AN OPEN LETTER OF PROTEST FROM LUCIFER SATAN
The Rev. Obed Juan Vizcaino Najera (Maracaibo) intercedes:
Dear world media editors:
A few days ago, I was shocked at what I consider to be a monumental
offense against the vast work that I have been carrying out for thousands
and thousands of years throughout mankind's history.
I know that I am no gold nugget but to compare me to someone
as evil as Mr. Bush, aka Mr. Danger, is an unfair and disproportionate
offense that I cannot allow to pass.
Only I know and understand how I felt when I heard that extremely offensive
comment about me coming out of President Chavez's mouth before
the General Assembly at the United Nations.
I don't deserve such an insult!
This is why I now come before the nations of the world to let it be known
that I want nothing to do with that ultra-dark and hyper-diabolical Mr. Bush.
I m not a friend of the current pResident of the United States, even though
(unfortunately) we are blood relatives.
I broke up all diplomatic relations with Mr. Bush and recalled my Ambassador
when he attempted to steal the sulfur mines in hell and threatened to invade
and bomb us to kingdom come should we fail to heed his ominous threats.
I categorically reject any alliance or friendship with the likes of Mr. George
W. Bush. God have mercy on me!!! Just the thought of such an alliance fills
me with dread and makes me shudder.
Therefore, I demand an apology from President Hugo Chavez.
I demand that the United Nations allow me the opportunity to reply and
clarify that it wasn't me who stood at the podium under the appearance
of George W. Bush.
I want to make it absolutely clear that I am highly offended that President
Chavez could confuse my scent with that pestilent odor of war, death and
destruction that emanates from this dark entity known in your dimension
as George W. Bush - a fiend from the deepest, darkest, and most dismal
abyss in the entire Universe.
I implore that the Secretary General of the United Nations call upon President
Chavez to retract his words before the nations of the world. I am highly
offended that President Chavez has dared to compare me to this most
hideous ghoul: George W. Bush.
Signed:
Lucifer Satan
A communication delivered by:
The Rev. Obed Juan Vizcaino Najera
obedvizcaino@gmail.com
http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=67560
Published: Friday, September 22, 2006
Bylined to: The Rev. Obed Juan Vizcaino Najera
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Before You Enlist
Excellent flash film that should be shown to all students.
http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=ZFsaGv6cefw
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
THIS JUST IN! MORE OF THE SAME!
THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT, OCT 5 PERMITS BEING STALLED!
OPEN LETTER TO CITY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS:
To Mayor Gavin Newson, S.F. Supervisors, and Parks Dept. officials,
From: Carole Seligman
I protest the failure of The City to provide permits to the World
Can't Wait organization to allow the people of S.F. to exercise
our constitutionally guaranteed rights of Freedom of Speech
and Assembly on October 5th.
A dangerous pattern is being established in S.F. of authorities
denying groups the necessary permits to use sound equipment
and demonstrate on City streets, or failing to issue these permits
in a timely fashion.
A demonstration for Amnesty for all immigrants, coinciding
with Mexican Independence Day, Sept. 16, was denied to the
group Barrio Unidos for Amnestia, preventing many people
from participating in the scaled down activities of the day
(picketing on the sidewalk in front of the Mission Police station.)
The permit was denied a mere 2 days before the scheduled event.
You must know that the people of S.F. have a proud history
of exercsing our rights to redress our grievances to all government
authorities, on issues that are local, national and international.
Suddenly the City authorities are using bureacratic means
of impeding these basic, consitutionally protected rights.
I do not think the people of S.F. are going to accept your
actions that restrict our basic democratic rights.
I ask that you immediately grant the permit for the World
Can't Wait activities and that the City leaders make it public
and clear that the First Amendment of the Constitution
is respected and enforced in S.F.
Sincerely,
Carole Seligman
415 282-1079
OPEN LETTER TO CITY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS:
By Bonnie Weinstein
Gavin Newsom gavin.newsom@sfgov.org
San Francisco Board of Supervisors board.of.supervisors@sfgov.org
Sandy Lee sandy.lee@parks.sfgov.org
Cindy Shamban cindy.shamban@sfmta.com;sfgov.org/dpt
Crystal Stewart crystal.stewart@sfgov.org
Heather Fong heather.fong@sfgov.org
Dear City Government Officials and Interested Parties:
The World Can't Wait group, sf@worldcantwait.org, has
applied for permits to rally at Justin Herman Plaza at noon,
OCT 5 to march on Market Street to a main rally with prominent
speakers at 4PM in Union Square, and then to march back to
Justin Herman Plaza for the all-night vigil to to demonstrate
as part of the national day of mass resistance against the war
called with actions across the country.
The San Francisco Police Department has denied the march
permit. The SF Recreation and Parks Department is responsible
for permits at the sites and has not yet granted them.
Again, the San Francisco City Government has denied the right
to free speech and assembly to voices of resistance and
opposition to the policies of this government.
The bloodbath in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon, Haiti--
in nations around the world is continuing thanks to this hideous
and corrupt government, the government of the United States,
responsible for terror around the world. I do not support this
government. It is corrupt, vicious and out to defend the wealthy
at the expense of the planet itself--anything for the almighty
dollar and the power it buys.
I do not agree with everything that The World Can't Wait group
has to say --we have friendly debates frequently--but I insist
that they have the right to say it!
The right to free speech and assembly is meaningless if the
government at any level--city, state or federal--has the right
to deny permits for no reason or dictate when and where we
are allowed to demonstrate.
Our group, People United for General and Unconditional Amnesty
for All, was also denied our right to free speech and assembly--
based upon false statements made by the Police Department.
I got an apology about one of the false statements but still, we
were denied our permits and were subject to police intimidation.
A large number of police were present at the time and location
of our planned event last Saturday, Sept. 16th prepared to stop
us if we attempted to use amplified sound or take to the street.
With our permit denied we knew we would endanger many
people if we tried to go ahead with our plans so we altered
them to comply with the law. Which is why we tried to get
permits in the first place. So that we could advertise
a peaceful and legal rally.
We arrive the day of our planned rally with a bullhorn to
inform the community that the rally permits were denied and
why. We handed out explanatory flyers to those who would
take them and went ahead with our modest list of speakers.
We then peacefully marched on the sidewalk to the Mission
Police Station--the location of the source of the false statements
--where we formed an orderly picket line for about an hour.
We are very proud that we did this. And, we will not let this
issue go. WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTEST THE
GOVERNMENT AND THE GOVERNMENT DOESN'T HAVE THE
RIGHT TO SILENCE US!
NOT ALLOWING PERMITS AND DENYING US THE RIGHT TO
AMPLIFIED SOUND IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
TO EXACT HUGE FEES FROM PEOPLE IN ORDER JUST TO APPLY
FOR PERMITS (We had to come up with over $700.00 just for
the permits. We found we couldn't afford to rent a flatbed
truck or any speakers so decided to just use our own speaker
and speak from a milk-carton-type platform. The City couldn't
even allow this!)
FREE SPEECH IS FOR EVERYONE RICH OR POOR! WAVE THE FEES
FOR POOR GROUPS WHO HAVE NO MEANS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT.
EVERY PERMIT APPLIED FOR MUST BE GRANTED UNLESS THERE
IS A DAMNED GOOD REASON.
The news of this and the city's insistence that A.N.S.W.E.R. pay
tens of thousands of dollars in fines for posting information
up in the community--a centuries-long practice of free speech
and mass communication among the poor--among those without
the billions of advertising dollars to spend--is already spreading
shockwaves throughout the community.
News of these permit denials and the harassment of A.N.S.W.E.R.
Will serve to expose the real nature of the city government.
What do we call a state that allows the Police to determine when,
where, how and if an opposition demonstration can take place?
We call that a Police State! What do we call those who do not
stand up against this injustice? I can think of a few choice words.
Why is it that the Zionists are afforded a location directly in front
of antiwar protests? Why do the Right to Lifers get a police escort
in a solidly pro-choice city? Why are mainstream politicians
or even corporations catered to routinely with street closures,
giant stages, sound systems, etc. when a small group of immigrants
who wanted to use a small sound system and a very short street
closure from Mission to Bartlett Streets on 24th Street for a total
of two hours on one day was met with a show of force at both the
ISCOTT hearing and at the location the demonstration was to take
place--to see to it that it would not take place. How much money
in Police overtime did we, the taxpayers, have to pay in order
to squelch this small expression of free speech and assembly?
How much to harass A.N.S.W.E.R.?
The whole community witnessed what happened to the People
United for General and Unconditional Amnesty for All on
September 16th at 24th and Mission Street. The whole
community notice the police show of force! The community
also noticed a small but brave group of people who carried
on as best we could with our rally. Standing on the lamp post
on the corner and having our rally anyway with an ineffective
bullhorn. The flyers, signs, posters and banners we carried
and handed out said it all! The whole community also watched
as this same small, gutsy group of about 50 people march
to the Mission Police Station at 17th and Valencia and picketed
them in protest of their denial of our permits.
WE DEMAND YOU SEE TO IT THAT "THE WORLD CAN'T WAIT"
PERMITS ARE GRANTED IMMEDIATELY! AND IMMEDIATELY DISMISS
ALL OF A.N.S.W.E.R.'S FINES AND MAKE REPARATIONS TO THEM
FOR THE HARASSMENT THEY HAVE HAD TO DEAL WITH! WE, AGAIN,
ALSO DEMAND THAT OUR PERMIT FEES BE RETURNED TO US SINCE
OUR PERMIT WAS DENIED UNDER FALSE PRETENCIS.
You can't pick and choose who can demonstrate. That is not your
prerogative if we are to claim to have freedom of speech and assembly.
WE DEMAND OUR RIGHTS!
Bonnie Weinstein
People United For a General and Unconditional Amnesty
Barrio Unido Por una Amnistia General e Incondicional
474 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Contact Persons:
Cristina Gutierrez: 415-431-9925
Bonnie Weinstein: 415-824-8730
www.bauaw.org
Text of flyer handed out Sept. 15th to the community:
POLICE DENY PERMITS TO THE IMMIGRANTS OF THE PEOPLE
UNITED PREVENTING US FROM ORGANIZING IN OUR OWN
NEIGHBORHOOD IN ORDER TO DEMAND UNCONDITIONAL
AND GENERAL AMNESTY
The People United has been engaged in the application
process since May 10th in order to celebrate our national
holidays and find a real solution to our problems as immigrants
and specifically for undocumented immigrants. The police
have completely blocked all of the attempts we have made
in having an assembly in our own neighborhood. There has
been no possible negotiation, and furthermore the police
had lied at the public hearing in order to deny us our permits.
WHY?
Because The People United is the only organization in San
Francisco led by immigrants! Not by the sons of immigrants.
Not by any democratic nor republican parties. Not by any so
called left organizations or parties who claim they want to
save us but won't listen to our demands. Not by organizations
that receive governmental monies or who receive salaries
in order to supposedly help us immigrants get papers.
Not by democratic or republican parties who see us as
their future votes.
NO!
We are a group of immigrants who demand a general
and unconditional amnesty for all, we are not talking
about using our people to go vote and elect people who
never fulfill their promises.
We denounce our governments of Mexico, Guatemala,
Nicaragua, Colombia, Peru, etc., for not providing jobs
in our countries and forcing us to leave them.
We denounce the government of the United States for
being an accomplice with the government of our countries.
They work together to bring us here as a cheap source
of labor and many times we are forced to become scabs.
We denounce the government of the United States for planning
disenfranchisement and dehumanization keeping us as an
army of unemployed with no rights to health, education,
or dignity.
We denounce all the political parties and organizations that
look at us as objects in order to achieve their political and
economic needs and they deny us the right to organize
ourselves and represent our own struggle.
We denounce the police for the constant abuse of our people
of which the negation of this permit of this assembly
is just one more.
Immigrant brothers and sisters, unite in the struggle for
our rights and the general and unconditional amnesty for all!!!!
MEETING
Date: Thursday, September 21st
Place: 474 Valencia St.
Time: 7pM
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
QUOTE OF THE DAY:
In an interview in March 1995 entitled, "Jesse Helms: Setting the
Record Straight" that appeared in the Middle East Quarterly, Helms
said, "I have long believed that if the United States is going to give
money to Israel, it should be paid out of the Department of Defense
budget. My question is this: If Israel did not exist, what would
U.S. defense costs in the Middle East be? Israel is at least the
equivalent of a U.S. aircraft carrier in the Middle East. Without
Israel promoting its and America's common interests, we would
be badly off indeed."
(Jesse Helms was the senior senator from North Carolina and the
chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at the time.)
http://www.meforum.org/article/244
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
!VIVA FIDEL! LONG LIVE FIDEL! LONG LIVE THE CUBAN REVOLUTION!
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Harvest Time
By Bonnie Weinstein
Congress is postponing decisions about immigrant rights legislation
until after the elections. They say they don't want to antagonize
the Latino community before elections. But there is another reason.
It's harvest time! They need thousands of immigrant workers
to harvest the nations crops. They are not worried about antagonizing
Latino's-it's America's agribusiness they don't want to upset. Clearly
they don't want to deport all immigrants, they just want to be able
to terrorize them into submission.
What many American-born workers don't realize is that this threat
will be extended to them as well-not deportation, of course-but
the threat of being out of a job if they stand up for their rights.
What are the common dangers that we face? At the stroke of
a bosses pen we can be fired and find ourselves without a livelihood.
Throughout America factories are being closed down and re-built
in countries that force workers to live as slaves while a bonanza
of U.S, tax-free, corporate profits flows freely across all borders
and into the bosses' pockets.
An even more sinister danger is the lure of U.S. Military service.
All of our children and especially the children of undocumented
workers are in danger of being used as cannon fodder to maintain
the power and wealth of America's corporations. The Military
is entrenched in our public schools. They don't go to the schools
of the wealthy. To the children of immigrants they promise
citizenship and to the children of poor, American workers they
promise college and a career. But it does no good to become
a citizen after you are dead and it's hard to have a career with
half of your brain or body missing in action!
On Tuesday, November 14th at 7:00 P.M., the San Francisco Board
of Education will vote on whether to phase out the Junior Reserve
Officers Training Corps-a military recruitment program for the
High Schools. We must be there in force to see that they do
so immediately, and that they rid the schools of all military
recruiters! It is up to us so please come! That's Tuesday,
November 14, 7:00 P.M., at 555 Franklin Street, First Floor.
You can call the day before and the day of the meeting
to get on the speakers list: 415-241-6427.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
WE EXTEND OUR SOLIDARITY TO A.N.S.W.E.R. IN THEIR STRUGGLE
AGAINST THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO WHO, ACTING
AS A BODY, ARE INCREASINGLY LIMITING OUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH
(INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO POST PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS--A CENTURIES
OLD TRADITION OF MASS COMMUNICATION FOR THE POOR)
AND THE RIGHT TO FREE ASSEMBLY!
Paid advertising in the mass media is prohibitive. Only those with millions
of dollars to spend for advertising are allowed a public voice.
Right here in San Francisco the fees for permits have skyrocketed
and the permit process is long and complicated. The permit
application for DPT is 17 pages long and full of rules and regulations
that must be followed. And both the City and County and the ACLU
have agreed that while we have the right to free speech, the City and
County does, indeed, have the right to say when and where we may
or may not exercise it.
WE SAY NO!
THE CITYS' OBLIGATION IS TO MAKE SURE OUR
RIGHT TO ORGANIZE, PUBLICIZE AND PROTEST IS PROTECTED!
AND THAT OUR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH AND THE RIGHT TO
HAVE DIRECT CONTACT WITH OUR OWN CONSTITUENCY
IS GUARANTEED! We must be able to post public events,
and hold public events where the people are. The San Francisco
Police Department routinely protects the rights of the Zionists
when they want to hold counter-demonstrations to our
Antiwar actions. They also protect the "Right to Lifers" when
they want to march down San Francisco's Embarcadero--HERE
IN SAN FRANCISCO--A PRO-CHOICE CITY!
The San Francisco Police Department goes all out to
accommodate them! WHY NOT US!
RESCHEDULED: ANSWER Postering Case Hearing
We are appealing for your support as our free speech lawsuit
against the San Francisco Department of Public Works (DPW)
reaches a critical stage. As you may be aware from articles that
have recently appeared in the Bay Guardian, the SF Weekly and
elsewhere, the DPW is attempting to impose fines that now total
more than $45,000 against the local ANSWER Coalition for
postering violations.
We just received word that the hearing for the ANSWER postering
case has been put off for 2 weeks. The new date of the hearing is
Thurs. Sept. 28, 9:30am at Superior Court, 400 McAllister St. (corner
Polk St., SF), 3rd Floor, Dept. 302. If you can, please join us at the
hearing two weeks from today to show your support.
If you would like to read a copy of attorney Ben Rosenfeld’s reply
to the city's response to our lawsuit, which summarizes the main
points of our position, please contact us at 415-821-6545 or
answer@actionsf.org.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
STOP THE WAR! BRING ALL THE TROOPS HOME NOW!
MONEY FOR HUMAN NEEDS NOT WAR!
MARCH AND RALLY
SATURDAY, 10/28
(TIME AND LOCATION TBA)
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
THIS JUST IN:
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
The Democratic Party's redevelopment plan is stopped by Petition
campaign until 2000! House Speaker Pelosi's, the Board of Supervisor's,
and the Mayor's plans to help the housing profiteers is stopped.
"The Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area, passed on by the
Board of Supervisors 7-4 , and signed into law by the Mayor on
June 1, 2006, is now officially suspended pending an election at
which the voters will be given the opportunity to decide. The election
will most likely take place during a normally scheduled general
election in 2007."
SEPTEMBER 12, 2006
Just before 5 pm today, Tuesday, September 12, 2006, John Arntz,
Director of Elections for the City and County of San Francisco officially
certified that the REFERENDUM PETITION opposing the creation
of a Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area as successful.
The Department of Elections found that more than the minimum
number of 21,615 valid signatures were submitted by Petition
sponsors. Sponsors had submitted in excess of 33,000 signatures
on August 30th, 2006 after a 90 day signature gathering drive.
San Francisco has not seen a successful referendum petition drive
in decades. A referendum allows San Francisco voters to decide
on the merits of legislation passed by the Board of Supervisors.
WHAT THIS MEANS:
The Bayview Hunters Point Redevelopment Area, passed on by the
Board of Supervisors 7-4 , and signed into law by the Mayor on
June 1, 2006, is now officially suspended pending an election
at which the voters will be given the opportunity to decide.
The election will most likely take place during a normally
scheduled general election in 2007.
SUPPORTES HAIL VICTORY:
Petition supporters hailed the results as a victory for democracy
and echoed their campaign slogan "Let the Voters Decide!
Petition supporter , Willie Ratcliff,publisher of the Bayview Newspaper
said "This special interest legislation was never about the benefiting
the community. Now ,finally, the will of the voters can be expressed
democratically, at the ballot."
CONTACT FOR FURTHER INFO:
Brian Murphy O'Flynn 415-867-4370
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
SCROLL DOWN TO READ:
EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
ARTICLES IN FULL
LINKS ONLY
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
EVENT ANNOUNCEMENTS
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
THE DECLARATION OF PEACE
“WITNESS TO PEACE: PROTEST AND CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE TO
SAVE THE LIVES OF OUR CHILDREN”
ANOTHER WORLD IS POSSIBLE!
Meet at Military Recruiting Office
Monday, September 25, 2006, 4:00 P.M.-6:00 P.M.
Stonestown Ocean Recruiting Station
561 Buckingham Way
(Across the street from the mall.)
Eyes Wide Open Boots and Shoes Exhibit: The Numbers Increase
The Declaration of Peace
The Declaration of Peace (www.declarationofpeace.org) is
a nationwide campaign to establish a concrete and rapid
plan for peace in Iraq. In August and September Congressional
visits have urged our Members of Congress to sign on to end
this militaristic adventure in Iraq.
IF CONSCIENCE LEADS YOU, TRAIN AND JOIN WITH ACTIVISTS
OF FAITH IN A NON VIOLENT ACTION TO END MILITARISM
AND THE WAR IN IRAQ
PREPARATION AND TRAININGS
September 23, Saturday 1-5 p.m. Non-Violence Training,
San Francisco First Unitarian Universalist Society,
1187 Franklin Street at Geary
Get information as it develops.
Contact Sandra Schwartz at (415) 565-0201 x 24
or email sschwartz@afsc.org
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Mass March & Rally
Wednesday, Sept. 27, 2006
the 40th anniversary of the
1966 Hunters Point Uprising
For more info, call POWER, (415) 864-8372, ext. 302/ 303,
or SF Bay View, (415) 671-0789.
On Sept. 27, 1966, Matthew Johnson, 16, was fatally
shot in the back by SFPD, and the people rose up in
rage – only to be put down by National Guard troops
and tanks called in by City Hall.
On Sept. 27, 2006, we demand that City Hall reinstate
our referendum petition signed by over 33,000 San
Franciscans to stop the Redevelopment land grab and
‘repeopling’ of Bayview Hunters Point.
For 40 years, we’ve demanded
· no more police brutality
· living wage jobs, especially on City construction
· the right to develop our own community
Don’t let City Hall shoot us in the back again!
Gather 3:30 Third St. & Williams
March to Rally at Third & Palou
Tell City Hall
Hands off Hunters Point!
We shall not be moved!
Sponsored by Defend Bayview Hunters Point Coalition: San Francisco
Bay View National Black Newspaper, POWER, ACORN, Environmental
Justice Advocacy, Nation of Islam Bay Area & many more …
Info (415) 864-8372, ext. 302 / 303
To subscribe, email sfbayview-subscribe@lists.riseup.net.
To unsubscribe, email sfbayview-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.ne
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
"No Thanks Bechtel!"
...for the Iraq war
...for undermining democracy
...for sick Iraqi children
...for destruction of the environment
...for nuclear weapons
Join us! Wednesday, Sept 27, 4:00 PM
Bechtel Corporate Headquaters, 50 Beale St, San Francisco
Half a block east from Embarcadero BART
DECLARE Peace - an end to war and war profiteering!
For more info on this event, please contact Lacy MacAuley at
Butterfly@Lacy.com.
For more info on Declaration of Peace, including a full calendar of events,
please visit:
http://www.declarationofpeace.org
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
WHY DOES PROP 85 ENDANGER
TEEN SAFETY
Dear Health Care Activist,
Parents care most about keeping their teenagers safe.
That means always safe, even if they feel they can’t talk
to their parents about an unplanned pregnancy.
Parental notification laws cause young women to delay
seeking medical care.
When desperate teenagers turn to back-alley abortions
many will suffer serious injuries and some will die.
You are invited to our Saturday, September 30 health care meeting
on "Why Proposition 85 is bad for our health." The 3pm meeting
will be 4760 Mission in San Francisco, between Ocean and Geneva
at Russia. It is 5 blocks from the Balboa BART station.
Proposition is 85 is a re-run of the 2004 ballot initiative,
Proposition 73.
Groups in opposition to prop 85 include:
The California Federation of Labor, The California Medical
Association, The California Academy of Family Physicians,
The California Nurses Association, American Academy
of Pediatrics-California District, The Adolescent Health
Collaborative, Health Care of All, The League of Women
Voters, and Planned Parenthood. The State AFL-CIO at its
July convention voted to oppose this attack on reproductive rights.
Don Bechler
Chair - California Universal Health Care Organizing Project
Chair - Health Care for All - San Francisco chapter
415-695-7891
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Brian Ashley will report
on the new stage
of the struggle
for liberation in South Africa
October 1, 2006
2:00 PM - 5:00 PM
Refreshments @ 2:00 PM
Brian to speak @ 3:00 PM
Q & A to follow
Hosted By Alice & Frank Fried
742 Palmera Court
Alameda, CA 94501
510.769.0599
About Brian Ashley:
Brian Ashley has been an activist in the South African liberation
struggle having gone into exile in Zimbabwe in 1984. He is the
founder and director of the Alternative Information and
Development Centre, AIDC, a radical advocacy NGO mobilising
against neoliberal globalisation and its impact in South Africa
and Southern Africa. He helped form the Jubilee 2000 anti-
debt movement in South Africa and the global Jubilee South
movement that fights against debt domination by the International
Financial Institutions and the G8 countries. He is active in the
World Social Forum representing AIDC on the WSF International
Council and the African Social Forum Council. He is also a leading
member of the Palestinian Solidarity Committee. Apart from being
active in a number of social movements in SA he is a board member
of the Congress of South African Trade Unions, COSATU led Working
Partnerships Research and Education Agency.
A collection will be taken to support South African Solidarity Work
Frank Fried
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Urgent call from October 22 Coalition against Police Brutality, SF
October 22 Coalition against Police Brutality, Repression
and Criinalization of a generation
National Day of Protest, March and Rally in SF, Planning
NO MORE STOLEN LIVES ! NO MAS VIDAS ROBADAS !
Contact:
mesha Monge-Irizarry
Idriss Stelley Foundation
(415) 595-8251 24HR Bilingual Spa. Crisis line
iolmisha@cs. com
How: Already involved are : October 22 Bay Area, Idriss
Stelley Foundation, SF CEDP (Campaign to End the Death
Penalty, ISO (International Socialist Organization, Bay Area),
Bay Area Families of Victims and Survivors of Police brutality,
Code Pink
http://www.october22.org/
GET INVOLVED: To join our mailing list, please write to:
sf1022-talk-subscribe@lists.riseup.net
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
U.S. Out of Iraq Now! We Are the Majority!
End Colonial Occupation from Iraq,
to Palestine, Haiti, and Everywhere!
October 28 National Day of Action
Locally Coordinated Anti-War Protests from Coast to Coast
Vote With Your Feet … and Your Voices, and Banners, and Signs!
Let Every Politician Feel the Power of the People!
http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7836
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
October 28 National Day of Action
Locally Coordinated Anti-War Protests from Coast to Coast
Vote With Your Feet … and Your Voices, and Banners, and Signs!
Let Every Politician Feel the Power of the People!
http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7836
http://www.actionsf.org/
http://answer.pephost.org/site/News2?abbr=ANS_&page=NewsArticle&id=7869
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
End Canada's Occupation of Afghanistan!
Call for action on October 28, 2006
This call for a pan-Canadian day of action, co-signed by the
Canadian Peace Alliance, the Canadian Islamic Congress, the
Canadian Labour Congress and the Montreal coalition Echec
a la Guerre, is being distributed and discussed at the World Peace
Forum now taking place in Vancouver. -SV The Collectif Échec
à la guerre, Canadian Peace Alliance, the Canadian Labour Congress,
and the Canadian Islamic Congress are jointly calling for a pan-
Canadian day of protest this October 28th, 2006, to bring Canadian
troops home from Afghanistan.
On that day, people all across the country will unite to tell
Stephen Harper that we are opposed to
his wholehearted support for Canadian and U.S. militarism.
This October marks the fifth anniversary of the invasion and
occupation of Afghanistan, and the people of that country are
still suffering from the ravages of war. Reconstruction in the
country is at a standstill and the needs of the Afghan people
are not being met. The rule of the new Afghan State, made
up largely of drug running warlords, will not realize the
democratic aspirations of the people there. In fact, according
to Human Rights Watch reports, the human rights record
of those warlords in recent years has not been better than
the Taliban.
We are told that the purpose of this war is to root out terrorism
and protect our societies, yet the heavy-handed approach of
a military occupation trying to impose a US-friendly
government on the Afghan people will force more Afghans
to become part of the resistance movement. It will also
make our societies more -- not less -- likely to see terrorist
attacks.
No discussion on military tactics in the House of Commons
will change that reality. Indeed, violence is increasing with
more attacks on both coalition troops and on Afghan civilians.
While individual Canadian soldiers may have gone to Afghanistan
with the best of intentions, they are operating under the
auspices of a US-led state building project that cares little
or the needs of the Afghan people. US and Canadian interests
rest with the massive $3.2 billion Trans Afghan Pipeline (TAP)
project, which will bring oil from the Caspian region through
southern Afghanistan (where Canada is stationed) and onto the
ports of Pakistan.
It has been no secret that the TAP has dominated US foreign
policy towards Afghanistan for the last decade. Now Canadian
oil and gas corporations have their own interests in the TAP.
Over the last decade, the role of the Canadian Armed Forces
abroad has changed, and Canadian foreign policy has become
a replica of the US empire-building rhetoric. The end result
of this process is now plain to see with the role of our troops
in Southern Afghanistan, with the enormous budget increases
for war expenditures and "security," with the Bush-style speeches
of Stephen Harper, and with the fear campaigns around
"homegrown terrorism" to foster support for those nefarious
changes.
It is this very course that will get young Canadian soldiers killed,
that will endanger our society and consume more and more
of its resources for destruction and death in Afghanistan.
We demand a freeze in defense and security budgets until
an in-depth public discussion is held on those issues across
Canada. The mission in Afghanistan has already cost Canadians
more than $4 billion. That money could have been used to fund
human needs in Canada or abroad. Instead it is being used
to kill civilians in Afghanistan and advance the interests
of corporations.
On October 28th, stand up and be counted.
Canadian Troops Out of Afghanistan Now!
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
San Francisco Board of Education Meeting
Tuesday, November 14th, 7PM
555 Franklin Street, 1st Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
415/241-6427
The Board will vote on a resolution to phase out JROTC.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Close the SOA and Change Oppressive U.S. Foreign Policy
Nov. 17-19, 2006 - Converge on Fort Benning, Georgia
People's Movements across the Americas are becoming increasingly more
powerful. Military "solutions" to social problems as supported by
institutions like the School of the Americas were unable to squash their
voices, and the call for justice and accountability is getting louder each
day.
Add your voice to the chorus, demand justice for all the people of the
Americas and engage in nonviolent direct action to close the SOA and
change oppressive U.S. foreign policy.
With former SOA graduates being unmasked in Chile, Argentina, Colombia,
Paraguay, Honduras, and Peru for their crimes against humanity, and with
the blatant similarities between the interrogation methods and torture
methods used at Abu Ghraib and those described in human rights abuse cases
in Latin America, the SOA/WHINSEC must be held accountable!
Visit http://www.soaw.org to learn more about the November Vigil, hotel
and travel information, the November Organizing Packet, and more.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
GENERAL ANNOUNCEMENTS
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Shop for a Donation at Al-Awda!
Interested in furthering your knowledge about Palestine
and its people?
Want to help make the Palestinian Right to Return a reality?
Looking for ways to show your support for Palestine and
Palestinian refugees?
Why not shop for a donation at Al-Awda
http://al-awda.org/shop.html
and help support a great organization and cause!!
Al-Awda offers a variety of educational materials including interesting
and unique books on everything from oral histories, photo books
on Palestinian refugees, to autobiographies, narratives, political
analysis, and culture. We also have historical maps of Palestine
(in Arabic and English), educational films, flags of various sizes,
and colorful greeting cards created by Palestinian children.
You can also show your support for a Free Palestine, and wear with
pride, great looking T-shirts, pendants, and a variety of Palestine pins.
Shop for a Donation at Al-Awda!
Visit http://al-awda.org/shop.html for these great items, and more!
The Educational Supplies Division
Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition
PO Box 131352
Carlsbad, CA 92013, USA
Tel: 760-685-3243
Fax: 360-933-3568
E-mail: info@al-awda.org
WWW: http://al-awda.org
Al-Awda, The Palestine Right to Return Coalition (PRRC), is a broad-
based, non-partisan, democratic, and charitable organization of
grassroots activists and students committed to comprehensive public
education about the rights of all Palestinian refugees to return to their
homes and lands of origin, and to full restitution for all their confiscated
and destroyed property in accordance with the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, International law and the numerous United Nations
Resolutions upholding such rights (see FactSheet). Al-Awda, PRRC
is a not for profit tax-exempt educational and charitable 501(c)(3)
organization as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) of the
United States of America. Under IRS guidelines, your donations
to Al-Awda, PRRC are tax-deductible.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
IN VOGUE:
Unspeakably grotesque, This spread was so galling I felt a primal
scream rising inside me. And it was not because I am a woman.
The link is
http://www.voguevan ity.it/cont/ 060hvg/default. asp
The wounds of "western civilization" inflict themselves over
and over...unapologetic , shameless...ditto BW
http://www.voguevanity.it/cont/060hvg/default.asp
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
A CALL TO SUPPORT THE CASE OF ELVIRA ARELLANO
Stand in solidarity with all immigrants, documented and undocumented
The IAC urges you to support the case of Elvira Arellano. Elvira is
an undocumented worker who is taking a heroic stand against
deportations and fighting for her rights. She is a native of Michoacán,
Mexico who came to the U.S. like many of the other 12 million
undocumented in this country, in search of work and a better life.
In 2002, Elvira was detained by Homeland Security agents in an
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sweep at O’Hare Airport
in Chicago under the guise of allegedly looking for “terrorists”. She
was detained by the Department of Homeland Security for using
a false social security number on her job at O’Hare.
On August 18, 2006 Elvira Arellano and her seven year old son,
Saul who is a US citizen, took sanctuary in Adalberto United Methodist
Church in Chicago instead of reporting for deportation, primarily
because Saul has health problems. She has pledged to live indefinitely
in the church until granted a reprieve.
Elvira is a well known activist, representing many families in
Congressional hearings and speaking on behalf of immigrant rights.
She worked to organize in July 2005 a march of 50,000 for immigrant
rights in Chicago, and went on a hunger strike to support workers who
were picked up by ICE prior to the historic May 1st boycott in 2006.
Arellano was a founder of both La Familia Latina Unida and the
Coalition of African Arab Asian European and Latino Immigrants
of Illinois (CAAAELII).
The case of Elvira Arellano is a just case
Elvira Arellano has become the symbol of resistance to the heartless
and callous deportations that are sweeping the country. Despite
a legislative standstill in Congress, not only are deportations
escalating, local officials around the nation are implementing
de facto immigration policy that amount to a witch-hunt against
immigrants. A case in point is the anti-immigrant ordinance that
passed in July in Hazelton, PA.
Due to her heroic stand, a group of Black ministers spoke last
week at Adalberto Methodist of the comparisons of Arellano
to Rosa Parks. Reverend Albert Tyson said he hopes “their
support would increase the bonds between Latinos and African-
Americans.” At the meeting Arellano said, “I don’t only speak
for me and my son, but for millions of families like mine.”
Supporters from the predominantly Puerto Rican neighborhood
chanted, “Luchando mano y mano, Boriqua y Mexicano!”
(“Fighting hand in hand, Puerto Rican and Mexican!”)
Elvira Arellano is the perfect example that the anti-immigrant
hysteria sweeping the country is an inhumane situation that
has become intolerable. The human rights of immigrants are
being cruelly violated under the guise of fighting terrorism
or stopping “illegal” immigration. In fact, no human being
is illegal and whether in the U.S. documented or undocumented,
immigrants have a right to live in peace, without fear of evictions
from their homes or the country.
How you can help Elvira:
1. Write letters to Illinois Senators Richard Durbin and Barack
Obama as well as your own legislator urging them to prevent
her deportation.
For Senator Durbin visit: http://durbin.senate.gov/contact.cfm#contact
For Senator Obama: http://obama.senate.gov/contact/index.php
2. Send Letters to the Chicago Sun Times and the Chicago Tribune
asking them to stop demonizing Elvira as well as all immigrants.
Their emails are letters@suntimes.com and ctc-tribletter@tribune.com.
3. Send letters of support directly to Elvira at the organization she works
with and who has been spearheading her support, Sin Fronteras
at Centro Sin Fronteras 2300 S. Blue Island Ave., Chicago IL 60608
or visit the website: www.legalizationyes.com
For Spanish speakers visit:
www.legalizacionsi.com
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
TWO AMICUS BRIEFS FILED FOR MUMIA ABU-JAMAL WITH
THE 3RD CIRCUIT FEDERAL APPEALS COURT IN JULY 2006
These pdf files can be found on Michael Schiffmann's web site at:
http://againstthecrimeofsilence.de/english/copy_of_mumia/legalarchive/
The first brief is from the National Lawyers Guild.
The second brief is from the NAACP Legal Defense
and Educational Fund, Inc.
Howard Keylor
For the Labor Action Committee to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal
www.laboractionmumia.org.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
SIR! NO SIR!
I urge everyone to get a copy of "Sir! No Sir!" at:
http://www.sirnosir.com/
It is an extremely informative and powerful film
of utmost importance today. I was a participant
in the anti-Vietnam war movement. What a
powerful thing it was to see troops in uniform
leading the march against the war! If you would
like to read more here are two very good
publications:
Out Now!: A Participant's Account of the Movement
in the United States Against the Vietnam War
by Fred Halstead (Hardcover - Jun 1978)
and:
GIs speak out against the war;: The case of the
Ft. Jackson 8; by Fred Halstead (Unknown Binding - 1970).
Both available at:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/search/103-1123166-0136605?search-alias=books&rank=+availability,-proj-total-margin&field-author=Fred%20Halstead
In solidarity,
Bonnie Weinstein
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Endorse the following petition:
Don't Let Idaho Kill Endangered Wolves
Target: Fish and Wildlife Service
Sponsor: Defenders of Wildlife
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/664280276?z00m=99090&z00m=99090<l=1155834550
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
THIS JUST IN: THE KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL HAS TURNED DOWN
THE SHOW!
SUPPORT "TAKING AIM" produced by Ralph Schoenman and
Mya Shone.
LET KPFA KNOW WE ARE DISAPPOINTED!
To contact KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL email:
programcouncil@lists.kpfa.org
KPFA's Tracy Rosenberg voted to air "Taking Aim" and we
commend her for it.
You can thank her by writing her at:
tracyrose@gmail.com
In solidarity,
Bonnie Weinstein
Here's my letter to the KPFA Program Council::
To: KPFA PROGRAM COUNCIL
programcouncil@lists.kpfa.org
KPFA RADIO
Re: "Taking Aim"
Dear Council Members,
We are very disappointed that KPFA decided not to air the extremely
important show, "Taking Aim" produced by Ralph Schoenman and
Mya Shone.
Of course, we are also disappointed by your reluctance
to air a PSA for a rally to defend death row inmate, renowned
commentator, leader and writer, Mumia Abu-Jamal, because the
group that sponsored the rally was not a 501c3, non-profit,
semi-corporation.
I am happy to say that I did hear it announced in the Community
Calendar during Denis Bernstein's "Flashpoints," Thursday evening,
9/14, the day before the rally. But I'm sorry to say that I did not
hear the PSA.
God only knows, the downtrodden need a public voice more
than ever.
Organizers are not even allowed to post up posters and
announcements anymore in San Francisco. A.N.S.W.E.R. is currently
in a battle over the right to practice this centuries-old custom of
"posting up" for meetings, marches and rallies--historically one
of the only venues of mass communication freely available to the poor.
"Taking Aim" is a program that express that public voice.
KPFA is also supposed to express that public voice.
Now is not the time to silence it!
Please reconsider your decision not to air "Taking Aim." And end
the prohibition against airing the PSAs of non-501c3 groups and
organizations--after all, aren't they the grass roots of the matter?
Sincerely,
Bonnie Weinstein, www.bauaw.org
415-824-8730
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
END ALL U.S. AID TO ISRAEL!
Stop funding Israel's war against Palestine
Complete the form at the website listed below with your information.
Personalize the message text on the right with
your own words, if you wish.
Click the Next Step button to send your letter
to these decision makers:
President George W. Bush
Vice President Richard 'Dick' B. Cheney
Your Senators
Your Representative
Go here to register your outrage:
https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Advocacy?
JServSessionIdr003=cga2p2o6x1.app2a&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=177
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Idriss Stelley Foundation is in critical financial crisis, please help !
ISF is in critical financial crisis, and might be forced to close
its doors in a couple of months due to lack of funds to cover
DSL, SBC and utilities, which is a disaster for our numerous
clients, since the are the only CBO providing direct services
to Victims (as well as extended failies) of police misconduct
for the whole city of SF. Any donation, big or small will help
us stay alive until we obtain our 501-c3 nonprofit Federal
Status! Checks can me made out to
ISF, ( 4921 3rd St , SF CA 94124 ). Please consider to volunteer
or apply for internship to help covering our 24HR Crisis line,
provide one on one couseling and co facilitate our support
groups, M.C a show on SF Village Voice, insure a 2hr block
of time at ISF, moderate one of our 26 websites for ISF clients !
http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeo9ewi/idrissstelleyfoundation/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/isf23/
Report Police Brutality
24HR Bilingual hotline
(415) 595-8251
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Justice4Asa/
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Appeal for funds:
Dahr Jamail's Iraq Dispatches
Visit the Dahr Jamail Iraq website http://dahrjamailiraq.com
Request for Support
Dahr Jamail will soon return to the Middle East to continue his
independent reporting. As usual, reporting independently is a costly
enterprise; for example, an average hotel room is $50, a fixer runs $50
per day, and phone/food average $25 per day. Dahr will report from the
Middle East for one month, and thus needs to raise $5,750 in order to
cover his plane ticket and daily operating expenses.
A rare opportunity has arisen for Dahr to cover several stories
regarding the occupation of Iraq, as well as U.S. policy in the region,
which have been entirely absent from mainstream media.
With the need for independent, unfiltered information greater than ever,
your financial support is deeply appreciated. Without donations from
readers, ongoing independent reports from Dahr are simply not possible.
All donations go directly towards covering Dahr's on the ground
operating expenses.
(c)2006 Dahr Jamail.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
New Flash Film
From Young Ava Over At 'Peace Takes Courage'
http://www.peacetakescourage.com/page-blog.htm
http://letter.cf.huffingtonpost.com/
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Save the Lebanese Civilians Petition
http://epetitions.net/julywar/index.php
http://donations.tayyar.org/
To The Concerned Citizen of The World:
http://epetitions.net/julywar/index.php
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Legal update on Mumia Abu-Jamal’s case
Excerpts from a letter written by Robert R. Bryan, the lead attorney
for death row political prisoner, Mumia Abu-Jamal.
...On July 20, 2006, we filed the Brief of Appellee and Cross
Appellant, Mumia Abu-Jamal, in the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit, Philadelphia.
http://www.workers.org/2006/us/mumia-0810/
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Today in Palestine!
For up to date information on Israeli's brutal attack on
human rights and freedom in Palestine and Lebanon go to:
http://www.theheadlines.org
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
For a great car magnet--a black ribbon with the words, "Bring
the troops home now!" written in red, and it also comes in a
lapel pin!--go to:
(Put out by A.N.S.W.E.R.)
https://secure2.convio.net/pep/site/Ecommerce?store_id=1621
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF ZIONISM
BY RALPH SCHOENMAN
Essential reading for understanding the development of Zionism
and Israel in the service of British and USA imperialism.
The full text of the book can be found for free at:
http://www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
JOIN THE LYNNE STEWAR DEFENSE
For those of you who don't know who Lynne Stewart is, go to
www.lynnestewart.org and get acquainted with Lynne and her
cause. Lynne is a criminal defense attorney who is being persecuted
for representing people charged with heinous crimes. It is a bedrock
of our legal system that every criminal defendant has a right to a
lawyer. Persecuting Lynne is an attempt to terrorize and intimidate
all criminal defense attorneys in this country so they will stop
representing unpopular people. If this happens, the fascist takeover
of this nation will be complete. We urge you all to go the website,
familiarize yourselves with Lynne and her battle for justice
www.lynnestewart.org
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
NATIONAL COMMITTEE TO FREE THE CUBAN FIVE
Comité Nacional por la Libertad de los Cinco Cubanos
Who are the Cuban Five?
The Cuban Five are five Cuban men who are in U.S. prison, serving
four life sentences and 75 years collectively, after being wrongly
convicted in U.S. federal court in Miami, on June 8, 2001.
They are Gerardo Hernández, Ramón Labañino, Antonio Guerrero,
Fernando González and René González.
The Five were falsely accused by the U.S. government of committing
espionage conspiracy against the United States, and other related
charges.
But the Five pointed out vigorously in their defense that they were
involved in monitoring the actions of Miami-based terrorist groups,
in order to prevent terrorist attacks on their country of Cuba.
The Five’s actions were never directed at the U.S. government.
They never harmed anyone nor ever possessed nor used any
weapons while in the United States.
The Cuban Five’s mission was to stop terrorism
For more than 40 years, anti-Cuba terrorist organizations based
in Miami have engaged in countless terrorist activities against
Cuba, and against anyone who advocates a normalization
of relations between the U.S. and Cuba. More than 3,000 Cubans
have died as a result of these terrorists’ attacks.
Gerardo Hernández, 2 Life Sentences
Antonio Guerrero, Life Sentence
Ramon Labañino, Life Sentence
Fernando González, 19 Years
René González, 15 Years
Free The Cuban Five Held Unjustly In The U.S.!
http://www.freethefive.org/
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Eyewitness Account from Oaxaca
A website is now being circulated that has up-to-date info
and video that can be downloaded of the police action and
developments in Oaxaca. For those who have not seen it
elsewhere, the website is:
www.mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca
http://www.mexico.indymedia.org/oaxaca
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
REMINDER TO ALL GROUPS: BE SURE AND POST ALL ACTIONS AND
EVENTS TO WWW.INDYBAY.ORG TO REACH THE MOST PEOPLE
AGAINST THE WAR IN THE BAY AREA!
http://www.indybay.org
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Iraq Body Count
For current totals, see our database page.
http://www.iraqbodycount.net/press/pr13.php
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
The Cost of War
[Over three-hundred-billion so far...bw]
http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
"The Democrats always promise to help workers, and the don't!
The Republicans always promise to help business, and the do!"
- Mort Sahl
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
"It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees."
- Emilano Zapata
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Join the Campaign to
Shut Down the Guantanamo Torture Center
Go to:
http://www.shutitdown.org/
to send a letter to Congress and the White House:
Shut Down Guantanamo and all torture centers and prisons.
A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition
Act Now to Stop War & End Racism
http://www.ANSWERcoalition.org http://www.actionsf.org
sf@internationalanswer.org
2489 Mission St. Rm. 24
San Francisco: 415-821-6545
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Great Counter-Recruitment Website
http://notyoursoldier.org/article.php?list=type&type=14
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
DEFEND IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND
CIVIL RIGHTS!
Last summer the U.S. Border Patrol arrested Shanti Sellz and
Daniel Strauss, both 23-year-old volunteers assisting immigrants
on the border, for medically evacuating 3 people in critical
condition from the Arizona desert.
Criminalization for aiding undocumented immigrants already
exists on the books in the state of Arizona. Daniel and Shanti
are targeted to be its first victims. Their arrest and subsequent
prosecution for providing humanitarian aid could result in
a 15-year prison sentence. Any Congressional compromise
with the Sensenbrenner bill (HR 4437) may include these
harmful criminalization provisions. Fight back NOW!
Help stop the criminalization of undocumented immigrants
and those who support them!
For more information call 415-821- 9683.
For information on the Daniel and Shanti Defense Campaign,
visit www.nomoredeaths.org.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
FYI
According to "Minimum Wage History" at
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth484/minwage.html "
"Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the
highest at $9.12. "The 8 dollar per hour Whole Foods employees
are being paid $1.12 less than the 1968 minimum wage.
"A federal minimum wage was first set in 1938. The graph shows
both nominal (red) and real (blue) minimum wage values. Nominal
values range from 25 cents per hour in 1938 to the current $5.15/hr.
The greatest percentage jump in the minimum wage was in 1950,
when it nearly doubled. The graph adjusts these wages to 2005
dollars (blue line) to show the real value of the minimum wage.
Calculated in real 2005 dollars, the 1968 minimum wage was the
highest at $9.12. Note how the real dollar minimum wage rises and
falls. This is because it gets periodically adjusted by Congress.
The period 1997-2006, is the longest period during which the
minimum wage has not been adjusted. States have departed from
the federal minimum wage. Washington has the highest minimum
wage in the country at $7.63 as of January 1, 2006. Oregon is next
at $7.50. Cities, too, have set minimum wages. Santa Fe, New
Mexico has a minimum wage of $9.50, which is more than double
the state minimum wage at $4.35."
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
NO BORDERS! NO WALLS! NO FENCES! GENERAL AMNESTY FOR ALL!
OUR HOMELAND IS WHERE WE LIVE!
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
REPEAL THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT IN 2007!
Check out: 10 EXCELLENT REASONS NOT TO JOIN THE MILITARY
http://www.10reasonsbook.com/
Public Law print of PL 107-110, the No Child Left Behind
Act of 2001 [1.8 MB]
http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
Also, the law is up before Congress again in 2007.
See this article from USA Today:
Bipartisan panel to study No Child Left Behind
By Greg Toppo, USA TODAY
February 13, 2006
http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-02-13-education-panel_x.htm
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies
http://www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/declaration.html
http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/decind.html
http://www.usconstitution.net/declar.html
http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805195.php
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Bill of Rights
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html
http://www.indybay.org/news/2006/02/1805182.php
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
ARTICLES IN FULL:
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
1) Hezbollah Chief Leads Huge Rally
By JOHN O’NEIL
September 22, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/world/middleeast/23lebanoncnd.html?hp&ex=1158984000&en=fea12c38b110044b&ei=5094&partner=homepage
2) Insurance Horror Stories
By PAUL KRUGMAN
September 22, 2006
http://select.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/opinion/22krugman.html?hp
3) Hugo Chavez Speech at United Nations
NewsMax.com Wires
Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2006
PRESIDENT CHAVEZ DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY
SEPTEMBER 20, 2006
SPEAKER: HUGO CHAVEZ, PRESIDENT OF VENEZUELA
http://www.newsmax.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/9/20/123752.shtml
4) Mariela Castro: "I am proud of my father "
Fernán González
BBC Mundo, Havana
A CUBANEWS TRANSLATION BY ANA PORTELA
Edited by Walter Lippmann
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs955.html
5) PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA TO THE UNITED NATIONS
DRAFT SPEECH BY ESTEBAN LAZO, HEAD OF THE CUBAN DELEGATION
TO THE 61st SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NEW YORK
United Nations website
http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/61/pdfs/cuba-e.pdf
Text covnersion by NY Transfer News
315 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Tel: 212-689-7215 * Fax: 212-689-9073
email: publicrelations@cubanmission.com
6) AP Propaganda About Iraq
By Dahr Jamail
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Friday 22 September 2006
http://dahrjamailiraq.com
7) Pickers Are Few, and Growers Blame Congress
By JULIA PRESTON
September 22, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/washington/22growers.html?ex=1159156800&en=07122ee1139ef2b6&ei=5087%0A
8) Billionaires Only Occupy Forbes 400 List
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 6:30 a.m. ET
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Forbes-400.html
9) America's 400 Richest
Edited by Matthew Miller and Tatiana Serafin
09.21.06, 6:00 PM ET
http://www.forbes.com/2006/09/21/americas-400-richest-biz_cx_mm_06rich400_0921richintro.html
10) Off the Charts
What’s a Couple of Hundred Trillion When You’re Talking Derivatives?
By FLOYD NORRIS
September 23, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/business/23charts.html?adxnnl=6&adxnnlx=1159027325-6IAu68axWRTicEnv+8kGMQ
11) Solidarity in New York with
Cuban delegation
Havana. September 22, 2006
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2006/septiembre/vier22/40solidar-i.html
12) Line drawn on immigration legislation
Newsom, Yee slam federal attempts as discriminatory
Leslie Fulbright, Chronicle Staff Writer
[NOTE: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is actively at
work in San Francisco deporting hundreds of undocumented
workers--perhaps not with the help of city employees but,
right under their noses. I send this out as a reminder of what
was promised noting that the city government only promised
not to aid ICE in it's assault against the basic human rights
of undocumented workers, not to stop it. Currently, the City
Government is standing by and not saying a word about it.
We have received many personal reports of such deportations,
firings, evictions, etc., happening in San Francisco. There
have been incidents of workers, upon going to collect
their pay, instead get ICE brought down upon them.
What is the City Government going to do about this?....bw]
Saturday, April 8, 2006
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/04/08/BAGGII5THL1.DTL
13) Turning Back the Clock on Rape
New York Times Editorial
September 23, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/opinion/23sat1.html?hp
14) Are You Better Off Than You Were 4 Years Ago? Do You Care?
By DANIEL ALTMAN
September 24, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/business/yourmoney/24view.html?ref=business
15) U.S. Detention of Venezuelan at J.F.K. Airport Raises Tensions
By SIMON ROMERO
September 25, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/25/world/americas/25venez.html
16) HEZBOLLAH LEADER ADDRESSES "VICTORY RALLY" IN
LEBANON - TEXT
LENGTH: 7402 words
BBC Monitoring International Reports September 23, 2006 Saturday
Here is the USG Open Source Center translation of Hasan Nasrullah's speech
on Friday to an enormous crowd (well over a million people) in bombed-out
South Beirut. The following is the text of the speech by Hezbollah
Secretary-General Hasan Nasrallah, during a rally in
Beirut celebrating the "victory" in the latest hostilities with Israel -
live; broadcast by Lebanese Hezbollah TV Al-Manar on 22 September,
subheadings inserted editorially.
17) CIA Spins Spider’s Web vs. Cuba, Venezuela
W. T. Whitney Jr.
20 September, 2006
http://www.granma.cubaweb.cu/secciones/ingles/noticias/art33.html
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
1) Hezbollah Chief Leads Huge Rally
By JOHN O’NEIL
September 22, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/world/middleeast/23lebanoncnd.html?hp&ex=1158984000&en=fea12c38b110044b&ei=5094&partner=homepage
[Photo with the article shows what looks like over a million people
waving the yellow flag of Hezbollah in the midst of ruined Lebanon...bw]
The leader of Hezbollah, Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, told the crowd
at a giant open-air rally in Beirut today that the militant group had
more than 20,000 rockets, and made clear that it would not disarm,
despite the requirements of a United Nations cease-fire accord.
Mr. Nasrallah declared that the group “has recovered all its
organizational and military capabilities,” and “is stronger than
it was before July 12,” the day the war with Israel began, according
to Reuters.
The rally was the first time Mr. Nasrallah has appeared in public
since before the war.
He also called for replacing Lebanon’s current pro-Western
government with a new government of national unity,
as Hezbollah seeks to capitalize on what he described
today as “a divine, historic and strategic victory over Israel
and the United States.”
Mr. Nasrallah told the crowd, which filled a vast space cleared
from the rubble left by Israel’s bombing raids, that he had
decided to appear in person only half an hour before the
start of the rally. “Standing here before you,” he said,
“incurs dangers on you and me.”
Israeli officials have made clear that they consider Mr. Nasrallah
a legitimate target. Some 4,000 rockets fired over the border
into Israel by Hezbollah during the 34-day war killed
43 civilians and wounded more than 2,000.
Asked on Thursday by Israel’s Channel 10 television if
Mr. Nasrallah would be a target if he appeared at the rally,
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert replied: “And you think,
that if he was, I would tell you — and tell him?”
But Mr. Nasrallah directed as much or more of his wrath
today at the United States as at Israel, and declared that
“your resistance and steadfastness” has “opened the
eyes of the world.”
The United Nations ceasefire that halted the fighting
on Aug. 14th called for, among other things, the
disarmament of Hezbollah to give the fragile Lebanese
government a monopoly on armed force within the country.
Secretary General Kofi Annan has made it clear since then
that he expects the disarmament to come only as part of
a political settlement within Lebanon, saying that disarming
Hezbollah would not be part of the mandate of the
international force being deployed along the border
with Israel.
Israeli officials said after the fighting ended that Hezbollah’s
stockpile of long-range weapons had been diminished,
and that the danger posed by its remaining short-range
Katyusha rockets was limited by the clearing of a zone
south of the Litani River, about 15 miles from the border.
Since the ceasefire, the Israelis have focused on trying
to make sure that Hezbollah does not receive new
shipments of smuggled arms from Iran and Syria,
considered by Israel and the United States to be the
militant group’s prime sponsors.
But Mr. Nasrallah’s declaration of the group’s renewed
strength seemed to leave little prospect of any voluntary
disarmament.
In contrast to the understated tone he took in his
appearances on Hezbollah television during the war,
his speech today, portions of which were broadcast by
CNN, was an angry declaration of victory. It met with
prolonged cheers from the crowd, with many people
waving the militant group’s yellow flag.
Since the fighting ended on Aug. 14th, Hezbollah has tried
to build on the increase in popular support that was
a side-effect of Israel’s widespread bombing campaign,
which killed more than 1,200 Lebanese, mostly civilians.
Its leaders recently called for a government of national
unity to replace the mainly pro-Western, anti-Syrian
March 14 coalition now in power. The coalition, which
gave Hezbollah a share in government, won a slim
majority in elections last spring.
Some Lebanese have criticized Hezbollah for its role
in the start of the war, which was touched off by
a cross-border raid in which militants seized two
Israeli soldiers. Shortly after the war’s end, Mr. Nasrallah
said in a televised address that the raid a miscalculation,
and that he would not have ordered the raid if he had
known how fierce the response from Israel would be.
But today he said that part of the Israeli and American
plan had been to set the rest of Lebanon against
Hezbollah by inflicting widespread punishment.
“They thought that we would be divided,” he said.
“It’s not a victory for a party or a group, it’s a victory
for the people of Lebanon.”
Mr. Nasrallah called the conflict “an American war,” saying
that the United States had made Israel’s attacks possible
by providing arms, planning and diplomatic support.
He said the war came to and end not because of the
suffering of the Lebanese or any weakness on the part
of Hezbollah, but because “the Zionists realized that
if it continued it would be a catastrophe.”
“The Americans agreed to stop the war, not for the women,
not for the children of the Lebanese — they stopped the war
for Israel,” he said.
He said the Bush administration had allowed the war to go
forward as part of the plan to create “a new Middle East.”
“This Middle East was illegitimate,” he said, and its defeat
has become an inspiration “for people who fight for their
freedom and dignity” around the world.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
2) Insurance Horror Stories
By PAUL KRUGMAN
September 22, 2006
http://select.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/opinion/22krugman.html?hp
“When Steve and Leslie Shaeffer’s daughter, Selah, was diagnosed
at age 4 with a potentially fatal tumor in her jaw, they figured their
health insurance would cover the bulk of her treatment costs.” But
“shortly after Selah’s medical bills hit $20,000, Blue Cross stopped
covering them and eventually canceled her coverage retroactively.”
So begins a recent report in The Los Angeles Times titled “Sick
but Insured? Think Again,” which offers a series of similar horror
stories, and suggests that these stories represent a growing trend:
more and more health insurers are finding ways to yank your
insurance when you get sick.
This trend helps explain something that has been puzzling me:
why is the health insurance industry growing rapidly, even as
it covers fewer Americans?
Between 2000 and 2005, the number of Americans with private
health insurance coverage fell by 1 percent. But over the same
period, employment at health insurance companies rose
a remarkable 32 percent. What are all those extra employees
doing?
Now we know at least part of the answer: they’re working
harder than ever at identifying people who really need medical
care, and ensuring that they don’t get it. In the past, they
mainly concentrated on screening out applicants likely to
get sick. Now, it seems, they’re also devoting a lot of effort
to finding pretexts for revoking insurance after they’ve already
granted it. They typically do this by claiming that they weren’t
notified about some pre-existing condition, even if the insured
wasn’t aware of that condition when he or she bought the policy.
Welcome to the ugly world of American health care economics.
Health care is poised to become America’s largest industry.
Employment in manufacturing, which once dominated the
economy, has fallen 18 percent since 2000, to 14.2 million.
Meanwhile, employment in the private health services industry
has risen 16 percent, to 12.6 million. Another 1.3 million
people are employed at government hospitals. So we’re
quickly approaching the point at which more Americans
will be employed delivering health care than are employed
producing manufactured goods.
Yet even as health care becomes the core of the American
economy, our system of paying for health care remains
sick, and is getting sicker.
Because everyone faces some risk of incurring huge medical
costs, only the superrich can afford to be without health
insurance. Yet private insurers try to refuse coverage
to those most likely to need it, and deny payment whenever
they can get away with it.
The point isn’t that they’re evil or greedy (although you
do wonder how the people who cut off the Schaeffers can
look themselves in the mirror). The fact is that cruelty
and injustice are the inevitable result of the current rules
of the game. Blue Shield of California is a nonprofit insurance
provider, yet as a spokesman put it, if his organization doesn’t
follow the for-profit practice of selectively covering only the
healthiest people, “we will end up with all the high-risk people.”
Now, before you panic about the state of your own coverage,
you should know that the horror stories in The Los Angeles
Times article all involve individual insurance; if your coverage
comes via your employer, you’re reasonably secure against
sudden cancellation.
But employment-based insurance is in rapid decline,
as employers balk at the cost and more and more companies
adopt Wal-Mart-style minimal-benefit policies. That’s why
many people are turning to individual insurance — only to find
out, in some cases, that they didn’t get what they thought
they paid for.
And here’s the thing: it’s all unnecessary.
Every other wealthy nation manages to provide almost all its
citizens with guaranteed health insurance, while spending
less on health care than we do. And there’s no mystery why:
we’re paying the price for pointless, destructive reliance on
private insurers. Medicare, which is a universal health insurance
program for older Americans, spends less than 2 cents of every
dollar on administrative costs, leaving 98 cents to pay for medical
care. By contrast, private insurance companies spend only around
80 cents of each dollar in premiums on medical care; much
of the remaining 20 cents is spent denying insurance to those
who need it.
If we had a universal system — Medicare for everyone — there
would be no more horror stories like those reported by The Los
Angeles Times. And we’d almost certainly spend less on health
care than we do now.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
3) Hugo Chavez Speech at United Nations
NewsMax.com Wires
Wednesday, Sept. 20, 2006
PRESIDENT CHAVEZ DELIVERS REMARKS AT THE U.N. GENERAL ASSEMBLY
SEPTEMBER 20, 2006
SPEAKER: HUGO CHAVEZ, PRESIDENT OF VENEZUELA
http://www.newsmax.com/scripts/printer_friendly.pl?page=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2006/9/20/123752.shtml
"Representatives of the governments of the world, good morning
to all of you. First of all, I would like to invite you, very respectfully,
to those who have not read this book, to read it.
Noam Chomsky, one of the most prestigious American and world
intellectuals, Noam Chomsky, and this is one of his most recent
books, 'Hegemony or Survival: The Imperialist Strategy of the United
States.'" [Holds up book, waves it in front of General Assembly.]
"It's an excellent book to help us understand what has been
happening in the world throughout the 20th century, and what's
happening now, and the greatest threat looming over our planet.
The hegemonic pretensions of the American empire are placing
at risk the very survival of the human species. We continue to warn
you about this danger and we appeal to the people of the United
States and the world to halt this threat, which is like a sword
hanging over our heads. I had considered reading from this book,
but, for the sake of time," [flips through the pages, which are
numerous] "I will just leave it as a recommendation.
It reads easily, it is a very good book, I'm sure Madame [President]
you are familiar with it. It appears in English, in Russian, in Arabic,
in German. I think that the first people who should read this book
are our brothers and sisters in the United States, because their
threat is right in their own house.
The devil is right at home. The devil, the devil himself, is right
in the house.
"And the devil came here yesterday. Yesterday the devil came here.
Right here." [crosses himself] "And it smells of sulfur still today."
Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum, the president
of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as the devil,
came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As the owner
of the world.
I think we could call a psychiatrist to analyze yesterday's
statement made by the president of the United States. As the
spokesman of imperialism, he came to share his nostrums,
to try to preserve the current pattern of domination, exploitation
and pillage of the peoples of the world.
An Alfred Hitchcock movie could use it as a scenario.
I would even propose a title: "The Devil's Recipe."
As Chomsky says here, clearly and in depth, the American
empire is doing all it can to consolidate its system of domination.
And we cannot allow them to do that. We cannot allow world
dictatorship to be consolidated.
CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): The world parent's statement
-- cynical, hypocritical, full of this imperial hypocrisy from the
need they have to control everything.
They say they want to impose a democratic model. But that's
their democratic model. It's the false democracy of elites, and,
I would say, a very original democracy that's imposed by weapons
and bombs and firing weapons.
What a strange democracy. Aristotle might not recognize
it or others who are at the root of democracy.
What type of democracy do you impose with marines
and bombs?
The president of the United States, yesterday, said to us,
right here, in this room, and I'm quoting, "Anywhere you
look, you hear extremists telling you can escape from
poverty and recover your dignity through violence,
terror and martyrdom."
Wherever he looks, he sees extremists. And you, my brother
-- he looks at your color, and he says, oh, there's an extremist.
Evo Morales, the worthy president of Bolivia, looks like
an extremist to him.
The imperialists see extremists everywhere. It's not that we
are extremists. It's that the world is waking up. It's waking
up all over. And people are standing up.
I have the feeling, dear world dictator, that you are going
to live the rest of your days as a nightmare because the rest
of us are standing up, all those who are rising up against
American imperialism, who are shouting for equality,
for respect, for the sovereignty of nations.
CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): Yes, you can call
us extremists, but we are rising up against the empire,
against the model of domination.
The president then -- and this he said himself, he said:
"I have come to speak directly to the populations in the
Middle East, to tell them that my country wants peace."
That's true. If we walk in the streets of the Bronx, if we
walk around New York, Washington, San Diego, in any city,
San Antonio, San Francisco, and we ask individuals, the citizens
of the United States, what does this country want?
Does it want peace? They'll say yes.
But the government doesn't want peace. The government
of the United States doesn't want peace. It wants to exploit
its system of exploitation, of pillage, of hegemony through war.
It wants peace. But what's happening in Iraq? What happened
in Lebanon? In Palestine? What's happening? What's happened
over the last 100 years in Latin America and in the world?
And now threatening Venezuela -- new threats against
Venezuela, against Iran?
He spoke to the people of Lebanon. Many of you, he said,
have seen how your homes and communities were caught
in the crossfire. How cynical can you get? What a capacity
to lie shamefacedly. The bombs in Beirut with millimetric
precision?
CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): This is crossfire? He's
thinking of a western, when people would shoot from
the hip and somebody would be caught in the crossfire.
This is imperialist, fascist, assassin, genocidal, the empire
and Israel firing on the people of Palestine and Lebanon.
That is what happened. And now we hear, "We're suffering
because we see homes destroyed.'
The president of the United States came to talk to the peoples
-- to the peoples of the world. He came to say -- I brought
some documents with me, because this morning I was reading
some statements, and I see that he talked to the people
of Afghanistan, the people of Lebanon, the people of Iran.
And he addressed all these peoples directly.
And you can wonder, just as the president of the United States
addresses those peoples of the world, what would those peoples
of the world tell him if they were given the floor? What would
they have to say?
And I think I have some inkling of what the peoples of the
south, the oppressed people think. They would say, "Yankee
imperialist, go home." I think that is what those people would
say if they were given the microphone and if they could speak
with one voice to the American imperialists.
And that is why, Madam President, my colleagues, my friends,
last year we came here to this same hall as we have been doing
for the past eight years, and we said something that has now
been confirmed -- fully, fully confirmed.
CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): I don't think anybody in this
room could defend the system. Let's accept -- let's be honest.
The U.N. system, born after the Second World War, collapsed.
It's worthless.
Oh, yes, it's good to bring us together once a year, see each
other, make statements and prepare all kinds of long documents,
and listen to good speeches, like Abel's (ph) yesterday,
or President Mullah's (ph). Yes, it's good for that.
And there are a lot of speeches, and we've heard lots from
the president of Sri Lanka, for instance, and the president of Chile.
But we, the assembly, have been turned into a merely deliberative
organ. We have no power, no power to make any impact on the
terrible situation in the world. And that is why Venezuela once
again proposes, here, today, 20 September, that we re-establish
the United Nations.
Last year, Madam, we made four modest proposals that we felt
to be crucially important. We have to assume the responsibility
our heads of state, our ambassadors, our representatives,
and we have to discuss it.
The first is expansion, and Mullah (ph) talked about this yesterday
right here. The Security Council, both as it has permanent
and non-permanent categories, (inaudible) developing countries
and LDCs must be given access as new permanent members.
That's step one.
CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): Second, effective methods
to address and resolve world conflicts, transparent decisions.
Point three, the immediate suppression -- and that is something
everyone's calling for -- of the anti-democratic mechanism known
as the veto, the veto on decisions of the Security Council.
Let me give you a recent example. The immoral veto of the United
States allowed the Israelis, with impunity, to destroy Lebanon.
Right in front of all of us as we stood there watching, a resolution
in the council was prevented.
Fourthly, we have to strengthen, as we've always said, the role
and the powers of the secretary general of the United Nations.
Yesterday, the secretary general practically gave us his speech
of farewell. And he recognized that over the last 10 years, things
have just gotten more complicated; hunger, poverty, violence,
human rights violations have just worsened. That is the tremendous
consequence of the collapse of the United Nations system
and American hegemonistic pretensions.
Madam, Venezuela a few years ago decided to wage this battle
within the United Nations by recognizing the United Nations,
as members of it that we are, and lending it our voice, our thinking.
Our voice is an independent voice to represent the dignity and the
search for peace and the reformulation of the international system;
to denounce persecution and aggression of hegemonistic
forces on the planet.
CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): This is how Venezuela has
presented itself. Bolivar's home has sought a nonpermanent
seat on the Security Council.
Let's see. Well, there's been an open attack by the U.S. government,
an immoral attack, to try and prevent Venezuela from being freely
elected to a post in the Security Council.
The imperium is afraid of truth, is afraid of independent voices.
It calls us extremists, but they are the extremists.
And I would like to thank all the countries that have kindly
announced their support for Venezuela, even though the ballot
is a secret one and there's no need to announce things.
But since the imperium has attacked, openly, they strengthened
the convictions of many countries. And their support strengthens us.
Mercosur, as a bloc, has expressed its support, our brothers
in Mercosur. Venezuela, with Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay,
is a full member of Mercosur.
And many other Latin American countries, CARICOM, Bolivia
have expressed their support for Venezuela. The Arab League,
the full Arab League has voiced its support. And I am immensely
grateful to the Arab world, to our Arab brothers, our Caribbean
brothers, the African Union. Almost all of Africa has expressed
its support for Venezuela and countries such as Russia
or China and many others.
CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): I thank you all warmly
on behalf of Venezuela, on behalf of our people, and on behalf
of the truth, because Venezuela, with a seat on the Security Council,
will be expressing not only Venezuela's thoughts, but it will also
be the voice of all the peoples of the world, and we will defend
dignity and truth.
Over and above all of this, Madam President, I think there
are reasons to be optimistic. A poet would have said "helplessly
optimistic," because over and above the wars and the bombs
and the aggressive and the preventive war and the destruction
of entire peoples, one can see that a new era is dawning.
As Sylvia Rodriguez (ph) says, the era is giving birth to a heart.
There are alternative ways of thinking. There are young people
who think differently. And this has already been seen within
the space of a mere decade. It was shown that the end of history
was a totally false assumption, and the same was shown about
Pax Americana and the establishment of the capitalist neo-liberal
world. It has been shown, this system, to generate mere poverty.
Who believes in it now?
What we now have to do is define the future of the world. Dawn
is breaking out all over. You can see it in Africa and Europe and
Latin America and Oceanea. I want to emphasize that optimistic
vision.
We have to strengthen ourselves, our will to do battle,
our awareness. We have to build a new and better world.
Venezuela joins that struggle, and that's why we are
threatened. The U.S. has already planned, financed and
set in motion a coup in Venezuela, and it continues
to support coup attempts in Venezuela and elsewhere.
CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): President Michelle
Bachelet reminded us just a moment ago of the horrendous
assassination of the former foreign minister, Orlando Letelier.
And I would just add one thing: Those who perpetrated
this crime are free. And that other event where an American
citizen also died were American themselves. They were CIA
killers, terrorists.
And we must recall in this room that in just a few days there
will be another anniversary. Thirty years will have passed
from this other horrendous terrorist attack on the Cuban
plane, where 73 innocents died, a Cubana de Aviacion airliner.
And where is the biggest terrorist of this continent who took
the responsibility for blowing up the plane? He spent a few
years in jail in Venezuela. Thanks to CIA and then government
officials, he was allowed to escape, and he lives here in this
country, protected by the government.
And he was convicted. He has confessed to his crime. But the
U.S. government has double standards. It protects terrorism
when it wants to.
And this is to say that Venezuela is fully committed to combating
terrorism and violence. And we are one of the people
who are fighting for peace.
Luis Posada Carriles is the name of that terrorist who is protected
here. And other tremendously corrupt people who escaped from
Venezuela are also living here under protection: a group that
bombed various embassies, that assassinated people during
the coup. They kidnapped me and they were going to kill me,
but I think God reached down and our people came out into
the streets and the army was too, and so I'm here today.
But these people who led that coup are here today in this
country protected by the American government. And I accuse
the American government of protecting terrorists and of having
a completely cynical discourse.
CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): We mentioned Cuba.
Yes, we were just there a few days ago. We just came from
there happily.
And there you see another era born. The Summit of the 15,
the Summit of the Nonaligned, adopted a historic resolution.
This is the outcome document. Don't worry, I'm not going to read it.
But you have a whole set of resolutions here that were adopted
after open debate in a transparent matter -- more than 50 heads
of state. Havana was the capital of the south for a few weeks,
and we have now launched, once again, the group of the
nonaligned with new momentum.
And if there is anything I could ask all of you here, my companions,
my brothers and sisters, it is to please lend your good will to lend
momentum to the Nonaligned Movement for the birth of the new
era, to prevent hegemony and prevent further advances of imperialism.
And as you know, Fidel Castro is the president of the nonaligned
for the next three years, and we can trust him to lead the charge
very efficiently.
Unfortunately they thought, "Oh, Fidel was going to die." But
they're going to be disappointed because he didn't. And he's
not only alive, he's back in his green fatigues, and he's now
presiding the nonaligned.
So, my dear colleagues, Madam President, a new, strong movement
has been born, a movement of the south.
We are men and women of the south.
With this document, with these ideas, with these criticisms,
I'm now closing my file. I'm taking the book with me. And,
don't forget, I'm recommending it very warmly and very humbly
to all of you.
CHAVEZ (THROUGH TRANSLATOR): We want ideas to save our
planet, to save the planet from the imperialist threat. And hopefully
in this very century, in not too long a time, we will see this, we will
see this new era, and for our children and our grandchildren a world
of peace based on the fundamental principles of the United Nations,
but a renewed United Nations.
And maybe we have to change location. Maybe we have to put
the United Nations somewhere else; maybe a city of the south.
We've proposed Venezuela.
You know that my personal doctor had to stay in the plane.
The chief of security had to be left in a locked plane. Neither
of these gentlemen was allowed to arrive and attend
the U.N. meeting. This is another abuse and another abuse
of power on the part of the Devil. It smells of sulfur here,
but God is with us and I embrace you all.
May God bless us all. Good day to you.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
4) Mariela Castro: "I am proud of my father "
Fernán González
BBC Mundo, Havana
A CUBANEWS TRANSLATION BY ANA PORTELA
Edited by Walter Lippmann
http://www.walterlippmann.com/docs955.html
Mariela Castro is the daughter of the interim Cuban president, Raul
Castro and director of the National Center for Sexual Education in
this country. For the past few years she has been noted for defending
the rights of sexual minorities.
In an interview with BBC Mundo, in her office of Havana, in an old
house in the Vedado neighborhood, she talks of her relationship with
her father, of her family life and work she does, which is not always
easy.
What is your father like?
My Dad, not Raúl Castro, is marvelous (she smiles), he is very
active, very caring, always interested in us.
I remember, when I was little, that I managed to be taken to school
holding his hand, like other parents, walking the six blocks and
waiting for the morning formation (with all the teachers and students
before classes that almost always had an ideological teaching).
He is a father that always has surprises. One thing that I liked very
much is that my father is a very loving, very romantic and passionate
person with my Mom (Vilma Espín, president of the Cuban Women‚s
Federation).
They have transmitted a great stability. They taught us to love, to
be romantic, to believe in people, even if they may disappoint us.
They taught us many important values.
Often we said that we didn‚t want him to continue with his public
responsibilities because we wanted him closer. We wanted to be with
him. We understood the responsibility he had to assume because, once
you take a revolutionary course, you can‚t say "well, I'm going home.
So long. That's your problem."
That is also a great responsibility. Like Garibaldi. He forged
Italian unity and then said, "chao, it yours now" and left. That was
a great lack of historical responsibility. They were not like that.
That must be admired but it means that we will not be with him as
often that we want.
But we are also proud of how he is, as a human being, of how he as
assumed his public responsibility and how he has had the honesty to
assume his errors when he identifies them, which is the majority of
times.
He has a great experience in collective work, in boosting collective
creation in leading because he does not feel omnipotent, because he
is not self-satisfied. The Cuban people have confidence in him, not
because he has a magic wand, something no one has.
It is a great effort, a great exercise in creativity, of a
collective will to create a more just and fairer society in such a
poor country such as Cuba with so few material resources, under the
hostility of the most powerful empire in all of history.
History fascinates him. He is very well versed in universal and Cuban
history. It helps him to understand Cuban reality and tries to push
forward. He will follow the strategy of the Revolution which will,
collectively, continue to strengthen and actions will be identified
for Cuban society to advance, like a sovereign state.
What do you remember most about your father?
His joy, his congeniality, his jokes and his affection. He has been
very affectionate with all of us. He is very reserved in his public
life but, privately, he is fascinating.
Let‚s talk about your work as director of the Cuban Center of Sexual
Education. What made you decide to work for the rights of
transvestites, the transsexuals, and homosexuals in Cuba?
I was working here as the director of the center. I think it was
about 2004 when a group of transvestites, transsexuals came. Some
were patients, others collaborators here in the center, in
educational work.
Some were not, but many were prostitutes and wanted support of our
institution because they had problems with the police here in Havana,
not in other parts of the country.
There was an event here in Havana, around La Rampa, the Malecon
(seaside walk) where many people with different sexual preferences
met and engaged in prostitution. But they disturbed the neighbors. If
they had exercised prostitution without disturbing the neighbors...That
implied harassment of tourists who complained.
There was a meeting of the Young Communist League in Havana who
complained to the government. They said that measures had to be taken
because the families felt infringed upon and tourists also.
Instead of taking a more logical measure, the decision of the
police was to arrest anyone who looked like a transvestite,
transsexual or anything that looked strange, arbitrary, absurd.
Of course, they came to demand their rights because I don't know if
you have noticed, we Cubans have a strong sense of justice and fight
when we have to and we accept when we feel that we must accept.
That's why I say, Why is Fidel here? Why do people want him here...
because the day that the people don't want him here he won't be. That
happened with this subject. They spoke of everything bothering them.
I asked if I could tape what they had said to prepare a report. And
that's what I did, a short report so they could read it over rapidly
and then a longer one with many annexes.
That is how a national strategy came about for attention to
transsexuals with an integral vision since 1979 which was created by
my mother, Vilma Espín, president of the Cuban Women's Federation.
What we did was to broaden this work, to enrich it. Since the
transvestites and transsexuals asked my help I got seriously involved
in this. I have studied these subjects to have background then, in
the end, I am doing my PhD on the subject.
How long will it be in Cuba to achieve total respect for the rights
of homosexuals?
I don't know, I don't know how long and I would like to know. At
first I was very passionate about it and understood that I was
killing myself and that everything had a process, that it took time;
it has to be moved, to boost it. It is, precisely, what I am doing to
prevent this process from taking too long but to make it shorter.
Do you think these problems are institutional or about machismo in
society or a combination of both?
A combination of both. They are socio-cultural and historical and, of
course; they are visible because human beings with the same
conditioning make institutions. That is why it has an educational,
massive and very important component.
We are even carrying out a very important study on representations of
transexuality; to carry out educational campaigns to teach society to
respect these people and respect their rights.
Of course, everyone is going to compare what happens now with what
happened in the sixties when homosexuals were sent to work camps or
the UMAP. Why do you think this happened?
It was like what happened in other places only that Cuba is more
visible because it was during the Cold War and war had to be waged
against Cuba, on anything where Cuba made a mistake. This was
happening everywhere in different ways and continues to happen, even
in developed countries. What happens is that it doesn't transcend.
I know about it because that is my work and I know groups in Europe
who denounce the violation of the rights of these people.
I know of parents of transsexuals in England who call for the respect
of the rights of transsexuals because their sons have been physically
beaten. There are hate crimes that are sexually orientated.
This doesn't exist in Cuba. The Cuban population is much more
respectful of differences than in other places, I don't know why. I
don't know if it's the "conga" (always willing to have a party),
that's the way we are. When I'm afraid I will find a very strong
resistance, I find a high degree of sensibility in the Cuban
population.
Do you think that perception about homosexuals in Cuban society has
changed, lately?
I think so; it has changed very much. Also, because there is no
longer a hostile policy, because we also talk of those subjects in
social communication media.
This makes people think, to reflect upon and that homosexuals and
lesbians express their sexual orientation like everyone else in the
world, without fears although this does not mean that there may be
persons who are afraid because it very difficult to feel different.
I think that it is the same thing that happens with Blacks in a
racist society or to women in a society that discriminates against
her.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
5) PERMANENT MISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA TO THE UNITED NATIONS
DRAFT SPEECH BY ESTEBAN LAZO, HEAD OF THE CUBAN DELEGATION
TO THE 61st SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NEW YORK
United Nations website
http://www.un.org/webcast/ga/61/pdfs/cuba-e.pdf
Text covnersion by NY Transfer News
315 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Tel: 212-689-7215 * Fax: 212-689-9073
email: publicrelations@cubanmission.com
Madame President, Mr. Secretary General, Your Excellencies:
A mere four days ago, the 14th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement held in
Cuba was concluded. Today, I speak on behalf of the Movement's Chairman,
President Fidel Castro, fulfilling our obligation to inform this Assembly of
the main decisions agreed on at the Summit Conference held in Havana.
As First Vice-President of the Councils of State and Ministers of the
Republic of Cuba, Razl Castro said in his opening speech:
"The current international situation, characterised by the one superpower's
irrational attempts to control the world, aided by its allies, shows that we
need to be increasingly united In defence of the principles and purposes
upon which the Non-Aligned Movement was established, which are those
enshrined In the international law and the Charter of the United Nations."
While the founding of the Movement was necessary more than four decades ago,
its continued relevance in today's world is beyond doubt.
The NAM Summit held in Cuba was an indisputable success, in spite of the
threats and pressures of those who oppose the unity and common efforts of
the countries of the South.
The Summit saw high levels of participation, both in terms of the number of
countries which attended the conference and that of Heads of State or
Government.
Profound and fruitful debates were held, in an atmosphere of true
understanding, unity and cohesion, which allowed for the adoption of
documents of crucial importance to the future of the Non-Aligned Movement.
As the new Chairman, Cuba was given clear mandates and an action program
which shall govern its activities as head of the Movement.
As a result of the Summit, the Non-Aligned Movement has been strengthened
and, consequently, so has the political unity of the countries of the South.
The diverse and heterogeneous nature of the Movement's membership, far from
weakening it, constitutes its essential strength. These features have
allowed for the creation of solid consensuses that are a positive
contribution to our efforts to overcome the many and serious challenges
humanity faces today.
The commendable work of Malaysia as the Movement's Chairman over the last
three years was acknowledged at the Summit.
There was no cause of or demand by a South country which was not duly
considered by or which did not meet with the support of the Movement.
The urgent need to make progress in the defense of multilateralism, to
demand respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all States
and ensure the full realization of our peoples' right to development and
peace were ratified at the Summit as the Movement's principles.
The Heads of State or Government decided to work to suppress acts of
aggression and other actions contrary to the preservation of peace and to
encourage the peaceful settlement of international conflicts.
The Summit called on all nations to abstain from the use of force or from
threatening to use force against the territorial integrity or independence
of any State. Participating nations promoted the development of relations of
friendship based on respect towards the principle of equal rights and the
will of all peoples to struggle against foreign occupation.
They urged nations to extend international cooperation with a view to
overcoming the serious economic, social, cultural and humanitarian
challenges that face the world and to promote respect towards the human
rights and fundamental liberties of all and for the benefit of all.
The fundamental and inalienable right of all peoples to self-determination
was reaffirmed in Havana.
Non-Aligned countries agreed that world peace and security are today more
imperiled than ever as a result, among other factors, of the growing trend
of the most powerful States to resort to unilateral measures and to the
threat of preemptive wars.
The Movement's commitment to general and complete disarmament and nuclear
disarmament in particular, under strict and efficient international
monitoring, was underscored. The Summit also reaffirmed the basic and
inalienable right of all States to research, development, production and the
use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, and to be free from any kind of
discrimination in this connection, in conformity with their respective
international obligations.
In addition to this, the Summit clearly and firmly pronounced itself against
terrorism, double standards in international relations, coercive unilateral
measures against any nation, "regime change" policies and the failure of
developed countries to fulfill their commitments in economic and social
areas.
The Heads of State or Government of the Movement reaffirmed their hope to
live in a peaceful world in which all nations have the right to a better
future and a fair and equitable world order based on the sustainable
development of all nations.
They affirmed that, in its current form, globalization perpetuates and even
exacerbates the marginalization of the countries of the South, and demanded
that it be radically transformed into a positive force for change, for the
benefit of all peoples.
Participants reaffirmed the right of the Palestinian people to have their
own State and condemned the government of Israel for the new wave of crimes
and massacres in Gaza and other occupied territories. They also vigorously
condemned Israel's merciless acts of aggression against Lebanon and the
serious violations of this nation's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
The people and government of Bolivia, facing attempts aimed at destabilizing
the country instigated by external forces, met with a gesture of support and
solidarity from the Summit. The process which is underway in that sister
nation, aimed at guaranteeing the real rights of all Bolivians and at
securing full national control over the country's natural resources, was
offered solid support.
The Movement considered, with great concern, the aggressive policies and the
intensification of actions aimed at undermining the stability of the
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and expressed support for the inalienable
right of the Venezuelan people to determine its form of government and
choose its economic, political and social system, free from foreign
intervention, subversion, coercion or restrictions of any kind.
Non-Aligned countries undertook to promote and participate in a true process
of democratization and reform of the United Nations to put behind the
anti-democratic impositions and practices of the Security Council and to
give the General Assembly its due decisive role, in conformity with the
roles and powers described in the UN Charter.
I have mentioned only a few examples of the positions adopted at the Summit
held in Havana, with respect to the most diverse issues on the international
agenda. The documents adopted shall be offcially distributed to all UN
member States. A number of the decisions adopted at the Summit shall soon be
put into practice in this Session of the General Assembly.
Madame President:
Cuba is aware of the immense responsibility inherent in presiding over the
Non-Aligned Movement in one of the most difficult times In human history,
when we face more inequality and injustice than ever before.
We shall not rest in our efforts to have the Movement occupy the place it
can and must occupy in the international arena, in keeping not only with its
broad membership of 118 countries, nearly two-thirds of the UN membership,
but also of its history on behalf of the loftiest causes.
On inaugurating the 6th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement 27 years ago,
President Fidel Castro expressed:
"The struggle for peace and for a just economic order, and a workable
solution to the pressing problems that weigh on our peoples is, in our
opinion, increasingly becoming the main question posed to Movement of
Non-Aligned Countries.
"Peace, and the immense risks that threaten it, are not something that
should be left exclusively in the hands of the big military Powers. Peace is
possible, but world peace can only be assured to the extent that all
countries are consciously determined to fight for it -- peace, not just for
a part of the world, but for all peoples."
Days later, in this same hall, on reporting on that Summit, President Fidel
Castro expressed:
"The sounds of weapons, of threatening language, and of prepotent behavior
in the international arena must cease.
"Enough of the illusion that the problems of the world can be solved by
nuclear weapons. Bombs may kill the hungry, the sick, and the ignorant, but
they cannot kill hunger, disease, and ignorance. Nor can they kill the
righteous rebellion of the peoples."
The countries of the South shall work, united, for justice, peace and the
development of our nations and the entire World, convinced that a better
world is possible if we all struggle for it.
Madame President:
I would now like to say a few words on behalf of the people and government
of Cuba.
Our people's exercise of its right to self-determination faces new threats.
The Bush administration has stepped up its brutally hostile measures against
Cuba with new economic sanctions which further intensify the longest
blockade human history has known. More severe reprisals are also being taken
against those who have business dealings with Cuba from other nations, and
financial transactions with our country are viciously persecuted. The very
government of the United States recognizes that it is spending more, today,
in persecuting and punishing those who have business dealings with Cuba than
in monitoring the finances of those who attacked the Twin Towers.
This past June, the Bush administration approved the second version of its
most recent plan of aggression and domination against our country, aimed not
only at overthrowing the Revolution but also at destroying the Cuban nation.
In violation of international norms and laws, an unprecedented build-up in
the financial and material support to subversive actions aimed at
overthrowing the constitutional order freely chosen by the Cuban people is
being promoted.
The abovementioned anti-Cuban plan contains a chapter, which is being held
in secret. The antecedents of these decisions are the covert actions
undertaken against the Cuban revolution, which include mercenary invasions,
terrorists actions, the introduction of plagues and epidemics into the
country and over 600 plots to assassinate Fidel. Thousands of Cubans have
lost their lives or have been maimed for life as a result of this criminal
policy.
At the height of hypocrisy and irresponsibility, the government of the
United States tolerates the presence of and protects the terrorists who plan
new actions against our people on US soil. While maneuvering to free the
murderers responsible for monstrous crimes, such as the notorious
international terrorist and CIA agent Luis Posada Carriles, whom they refuse
to extradite to Venezuela, it illegally and unjustly keeps five courageous
anti-terrorist Cuban activists in prison.
But, in spite of these acts of aggression and the criminal blockade, the
Cuban people shall never be defeated. Cuba's internationalist efforts
continue unhindered. More than 30,000 Cuban doctors and other health
professionals are saving lives in 68 different countries today; we are
participating in the struggle against illiteracy in several continents; we
are developing a plan to train 100,000 doctors for the Third World and we
are helping hundreds of thousands of people in many countries regain their
sight through Operation Miracle. With these efforts, we are but fulfilling
our fundamental duty to aid all of the peoples of the world.
Your Excellencies:
Cuba is making progress and shall continue to face the future with optimism
and unity. Its educated and hard-working people, to whom the homeland is
humanity, shall struggle hand in hand with the peoples you represent for the
right to live in peace, justice and dignity for all.
Thank you, very much.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
6) AP Propaganda About Iraq
By Dahr Jamail
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Friday 22 September 2006
http://dahrjamailiraq.com
"But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought."
-George Orwell
On Monday, September 18, Associated Press (AP) ran a story titled,
"Iraqi tribes fight Insurgency"
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060918/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_tribes
At first glance, the average reader cannot be blamed for thinking that this
is a story about how tribes in Iraq have decided to take up arms against
the "insurgency."
The reader certainly cannot be blamed for thinking this, because the
first paragraph in the AP story reads, "Tribes in one of Iraq's most
volatile provinces have joined together to fight the insurgency there,
and they have called on the government and the US-led military coalition
for weapons, a prominent tribal leader said Monday."
Allow me to pause here and address the use of the word "insurgent."
According to Webster's Third New International Dictionary, an insurgent
is "a person who rises in revolt against civil authority or an
established government: [a] rebel." This of course begs the existence of
a legitimately elected government that the "insurgent" rises in revolt
against, which in Iraq we do not have. How is it possible to have a
legitimate government in a country that was first illegally invaded and
today is illegally occupied?
Yet, AP uses the word unquestioningly.
The story continues: "Tribal leaders and clerics in Ramadi, the capital
of violent Anbar province, met last week and have set up a force of
about 20,000 men 'ready to purge the city of these infidels,' Sheik
Fassal al-Guood, a prominent tribal leader from Ramadi, told the
Associated Press, referring to the insurgents. 'People are fed up with
the acts of those criminals who take Islam as a cover for their crimes,'
he said. 'The situation in the province is unbearable, the city is
abandoned, most of the families have fled the city and all services are
poor.' Al-Guood said 15 of the 18 tribes in Ramadi 'have sworn to fight
those who are killing Sunnis and Shiites and they established an armed
force of about 20,000 young men ready to purge the city from those
infidels.'"
At this point, either the author of this AP story, or the editor, or
both, rightly assume that the reader is not aware that Sheik Fassal
al-Guood tried to lead the local resistance against the occupation in
Ramadi, but turned against the same resistance group when its members
rejected him as a leader because they considered him a corrupt thief.
Nor is the reader aware that today, Sheikh Fassal al-Guood lives in the
"Green Zone" and happily talks to reporters from behind the concrete
blast walls, and that his power in Al-Anbar now equals exactly nothing.
I contacted author and media critic Norman Solomon and asked him what he
thought of this AP story. "The holes in this story beg for questions
that it does not raise, much less answer," he wrote. "For instance: What
are the past, present and hoped-for financial relationships between the
quoted 'tribal leader' on the one hand and the US and Iraqi governments
on the other? Are there any indications that money has changed hands? Is
a mercenary arrangement being set up? Is this part of the Bush
administration's strategy to get more Iraqis to kill each other rather
than have Iraqis killing American troops - aka 'As the Iraqis stand up,
we'll stand down?' Isn't there a good chance that such arrangements will
actually fuel civil war in Iraq rather than douse its already horrific
flames?"
He continued, "So, this AP story agreeably paraphrases an official from
the US-backed Iraqi government's Defense Ministry as saying that 'Iraqi
security forces had met with tribal leaders and had agreed to cooperate
in combating violence.' But how will they be 'combating violence?' With
massive violence, of course, although the article doesn't say so. Many
sources are available to make such a point, but in this story AP availed
itself of none of them."
Solomon, a nationally-syndicated columnist on media and politics who is
also the founder and executive director of the Institute for Public
Accuracy, a national consortium of policy researchers and analysts, had
this to say about why AP might get away with this type of "reportage" as
consistently as it does: "AP is providing the kind of coverage that it
and other mainstream US media outlets have provided in the past. The
coverage does not seem conspicuously shoddy to most readers because it
fits in with previous shoddy reportage. From all appearances, this AP
article is based on statements from four sources - and each of them is
in line with US government policies. There's one tribal leader from
Ramadi who is seeking large quantities of material aid from the US and
the Iraqi government; there are two spokespeople for that Iraqi
government; and there's a general from the US military. That all four
would present a similar picture of events is not surprising. But for an
article to rely on only those sources is stenography for one side of the
conflict - which should not be confused with journalism."
It is also important for the reader to note that, according to an August
US Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, of 1,666 bombs exploded in
Iraq in July, 90% were aimed at US-led forces. Along with this fact,
attacks against US forces have increased dramatically in recent months,
and the US military itself has admitted that less than 6% of the attacks
against them are from foreign fighters (i.e., "terrorists"). Thus, at
least 94% of all attacks against US forces in Iraq are from the Iraqi
Resistance, as opposed to "terrorists."
It is time, too, that readers of mainstream news knew that any "tribal
meeting" that discusses fighting "the insurgents" is currently being
held secretly inside American military bases or inside the "green zone."
Iraqi people who are trying to lead that operation are well known to
Al-Anbar citizens. These leaders did succeed in some cases in recruiting
certain groups to fight resistance fighters by paying considerable sums
of money, but it was only temporary success.
A case in point would be Al-Qa'im last spring. A tribal fight occurred
between local resistance fighters. Sheik Osama al-Jadaan was involved in
engineering it by paying members of his tribe to take up arms against
local resistance groups. Yet this conflict was settled, and when it was,
al-Jadaan had to flee to the "green zone." He lived there for a short
time before his work as a collaborator with occupation forces caught up
with him, and he was killed in Baghdad.
Yet the AP story has this to say about al-Jadaan: "In late May, a
prominent Sunni Arab tribal leader, Sheik Osama al-Jadaan, who provided
fighters to help battle al-Qaeda in Anbar, was assassinated in Baghdad."
There are the usual token scraps of truth in the AP story, lending it a
hue of credibility. The story quotes a US military spokesperson who goes
out on a limb to say that tribal leaders in Anbar "very much want to see
security brought back to that area."
Another scrap of truth came earlier in the story where Al-Guood is
quoted as saying that most of the tribes of Ramadi "have sworn to fight
those who are killing Sunnis and Shiites and they established an armed
force of about 20,000 young men ready to purge the city from those
infidels."
This is true throughout Iraq, where even the US military has documented
several cases of resistance groups fighting foreign terror groups that
have infiltrated Iraq's porous borders in order to carry out attacks
against Iraqi civilians.
The most disconcerting portion of this AP story, however, is the melding
of the word "insurgent" with the word "terrorist." Clearly there is a
flippancy, and I believe a malicious intent in this misuse. I have
witnessed this melding repeated in AP stories from Iraq in which
"insurgent" replaces "terrorist."
We can see the melding in a recent AP story
http://www.newspress.com/Top/Article/article.jsp?Section=WORLD&ID=564808338794480636
which states: "Attacks against US troops have increased following a call
earlier this month from al-Qaeda in Iraq's leader to target American
forces, the top US military spokesman said Wednesday."
Another example of this melding is in an AP story from September 17th
about Bilal Hussein, an Iraqi citizen of Fallujah who has been held by
the US military without charges for five months. Part of the story
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060917/ap_on_re_mi_ea/photographer_detained
reads, "The military said Hussein was captured with two insurgents,
including Hamid Hamad Motib, an alleged leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq."
Regarding the reference to al-Qaeda (read "terrorism"), Solomon had this
to say: "The word 'terrorism' is clearly a pejorative. And it's an
unwritten rule of US media coverage that the 'terrorism' label can only
be used, or quoted with credence being given to the sources, if
'terrorism' applies to murderous violence opposed by the US government -
in contrast to murderous violence inflicted or otherwise supported by
the US government, in which case that violence is routinely presumed to
be positive."
It is a melding that has the power to change minds.
A melding that may have prompted Orwell to say, "... language can also
corrupt thought."
It is important to note that the board of directors of AP is composed of
22 newspaper and media executives that include the CEOs and presidents
of ABC, McClatchy, Hearst, Tribune and the Washington Post. Two of the
directors are members of very conservative policy councils that include
the Hoover Institute. The Hoover Institute is a Republican policy
research center that has been referred to as "Bush's brain trust." Its
fellows include Condoleezza Rice and Newt Gingrich, a Distinguished
Visiting Fellow, along with George Shultz.
Douglas McCorkindale, also on the board of directors at AP, is on the
board of Lockheed Martin, the world's largest defense contract company.
One does not require crystals to see that the board of AP displays a
clear tilt toward right-wing conservative views, and comprises
representatives of a huge corporate media network of the largest
publishers in the US.
It is not difficult to demolish the myth of the liberal media and its
prominent arms like AP.
*Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and
murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.
*- George Orwell
(c)2006 Dahr Jamail.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
7) Pickers Are Few, and Growers Blame Congress
By JULIA PRESTON
September 22, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/22/washington/22growers.html?ex=1159156800&en=07122ee1139ef2b6&ei=5087%0A
LAKEPORT, Calif. — The pear growers here in Lake County waited
decades for a crop of shapely fruit like the one that adorned their
orchards last month.
“I felt like I went to heaven,” said Nick Ivicevich, recalling the
perfection of his most abundant crop in 45 years of tending trees.
Now harvest time has passed and tons of pears have ripened
to mush on their branches, while the ground of Mr. Ivicevich’s
orchard reeks with rotting fruit. He and other growers in Lake
County, about 90 miles north of San Francisco, could not find
enough pickers.
Stepped-up border enforcement kept many illegal Mexican
migrant workers out of California this year, farmers and labor
contractors said, putting new strains on the state’s shrinking
seasonal farm labor force.
Labor shortages have also been reported by apple growers
in Washington and upstate New York. Growers have gone
from frustrated to furious with Congress, which has all but
given up on passing legislation this year to create an
agricultural guest-worker program.
Last week, 300 growers representing every major agricultural
state rallied on the front lawn of the Capitol carrying baskets
of fruit to express their ire.
This year’s shortages are compounding a flight from the
fields by Mexican workers already in the United States. As
it has become harder to get into this country, many illegal
immigrants have been reluctant to return to Mexico in the
off-season. Remaining here year-round, they have gravitated
toward more stable jobs.
“When you’re having to pay housing costs, it’s very difficult
to survive and wait for the next agricultural season to come
around,” said Jack King, head of national affairs for the
California Farm Bureau Federation.
California farms employ at least 450,000 people at the peak
of the harvest, with farm workers progressing from one crop
to the next, stringing together as much as seven months of work.
Growers estimate the state fell short this harvest season
by 70,000 workers. Joe Bautista, a labor contractor from
Stockton who brings crews to Lake County, said about one-third
of his regular workers stayed home in Mexico this year, while
others were caught by the Border Patrol trying to enter
the United States.
With fewer workers, Mr. Bautista fell behind in harvests near
Sacramento and arrived weeks late in Lake County. “There was
a lot of pressure on the contractors,” he said. “But there is only
so much we can do. There wasn’t enough labor.”
For years, economists say, California farmers have been losing
their pickers to less strenuous, more stable and sometimes
higher-paying jobs in construction, landscaping and tourism.
“If you want another low-wage job, you can work in a hotel
and not die in the heat,” said Marc Grossman, the spokesman
for the United Farm Workers of America. The union calculates
that up to 15 percent of California’s farm labor force leaves
agriculture each year.
As they sum up this season’s losses, estimated to be at least
$10 million for California pear farmers alone, growers in the
state mainly blame Republican lawmakers in Washington for
stalling immigration legislation that would have addressed
the shortage by authorizing a guest-worker program for
agriculture. Many growers, a dependably Republican group,
said they felt betrayed.
“After a while, you get done being sad and start being really
angry,” said Toni Scully, a lifelong Republican whose family
owns a pear-packing operation in Lake County. “The Republicans
have given us a lot of lip service, and our crops are hanging
on the trees rotting.”
Tons more pears that were harvested were rejected by
Mrs. Scully’s packing plant because they were picked too
late. The rejects were dumped in a farm lot, mounds
of pungent fruit swarming with bees, left to be eaten
by deer. “The anthem about the fruited plain,” Mrs. Scully
said sadly, “I don’t think this is what they had in mind.”
Some economists and advocates for farm workers say the
labor shortages would ease if farmers would pay more.
Lake County growers said that pickers’ pay was not low —
up to $150 a day — and that they had been ready to pay
even more to save their crops. “I would have raised my wages,”
said Steve Winant, a pear grower whose 14-acre orchard
is still laden with overripe fruit. “But there weren’t any
people to pay.”
The tightening of the border with Mexico, begun more than
a decade ago but reinforced since May with the deployment
of 6,000 National Guard troops, has forced California growers
to acknowledge that most of their workers are illegal Mexican
migrants. The U.F.W. estimates that more than 90 percent
of the state’s farm workers are illegal.
Most California growers gave up years ago on recruiting workers
through the seasonal guest-worker program currently in place.
Known as H-2A, the program requires employers to prove they
tried to find American workers and to apply well in advance
for relatively small contingents of foreign workers for fixed
time periods.
“Our experience with the current H-2A program has been
a nightmare,” said Luawanna Hallstrom, general manager
of Harry Singh & Sons, a vine-ripe tomato grower based
in Oceanside, near San Diego.
Ms. Hallstrom said her company tried to use the program
in the months after the Sept. 11 attacks, when security checks
forced it to fire illegal migrant employees who were working
in tomato fields on a military base. Her company lost
$2.5 million on that 2001 crop, she said.
Over the years, occasional programs to draw American
workers to the harvests have failed. “Americans do not raise
their children to be farm workers,” Ms. Hallstrom said.
The failure of Congress to approve a new guest-worker
program surprised California growers because a proposal
that the Senate passed stemmed from a rare agreement
between growers’ organizations, the U.F.W. and other
advocates for farm workers, and legislators ranging
from conservative Republicans to liberal Democrats.
Known as AgJobs, the proposal would create a new
temporary-resident status for seasonal farm workers
and give them the chance to become permanent residents
if they work intensively in agriculture for at least three years.
It was included in a bill that passed the Senate in May.
The House has passed several bills focused on border security,
and has avoided negotiations with the Senate on a broader
immigration overhaul. [Three of the House bills were
passed Thursday.]
Mr. Ivicevich, a 69-year-old family farmer, is not given
to displays of emotion. But he paused for a moment,
overwhelmed, as he stood among trees sagging with pears
that oozed when he squeezed them. His nighttime sleep,
in his cottage among his 122 acres of orchards, is disrupted
by the thud of dropping fruit and the cracking of branches.
For decades, Mr. Ivicevich said, migrant pickers would knock
on his door asking for work climbing his picking ladders.
Then about five years ago they stopped knocking, and he
turned to a labor contractor to muster harvest crews.
This year, elated, he called the contractor in early August.
Pears must be picked green and quickly packed and chilled,
or they go soft in shipping.
“Then I called and I called and I called,” Mr. Ivicevich said.
The picking crew, which he needed on Aug. 12, arrived two
weeks late and 15 workers short. He lost about 1.8 million
pounds of pears.
His neighbor, Mr. Winant, standing in his drooping orchard
with his hands sunk in his jeans pockets, said he would rather
bulldoze the pear trees than start preparing them for a new season.
“It’s like a death, like a son died,” said Mr. Winant, 45, who cares
for the small orchard himself during the winter. “You work all year
and then see your work go to ground. I want to pull them
out because of the agony. It’s just too hard to take.”
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
8) Billionaires Only Occupy Forbes 400 List
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 6:30 a.m. ET
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Forbes-400.html
NEW YORK (AP) -- For the first time, Forbes magazine's list of the
400 richest Americans consists exclusively of people worth
$1 billion or more. As a group, the people who made the rankings
released Thursday are worth a record $1.25 trillion, compared
with $1.13 trillion last year.
In the billionaire-athon, casino magnate Sheldon Adelson pole-
vaulted to No. 3 from 15 in last year's ranking, finishing behind
the mainstays at Nos. 1 and 2: Microsoft Corp. founder Bill Gates
and Warren Buffett of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Adelson is now estimated to have $20.5 billion, Buffett $46 billion
and Gates $53 billion. Gates has held the No. 1 spot for the last
13 years while Buffett has been No. 2 every year since 1994
except 2000, when Larry Ellison of Oracle Corp. held that spot.
Adelson's expanding net worth is related in no small part to his
decision to open a casino two years ago on the island of Macau,
an emerging gambling haven off the southeastern coast of China.
Profits are growing rapidly thanks to the Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s
Macau casino. Adelson personally and through family trusts
controls 70 percent of the company, Las Vegas Sands spokesman
Ron Reese said.
Forbes estimates Adelson earned about $1 million an hour over
the past two years. In the second quarter alone, the Sands Macau
property saw net revenue jump to $310.4 million, up from $205.1
million a year ago. To tap the demand from gamblers in Asia going
forward, the Sands Corp. plans a second property on Macau and
a casino in Singapore.
The two Google Inc. founders were also big earners. Sergey Brin
and Larry Page gained about $13 million a day over the last two
years, according to Forbes. That puts them in 12th and 13th place,
up from a tie at 16th place last year.
Page and Brin also share the distinction of being, at 33 years old,
the two youngest people on the list and two of only eight who
are younger than 40.
The list was led off by technologists, such as Gates, Microsoft
co-founder Paul Allen, Dell Inc.'s Michael Dell and Ellison, and
rounded out by five members of the Walton clan who have fortunes
amassed from sales by the world's largest retailer.
Ellison, with $19.5 billion, moved to fourth place from fifth,
while Allen, last year's No. 3, was fifth this year with $16 billion.
Dell fell to a tie at ninth place from fourth in last year's list;
he is worth $15.5 billion
Adelson's ascension knocks Helen Walton, the wife of Wal-Mart
Stores Inc. founder Sam Walton, into 11th place with a net worth
of $15.3 billion. Her children, Jim, S. Robson and Alice, and Christy
Walton, the widow of her son John, ranked in the bottom half
of the top 10 this year. Each was worth between $15.5 billion
and $15.7 billion, Forbes reported.
Martha Stewart, founder of the eponymous Martha Stewart Living
Omnimedia Inc., fell off the list completely, as she lost
$395 million over the past year.
The biggest number of people on the list live in California, which
houses 90 of the 400, and another 44 live in New York City.
On the Net:
Forbes.com list of 400 richest Americans:
www.forbes.com/400richest
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
9) America's 400 Richest
Edited by Matthew Miller and Tatiana Serafin
09.21.06, 6:00 PM ET
http://www.forbes.com/2006/09/21/americas-400-richest-biz_cx_mm_06rich400_0921richintro.html
A nine-figure fortune won’t get you much mention these days,
at least not on these pages. This year, for the first time, everyone
in The Forbes 400 has at least $1 billion. The collective net worth
of the nation’s wealthiest climbed $120 billion, to $1.25 trillion.
Surging real estate, oil and other asset prices paved the way for
28 new members. Developer John P. Manning used political savvy
to build a $1.1 billion fortune in part by brokering low-income
housing projects. Chesapeake Energy founders Aubrey McClendon
and Tom L. Ward are two of the oil fortunes added to the list.
Pouring 40 million caffeinated drinks a week landed Starbucks
honcho Howard Schultz on our list of America’s 400 richest.
Manny Mashouf placed his skimpy women’s wear on TV shows
like Party of Five and Ally McBeal; today he has a $1.5 billion
fortune in Bebe clothing stores.
Also gracing our list for the first time are Lehman Brothers Chief
Richard Fuld ($1 billion), hedge fund manager David E. Shaw
($1 billion), mutual fund guru Jonathan Lovelace Jr. ($1.1 billion),
Houston Rockets owner Leslie Alexander ($1.2 billion), leveraged
buyout tycoon Leon Black ($2 billion), Google veteran Omid
Kordestani ($1.9 billion), Colony Capital’s Thomas Barrack
($1 billion), New York City real estate moguls Stephen Ross
($2.5 billion) and Tamir Sapir ($2 billion), and the husband-and-
wife computer chip team of Weili Dai ($1 billion) and
Sehat Sutardja ($1 billion).
Black Entertainment Television founder Robert Johnson, who
rebuilt his fortune with investments in real estate and restaurants,
is among the 14 returnees to this year’s list. Netscape pioneer
James Clark is another retread; he reinvested his tech proceeds
into Miami condos and construction outfit Hyperion Development
Group following the burst of the tech bubble six years ago.
Also returning is Little Caesar’s founder Michael Ilitch ($1.5 billion),
car dealership owner Robert Friedkin ($1.2 billion),
investors J. Christopher Flowers ($1.2 billion) and Alfred P. West
($1.2 billion), and banking and real estate maven
Paul M. Milstein ($3.5 billion).
Once again the biggest gainer is casino mogul Sheldon Adelson,
with a net worth up $9 billion. Adelson’s Las Vegas Sands stock
is up 125% since its public offering in December 2004. He has
made almost $1 million an hour since the 2004 Forbes
400 list was published.
Another big gainer is Warren Buffett, who added $6 billion.
That wealth, and the rest of what he has accumulated as
a value investor, will be given away, mostly to the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation.
Eight members of last year’s list died, including investor
Preston Tisch, Grey Goose vodka creator Sidney Frank, and
James and Margaret Cargill, two cousins who inherited
a stake in the world’s largest commodities company
from William W. Cargill.
Thirty-four people couldn’t keep up or gave their money
away. They include leveraged buyout tycoon Theodore
Forstmann, poultryman Donald Tyson, real estate investors
John Arrillaga and Richard Peery, and fashionista Richard
Hayne. Husband-and-wife banking team Herbert and Marion
Sandler dropped from our rankings after giving away more
than $1 billion combined to charity.
Reported by: Emily Douglas, Elyse Graham and Duncan
Greenberg with Christopher Helman and Adam Kemezis.
Additional reporting by: David Armstrong, Victoria Murphy
Barret, William P. Barrett, _Erika Brown, Monte Burke, Kerry A.
Dolan, Tim Doyle, Jonathan Fahey, Allison Fass, Stephane Fitch,
Elizabeth Gregory, Miriam Gottfried, Emily Lambert, Michael
Maiello, Peter Newcomb, Deborah Orr, Matthew Rand, Amanda
Schupak, Matthew Swibel, Mark Tatge and David Whelan, Art
direction: Charles A. Brucaliere_Photo Editor: Gail Toivanen,
Database: Mitchel Rand
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
10) Off the Charts
What’s a Couple of Hundred Trillion When You’re Talking Derivatives?
By FLOYD NORRIS
September 23, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/business/23charts.html?adxnnl=6&adxnnlx=1159027325-6IAu68axWRTicEnv+8kGMQ
Everett McKinley Dirksen, the Senate Republican leader in the
1950’s, is supposed to have said, “A billion here and a billion
there, and pretty soon you’re talking real money.” What would
he have thought of derivatives today?
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, a trade
group, reported this week that the outstanding nominal value
of swaps and derivatives at the end of June was $283.2 trillion.
Compare that with the combined gross domestic product of the
United States, the European Union, Canada, Japan and China,
which is about $34 trillion. The total value of all homes in the
United States is about the same amount.
To be sure, notional value is an exaggerated term as it greatly
overstates the amount at risk in many contracts. But the growth
rate is real, and in the fastest-growing area of swaps — credit
default swaps — notional value is closer to the amount at risk,
because such swaps promise to make up the losses if a borrower
defaults on the notional amount.
The value of outstanding credit default swaps doubles every year
— a trend that must eventually stop — and now equals $26 trillion.
That is about the same as the total amount of bond debt in the
United States, and corporate debt, on which most credit swaps
are traded, comes to just $5.2 trillion.
The credit derivatives cover the risks of default by individual
companies, and offer insurance against default for bond indexes
and specified bond portfolios.
The growth of the market has forced the swaps and derivatives
association to change the way its credit swaps work. It used to
be that if a company defaulted, the writer of a credit swap would
have to pay par value for the bond he had guaranteed, and could
then sell the bond to reduce his losses.
But in some cases defaults led to bond rallies, as those who had
purchased credit swaps scrambled to get bonds to deliver. Now
traders can choose cash settlements, with the amounts to be
paid determined through auctions.
Until 1997, the association provided separate numbers on currency
and interest rate contracts, but innovations blurred the distinction
between those categories, and now it publishes a combined total.
At the end of June, the figure was $250.8 trillion, up 25 percent
over the previous 12 months.
Growth in that market slowed markedly early in this decade,
as worldwide markets cooled, and there was even one annual
decline, from mid-2000 to mid-2001. But growth picked up in
2002 as economies began to recover.
The volume outstanding of equity derivatives is rising by about
30 percent a year, and now totals $5.6 trillion. It could go farther,
with world stock market capitalization now about $41 trillion,
according to Standard & Poor’s.
Robert Pickel, the chief executive of the association, said that the
growth in derivatives enables “more and more firms to benefit
from these risk management tools.” On the other hand, the
situation allows more and more traders to load up on risk
if they choose, and hedge funds have become major derivatives
traders.
The combination of large unregulated hedge funds trading ever
larger amounts of unregulated derivatives in nontransparent
markets makes some people nervous. But so far, anyway, little
is being done to change the situation, and nothing devastating
has happened to markets.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
11) Solidarity in New York with
Cuban delegation
Havana. September 22, 2006
http://www.granma.cu/ingles/2006/septiembre/vier22/40solidar-i.html
NEW YORK, September 21—The Cuban delegation participating
in the 61st Session of the UN General Assembly, led by Vice President
of the Council of State Esteban Lazo Hernández, was warmly received
with messages of solidarity in an enthusiastic public welcome
in the historically Black community of Harlem.
“We know that this neighborhood is the cradle of solidarity with
the Cuban revolution,” said Lazo, who is also a member of the
Political Bureau of the Communist Party of Cuba, referring to the
welcome that the people of Harlem gave President Fidel Castro
in September 1960 in response to the hostility surrounding
his first visit to the United Nations.
During the solidarity event at the Church of the Intercession that
attracted an overflow crowd, Reverend Lucius Walker, executive
director of the Pastors for Peace organization, said that Cuba
deserves gratitude.
“We thank Cuba for the doctors and specialists that it was willing
to send to the aid of the victims of Hurricane Katrina, an offer that
the Bush government did not accept,” he said.
Walker also expressed his thanks for the 110 young medical
students from the United States studying in Cuba without charge.
In her turn, Heidi Bogosian, executive director of the National Lawyers
Guild, highlighted the case of the Cuban Five, unjustly incarcerated
in U.S. prisons because of their activities to prevent acts of terrorism.
The crowd of supporters burst into cheers when Cuban Foreign
Minister Felipe Pérez Roque said that President Fidel Castro was
in full recovery.
In his turn, Vice President Esteban Lazo qualified as immoral the
prison terms handed down to the five Cuban patriots and noted that
it is further evidence of the U.S. imperialist government’s hatred
of the Cuban Revolution.
During the solidarity event, Lazo was approached by a group
of young people who wanted to send greetings to Fidel for
his 80th birthday.
The occasion was an opportunity for the member of the Political
Bureau to recount the political trajectory of President Fidel Castro.
“The first to be in the trenches is Fidel,” Lazo said to applause,
PL reported.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
12) Line drawn on immigration legislation
Newsom, Yee slam federal attempts as discriminatory
Leslie Fulbright, Chronicle Staff Writer
[NOTE: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is actively at
work in San Francisco deporting hundreds of undocumented
workers--perhaps not with the help of city employees but,
right under their noses. I send this out as a reminder of what
was promised noting that the city government only promised
not to aid ICE in it's assault against the basic human rights
of undocumented workers, not to stop it. Currently, the City
Government is standing by and not saying a word about it.
We have received many personal reports of such deportations,
firings, evictions, etc., happening in San Francisco. There
have been incidents of workers, upon going to collect
their pay, instead get ICE brought down upon them.
What is the City Government going to do about this?....bw]
Saturday, April 8, 2006
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/04/08/BAGGII5THL1.DTL
A cross-section of elected officials, religious leaders and immigrant
-rights advocates in San Francisco is vowing not to comply with
proposed legislation that would criminalize living in the United
States illegally and make helping undocumented immigrants
a felony.
Mayor Gavin Newsom said the city will not cooperate with any
federal attempt to criminalize illegal immigration. "This is a city
of refuge," Newsom said at a press conference Thursday. "San
Francisco stands in strong opposition of the rhetoric coming
out of Washington, D.C."
San Francisco's 17-year-old status as a "city of refuge" remains
in effect, the mayor said, meaning that city employees cannot
work with federal authorities to enforce U.S. immigration law.
The Board of Supervisors passed a resolution this month that
expands the city's position, barring any assistance in enforcing
proposed criminal provisions in federal immigration law.
Assemblyman Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, on Friday announced
a new multifaith delegation of Bay Area religious leaders to protest
the proposed legislation, which, he said, "not only unfairly
discriminates against many people in our community, but
it criminalizes churches, mosques and temples for the good
work they are doing."
Yee said he has drafted a state resolution to declare California's
opposition to "such anti-immigrant, anti-worker federal legislation."
The bill drawing fire, passed by the U.S. House of Representatives
in December, criminalizes "illegal presence" in the United States
and the provision of any kind of aid to illegal immigrants. It also
proposes building new fences along 700 miles of the U.S.-Mexico
border, requiring businesses to verify the status of workers,
restricting court review of immigration decisions to a single
jurisdiction and deputizing local sheriffs along the border
to arrest illegal immigrants.
A big concern is the section that would make it criminal to aid
undocumented immigrants, which some immigrant rights groups
say could be translated into handing out groceries at a food bank,
providing medical care or babysitting.
Immigration reform has been the subject of intense debate over
the past two weeks as the U.S. Senate considers its own proposal.
The Senate's bill, which didn't pass before a recess Friday, is much
less punitive and provides a path to legal residency for many
illegal immigrants.
While the two drastically different approaches are debated, fear
remains in immigrant communities that undocumented residents
could be considered felons, as well as the people who help them.
"The way the House bill is written, doctors providing medical care
could be put in jail," said Philip Hwang, an attorney with San
Francisco's Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights. "This is of tremendous
concern to our office, to the community and throughout California."
Cities throughout the state -- including San Francisco, Los Angeles
and San Diego -- instituted sanctuary laws in the 1980s that prevent
city employees from asking immigration status or cooperating
with federal officials attempting to enforce federal laws.
San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris recently signed
a newspaper ad denouncing "anti-immigrant proposals."
"The D.A. opposes any measure that would criminalize assisting
immigrants," said Bilen Mesfin, a spokeswoman for the district a
ttorney's office. "We are a sanctuary city, a city of refuge,
and we always will be."
Eileen Hurst, a spokeswoman for the San Francisco Sheriff's
Department, said her office is currently bound by the sanctuary
ordinance, but that could change with new legislation.
"It is highly speculative at this point," Hurst said. "If it passed,
we would seek the advice of the city attorney in implementing it."
Some church leaders who provide services to immigrants have
been vocal in their opposition as well.
The Rev. Kay Jorgensen of the First Unitarian Universalist Society
of San Francisco said, "Immigrants are contributing to the health
and well-being of our communities, while living under the pressures
of immigration laws that threaten their own well-being.
"People of faith must break down the barriers that cause poverty
and suffering, not to help build them through harsh legislation."
Staff writer Rachel Gordon contributed to this story. E-mail Leslie
Fulbright at lfulbright@sfchronicle.com.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
13) Turning Back the Clock on Rape
New York Times Editorial
September 23, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/opinion/23sat1.html?hp
In recent decades, women’s advocates and human rights
activists have made huge progress on the issues of rape and
sexual assault — in the United States and globally. Both crimes
are now more powerfully defined in state and federal laws.
In international law, where rape and sexual assault have long
been classified as torture and war crimes, the world has begun
to accept the importance of enforcement. In 1998, a tribunal
convicted a paramilitary chief for watching one of his men
rape a woman in Serbia. A year ago, the world rose up
in outrage when United Nations peacekeepers raped
women in Congo.
You’d think this was a settled issue. But it’s been opened
up again in the bill on jailing, interrogating and trying terror
suspects that President Bush is trying to ram through Congress
in a pre-election rush. Both the White House and Senate versions
contain provisions on rape and sexual assault that turn back
the clock alarmingly. They are among the many flaws that must
be fixed before Congress can responsibly pass this legislation.
Rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse are mentioned twice
in the bill — once as crimes that could be prosecuted before
military tribunals if committed by an “illegal enemy combatant,”
and once as “grave breaches” of the Geneva Conventions that
could be prosecuted as war crimes if committed by an American
against a detainee. But in each case, the wording creates
new and disturbing loopholes.
In the bill, rape is narrowly defined as forced or coerced genital
or anal penetration. It utterly leaves out other acts, as well as the
notion that sex without consent is also rape, as defined
by numerous state laws and federal law. That is the more
likely case in a prison, where a helpless inmate would be
unlikely to resist the sexual overtures of a guard or interrogator.
The section on sexual abuse requires that the act include
physical contact. Thus it might not include ordering a terrified
female prisoner to strip and dance, which happened in Rwanda,
or compelling a male prisoner to strip and wear women’s
underwear on his head, or photographing naked prisoners
piled together, both of which happened at Abu Ghraib.
Rhonda Copelon, a professor of law at the City University
of New York who was an author of the international law on rape
as a war crime, says the bill also could make it impossible
to prosecute rape or sexual assault as torture, because the
definition of torture in the legislation requires proof of specific
intent to commit the crime. Motive is very hard to prove in cases
of rape or sexual assault.
Experts on sexual violence fear that the intent is to absolve
American soldiers and their commanders from prosecution
for deeds that have occurred since Sept. 11. Ms. Copelon also
points out that the United States has been trying for years
to write a specific intent requirement into international law
on torture. The co-authors of the bill, Senators John McCain
and Lindsey Graham, did not respond to questions about
the section.
But it does not really matter. This language simply needs
to be changed, and Senators McCain and Graham should
do it. If not, Democrats should insist on this among many
other changes they should be demanding before agreeing
to a vote on the prison measure.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
14) Are You Better Off Than You Were 4 Years Ago? Do You Care?
By DANIEL ALTMAN
September 24, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/business/yourmoney/24view.html?ref=business
WHY doesn’t anyone seem to care about the economy anymore?
Despite an apparently imminent slowdown, which could cost millions
of jobs, economic policy and the general state of the economy have
hardly made it onto the evening news of late, let alone onto the
Congressional agenda or an electoral platform. It’s an odd turn
of events, given Americans’ obsession a decade ago with the
financial markets. During the wild days of the Internet boom,
everyone and their dog was investing in stocks. Construction
workers could be heard discussing technology stocks over lunch.
Pundits like James J. Cramer, analysts like Abby Joseph Cohen
and even college professors like Robert J. Shiller of Yale became
media superstars.
Lately, however, chatter about the economy seems to have fallen
on the list of priorities, both in the news media and in Washington,
as terrorism and the war in Iraq dominate public debate.
“There is a lot of stuff on the foreign policy side that has
a newsworthiness and an urgency that tend to crowd out the
domestic,” said William G. Gale, director of economic studies
at the Brookings Institution, a left-leaning group in Washington.
Citing the worsening economic trend, he added, “it is kind
of remarkable that it’s not all over the headlines the way it might be.”
Marginalized economists might be consoled if there were an economic
explanation for the lack of attention. Indeed, you can come up with
a theory if you try. Much of that extravagant paper wealth generated
in the 1990’s has disappeared, and so have the assets of many
pensions. Given the nation’s low saving rate, those investments
aren’t being replenished quickly. Is it any surprise that fewer
people are interested in how the markets are doing?
“The baby boom generation is 10 years older, and getting close
to retirement. They’ve kind of set the tone for what’s happened,”
said Bruce Bartlett, a conservative commentator who wrote a book
critical of President Bush’s economic record. “They’re not driving
things the way they did when they were in their peak earning
years and peak saving years.”
But other things are going on, too, Mr. Bartlett said. “We’ve had,
the last few years anyway, quite a bit of activity in the area of
economic policy, especially tax policy, and it might be that people
are just kind of fatigued by what’s been done.”
That might also be true of politicians, said Kevin A. Hassett, director
of economic policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute,
a right-leaning research group. “I don’t think they did anything
on the economy, really, this year,” he said of the administration.
“I don’t know why it is that their sights are set so low.”
Mr. Hassett said his research showed an extremely strong
correlation between how people felt about the war in Iraq and
how they felt about the economy, even though the war in Iraq
isn’t necessarily the biggest force driving month-to-month
economic performance. He drew the conclusion that sentiment
didn’t always translate into action.
“How people say they feel about the economy is not an accurate
reflection of what really motivates them as economic agents,”
he said. “Americans have said that they’re really pessimistic,
but they’ve been anything but cautious with their spending.”
Mr. Gale suggested that Americans might be addicted to spending,
in the form of payments for mortgages, car loans and college
tuition. But Mr. Bartlett said that falling gasoline prices —
a factor that people do seem to care about — might be
contributing to the public’s blasé attitude.
That attitude is hardly enough to spur politicians into action.
But there may be another reason that they haven’t initiated
any significant economic legislation lately, said Robert Greenstein,
president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning
research group. The old practice of reaching behind-the-scenes
agreements in Congress to push forward important legislation
may be dying out.
“The whole atmosphere with each passing year seems to move
farther away from what you’d need to have a bipartisan bill, like
in 1983 on Social Security,” Mr. Greenstein said. “To the degree
that they see that there’s no prospect for that actually happening
in the future, why stick your neck out and talk seriously
about that stuff?”
The president did start his second term with an ambitious
agenda for tax changes, set forth by a panel he had appointed
earlier. But the panel’s recommendations have gone absolutely
nowhere. “The tax reform panel did a great job,” Mr. Hassett said.
“Their report will likely be graduate-school required reading for
many years. It was dead on arrival.”
The process feeds upon itself, Mr. Greenstein added. The news
media don’t take politicians’ partisan posturing seriously, the
economy gets less coverage and there is less public appetite for
legislation — so the posturing continues.
The disaffection may also be growing because some traditional
economic maxims don’t appear to be holding, Mr. Bartlett said.
In the past, many economists might have agreed that higher fiscal
deficits would push up interest rates, or that a huge trade deficit
would depress the value of the dollar. And although one could
argue that interest rates would be still lower without such big
deficits, rates are not high in absolute terms.
As a result, Mr. Bartlett said, there’s not much pressure on
politicians to act. The only economic policies left to discuss,
he asserted, concern divisive issues like immigration and
international trade.
Big macroeconomic issues could return, Mr. Greenstein said,
if the nation’s budget and trade deficits bring the country closer
to an economic crisis, or if a recession seems imminent. Economists
at Goldman Sachs have already been predicting below-average
growth through the end of 2007 — just 2 to 2.5 percent, adjusted
for prices, or about 1 percentage point below the long-term norm.
Though such slow growth might not imply a recession, millions
of people could still lose their jobs if the economists are right.
YET such pronouncements don’t command the attention they
once did. That’s not surprising, given the many dire predictions
that never came to pass. There never was a double-dip recession,
as Stephen S. Roach of Morgan Stanley predicted in 2002, just
another year of slow growth. If there ever was a multitrillion-dollar
housing bubble, as Dean Baker of the Center for Economic Policy
Research wrote back in 2002, it hasn’t burst in four years. And
the financial crisis that experts have been forecasting — including,
for over a year now, Paul A. Volcker, the chairman of the Federal
Reserve from 1979 to 1987— hasn’t arrived.
So the public could simply be suffering from a case of ignoring
the boy who cried wolf. But if that’s true, Mr. Bartlett said, there’s
a little problem: “Eventually, the wolf did come around, remember?”
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
15) U.S. Detention of Venezuelan at J.F.K. Airport Raises Tensions
By SIMON ROMERO
September 25, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/25/world/americas/25venez.html
CARACAS, Venezuela, Sept. 24 — With political relations between
the United States and Venezuela already very tense, the brief
detention of the Venezuelan foreign minister over the weekend
in New York worsened matters here on Sunday.
Demonstrators allied with President Hugo Chávez protested
the treatment of Nicolás Maduro, the foreign minister, who
was detained Saturday for about an hour at Kennedy
International Airport while trying to fly home after
the United Nations General Assembly meeting
in New York last week.
Ismael García, secretary general of the pro-government party
Podemos, told the local news media that if Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice had been subjected to 20 percent of what
Mr. Maduro went through, Venezuela would be under siege
by the United States Marines.
Even political opponents of Mr. Chávez criticized the detention
of Mr. Maduro, which drew a rare apology from the
State Department.
A woman who answered a call to the Venezuelan Mission
to the United Nations in New York on Sunday said that
Mr. Maduro had not yet left the United States. She declined
to say more, or to identify herself, because she said she
was not authorized to discuss the matter.
She provided the name of a spokeswoman for Mr. Maduro,
who did not return telephone requests for comment.
Stéphane Dujarric, the spokesman for Secretary General
Kofi Annan, said: “We have received from the Venezuelans
a serious complaint. Our legal affairs office is now in touch
with the U.S. authorities and the Venezuelan authorities
to try to establish the facts of the case.”
A United Nations official who said he was not authorized
to discuss the incident for attribution said the organization
had received a report that Mr. Maduro had first come
to the authorities’ attention because he had arrived
at the airport less than an hour before the flight
and had purchased his ticket with cash.
Warren Hoge and Thomas J. Lueck contributed
reporting from New York.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
16) HEZBOLLAH LEADER ADDRESSES "VICTORY RALLY" IN
LEBANON - TEXT
LENGTH: 7402 words
BBC Monitoring International Reports September 23, 2006 Saturday
Here is the USG Open Source Center translation of Hasan Nasrullah's speech
on Friday to an enormous crowd (well over a million people) in bombed-out
South Beirut. The following is the text of the speech by Hezbollah
Secretary-General Hasan Nasrallah, during a rally in
Beirut celebrating the "victory" in the latest hostilities with Israel -
live; broadcast by Lebanese Hezbollah TV Al-Manar on 22 September,
subheadings inserted editorially:
Nasrullah's Speech
I seek God's protection against the cursed Satan; in the name of God, the
merciful, the compassionate; praise be to almighty God; blessings and peace
be upon our master and prophet, the last of the prophets, Muhammad; his
good, righteous, infallible family members; his noble companions; and upon
all the prophets and messengers;
O beloved and honourable ones; O most honourable, pure, and generous people,
may God's peace, mercy, and blessings be upon you; [applause].
Praise be to God, who fulfilled His promise to us and who granted us,
Lebanon, and the people of Lebanon victory over the enemy of Lebanon. Praise
be to God who made us proud, enabled us to hold fast, and gave us security.
Praise be to God, on whom we relied and to whom we turned repentantly. As He
promised, He has always been the best protector. Praise be to God for His
victory, assistance, and support.
Brothers and sisters, Ladies and Gentlemen.
On 22 September, you once again surprised the world and truly proved that
you are a great, proud, loyal, and courageous people. [Applause]
Rally involves risks
For some days now, many people have been waging a psychological war on this
rally, just as they waged a psychological war on the Resistance. [Boos] They
said that this square would be bombed and that this podium would be
destroyed in order to scare people and keep them from coming. On 22
September, you prove, by crowning the victory rally, that you are more
courageous than [you were on] 12 July and 14 August. [Applause]
Standing before you and amongst you involves risk for you and me. There were
other choices, up until just half an hour ago, we were discussing [my
participation]. However, my heart, mind, and soul did not allow me to
address you from afar nor through a screen. [Applause]
The utmost one expects is for the enemy to make a mistake or commit a crime.
However, does this enemy not know who we are? We are the sons of that imam,
who said: Are you threatening me with death? We are used to death and our
dignity is derived from the martyrdom God grants us. [Applause]
You are all welcome - from the fighting and resisting south, to the
steadfast Al-Biqa, to the loyal north, to the proud mountain, to the Beirut
of Arabism, to the [southern] suburb of loftiness and dignity. You are all
welcome - from the Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon; you are all
welcome - from Syria, Iran, Kuwait, Bahrain, and every country that came to
us to celebrate and rejoice.
God's peace, mercy, and blessings be upon you; peace be upon your martyrs
and the families of your martyrs; peace be upon your wounded people and
their bleeding wounds; peace be upon your prisoners; peace be upon your
blood and tears; peace be upon your orphans and widows; peace be upon your
demolished houses; peace be upon your burnt property; peace be upon your
souls and strong will, which is stronger than the mountains of Lebanon.
"Strategic, historic, divine victory"
Brothers and sisters,
We are today celebrating a big strategic, historic, and divine victory. How
can the human mind imagine that a few thousand of your Lebanese resistance
sons - if I wanted, I would give the exact number - held out for 23 days in
a land exposed to the skies against the strongest air force in the Middle
East, which had an air bridge transporting smart bombs from America, through
Britain, to Israel; against 40,000 officers and soldiers - four brigades of
elite forces, three reserve army divisions; against the strongest tank in
the world; and against the strongest army in the region? How could only a
few thousand people hold out and fight under such harsh conditions, and [how
could] their fighting force the naval warships out of our territorial
waters? By the way, the army and the resistance are capable of protecting
the territorial waters from being desecrated by any Zionist. [Applause] [And
how could their fighting] also lead to the destruction of the Mirkava tanks,
which are an object of pride for the Israeli industry; damage Israeli
helicopters day and night; and turn the elite brigades - I am not
exaggerating, and you can watch and read the Israeli media - into rats
frightened by your sons? [How did this happen] while you were relinquished
by the Arabs and the world and in light of the political (human solidarity
was profound though) division around you?
How could this group of mujahidin defeat this army without the support and
assistance of almighty God?
Resistance depends on planning, organization
This resistance experience, which should be conveyed to the world, depends -
on the moral and spiritual level - on faith, certainty, reliance [on God],
and readiness to make sacrifices. It also depends on reason, planning,
organization, armament, and, as is said, on taking all possible protective
procedures.
We are neither a disorganized and sophistic resistance, nor a resistance
pulled to the ground that sees before it nothing but soil, nor a resistance
of chaos. The pious, God-reliant, loving, and knowledgeable resistance is
also the conscious, wise, trained, and equipped resistance that has plans.
This is the secret of the victory we are today celebrating, brothers and
sisters.
This victory requires a courageous stand like your stand today. You are
today sending an extremely important and serious political and moral message
to the Lebanese, the Arabs, and the entire world - friends and foes. You
amazed the world when you, as a people in Lebanon, held fast from 12 July to
14 August. They wagered on our division. You - the displaced and those who
sheltered [the displaced] - remained fast throughout this stage. When 14
August came, their wager was that the presence of the displaced in the areas
to which they were displaced would put pressure on the resistance to impose
more conditions on it. The resistance did not submit to any conditions.
Once again, you amazed the world when the displaced returned in their cars
and trucks, and some on foot. At 0800, the southern suburb of Beirut, the
south of Lebanon, and Al-Biqa were full of their proud and honourable
residents, who returned with raised heads.
You are today amazing the world and telling the American, who a few days
said, "we received good signs from Lebanon that the popularity of the
resistance has receded, and it has started to weaken", that this is the
people of resistance. [Applause] These are the masses of the Resistance.
I tell this American: You should address a message of slander to the lying
writers of reports, who sends you wrong information on which you build wrong
calculations.
Brothers and sisters, we should today stress that this war was an American
war in terms of decision, weapons, planning, and desire, and by giving
several deadlines for the Zionists; one, two, three, and four weeks. What
stopped the war is the failure of the Zionists. If you recall the last days,
the largest number of tanks was destroyed on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday;
the largest number of the occupation soldiers was killed on Friday,
Saturday, and Sunday; the helicopters crashed on Friday, Saturday, and
Sunday. Therefore, the Zionists realized that if they had continued [the
war, it would have been a disaster. The Americans intervened and even
accepted the drafts [of resolutions] for the war to stop. They stopped the
war not for the sake of Lebanon, not for the sake of the children of
Lebanon, not for the sake of the blood of women in Lebanon, and not for the
sake of beautiful Lebanon. They stopped the war only for the sake of Israel.
They came to peddle it to us in Lebanon; namely, that our American friends
stopped the war. [Applause]
In the first two and three days, our American friends did not agree to stop
the war, and they refused [to stop it] on the first, second, third, and
fourth weeks. Could they not see the beauty of Lebanon for a month? They
wagered [changes thought] - this statement was used in some diplomatic
channels - the decision was to crush Hezbollah, and after crushing
Hezbollah, accounts would be settled with all its friends, allies, and those
who follow the nationalist, truly sovereign and independent line in Lebanon.
What stopped the war - after the help of Almighty God - were your resisting
sons and these loyal, proud, and courageous people, who supported the
resistance from the border to the border, and who sheltered it in their
mosques, churches, monasteries, and schools. This is what stopped the war.
If anyone deserves to celebrate the victory, then it is you who are present
here. You deserve it because you made the victory.
"We feel that we won"
We sometimes differ and ask: Was what happened in Lebanon a victory or a
defeat? I do not want to go into semantics, but I tell you: Whoever feels
that his option, plan, line, and vision has triumphed, feels the victory and
speaks about it. And, whoever feels that he has been defeated and has
fallen, speaks about defeat.
We feel that we won; Lebanon won; Palestine won; the Arab nation won, and
every oppressed, aggrieved person in this world also won.
Our victory is not the victory of a party. I repeat what I said in Bint
Jubayl on 25 May 2000: It is not the victory of a party or a community;
rather it is a victory for true Lebanon, the true Lebanese people, and every
free person in the world.
Don't distort this big historic victory. Do not contain it in party,
sectarian, communal, or regional cans. This victory is too big to be
comprehended by us. The next weeks, months, and years will confirm this.
Resistance dealt a blow to New Middle East plan
It is enough to say, on the basis of the direct results, that your
resistance and steadfastness foiled all the aims of the aggression, and that
this is a victory. Our resistance and steadfastness dealt a severe blow to
the New Middle East plan, which Condoleezza Rice said would be born in the
July War [Boos]. But it was stillborn because it was an illegitimate child.
Your resistance and steadfastness exposed the deceptive US policies that
speak about human rights, freedoms, democracy, and respect. Your
steadfastness and resistance exposed the United States and raised the level
of awareness before the level of hostility - the main thing is awareness
rather than hostility. It raised the level of awareness and hostility not
only in the Arab and Islamic world, but in the whole world.
Thanks to your steadfastness and resistance, Chavez, a man about whom I can
say that he is a great Arab indeed, made that statement in the United
Nations yesterday. [Cheers] The Lebanese resistance today inspires all
resistance men, all free men, and all honourable people in the world, as
well as all those who reject US subjugation and degradation of the world.
This is our victory and this is the result of our battle.
Resistance is model for "steadfastness"
Moreover, your resistance, which offered in the 2000 victory a model for
liberation, offered in the year 2006 a model for steadfastness; legendary
steadfastness and miraculous steadfastness. It is strong proof for all Arabs
and Muslims, and all rulers, armies, and peoples.
Yesterday, a group of Arab states went to the Security Council to beg for
peace and a settlement. I tell them: I am not speaking to you about removing
Israel, I am speaking to you about the settlement you want. How can you
obtain an honourable settlement, while you announce day and night that you
will not fight? You do not want to fight for Lebanon, Gaza, the West Bank,
or even Jerusalem. How then can you obtain a reasonable settlement, while
you announce every day that you will not use the oil weapon? In fact, even
if anyone comes to speak to you about the oil weapon, you deride him,
saying: This is backwardness. You do not want to fight, boycott, use the oil
weapon, or even allow the people to come out in the street, or the
resistance in Palestine to be equipped. You are besieging it and withholding
funds from it. In fact, you are starving it and cutting off salaries for the
sake of Condoleezza Rice [Boos].
How can these states secure a just and honourable settlement between quotes?
Does the Israeli recognize them in the first place? I tell you: The Israelis
today view the Resistance and the resistance men in Lebanon with great
respect. As to all those lowly ones, they are not worth anything. Even the
Arab initiative calls for a stand. It calls for men and power. If you can't
use power, you can at least threaten with it. The talk that we are weak will
not do.
The people of Lebanon gave strong proof to all the peoples of the world. The
Lebanese resistance provided strong proof to all Arab and Islamic armies.
Arab armies and peoples are not only able to liberate Gaza and the West Bank
and East Jerusalem, they are simply capable of regaining Palestine from sea
to river by one small decision and with some determination. The problem is
that when one is torn between two choices and is asked to choose between his
people and his throne, he chooses his throne. When he is asked to choose
between Jerusalem and his throne, he chooses his throne. When he is asked to
choose between the dignity of his homeland and his throne, he chooses his
throne.
What is distinct about the resistance movements in Lebanon and Palestine is
that they chose the dignity of their people, holy places, and freedom and
offer their leaders, sons, and dear ones as sacrifices to join the throne of
God Almighty.
This is the equation. Today, your resistance broke the image of Israel. We
have done away with the invincible army. We have also done away with the
invincible state. Indeed, we have done away with it. I am not exaggerating
or voicing slogans. It is enough for you to read what is going on in
occupied Palestine, what the Zionists are saying, and what is going on
between the Israeli generals and commanders.
Olmert protested again today because we are holding a victory rally. Yediot
Aharanot published the results of an Israeli poll today that asks: Who do
you think is suitable to be prime minister in Israel? How much did Olmert
get? He got seven per cent. [Boos] As for the heroic War Minister Amir
Peretz, he got one per cent. [Boos]
The image of this Israel, which is shaken in its political entity and
military establishments and defeated in its intelligence, has changed today.
No Arab ruler or regime can make further concessions to it, submit to its
humiliating terms, or tell the nation: There is nothing we can do with
Israel.
Once, an old man, who knew his time, place, and era, said: If every one of
us carried a bucket of water and threw it on occupied Palestine, Israel
would disappear from existence; yes, just a bucket of water. Two or three
hundred million people standing up to Israel can defeat it, especially when
a few thousand in Lebanon defeated Israel. This argument has fallen. We
should enter a new phase and a new time; namely, the time when we dictate
our conditions and restore our dignity, freedom, sovereignty, and holy
shrines.
Support for Palestinians
Brothers and sisters: On this day, the day of divine victory, there are
those who expect an internal talk about Lebanon, and I will certainly do
that. But before I switch to internal talk, I would like, as on 12 July,
emphasize two points: Our hearts, feelings, grief, and pain are today in
Palestine. They are in Gaza, Ramallah, and Nablus.
They are in Jenin, Jerusalem, and every Palestinian town,
village, and camp that are being bombed daily. The Palestinian people are
being killed every day and Palestinian houses are being destroyed every day
while the whole world is silent; the Arab world before the world at large.
Until when will this silence continue? Until when will we endure this shame?
Nobody is asking you to deploy your armies to defend the Palestinian people.
Let us just give support to these people, be it moral, political ,
financial, or armament. In Palestine, there are leaders, scholars, factions,
movements, youths, men, women, and children who can repeat the divine
miracle on the land of Palestine.
The second message is, before speaking about Lebanon, we as Lebanese should
see Iraq as a model. Had the war in Lebanon succeeded, the Americans would
have applied this model in Lebanon. They wanted to apply this model in
Lebanon. In the war, we the Lebanese offered martyrs from the Resistance,
the army, the security forces, the civil defence, the Red Cross, the news
media, the establishments, the different parties, and all our beloved
people. But how many were martyrs? Never mind, were they 1,000 or 1,200
martyrs? In Iraq, some 10,000 to 15,000 people are killed every month in a
chaotic war that is administered, financed, and incited by the Americans and
the Mosad. The resistance in Lebanon protected Lebanon from civil war.
[Cheers]
Some say that the resistance in Lebanon pushes for civil war. Never! Had
Israel won, Lebanon would have been pushed to civil war, and you would have
heard voices calling for federalism, cantons, and division. The Israeli
language would have become current anew.
Message to Iraq - patience, calm, unity
Iraq is a model, which we must always ponder. Our message to our people in
Iraq must always be: Patience, calm, unity, wisdom, communication, avoid
sedition, and don't wager on the enemy.
As to Lebanon, our message in Lebanon today is: Come all. No one should
outbid anyone on this subject. We all believe that our salvation and hope is
in building a capable, strong, just, proud, and clear state. This is the
hope. And this is supposed to be the issue of unanimity among the Lebanese.
We announce from this place, with the blood of our martyrs; we announce,
precede matters, and say, any talk in Lebanon about partition is an Israeli
talk, any talk in Lebanon about federalism is Israeli talk, and any talk in
Lebanon about cantons is Israeli talk. We the Lebanese, our fate, decision,
and wish to God should be to live together in one state. We are against its
partition and division. We are against its federalism and division into
cantons.
What will protect Lebanese unity is a strong, capable, and just state. What
will protect Lebanon's sovereignty from Zionist greed is a strong, capable,
and just state.
What will tackle social and livelihood crises for the Lebanese and the
residents in Lebanon is a strong, capable, just, clean and proud state. This
is what we all aspire to. A strong and capable state means a state that can
proudly regain every inch of its occupied territory and protect every drop
of water from Al-Wazzani River to Al-Litani River and Al-Hasbani River; that
can stop the enemy from encroaching on its sovereignty daily; and that can
assure its people that it is truly protecting them with arms, power, reason,
unity, organization, planning, and national will. As for tears, they do not
protect anyone.
We want a strong, capable, just, clear, and independent state that rejects
any foreign trusteeship or hegemony; a noble and proud state that does not
succumb to any humiliating terms; and a clean state where there is no room
for theft or waste. This is the state that we need.
I tell you, while we are in the resistance festival, that this is the
natural key to tackling the issue of the resistance. Here we come to the
issue of the weapons and to those who are dying to resolve this issue. I
tell them: Don't tackle the results. Come and let us tackle the causes. I am
not after slogans, but logic. Argue with us on the basis of logic.
The resistance is the result of several causes - the occupation, the arrest
of prisoners, the plunder of waters, the threat to Lebanon, and the attack
on Lebanese sovereignty. These are the causes. Tackle the causes and the
results will be tackled easily.
"We do not want to keep the weapons forever"
When we build a strong, capable, and just state that protects Lebanon and
the Lebanese, it will be easy to find an honourable solution to the question
of the resistance and its weapons. I would like the Lebanese to hear
clearly. I and my brothers get excited sometimes and say all kinds of
things. Let us speak with some responsibility. We do not say that these
weapons will remain forever. And, it is not logical for these weapons to
remain forever. There is bound to be an end to them. The natural key is to
tackle the causes and the results will disappear.
Come and build a strong and just state, protecting the country and the
citizens and their livelihoods, waters, and dignity, and you will find that
the resolution of the resistance issue will not need even a negotiation
table. It is a great deal easier than that.
But, what is happening now? Instead of the Israeli leaving Shab'a Farms, he
is extending the strip northward. Instead of the Israeli resolving the
problem of the border points, he moves forward to Al-Khiyam and Marwahin.
Instead of our benefiting from our legal right to the Al-Wazzani River, the
Israeli builds pipes to steal the water. Is this how to protect the country
and its resources?
Therefore, any talk about disarming the Resistance - to some people the word
"disarming" is a bit heavy; fine, how about surrendering the resistance
weapons? Any talk about surrendering the resistance weapons under this
state, this authority, this regime, and the existing situation means keeping
Lebanon exposed to Israel so it can kill as it wants, arrest as it wants,
bomb as it wants, and plunder our land and waters. We certainly cannot
accept that.
We did not fight since 1982 so that ... [change of thought] You know the
youth in the Resistance. They spent their entire youthful years in the
Resistance. They did not live a life of prosperity, ease, extravagance, or
calm. Some of them spent 24 to 25 years in the Resistance. The Resistance
will not end while Israel is still occupying our land, violating our honour,
undermining our security, and plundering our waters and resources. Never! I
swear to God.
This is the only natural, logical, reasonable, responsible, and patriotic
option. As for the other options, I want this big rally, which is attended
by these good and kind faces, and this public that comes from all of
Lebanon's communities and areas and many political trends and parties; I
want to tell them: Wagering on ending the resistance through pressure,
threats, and siege is a losing wager. Wagering on ending the resistance by
dragging the Resistance into sedition with the Lebanese army, as some people
think, is a losing wager. The army and the Resistance are two dear, loving
brothers that no one can separate. Those who wager - and I am not talking
about the inside; it can be the outside or the inside, take it as you like,
whoever is behind the wager - on disarming the resistance through a new war,
Israeli or otherwise, I refer them to Livni, [addressing the audience] you
know Livni, right, and Peretz. I refer them to these two persons; the
foreign minister and the war minister, to hear from them, as well as from
former Defence Minister Moshe Arens, the strategist, a clear sentence, and I
repeat it for them to hear. They say: We wanted to dismantle Hezbollah as a
whole, but we have found out that there is no army in the world that can
dismantle such an organization. [Cheers]
I tell them: No army in the world can make us lay down our arms. No one can
do that, so long as these loyal and brave people believe in this Resistance.
I am not threatening with arms. I am wagering on this people who embrace the
Resistance. I am wagering on that old, noble woman, who stood among the
debris and said: My house in Beirut was destroyed and my house in the south
was destroyed, but we are for the Resistance and the Resistance weapons.
Several others said: if Al-Sayyid Hasan surrendered the weapons, he would be
a traitor. I tell you: I pledge you, O our brave, loyal, and great people, I
do not aspire to end my life with treason, but with martyrdom. [Cheers]
Therefore, all these wagers are losers, because there are people in Lebanon
and a resistance in Lebanon that reject occupation, humiliation, and
despotism and are ready to sacrifice themselves and their beloved sons for
the sake of their country. Yes, today, Lebanon, and without exaggeration, is
no longer small in the Middle East. It is a great power with your support.
The West and Israel take it seriously and the oppressed in the world view it
with respect, appreciation, and pride.
Therefore, let me end this point by saying - so that no one will continue to
worry - we do not want to keep the weapons forever. I reiterate, as in the
past 25 years, these weapons are not for the interior. They were not used in
the interior and they will not be used in the interior. This is not a Shi'i
weapon... [words indistinct] and the Christians. This weapon is for the
Sunni, Druze, and Shi'i. This weapon is for all the Lebanese. It seeks to
protect Lebanon, its sovereignty and independence. I pledge you that the
identity and endowment of this weapon shall remain as it is. This is a
pledge before God, the nation, and the martyrs.
Therefore, the key is, come and let us build a just, strong, resisting,
proud, honourable, and clean state. If this objective is too big, and so
that we will not remain in theory, let us go straight to the subject. We
will not stand today and say: Whoever has failed in the test has failed and
whoever has succeeded has succeeded. We will not speak this way. I will say:
Come all, no matter how we differed, competed, and matters were difficult
between us on the psychological and political level. We are in a real
impasse in Lebanon now. No one can say, we are a majority, nothing has
changed, the country is proceeding well, and everything is fine. This is not
correct.
Impasse in Lebanon - political, not sectarian dispute
There is a real impasse in Lebanon today, especially after the war. There is
sharp national division and not sectarian division. What exists now is not a
dispute between Shi'is and Sunnis, or between Muslims and Christians, or
among Druze, Sunnis, Shi'is, and Christians. There is a national political
division. There are major strategic and political options, on which Shi'i,
Sunni, Druze, and Christian political forces agree and others, on which
Shi'i, Sunni, Druze, and Christian political forces disagree. When some
Shi'is said things different from Hezbollah and the Amal Movement, they
thought that we would grieve. We were happy when others came forth in
supporting the other stand, which proved that the dispute here is not
sectarian, but political. [Cheers]
Look at the miscalculations. Even when they want to hurt us, they benefit
us. Therefore, we are before a national division. And, my appeal today in
the rally of the victory, which was created by Lebanese from all communities
and areas, I would like to warn and say: Do not allow anyone to transform
political divisions into sectarian or communal divisions. It is forbidden to
manipulate sects and communities in defence of political options. This is
playing with fire. This is sabotaging the country. This is destroying the
country. Yes, we are split by political divisions. We compete, discuss, and
differ. We attack each other in the news media. We turn to the street and to
the elections. All these peaceful and democratic mechanisms are legitimate
and allowable. This is what we would like to emphasize.
National unity government is solution to political division
Therefore, as long as there is a political division and serious challenges -
and I will return to these shortly - to confront these challenges, I say
that the team currently ruling in Lebanon cannot continue in power, cannot
work. It cannot. [Applause] The natural solution is to form a national unity
government. When I speak about a national unity government, I do not mean
bringing down anyone, cancelling anyone, or dismissing anyone but as I said
on 25 May: Come and let us close our ranks and stand side by side to defend
Lebanon, to protect Lebanon, to build and construct Lebanon, and to preserve
Lebanon and unify it.
With all frankness, the current government is not able to protect Lebanon,
reconstruct Lebanon, or unify Lebanon. [Applause] However, when we say the
current government we do not mean that we want to cancel, remove, or erase
anyone at all. We say: Come, all of you, and let us protect, reconstruct,
and defend.
Therefore, building a strong, just, and capable state begins first by a
serious national unity government. Here I am not raising a slogan for local
consumption. Let them hear me. I am not raising a slogan for local
consumption, or to gain time, or to appease allies or friends. This is our
serious project and we will work for it with the utmost strength during the
next stage. [Applause]
Drafting a fair electoral law
The second measure in building the just, capable, and strong state begins by
drafting a fair electoral law in which all communities and all political
currents will have a realistic opportunity to have a genuine representation,
and in which no community will feel that it has become a follower of another
community. That is how we can build the just, strong, and capable state.
That is the way to solve all our problems.
Resistance has more than 20,000 rockets
Here I will briefly discuss the remaining issues and challenges. Now, the
issue of the Resistance. I said a short while ago that there is something
related to the current reality. They have come to blockade the sea. Why? To
protect Lebanon? No. The German chancellor, God's peace be upon her
[laughter by the crowd], said that the German navy was playing a historic
role in protecting Israel's right to exist. I like some of these stands and
I will talk about them later. They come from the sea and they want to
blockade the airspace and the borders. I tell them: Blockade and close the
borders, the sea, and the skies. This will neither weaken the will nor the
arms of the Resistance. [Applause] We have engaged in war for 33 days. This
is not mere rhetoric. We had been prepared for a long war. What we offered
in the war was a very small part of our resources. In Bint Jubayl I said
that we had more than 12,000 rockets and the poor ones [Israelis] started
calculating, based on 12,000. Then we explained things and said that 12,000
does not mean 13,000. [As heard] There might be more. Today, I say to those
who want to close the seas, the sky, the deserts, and the borders, and I say
to the enemy as well, that the resistance today has more - pay attention,
underline the word "more" - than 20,000 rockets. [Applause]
Within a very few days and after emerging from a fierce war, the Resistance
restored its entire military and organizational structure and its armaments.
[Applause] The Resistance today is stronger that it was on the eve of 12
July because during the war it added to its experience fresh experience and
acquired new wisdom and new resolve and determination. I tell those who
wager on the weakness of the Resistance that they are making a
miscalculation.
Today, 22 September 2006, the Resistance is stronger than at any time since
1982. [Applause] Concerning the resistance, its strength, and its weapons,
we say: Rest completely assured.
Prisoners only to be released as an exchange
The second issue is the prisoners. Your prisoners and children will return,
God willing. All of them will return, God willing. [Applause] In the name of
the resistance, I promised you on 12 July and I told you in the name of the
men of God and not in my name and the name of my father but in the name of
the resistance men that if the entire universe comes it will not be able to
save these two prisoners except through indirect negotiations and an
exchange process.
[Applause] After 12 July, the entire universe came and you remained
steadfast and the prisoners remained in our hands and they will not be
released except with the return of the prisoners whose release and return we
are demanding. [A man among the crowd utters indistinct words and Nasrallah
responds] "God willing". So we ask the world to be certain about this.
Shab'a Farms will not be relinquished
Thirdly, there is the issue of Shab'a Farms and Kfar Shuba Hills.
Delegations from these good and steadfast towns have been worried of late as
a result of the new arrangements in the border region. I assure them that
the Shab'a Farms and Kfar Shuba Hills will not be relinquished. Nobody will
relinquish a single inch of the occupied Lebanese territories. Never.
[Applause] I tell you that during the war and the political negotiations
there was a genuine opportunity to liberate the Shab'a Farms, and the
Americans were about to agree, and indeed they agreed, but they went back on
their promises, as is their wont, and said: We cannot return the Shab'a
Farms to Lebanon now. Why, because we do not want to offer a victory to
Hezbollah. I tell them: Return them to whomever you want and offer a victory
to whomever you want, but return them, return them. [Applause]
We could have regained the Shab'a Farms and the Kfar Shuba hills during the
war if there had been a serious political will, a serious political unity,
and an integrated political resistance. But I stress to you that these are
on their way to liberation. All current violations will then end. The state
is the one currently present there. The Lebanese Army, which is our national
army, is present there and the UNIFIL [United Nations Interim Force in
Lebanon] has risen to 5,000 in number. In the past when the Resistance was
on the borders, any bulldozer advancing even 10 meters would be hit and
forced to retreat, and none dared to enter. Now our border is open and they
enter here and there every now and then. What happened has happened but what
about the future? This issue is not linked to the Lebanese army. The
Lebanese army has courage, will, and determination. Its officers and
soldiers are the brothers of these resistance men. There is no difference
between them. The issue is linked to political decision.
Will the Lebanese government turn the Lebanese army into a unit in charge of
counting complaints and recording violations? This will be humiliating to
the Lebanese army. Neither the army nor the Lebanese people accept this. Our
army's task is not sitting in the border area and counting the Israeli
violations as the United Nations did in 1972. The task for which our army
went to the south upon a decision from the current government was defending
the country and protecting the citizens and their livelihood and security.
The country's sovereignty and territory are now violated and the citizens
are kidnapped and assaulted every now and then and their farms are attacked.
What is the government's political decision? We have thus far been patient
because we do not want to commit any violation of Resolution 1701, which is
not sacred, of course, because we know that any simple violation by us even
if it is done in legitimate defence of ourselves, a hue and cry will be
raised. Israel has been committing violations, attacks, and transgressions
all the time but the world remains silent. Be assured that we will not be
patient for long. Hear me well. If the state and government fail to carry
out their responsibility towards protecting the land and citizens, the
Lebanese people will assume this responsibility as they have done since
1982. [Applause] I tell the Zionists: If someone gives you security
assurances from above or under the table, these will concern him and not the
resistance in Lebanon or the people of Lebanon. [Applause]
What we are required to do then is sharpen our national zeal and stand
behind and support our national army so that it will be equipped with the
best equipment in order to guard the homeland - villages, towns, farms,
farmers, churches, and mosques - and not protect anyone else.
UNIFIL to support Lebanese army, not to spy on Hezbollah
To the UNIFIL, which they turned into something that is much larger than a
reinforced UNFIL, we say: We welcomed you and I reiterate our welcome of you
within the framework of your clear mission, which is supporting the Lebanese
army. Your mission is not to spy on Hezbollah or disarm the Resistance. This
is what UN Secretary General Kofi Annan and several officials said. Thus
far, I have not heard any country participating in the UNIFIL say that it
sent its sons and soldiers to defend Lebanon and the Lebanese. They are
ashamed of us, brothers and sisters. They are ashamed of saying they came to
defend us, but they talk about defending Israel. Well, the UNIFIL forces are
welcomed as long as they abide by their mission. I call on the UNIFIL
command in Lebanon to be alert because I have received information that
there are some who want to drag these UN forces to collision with the
Resistance. I heard that it was said at some meetings that the presence of
the UN forces will restore the internal balance of power in Lebanon. This is
serious talk. The UN forces came for a specific goal and they should not
interfere in Lebanon's internal affairs or be involved in such things.
The point before the last is about political arguments and counterarguments.
We did not seek political rivalry with anyone. We heard much harmful talk
during the war and we remained silent and were patient. Political and media
rivalry and attack on the resistance and on us continued after the war.
Things reached an unbearable limit in recent statements. The almighty God
wants believers to have broad minds, patience, and great hearts. But He at
the same time does not accept humiliation for them. The media and political
attacks on the resistance in Lebanon after the war - we put up with this
during the war - reached a limit that could be tolerated only by prophets
and we are not prophets. My brothers and I are not prophets. [Applause]
Pride in relationship with Iraq, Syria
We understand things if one or two persons stand up and say things. If three
persons say them, we will continue to comprehend what they say. Entire
political forces met at Bristol [Hotel]. They brought their deputies,
leaders, and members of political bureaus to show that the rally was big.
They then issued a statement in which they said the war which took place in
Lebanon was an Iranian war for the sake of the Iranian nuclear file, or a
Syrian war to obstruct the international tribunal. Actually, we did not
tolerate that although we - and I repeat this on the day of victory - take
pride in our relationship and friendship with the Islamic Republic of Iran
under the leadership of His Eminence Imam leader Al-Sayyid Khamene'i, may
God keep his shadow. [Applause] We also take pride in our relationship with
Syria - leadership and people. Yes, leadership and people under the
leadership of President Bashar al-Asad. [Applause]
We are independent and sovereign and our history testifies to this more than
their history. [Applause] But to say that this war - which America and
Israel launched and which Condoleezza Rice said was hard labour for the
birth of a new Middle East and about which Olmert, Peretz, and others said
all sorts of things, and which the Arabs said was the sixth war while the
Zionists said was the first in the history of Israel - was fought by us for
the sake of the nuclear issue and international tribunal is both shameful
and insulting. Our houses were destroyed and our children and women were
killed but we continued to fight. I care for all those who care for me and
for my turban and beard and those who tell me not to engage in an argument.
The party's youth and leadership can engage in such an argument. But there
is a limit. Even I and my turban and beard are not more honourable than this
resistance and these people. [Applause] If my turban and beard have honour,
it is then an honour bestowed by you and this resistance and the blood of
martyrs. [Applause] I call for stopping these arguments and avoiding silly,
harmful, and harsh phrases. We must remain within the framework of logical
and reasonable political competition because we have a common destiny and we
must finally build Lebanon together. But I, Hasan Nasrallah, will not remain
silent over any insult to the people of the resistance. [Applause]
A few days ago, a big leader in the 14 February forces said - I know some
people will ask me why I should say this but I will tell you [changes
thought]. None is allowed to stand up and say even calmly that the
Resistance masses are thoughtless. Are you thoughtless? [Chants] Who accepts
this insult? No, no, no, I respect his masses. I, however, respect their
masses and their youth and women. I respect their options if they are
national. But we will never accept any insult to the masses of the
resistance by anyone. He has to apologize. Yes, he has to apologize.
[Applause and chants] We are not a totalitarian party, regime, or faction.
Neither my father nor grandfather was a Bek [originally a Turkish title
given to rulers of tribal groups; currently used with the name of Lebanese
Druze leader Walid Junblatt]. Also my son will not be a Bek. [Chants and
applause]
We do not seek political arguments and counterarguments. We are keen to get
out of political division in the country through any dialogue formula. We
are committed and are advocates of the state, the state project, the
building of the state, and the establishment of the state, but we have
dignity. Our dignity is above anything else. We cannot allow anyone to
squander our dignity in return for building us a house. The house was
destroyed for the sake of our dignity. [Applause] None should imagine that
he can satisfy our hunger at the expense of our dignity. We sacrificed our
blood for the sake of our dignity. This is how we are. What else can we do?
This is how things are for us in Lebanon.
Call for return to calm, reason
Within this context, I call for a return to calm and reason. We are on the
threshold of the blessed month of Ramadan. May God return the happy occasion
to all Lebanese. We pray to the almighty God to grant us success this month
so that we can fast and pray for Him. I hope that the blessed month of
Ramadan will be an opportunity for meditation and reflection and return to
one's self and to seeing facts. Get out and see facts and do not let things
become dubious to you. Do not build things on miscalculations.
Brothers and sisters, once again I greet the martyrs, the families of the
chaste martyrs among all the Lebanese, the wounded, the detainees, all
communities, movements, and regions which embraced and helped the
resistance. I greet every Arab and Muslim people in the world. I greet every
person, faction, and party. I will not get into names because the list is
long and the ones I forget are more than those whom I remember. Therefore,
we will be satisfied with this generalization.
Thanks to all. As we said during the war: May God grant you victory and God
has granted your victory. We said may God help you and He has done so. I
will conclude as I did in Bint Jubayl on 25 May 2000. I told you: O people
of Lebanon, O people of Palestine, O peoples of our Arab nation. The era of
victories began on 25 May 2000 and the era of defeats came to an end. There
will absolutely be no defeat. Happy Ramadan and I wish you well on every
historic and strategic victory. You are the most honourable, generous, and
pure among people. God's peace and blessings be upon you. [Applause and
chants]
Source: Al-Manar Television, Beirut, in Arabic 1400 gmt 22 Sep 06 '
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
17) CIA Spins Spider’s Web vs. Cuba, Venezuela
W. T. Whitney Jr.
20 September, 2006
http://www.granma.cubaweb.cu/secciones/ingles/noticias/art33.html
U.S. intelligence head John Negroponte announced Aug. 18 the
creation of a new Central Intelligence Agency mission to oversee
intelligence operations in Venezuela and Cuba at the strategic level.
J. Patrick Maher, a 32-year CIA veteran with supervisory experience
in Colombia and the Caribbean, was named as acting mission manager.
According to Negroponte, "Policymakers have increasingly focused
on the challenges that Cuba and Venezuela pose to American foreign
policy." He noted Washington’s concern about the close ties between
the two countries and failure on Venezuela’s part to cooperate with
Washington’s "anti-terrorist campaign."
The change comes in the wake of Raul Castro’s temporary accession
to the presidency of Cuba on July 31 and coincides with preparations
in Venezuela for presidential elections set for Dec. 3.
As a measure of the seriousness with which the U.S. government
regards Cuba and Venezuela, the new post is one of only six agencies
operating at the strategic level within the intelligence bureaucracy.
One of them covers Iran and North Korea — the only other countries
with a mission manager — and four others deal with counter-
proliferation, counterterrorism, counterintelligence, and weapons
of mass destruction.
Negroponte gave Maher responsibility "for ensuring that
policymakers have a full range of timely and accurate intelligence
on which to base their decisions." That objective, analysts suggest,
portends a buildup of agents and field officers in both countries.
Stepped-up U.S. intelligence attention to Cuba comes five weeks
after the Bush administration released an update of its plans for
returning Cuba to capitalism. Fidel Castro’s departure from power
was supposed to have signaled the time for implementation
to begin, facilitated by $80 million set-aside for Cuban government
opponents. That clock, of course, has started.
Intelligence operations in Venezuela are intensifying just as new
indications of massive U.S. spending to get rid of President Hugo
Chavez are in the limelight. According to an Associated Press
report on Aug. 26, the U.S. Agency for International Development
since 2002 has distributed $26 million via 220 grants to Venezuelan
recipients under a "Venezuela Confidence Building Initiative."
The data emerged from a survey of 132 contracts detailed on
1,600 pages made accessible under the Freedom of Information Act.
Within USAID, an "Office of Transition Initiatives" sees to spending
in Venezuela and other "priority countries" such as Iraq, Afghanistan,
Bolivia and Haiti. Reportedly, OTI funding is free of stipulations
applied to other USAID grants, and funds are available on short
notice because they originate from "disaster assistance"
appropriations.
As a parallel program poised to complement U.S. intelligence
activities in Venezuela, the National Endowment for Democracy
has distributed some $2.9 million over a four-year period
for technical training in organizing of political parties and
for voter education.
If other Latin American experience holds true, U.S. undercover
work will try to influence the media in Venezuela, a fertile field
inasmuch as opposition newspapers and television stations there
are far from silent.
On Aug. 25, for example, a few newspapers throughout Latin
America, among them La Nacion of Buenos Aires, carried an
article by Simon Romero of Caracas claiming that Venezuela
has collaborated with Iran in a uranium enrichment program.
Journalists working with that paper and others told the Association
of Media Professionals in Argentina that the CIA had fostered that
line. They alleged that U.S. "diplomats" had offered them bribes
to present the U.S. side in stories covering Venezuela’s admission
into the Mercosur trade group and Brazilian President Lula da Silva’s
bid for re-election in October.
The exposé by Victor Ego Ducrotto, appearing on the Rebelion
web site on Aug. 25, claimed that CIA personnel worked "elbow
to elbow" with the representatives of the right-wing Inter American
Press Society, based in Miami.
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
LINKS ONLY
---------*---------*---------*---------*---------*--------
Army Warns Rumsfeld It's Billions Short
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092506J.shtml
Study of Iraq War and Terror Stirs Strong Political Response
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092506K.shtml
Halliburton Employees, Subcontractors Allege More Abuses
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092506M.shtml
A Detainee's Story: The Man Who Has Been to America
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092506P.shtml
Technology for Spying Lures More Than Military
By JULIE CRESWELL and RON STODGHILL
September 25, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/25/technology/25spy.html?ref=business
Unit Makes Do as Army Strives to Plug Gaps
By DAVID S. CLOUD
September 25, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/25/us/25infantry.html?ref=us
Torture Victim Had No Terror Link, Canada Told U.S.
By SCOTT SHANE
September 25, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/25/world/americas/25arar.html?ref=world
Chavez' comments: strategy or ravings of a madman?
by Greg Palast
"I've known Hugo Chavez for years, let me tell you that man knows
a diablo when he sees one." -- Greg Palast
September 23, 2006
http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/9/2006/2160
Venezuelan Foreign Minister in Temporary Police Custody in New York
Saturday, Sep 23, 2006
http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news.php?newsno=208
What if It’s (Sort of) a Boy and (Sort of) a Girl?
By ELIZABETH WEIL
September 24, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/magazine/24intersexkids.html
Major Error Is Reported in Tax Paid by Mrs. Astor on Sale of Painting
By SERGE F. KOVALESKI
September 24, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/nyregion/24astor.html?ref=nyregion
100 Years Later, a Painful Episode Is Observed at Last
By SHAILA DEWAN
September 24, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/us/24riot.html?ref=us
As Children Suffer, Parents Agonize Over Spinach
By MONICA DAVEY
September 24, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/us/24spinach.html?_r=1&ref=us&oref=slogin
Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Worsens Terror Threat
By MARK MAZZETTI
September 24, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/world/middleeast/24terror.html?hp&ex=1159156800&en=22b7a0941b08007f&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Detainee Deal Comes With Contradictions
By ADAM LIPTAK
September 23, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/us/23legal.html?hp&ex=1159070400&en=48fa1d71c13d8435&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Decline in Gas Prices Isn’t Buoying Detroit
By NICK BUNKLEY
September 23, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/23/business/23gas.html?ref=business
Capital Punishment: DNA Tests Prove Justice Has Failed
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-08.htm
Toxic Shock: How Western Rubbish is Destroying Africa
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-09.htm
Restraining Order against Bush Denied
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-01.htm
60 Years to Restore the Ozone Layer Over Antarctica
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-02.htm
UN Finds Baghdad Toll Far Higher Than Cited
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-03.htm
Arctic Thaw Opens Passage to Pole
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0921-04.htm
Army on Pace to Meet Year's Recruiting Goal
By Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, September 9, 2006; Page A09
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090801534.html?nav=rss_nation
FOCUS | US Threatened to Bomb Pakistan Back to Stone Age
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092206Z.shtml
FOCUS | US Threatened to Bomb Pakistan Back to Stone Age
Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf said the US threatened to bomb his
country back to the Stone Age if he did not assist the administration's
war on terrorism. The threat was delivered after the attacks of
September 11, 2001, by Richard L. Armitage, then deputy secretary of state, to
Musharraf's intelligence director, the Pakistani leader told CBS's "60
Minutes" for Sunday's broadcast.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092206Z.shtml
The 'King Coal' 'Robber Barons' are Decapitating Mountains!
http://www.ilovemountains.org/cost_of_coal/87
British Science Group Says Exxon Misrepresents Climate Issues
By HEATHER TIMMONS
September 21, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/business/21green.html
House Panel Approves Wiretapping Bill
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The House Intelligence Committee approved by voice vote
a bill that would put into law the Bush administration’s
program of wiretapping without warrants. The sponsor,
Representative Heather A. Wilson, Repubican of New Mexico,
had rewritten the measure to make it more to Mr. Bush’s
liking. The Judiciary Committee later endorsed a similar
version, by 20 to 16. But Ms. Wilson’s revision, likely
to draw Mr. Bush’s support, is the bill that probably
will make it to the full House. Under her bill, the president
may conduct the secret surveillance only under specific
conditions. For example, the president must notify Congress
within five days of authorizing the surveillance, name
the entity that poses the threat and state the reason
for believing the attack is imminent.
September 21, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/washington/21brfs-007.html
More Small Women’s Colleges Opening Doors to Men
By DIANA JEAN SCHEMO
(On a lamp post next to Ginger Worden, interim president of Randolph-
Macon Woman's College (now including men,) was a hand-made sign
that read, "Well behaved women rarely make history." The sign was
a remnant from a student protest of the college's decision to let men
attend.)
September 21, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/education/21women.html?ref=us
Over the Roar of Protesters, Hungary’s Leader Tries to Talk Politics
By JUDY DEMPSEY
International Herald Tribune
September 21, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/world/europe/21hungary.html
Measures Seek to Restrict Detainees’ Access to Courts
By NEIL A. LEWIS and KATE ZERNIKE
September 21, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/washington/21habeas.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=00bf4cedca2834dd&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Suits Say U.S. Impeded Audits for Oil Leases
By EDMUND L. ANDREWS
September 21, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/business/21royalty.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=6a768e6c6f4a155a&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Only 25% in Poll Approve of the Congress
By ADAM NAGOURNEY and JANET ELDER
September 21, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/us/politics/21poll.html?hp&ex=1158897600&en=ef00c357f1e7980c&ei=5094&partner=homepage
When Is Thin Too Thin?
By ERIC WILSON
September 21, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/21/fashion/21MODELS.html?_r=1&8dpc&oref=slogin
At U.N., Chavez Calls Bush 'The Devil'
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 1:45 p.m. ET
September 20, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-UN-Venezuela.html?hp&ex=1158811200&en=525846319c57aae6&ei=5094&partner=homepage
FOCUS | Senate Bill on Torture and Detention Faces GOP Filibuster
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092006Z.shtml
Pension Fund Tallies Losses and Rethinks Its Strategy
By MARY WILLIAMS WALSH
September 20, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/business/20pension.html
Gaza: The children killed in a war the world doesn't want to know about
By Donald Macintyre In Rafah
Published: 19 September 2006
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1619227.ece
G.M. Talked With Ford About Merger, Report Says
By NICK BUNKLEY
September 19, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/business/19auto.html
States Await Ruling on Use of Lethal Injection
By ABBY GOODNOUGH
September 19, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/us/19death.html?ref=us
Sarah Olson | Lieutenant Watada Faces New Charges
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091806A.shtml
Canadians Fault U.S. for Its Role in Torture Case
By IAN AUSTEN
September 19, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/world/americas/19canada.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
On India’s Farms, a Plague of Suicide
By SOMINI SENGUPTA
September 19, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/world/asia/19india.html?hp&ex=1158724800&en=ce312104d42deb70&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Deadly harvest: The Lebanese fields sown with cluster bombs
Lebanese villagers must risk death in fields 'flooded' with more than
a million Israeli cluster bombs - or leave crops to rot
By Patrick Cockburn in Nabatiyeh
Published: 18 September 2006
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article1616665.ece
U.S.-Mexico border fencing passes House - again
Republican Congress votes to build wall of shame
National Immigrant Solidarity Network
The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday (9/14) voted in
favor of building a fence along portions of the border with Mexico,
the Secure Fence Act (H.R. 6061), this is no doubt a racist anti-
immigrant bill, the vote had more to do with election year politics
than solving immigration issues.
September 15, 2006
http://www.immigrantsolidarity.org/
Iraq to Seal Off Baghdad Next Month
By EDWARD WONG
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Sept. 15 — The Iraqi government plans to seal
off Baghdad next month by ringing it with a series of trenches
and setting up dozens of traffic checkpoints to control movement
in and out of the city of seven million people, an Interior Ministry
spokesman said today.
September 15, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/world/middleeast/16iraqcnd.html?hp&ex=1158379200&en=e07a513eed965c9f&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Ford Takes New Steps to Cut Costs
By MICHELINE MAYNARD
DEARBORN, Mich., Sept. 15 — The Ford Motor Company said
today that it would cut 10,000 more salaried jobs, close two
more factories and eliminate its stock dividend, as the latest
steps in a broad overhaul of its business that it calls the Way
Forward.
September 15, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/business/16fordcnd.html?hp&ex=1158379200&en=e3f03a9c648efed4&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Ford to Offer Buyouts
By REUTERS
Filed at 1:25 a.m. ET
DETROIT (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co. will offer buyout packages
of up to $140,000 to all of the more than 75,000 workers at its
U.S. plants, the United Auto Workers union said on Thursday,
a day before the automaker details a revised turnaround plan
in response to slumping sales.
September 15, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-autos-ford-buyout.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
Daimler Seeks Partners in China to Build Cars
By KEITH BRADSHER
BEIJING, Sept. 15 — DaimlerChrysler is in talks with companies
in China and elsewhere for the export of subcompact cars to
North America, the company chairman, Dieter Zetsche,
said here today.
The company has concluded that it cannot build its own
subcompact cars in North America cheaply enough
to make money on them, and must import them instead,
Mr. Zetsche said.
September 15, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/15/business/16chinacnd.html
No comments:
Post a Comment