapidly dismantling its new
acquisition, Equity Office Properties, plans to sell 10 buildings
in downtown San Francisco to Morgan Stanley for $2.65 billion,
according to an executive involved in the transaction.
The buildings include One Maritime Plaza at 300 Clay Street and
a 1.4-million-square-foot waterfront complex known as One Market.
Blackstone will continue to operate the Ferry Building, which is under
long-term lease from the Port of San Francisco.
Prices for San Francisco buildings have been rising, reflecting optimism
about the office market. But while rents are also going up, only
5.7 million square feet of space was leased last year, compared
with 7.8 million square feet in 2005, according to a report by Studley,
a national brokerage firm.
Blackstone, a private equity group, paid $39 billion on Feb. 9 for Equity
Office, the nation’s largest office landlord, and has sold or is under
contract to sell $22 billion worth of buildings.
Among these are five buildings in Denver, which the company plans
to sell to Callahan Capital Partners, a new real estate investment
company formed by Timothy H. Callahan, a former chief executive
of Equity Office. Callahan will pay $750 million to $800 million.
Because a challenge from another suitor drove up the price of Equity
Office by $3 billion, Blackstone is selling more buildings than it originally
intended to. But the equity firm plans to retain buildings in several
markets where rents are expected to rise, including West Los Angeles,
Boston and Silicon Valley. It will also keep the Verizon Building on 42nd
Street and the Avenue of Americas in Midtown Manhattan, which
is being redeveloped.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
13) Iraqi Cabinet Approves Draft of Oil Law
By EDWARD WONG
"The law also grants regional oil companies the power to sign contracts
with foreign companies for exploration and development of fields,
opening the door for investment by foreign oil companies in a country
whose oil reserves rank among the world’s top three in size."
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/world/middleeast/26cnd-Iraq.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
BAGHDAD, Feb. 26 — The Iraqi cabinet approved a draft of a law
today that would set guidelines for countrywide distribution of oil
revenues and foreign investment in the immense oil industry.
The endorsement marked a major agreement among the country’s
ethnic and sectarian political blocs on one of Iraq’s most divisive
issues.
The draft law approved by the cabinet allows the central government
to distribute oil revenues to the provinces or regions by population,
which could lessen the economic concerns of the rebellious Sunni
Arabs, who fear being cut out of Iraq’s vast potential oil wealth
by the dominant Shiites and Kurds.
The law also grants regional oil companies the power to sign contracts
with foreign companies for exploration and development of fields,
opening the door for investment by foreign oil companies in a country
whose oil reserves rank among the world’s top three in size.
Iraq has 80 known fields, 65 of which will be offered up for bids
for development contracts once the draft law is approved by the
Iraqi Parliament, said Hussain al-Shahristani, the Iraqi oil minister.
The 275-member Parliament is in recess but is expected to look
at the draft once it reconvenes next month, Mr. Shahristani said.
Ahead of today’s cabinet vote, the main Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish
political blocs had agreed to work together to ensure that the law
passes Parliament in an expeditious manner, he added.
Since last year, senior Bush administration officials and top American
commanders here have said a new oil law is crucial to the country’s
political and economic development, and they have been pressuring
Iraqi leaders to make passage of the law a priority. In recent weeks,
Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad, the senior American envoy here,
has been in intense talks with Kurdish leaders in the north
to overcome their objections to the draft. Iraqi officials say
Mr. Khalilzad’s negotiations were crucial to winning unanimous
cabinet approval today.
Since the American-led invasion of 2003, Iraqi politics has often
been split bitterly along ethnic and sectarian lines, and that kind
of conflict could still stall passage of the oil law in Parliament.
Drafts have been debated for months by a committee overseeing
the writing of the law before the cabinet finally approved it.
“At the end of the day, we all supported this thing because it’s
workable for all the parties and is all-inclusive,” said Barham Salih,
a deputy prime minister and the head of the committee.
Several members of the committee said in interviews that they
were confident that Parliament would ultimately endorse the law,
but perhaps only after heated arguments.
“It will be tough,” Mr. Salih said. “I want to admit it and I want
to recognize that. It will be an interesting roller coaster,
my friends.”
The writers of the draft law tried to balance regional control
of oil versus oversight by the central government, an issue
directly tied to the widening violence in Iraq.
The minority Sunni Arabs, who ruled Iraq for decades before
the toppling of Saddam Hussein and are now leading the
insurgency, have chafed at rule by the Shiites and Kurds partly
because they fear those two groups might hoard oil wealth
for themselves. Most of Iraq’s crude oil reserves lie in the
Shiite south and Kurdish north. Sunni Arab leaders have
resisted attempts by the Kurds and some Shiite politicians
to create laws allowing for greater regional autonomy.
The draft oil law says that all revenues from current and future
oil fields will be collected by the central government and
redistributed to regional or provincial governments by population,
in theory ensuring an equitable distribution of oil. This could help
calm Sunni Arabs hostile to Kurdish and Shiite autonomy.
The attitudes of Sunni Arabs could also soften if more oil exploration
is done on their lands. Iraqi officials recently increased their
estimates of the amount of oil and natural gas deposits on Sunni
Arab territory after paying tens of millions to foreign oil companies
to re-examine old seismic data across the country and retrain Iraqi
petroleum engineers.
The drafters of the law reached agreement on the principle of
revenue-sharing fairly early in the process. Much more contentious
was the issue of signing oil contracts. The Kurds, who have enjoyed
de facto independence in the mountainous north since the Persian
Gulf war ended in 1991, argued strongly for regional governments
to have full power in signing contracts with companies to develop
oil fields. Sunni Arab leaders insisted on keeping this power in the
hands of the Oil Ministry, and the Shiites fell somewhere in the middle.
The draft law has a compromise: regions can enter into contracts,
but a powerful new central body called the Federal Oil and Gas
Council would have the power to “prevent” the contracts from going
forward if they do not meet certain prescribed standards, Mr. Salih said.
A panel of oil experts from inside and outside Iraq would advise
the federal council on the contracts.
Much of the wrangling over the draft law stemmed from the minutiae
of language. Kurdish leaders insisted that the law not give the federal
council the power to “approve” contracts signed by the regional
governments. The council should only be able to “reject” contracts,
the leaders said. In the end, Kurdish and Arab leaders compromised
by agreeing to give the federal council the power to “prevent” contracts,
Mr. Salih said.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
14) A Necessary Vaccine
Editorial
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/opinion/26mon1.html?hp
Debate over a new vaccine to prevent cervical cancer and genital
warts has reached a high pitch. State legislatures are debating
whether to mandate the vaccine or insist that its use be kept
voluntary. The manufacturer stopped a vigorous lobbying
campaign lest it provoke more opposition than support. And
some health professionals who had been championing the
vaccine flinched at making it mandatory, at least for now.
Even so, state legislatures should require that all young girls
be given this vaccine, which protects against a virus that causes
some 10,000 new cases of cervical cancer in the United States
each year — and 3,700 cancer deaths.
Three weeks ago we applauded Gov. Rick Perry for making
Texas the first state to require vaccinating young schoolgirls
— ages 11 and 12 — against the human papillomavirus.
In the ensuing uproar, the Texas House has moved to overturn
his order, but the Virginia Legislature has approved a similar
mandate. Some 20 states have bills pending to require the
vaccinations for school attendance.
We have endorsed a mandate because the vaccine — Merck’s
Gardasil — looks highly effective against strains that cause
70 percent of all cervical cancer. With more than two million
doses already distributed, the reported side effects have been
mostly minor, such as dizziness or fainting. Many parents who
oppose a mandate are aghast at the thought of vaccinating
such young girls against a sexually transmitted disease.
But the vaccine works only if taken before a girl becomes
infected. Social conservatives object that the vaccine will
encourage promiscuity, but it seems farfetched to believe
that protection from cervical cancer will change any girl’s
behavior. Others complain that a mandate will pre-empt
parental rights to make health decisions, but all vaccine
mandates do that, to protect the children and those they
might infect.
The strongest arguments against moving ahead quickly tend
to be practical and financial. States have typically used school
mandates for vaccines that are already in wide use, and it is
possible that unexpected side effects could emerge (though
any mandate could be suspended if that happened). Health
professionals also need to be certain that there are stable
supplies, adequate insurance coverage, ample public money
to vaccinate low-income children and physician support.
Merck deserves praise for developing Gardasil at a time when
many companies shun the vaccine business as risky and
unprofitable. But it is charging $360 for a three-dose regimen,
a price that might come down if a competing vaccine enters
the market soon, as expected.
The vaccine could prevent thousands of new cases of cervical
cancer annually and hundreds of thousands of cases of genital
warts and precancerous growths. A mandate would force the
health care system to get cracking. And it is the best way
to ensure that all children get the vaccine, not just those
who are aware of it and can afford it.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
15) Strike Ends in Guinea After Deal With Unions
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/world/africa/26guinea.html
CONAKRY, Guinea, Feb. 25 (AP) — Guinea’s powerful union chiefs
called off a crippling strike on Sunday after the president agreed
to appoint a new prime minister in an effort to end simmering
unrest that has killed scores of people this year.
One of the country’s two main union chiefs, Rabiatou Sérah Diallo,
said Sunday that union officials proposed five names for the post
and that President Lansana Conté was expected to choose
one of them.
Ibrahima Fofana, another union leader, said that the strike would
end at midnight Sunday but that Monday should be a day of prayer
for the more than 100 people killed in political violence this year,
mostly during clashes with security forces.
Strikes this year have crippled the economy, shut down the port
and forced up prices for major commodities. The country of
10 million is deeply impoverished despite having half the world’s
supply of bauxite — the raw material of aluminum — as well
as iron ore, gold and diamonds.
The unions have complained of economic problems and demanded
salary increases and months of unpaid wages. Recently, they have
become more political, saying the country’s hardships are symptoms
of a corrupt government that neglects its people.
After a strike in January turned violent, with security forces firing
on demonstrators and killing dozens of people, Mr. Conté agreed
to appoint a new prime minister with increased powers who many
hoped would force the president to step down.
But Mr. Conté chose a close ally for the job, whom union leaders
rejected immediately.
Angry youths then took to the streets again as strikes resumed
Feb. 12, and Mr. Conté responded by imposing martial law, which
lasted until Friday. In talks late Saturday, Mr. Conté told a Nigerian
mediator that he was ready to appoint a new prime minister and
asked his opponents to propose five names for the post, said
Ousman Bah, a protocol official for the Parliament. Mr. Diallo,
the union leader, said the five names were relayed to the mediator,
who was expected to meet with Mr. Conté again later Sunday.
Mr. Bah said Mr. Conté would select one of the five by Friday.
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
16) A Push for Citizenship to Honor Anne Frank, but It’s No Easy Sell
By PAUL VITELLO
"SAYVILLE, N.Y., Feb. 23 — A congressman from Long Island wants
the United States government to grant honorary citizenship to Anne
Frank, at least in part to atone for having denied her family entry
in the years before her arrest and deportation to a Nazi
concentration camp."
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/nyregion/26frank.html?ref=nyregion
SAYVILLE, N.Y., Feb. 23 — A congressman from Long Island wants
the United States government to grant honorary citizenship
to Anne Frank, at least in part to atone for having denied her family
entry in the years before her arrest and deportation to a Nazi
concentration camp.
The House of Representatives is likely to take up the question
this year, yet the proposal is not quite as easy and unobjectionable
as it sounds. Only six people in history have been granted the honor,
and some of Anne Frank’s relatives are not supporting it.
How the issue came to emerge from this old seaside Long Island
village is almost as intriguing as the question itself. In a compact
grid of a dozen square blocks that seem cut from a Currier
and Ives catalogue, there are 11 churches and zero synagogues.
The idea was proposed three years ago on the 75th anniversary
of Anne Frank’s birth by a Sayville resident named Christopher
Bodkin, a Republican town councilman who is known around
town as a kind of serial memorializer. Over the years Mr. Bodkin,
59, has researched, documented and led successful campaigns
to erect memorials to Sayville citizens who died in World War II
and in the Vietnam War.
His campaign for Anne Frank’s citizenship, however, is of
a different order, he said in an interview: “When you come from
a town like this, you tend to grow up thinking that the whole
world has always been like this. Placid. Settled. It’s amazing
to me how much people don’t know about what came before us.“
The story of Anne Frank has enchanted him from the time he
first read her diary as a boy. And though she has no obvious
connection to his hometown or his personal background —
he is Episcopalian — Mr. Bodkin said Anne Frank’s genius
seemed to bridge time and space and the illusion of otherness
that for many Americans drapes the identities of the victims
of the Holocaust.
He first enlisted a friend, Representative Steve Israel of Long Island,
a Democrat, in efforts to have a commemorative stamp issued
in her honor by the United States Postal Service. The Postal Service,
however, informed them that it issued stamps only in honor
of deceased American citizens or “American-related subjects,”
a permitted category that has allowed stamps produced in honor
of Mickey Mouse, Spider-Man and the Incredible Hulk.
Representative Israel proposed honorary citizenship in 2004,
but the bill died. Then a few days ago — prompted in part by
the release of documents earlier this month showing that Anne
Frank’s father tried desperately in 1941 to obtain a United States
visa to leave Nazi-occupied Holland — he introduced it again.
“The best way we can honor Anne Frank in death is to give her
what her father sought for her in life,” the congressman said.
Seventeen House members from both parties have signed on as
co-sponsors. It would make Anne Frank only the seventh person
to be granted honorary citizenship in the history of the country.
The others are Winston S. Churchill; the Marquis de Lafayette;
Mother Teresa; the Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg, who
worked to save Jews in World War II; William Penn, the founder
of Pennsylvania; and his wife Hannah Callowhill Penn.
Relatives of Anne, who died at age 15 in the Bergen-Belsen
concentration camp in 1945, said they were not so certain
that this would have been the family’s wish.
“I cannot see the point,” said Bernd Elias, a first cousin and
president of the Anne Frank Foundation, a charitable organization
based in Basel, Switzerland. “She saw herself as Dutch. That is the
country she wanted to be a citizen of.”
Mr. Elias said his cousin would no more have wanted to become
an American citizen “than she would have wanted to become
a Cuban citizen.”
Letters among the papers of Otto Frank, Anne’s father — which
were rediscovered only in 2005 and disclosed on Feb. 14 by the
YIVO Institute for Jewish Research, which owns them — showed
that among the strategies Mr. Frank pursued to save Anne and
her sister, Margot, were efforts to obtain visas to enter the
United States and Cuba.
Despite contacts high in the United States government, Mr. Frank’s
efforts were thwarted by bureaucratic inertia, wartime fear
of German-born immigrants, and what Holocaust scholars
generally identify as an underlying anti-Semitism in American
society.
Edith Gordon, a cousin of Anne Frank who lives in San Diego,
was cool to the idea of honorary citizenship when she spoke to the
Long Island newspaper Newsday recently: “It doesn’t seem right
to me somehow, when we didn’t let her into the country.”
Mr. Israel said, “I realize there is no way of knowing what Anne
Frank herself would have wanted, but we do know from her diary
that she loved the values this country stands for. It would
be a way of admitting we made a terrible mistake.”
A number of people interviewed were asked: Would it be unseemly,
even presumptuous, at this point to honor someone in death who,
when alive, was lost in a maze of impersonal and bureaucratic
rejection? Does the United States have a right to claim her?
“No one has ever claimed her, remember,” Mr. Bodkin said.
“She is a stateless person.”
Deborah E. Lipstadt, director of the Institute for Jewish Studies
at Emory University and a Holocaust scholar, dismissed the
idea as “somewhat pointless.”
“There were thousands and thousands of refugees who tried
to get in, just like the Franks,” she said. “Granting citizenship
now to Anne Frank strikes me as a little too easy. The way this
country turned its back on Jewish refugees in that period
is a blot on our country. Nothing will change that.”
Elie Wiesel, the Holocaust survivor and Nobel laureate, described
the effort, however, as “very poignant.” He said in a telephone
interview: “I think it is a wonderful idea. Nobody can resurrect
the dead. But symbolic gestures such as this can only help
us preserve memory.”
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
17) Venezuela Spending on Arms Soars to World’s Top Ranks
By SIMON ROMERO
February 25, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/25/world/americas/25venez.html
CARACAS, Venezuela, Feb. 24 — Venezuela’s arms spending has climbed
to more than $4 billion in the past two years, transforming the
nation into Latin America’s largest weapons buyer and placing it
ahead of other major purchasers in international arms markets like
Pakistan and Iran.
Venezuelan military and government officials here say the arms
acquisitions, which include dozens of fighter jets and attack
helicopters and 100,000 Kalashnikov assault rifles, are needed to
circumvent a ban by the United States on sales of American weapons to
the country.
They also argue that Venezuela must strengthen its defenses to
counter potential military aggression from the United States.
“The United States has tried to paralyze our air power,” Gen. Alberto
Muller Rojas, a member of President Hugo Chávez’s general staff, said
in an interview, citing a recent effort by the Bush administration to
prevent Venezuela from acquiring replacement parts for American F-16s
bought in the 1980s. “We are feeling threatened and like any
sovereign nation we are taking steps to strengthen our territorial
defense,” he said.
This retooling of Venezuela’s military strategy, which includes
creation of a large civilian reserve force and military assistance to
regional allies like Bolivia, has been part of a steadily
deteriorating political relationship with the United States.
The Bush administration has repeatedly denied that it has any plans
to attack Venezuela, one of the largest sources of oil for the United
States. But distrust of such statements persists here after the
administration tacitly supported a coup that briefly removed Mr.
Chávez from office in 2002.
Venezuela’s escalation of arms spending, up 12.5 percent in 2006, has
brought harsh criticism from the Bush administration, which says the
buildup is a potentially destabilizing problem in South America and
is far more than what would be needed for domestic defense alone.
The spending has also touched off a fierce debate domestically about
whether the country needs to be spending billions of dollars on
imported weapons when poverty and a surging homicide rate remain
glaring problems. Meanwhile, concern has increased among Venezuela’s
neighbors that its arms purchases could upend regional power balances
or lead to a new illicit trade in arms across Venezuela’s porous
borders.
José Sarney, the former Brazilian president and a leading senator,
caused a stir this week when he was quoted in the newspaper O Globo
as describing Venezuela’s form of government as “military populism”
and “a return to the 1950s,” when Venezuela was governed by the army
strongman Marcos Pérez Jiménez.
“Venezuela is buying arms that are not a threat to the United States
but which unbalance forces within the continent,” Mr. Sarney said.
“We cannot let Venezuela become a military power.”
Still, officials in the administration of President Luiz Inácio Lula
da Silva of Brazil have been hesitant to publicly criticize
Venezuela’s arms purchases.
The issue remains delicate after the Brazilian company Embraer lost a
deal to sell military aircraft to Venezuela because the planes
included American technology.
After turning unsuccessfully to Brazil and Spain for military
aircraft, Venezuela has become one of the largest customers of
Russia’s arms industry.
Since 2005, Venezuela has signed contracts with Russia for 24 Sukhoi
fighter jets, 50 transport and attack helicopters, and 100,000
assault rifles. Venezuela also has plans to open Latin America’s
first Kalashnikov factory, to produce the Russian-designed rifles in
the city of Maracay.
A report in January by the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency
pegged Venezuela’s arms purchases in the past two years at $4.3
billion, ahead of Pakistan’s $3 billion and Iran’s $1.7 billion in
that period.
In a statement before the House Intelligence Committee, Lt. Gen.
Michael D. Maples, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency,
called attention to Mr. Chávez’s “agenda to neutralize U.S. influence
throughout the hemisphere,” contrasting Mr. Chávez with the
“reformist left” exemplified by President Michelle Bachelet of Chile.
Beyond Russia, Venezuela is also considering a venture with Iran, its
closest ally outside Latin America, to build a remotely piloted
patrol aircraft. Gen. Raúl Isaías Baduel, the Venezuelan defense
minister, recently told reporters that the project to build 20 of the
aircraft could be used to bolster border surveillance and combat
environmental destruction in Venezuela. Venezuela is also
strengthening military ties with Cuba, sending officers and soldiers
there for training.
Supporters of the arms buildup contend that under Mr. Chávez, who has
been in power for eight years, Venezuela has spent proportionately
less on its military in relation to the size of its economy than the
United States or than other South American countries like Chile and
Colombia.
In 2004, the last year for which comparative data were immediately
available and before Venezuela’s arms buildup intensified, overall
defense spending by Venezuela, including arms contracts, was about
$1.3 billion and accounted for about 1.4 percent of gross domestic
product, compared with 4 percent in the United States and 3.8 percent
in Colombia, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute, which tracks military spending.
Doubts persist as to how powerful Venezuela’s armed forces have
become in a regional context, even as they acquire new weapons.
Military experts here say pilots in the air force still need training
to start flying their new Russian fighters. And in terms of troop
strength, Venezuela’s 34,000-soldier active-duty army still lags
behind the armies of Argentina and Brazil, with about 41,400 and
200,000 members respectively, according to GlobalSecurity.org, a Web
site that compiles data on military topics.
Pro-Chávez analysts also say the president is less adventurous in
relation to military policy outside Venezuela than predecessors like
Luis Herrera Campíns, who supported Argentina in the Falklands War in
1982 to detract attention from a decline in oil revenue and climbing
inflation.
But critics of the arms purchases say they are being made with little
participation from or discussion with the National Assembly, which
recently allowed Mr. Chávez to govern by decree for 18 months.
Ricardo Sucre, a political scientist at the Central University of
Venezuela, said that the lack of transparency of the weapons
contracts had heightened concern that Mr. Chávez could be arming
parts of the army, the new civilian reserve and partisans like the
Frente Francisco de Miranda, a pro-Chávez political group, that would
be loyal to him in the event of fractures within the armed forces.
General Muller Rojas, the president’s military adviser, said concern
about the arms purchases was overblown, pointing to reports that
Venezuela was considering an acquisition of nine diesel-powered
submarines from Russia for about $3 billion.
He said the navy had “aspirations” for more submarines, but that no
“concrete plan” for such a large contract had been developed.
“We simply have an interest in maintaining peace and stability,”
General Muller Rojas said, describing the Caribbean as a crucial to
its military influence. “We have no intent of using the Venezuelan
armed forces to repress human rights.”
Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
18) UFPJ Finally Mentions the March on the Pentagon March 17, in D.C.
A letter VIA Email from Leslie Cagan to UFPJ member groups
to the UFPJ list: ufpj@lists.mayfirst.org
lesliecagan@igc.org
Dear UFPJ Member Groups,
In a short while the national office of UFPJ will be sending out an email
notice to our full national email list and we wanted to give you - the
member groups of UFPJ - a bit of advanced notice about this one.
Here's why...
In the blast that is sent out you will see a reference to the demonstration
that ANSWER is calling for March 17th in Washington, DC, as well as
an effort being organized by the Troops Out Now Coalition, also in
Washington, DC right before the weekend of the 4th anniversary
of the war. We want you to know that this does not mean UFPJ has
endorsed either of these activities, and it certainly does not mean that
we have changed our own call for local, decentralized actions all around
the country to mark the 4th anniversary.
In the alert we are sending to our full list there are examples of some
local and regional actions also taking place that weekend, as well as
a list of ways people can get involved. In other words, the full text
makes it clear that we believe local antiwar activities - using the full
range of tactics available to our movement - is the critical next step
for our work. We also know that some people would like to be in
Washington and there is no reason for us to dissuade them. In fact,
many actions against the war in Iraq and against a new war on Iran
are needed.
Here is a part of the message we'll soon be sending out to the
national list:
"On March 19th the fifth year of this illegal, immoral, disastrous war
will begin, and we must mark this occasion with the loudest and
widest demonstrations for peace that we can muster. ANSWER is
organizing a March on the Pentagon on March 17, and Troops Out
Now Coalition is calling for an Encampment to Stop the War beginning
March 12 in Washington, DC. We encourage you to attend these actions
if you are able to do so. At the same time, United for Peace and Justice
knows that our movement must also be vocal and visible in every
community across the country, around the 4th anniversary and beyond.
"We must capture the momentum of the huge numbers of new people
coming to the realization that this war must be stopped. UFPJ member
groups and allies from Alaska to Florida are working hard to organize
a wide array of actions, including vigils, marches, rallies, nonviolent
civil disobedience and more, to mark this tragic milestone and to raise
the demand to bring the troops home
"We urge you to take a moment now to find an event to participate in,
to begin planning one or to make your arrangements to go to DC.
Whatever you do to mark the 4th anniversary, start spreading the
word now to ensure a great turnout! To make Congress, the White
House, the media and our communities take notice, we need to be
loud and we need to be everywhere, saying, END THE WAR and
BRING THE TROOPS HOME NOW!"
We also want to remind you - and encourage you - to post any
antiwar events or activities you know about on the calendar on the
UFPJ web site. And to do so right now! There are several reasons
to do this:
1) Each day more and more people are looking for ways to get involved.
By posting your activities on the calendar you will make it possible
for more people to find out what's happening in their area.
2) Activists and organizers often look at the calendar to see what
other groups are planning. By posting your activities you might
inspire others to plan something in their town or community.
3) Reporters and journalists look at the UFPJ calendar to get a sense
of what's going on around the country, including in their own city
or state. Let's show them how widespread our movement really is!!
peace,
Leslie Cagan
National Coordinator
UFPJ
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
19) Open Letter to Lesie Cagan, National Coordinator, UFPJ
by Bonnie Weinstein
www.bauaw.org
Dear Leslie,
As a UFPJ member group, we are encouraged that finally, UFPJ will,
at least, be mentioning the March 17, March on the Pentagon in D.C.,
in your calendar of events and in your announcement.
http://answer.pephost.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ANS_homepage
http://www.actionsf.org/
It is a step forward from completely ignoring that the event is even
taking place, but a far cry from what is needed by the Iraqi people,
our troops and the American people.
What we need, is the greatest united force possible to be organized
in opposition to the war and for the immediate and unconditional
withdrawal of all U.S. Troops and “support-services” from Iraq NOW;
as well as against a myriad of other atrocities committed by the U.S.
Government that we all can agree upon!
Although it can be a difficult process at times, there is no excuse
for refusing to work together toward a massive outpouring of protest
on the fourth anniversary of this ongoing and expanding human
catastrophe--now on the verge of expanding to monumental proportions;
or for refusing to continue our cooperation and unification around these
goals for as long as it takes to achieve them.
Of course there is room for all kinds of protests in addition to mass,
peaceful demonstrations. But these actions should be viewed as ways
to link more individuals to united and massive, peaceful protests as
a culmination of events or as the launching of further, united, ever
larger massive outpourings of peaceful protest, up until our goals
are met and our troops are brought home and the will of the
majority is honored.
The U.S. escalation of the war and its continued and expanded
assault on the democratic process; on human rights across the globe;
the continued use of torture, imprisonment and rendering of innocent
people; the wanton disregard for the troops on the ground or the
troops tragically wounded; and, most of all, for the Iraqi people who
have suffered the greatest atrocities; compels the movement to bury
their differences and come together to make these protests as large
as possible. This isn’t a popularity contest this is a matter of peoples
lives and of human decency.
We urge UFPJ to go further and endorse, support and build the March
on the Pentagon as well as the mass demonstrations organized for
Los Angeles, San Francisco and elsewhere the weekend of March 17/18
as a first step toward the reorganization of the U.S. Antiwar movement
into a real, democratically structured, united front against the war.
Let’s utilize the full length and breadth of the movement to unify it and
bring more people into the fold. The more people who are involved
in the day to day organizing of the movement toward democratically
agreed upon unified goals--the easier our job will be and the faster
we can achieve our goals—which is the main point of our protests.
Clearly, by the sheer number of appeals for unity in the antiwar
movement recently from groups and individuals across the country—
this is what the people want.
Since it was UFPJ who stated categorically that it would not ever work
with A.N.S.W.E.R. again—it has the responsibility to make the first
move toward unity around the March on the Pentagon, March 17
in D.C.--and give it its full support.
The entire movement has the obligation to work together toward
these same unified goals.
ALL OUT MARCH 17 IN D.C. AND 18 IN SAN FRANCISCO:
MARCH ON THE PENTAGON
SATURDAY, MARCH 17
WASHINGTON, D.C .
Free Speech Victory! Permits Secured for Pentagon Demonstration
http://www.internationalanswer.org/
MARCH AND RALLY IN SAN FRANCISCO
SUNDAY, MARCH 18, 2007
(The annual St. Patrick's Day Parade is taking
place on Sat., March 17 in SF.)
ASSEMBLE 12:00 NOON
JUSTIN HERMAN PLAZA -
MARCH TO CIVIC CENTER
For more information:
http://www.actionsf.org/#local4
answer@actionsf.org
Phone: 415-821-6545
Fax: 415-821-5782
U.S. Out of Iraq Now!
From Iraq to New Orleans, Fund People's Needs NOT the War Machine
End Colonial Occupation: Iraq, Palestine, Haiti, Afghanistan & everywhere
U.S. Hands Off Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, Somalia, Philippines North Korea
Shut Down Guantanamo
In solidarity for antiwar unity and an end to the war,
Bonnie Weinstein, www.bauaw.org
If you would like to receive the Bay Area United Against War (BAUAW )
newsletter via email please send your name and email address to:
giobon@sbcglobal.net
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
LINKS AND VERY SHORT STORIES
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Fed up American GIs Petition Congress to End Iraq War
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0226-01.htm
Why Have So Many U.S. Attorneys Been Fired?
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0226-05.htm
Congress Reexamining 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0226-07.htm
US Developing Contingency Plan to Bomb Iran: Report
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0225-02.htm
US Generals 'Will Quit' If Bush Orders Iran Attack
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0225-01.htm
Global Warming: Enough to Make You Sick
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0225-05.htm
US Rejects Ban on Cluster Bombs
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0224-02.htm
Nation of Islam's Farrakhan Gives Farewell Speech
by Rachel Martin
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7595408
Seeking New Israeli Settlers, Synagogue Draws Protesters
By TRYMAINE LEE
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/nyregion/26settle.html?ref=nyregion
Sharpton Learns His Forebears Were Thurmonds’ Slaves
By FERNANDA SANTOS
"On the eve of the Civil War, in segregated Florida, a white man died
in debt at age 40, leaving his wife, Julia Thurmond Sharpton, alone
to raise their four children and to honor his financial obligations.
Determined to offer a helping hand, Mrs. Sharpton’s father-in-law,
a plantation owner in South Carolina, gave her a gift: four slaves,
two adults and two children, who would work to pay off the
money owed."
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/nyregion/26sharpton.html?ref=nyregion
Film’s View of Islam Stirs Anger on Campuses
By KAREN W. ARENSON
"When “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West,”
a documentary that shows Muslims urging attacks on the
United States and Europe, was screened recently at the
University of California, Los Angeles, it drew an audience
of more than 300 — and also dozens of protesters."
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/movies/26docu.html
Cheney Warns Pakistan to Act on Terror
By DAVID E. SANGER and MARK MAZZETTI
February 26, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/26/world/asia/26cnd-pakistan.html?ref=world
Feeding 18,000 Families a Month in One Neighborhood
The Right to Return to New Orleans
February 26, 2007
http://www.counterpunch.org/quigley02262007.html
By BILL QUIGLEY
THE REDIRECTION
by SEYMOUR M. HERSH
Is the Administration's new policy benefitting
our enemies in the war on terrorism?
Issue of 2007-03-05
Posted 2007-02-25
A STRATEGIC SHIFT
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070305fa_fact_hersh
Army Files New Charges in Watada Court-Martial
The Army has filed a new round of charges against a Fort Lewis
officer who refused to deploy to Iraq and spoke out publicly
against the war, resurrecting a high-profile case aborted by
a mistrial two weeks ago. In a widely expected move, the Army
on Friday filed the same charges against Lt. Ehren Watada that
were brought against him in the wake of his refusal to board
a plane bound for the Middle East on June 22.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/022407A.shtml
Retired Politicians Spend Unused Campaign Funds
By MIKE McINTIRE
February 24, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/nyregion/24retire.html?ref=nyregion
Defense Secretary Vows Action on Medical Center Conditions
By DAVID S. CLOUD
February 24, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/washington/24army.html?ref=us
Guinea: Parliament Ends Martial Law
By REUTERS
Parliament refused a request from President Lansana Conté to prolong
martial law in a rare act of defiance against his autocratic rule.
The period of martial law, imposed nationwide 12 days ago
to quell protests, riots and strikes calling for Mr. Conté to step
down, expired at midnight, along with a dusk-to-dawn curfew.
“We had to go in the direction of appeasement to maintain peace
and national unity,” Soriba Sorel Camara, a senior official from
Mr. Conté’s party, said after the vote.
February 24, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/world/africa/24briefs-martiallaw.html
U.S. in Talks With Britain on Installing Missile Defense System
By ALAN COWELL
February 24, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/world/europe/24missile.html?ref=world
U.S. Seizes Son of a Top Shiite, Stirring Uproar
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr.
February 24, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/world/middleeast/24iraq.html?ref=world
Canadian Court Limits Detention in Terror Cases
By IAN AUSTEN
"OTTAWA, Feb. 23 — Canada’s highest court on Friday unanimously
struck down a law that allows the Canadian government to detain
foreign-born terrorism suspects indefinitely using secret evidence
and without charges while their deportations are being reviewed."
February 24, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/world/americas/24ottawa.html?hp
Sorority Evictions Raise Issue of Looks and Bias
By SAM DILLON
"Worried that a negative stereotype of the sorority was contributing
to a decline in membership that had left its Greek-columned house
here half empty, Delta Zeta’s national officers interviewed 35 DePauw
members in November, quizzing them about their dedication
to recruitment. They judged 23 of the women insufficiently
committed and later told them to vacate the sorority house.
The 23 members included every woman who was overweight.
They also included the only black, Korean and Vietnamese members.
The dozen students allowed to stay were slender and popular with
fraternity men — conventionally pretty women the sorority hoped
could attract new recruits. Six of the 12 were so infuriated they quit."
February 25, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/25/education/25sorority.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
Another U.S. Military Assault on Media
Inter Press Service
Dahr Jamail and Ali al-Fadhily
"BAGHDAD, Feb 23 (IPS) - Iraqi journalists are outraged over
yet another U.S. military raid on the media."
http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/iraq/000543.php#more
Canada's High Court Strikes Down Indefinite Detention
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 7:51 p.m. ET
February 23, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Canada-Anti-Terror-Law.html?hp
One Immigrant Family’s Hopes Lead to a Jail Cell Suicide
By NINA BERNSTEIN
February 23, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/23/nyregion/23suicide.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Report: over 5,000 Palestinians killed by the Israeli army since 2000
Date: 21 / 02 / 2007 Time: 16:00
http://www.maannews.net/en/index.php?opr=ShowDetails&ID=19746
Fallujans Defiant Amidst Chaos
Inter Press Service
Dahr Jamail and Ali al-Fadhily
"FALLUJAH, Feb 22 (IPS) - Resistance attacks against U.S. forces
have been continuing in Fallujah despite military onslaughts
and strong security measures.
http://www.dahrjamailiraq.com/hard_news/archives/iraq/000540.php#more
Britain to Trim Iraq Force by 1,600 in Coming Months
By ALAN COWELL
February 22, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/22/world/middleeast/22blair.html
Law restricting Guantanamo appeals upheld
Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:07AM EST
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2016803120070220
Law restricting Guantanamo appeals upheld
Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:07AM EST
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2016803120070220
Soldiers coming home to neglect at Walter Reed
By Shelly Lewis
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/shelley-lewis/expose-wounded-soldiers-_b_41538.html
Gallaudet Accreditation in Jeopardy, Official Says
By BLOOMBERG NEWS
Gallaudet University, the only United States university for the deaf,
may lose its accreditation because of poor governance, low graduation
rates and a lack of tolerance on campus for varying views, a review
official warned. The official, Linda A. Suskie, vice president of the
Middle States Commission on Higher Education, wrote in a Jan. 13
letter to the university's interim president, Robert R. Davila, that
Gallaudet's accreditation was "fragile." Copies of the letter were
distributed yesterday by leaders of protests last year that led to the
ousting of the university's chosen president, Jane K. Fernandes.
Gallaudet has until March 1 to submit a supplement to an accreditation
report that did not meet the commission's requirements,
Ms. Suskie wrote.
February 21, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/washington/21brfs-gallaudet.html
737 U.S. Military Bases = Global Empire
By Chalmers Johnson
http://www.alternet.org/story/47998
"I Swore to Uphold the Constitution. Instead, I Disgraced It"
Vermont Legislature Says Bring Them Home Now!
By JAMES MARC LEAS
February 16, 2007
http://www.counterpunch.org/leas02162007.html
The giant Anglo-Dutch oil group Shell has signed a long-awaited
$800m deal with Iran to develop two offshore oil fields.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/the_economy/519688.stm
Kids get Addicted to WarSan Francisco's high school students
to study a different kind of schoolbook
By Amanda Witherell
http://www.sfbg.com/printable_entry.php?entry_id=2785
Fed Chief Sees a Rate Rise if Inflation Rears Its Head
By REUTERS
February 16, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/16/business/16fed.html
Hershey Cutting Work Force 12%
By BLOOMBERG NEWS
Hershey will close more than a third of its assembly lines and eliminate
12 percent of its work force after sales fell for the first time in 3 1?2 years,
the company said yesterday.
The company, whose products include Hershey's Kisses and Reese's
peanut butter cups, will cut 1,500 jobs over the next three years and
start production at a new factory in Monterrey, Mexico. The reductions
will cost as much as $575 million before taxes, the company said.
Hershey, which is based in Hershey, Pa., lost market share last year
to Mars, the maker of Snickers, and last month reported a fourth-
quarter sales decline of 0.7 percent.
Hershey's United States market share fell to 42.5 percent in the
13 weeks through Dec. 24, from 43.5 percent at the end of the
fourth quarter of 2005, according to Information Resources. Mars's
share rose to 25.9 percent, from 24.2 percent. The data excludes
sales to Wal-Mart Stores.
When the plan is completed, Hershey expects 80 percent of its
production to be in the United States and Canada.
Shares of Hershey rose 80 cents, or 1.6 percent, to $52.10 on
the New York Stock Exchange.
February 16, 2007
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/16/business/16hershey.html
Radio Station Cries 'Enough' -- Won't Quote From Certain News Stories
Relying on Unnamed Officials
By Greg Mitchell
Published: February 13, 2007 10:55 PM ET
http://www.editorandpublisher.com
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
SCROLL DOWN TO READ:
EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS (IN FULL DETAIL)
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
LYNNE STEWART AND MICHAEL RATNER IN BAY AREA
FEBRUARY 23-25 (Lynne and her husband Ralph will
stay on several more days. Stay tuned for complete
schedule of events.)
Dear Friends of Lynne Stewart,
I am pleased to announce that Lynne Stewart and Michael Ratner have
just accepted our invitation to tour the Bay Area. The confirmed
dates are February 23-25, 2007. Lynne, accompanied by her husband
Ralph Poynter, will stay on several more days for additional meetings.
In solidarity,
Jeff Mackler,
West Coast Coordinator, Lynne Stewart Defense Committee
Co-Coordinator, Mobilization to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal
O: 415-255-1080
Cell: 510-387-7714
H: 510-268-9429
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
May Day 2007
National Mobilization to Support Immigrant Workers!
Web: http://www.MayDay2007.net
National Immigrant Solidarity Network
No Immigrant Bashing! Support Immigrant Rights!
webpage: http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org
e-mail: info@ImmigrantSolidarity.org
New York: (212)330-8172
Los Angeles: (213)403-0131
Washington D.C.: (202)595-8990
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
A NEW LOOK AT U.S. RADIOACTIVE WEAPONS
Join us in a campaign to expose and stop the use of these illegal weapons
http://poisondust.org/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
You may enjoy watching these.
In struggle
Che:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqcezl9dD2c
Leon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukkFVV5X0p4
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
FIGHTBACK! A Collection of Socialist Essays
By Sylvia Weinstein
http://www.walterlippmann.com/sylvia-weinstein-fightback-intro.html
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
URGENT APPEAL TO SAVE IRAQ'S ACADEMICS.
Call for action to save Iraq's Academics
A little known aspect of the tragedy engulfing Iraq is the systematic
liquidation of the country's academics. Even according to conservative
estimates, over 250 educators have been assassinated, and many
hundreds more have disappeared. With thousands fleeing the country
in fear for their lives, not only is Iraq undergoing a major brain drain,
the secular middle class - which has refused to be co-opted by the
US occupation - is being decimated, with far-reaching consequences
for the future of Iraq.
http://www.brussellstribunal.org/
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
END ALL U.S. AID TO ISRAEL!
Stop funding Israel's war against Palestine
Complete the form at the website listed below with your information.
https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Advocacy?
JServSessionIdr003=cga2p2o6x1.app2a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=177
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
ENDORSE THE A.N.S.W.E.R. CALL TO ACTION
March 17-18, 2007
GLOBAL DAYS OF ACTION ON THE
4TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE WAR!
http://answer.pephost.org/site/Survey?
SURVEY_ID=3400&ACTION_REQUIRED=URI_ACTION_USER_REQUESTS&JServSessionIdr011=
k7a3443r73.app8a
http://answer.pephost.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ANS_homepage
Please circulate widely
www.answercoalition.org
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*
Sand Creek Massacre
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FEATURED AT NATIVE AMERICAN FILM FESTIVAL:
http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/local/16035305.htm
(scroll down when you get there])
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING
WRITER/FILMMAKER DONALD L. VASICEK REPORT:
http://www.digitalcinemareport.com/sandcreekmassacre.html
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FINALIST IN DOCUMENTARY CHANNEL COMPETITION (VIEW HERE):
http://www.docupyx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=41
VIEW "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FILM MOVIE OF THE WEEK FOR FREE HERE:
http://twymancreative.com/twymanc.html
On November 29, 1864, 700 Colorado troops savagely slaughtered
over 450 Cheyenne children, disabled, elders, and women in the
southeastern Colorado Territory under its protection. This act
became known as the Sand Creek Massacre. This film project
("The Sand Creek Massacre" documentary film project) is an
examination of an open wound in the souls of the Cheyenne
people as told from their perspective. This project chronicles
that horrific 19th century event and its affect on the 21st century
struggle for respectful coexistence between white and native
plains cultures in the United States of America.
Listed below are links on which you can click to get the latest news,
products, and view, free, "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" award-
winning documentary short. In order to create more native
awareness, particularly to save the roots of America's history,
please read the following:
Some people in America are trying to save the world. Bless
them. In the meantime, the roots of America are dying.
What happens to a plant when the roots die? The plant dies
according to my biology teacher in high school. American's
roots are its native people. Many of America's native people
are dying from drug and alcohol abuse, poverty, hunger,
and disease, which was introduced to them by the Caucasian
male. Tribal elders are dying. When they die, their oral
histories go with them. Our native's oral histories are the
essence of the roots of America, what took place before
our ancestors came over to America, what is taking place,
and what will be taking place. It is time we replenish
America's roots with native awareness, else America
continues its decaying, and ultimately, its death.
You can help. The 22-MINUTE SAND CREEK MASSACRE
DOCUMENTARY PRESENTATION/EDUCATIONAL DVD IS
READY FOR PURCHASE! (pass the word about this powerful
educational tool to friends, family, schools, parents, teachers,
and other related people and organizations to contact
me (dvasicek@earthlink.net, 303-903-2103) for information
about how they can purchase the DVD and have me come
to their children's school to show the film and to interact
in a questions and answers discussion about the Sand
Creek Massacre.
Happy Holidays!
Donald L. Vasicek
Olympus Films+, LLC
http://us.imdb.com/Name?Vasicek,+Don
http://www.donvasicek.com
dvasicek@earthlink.net
303-903-2103
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FEATURED AT NATIVE AMERICAN FILM FESTIVAL:
http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/local/16035305.htm
(scroll down when you get there])
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING
WRITER/FILMMAKER DONALD L. VASICEK REPORT:
http://www.digitalcinemareport.com/sandcreekmassacre.html
"THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FINALIST IN DOCUMENTARY CHANNEL COMPETITION (VIEW HERE):
http://www.docupyx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=41
VIEW "THE SAND CREEK MASSACRE" AWARD-WINNING DOCUMENTARY
SHORT FILM MOVIE OF THE WEEK FOR FREE HERE:
http://twymancreative.com/twymanc.html
SHOP:
http://www.manataka.org/page633.html
BuyIndies.com
donvasicek.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment